Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

also, delete sleep/ and delete ACPI_CFLAGS from Makefile
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Avoid using internal functions: acpi_hw_disable_all_gpes and acpi_hw_enable_all_runtime_gpes
Use new public GPE group enable/disable interfaces: acpi_disable_all_gpes and acpi_enable_all_runtime_gpes

Also avoid using internal symbol ACPI_TABLE_INDEX_FACS, call acpi_get_table.
Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

On some machines it may be necessary to disable the saving/restoring
of the ACPI NVS memory region during hibernation/resume.  For this
purpose, introduce new ACPI kernel command line option
acpi_sleep=s4_nonvs.

Based on a patch by Zhang Rui.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NNigel Cunningham <nigel@tuxonice.net>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

According to the ACPI Specification 3.0b, Section 15.3.2,
"OSPM will call the _PTS control method some time before entering a
sleeping state, to allow the platform's AML code to update this
memory image before entering the sleeping state. After the system
awakes from an S4 state, OSPM will restore this memory area and call
the _WAK control method to enable the BIOS to reclaim its memory
image."  For this reason, implement a mechanism allowing us to save
the NVS memory during hibernation and to restore it during the
subsequent resume.

Based on a patch by Zhang Rui.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NNigel Cunningham <nigel@tuxonice.net>
Cc: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Some Apple boxes evidently require us to set SCI_EN on resume
directly, because if we don't do that, they hung somewhere in the
resume code path.  Moreover, on these boxes it is not sufficient to
use acpi_enable() to turn ACPI on during resume.  All of this is
against the ACPI specification which states that (1) the BIOS is
supposed to return from the S3 sleep state with ACPI enabled
(SCI_EN set) and (2) the SCI_EN bit is owned by the hardware and we
are not supposed to change it.

For this reason, blacklist the affected systems so that the SCI_EN
bit is set during resume on them.

[NOTE: Unconditional setting SCI_EN for all system on resume doesn't
 work, because it makes some other systems crash (that's to be
 expected).  Also, it is not entirely clear right now if all of the
 Apple boxes require this workaround.]

This patch fixes the recent regression tracked as
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12038Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Tested-by: NTino Keitel <tino.keitel@gmx.de>
Tested-by: NBob Copeland <me@bobcopeland.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c:27: warning: ‘acpi_target_sleep_state’ defined but not used
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Initially CONFIG_PM_SLEEP was defined as
CONFIG_SUSPEND || CONFIG_HIBERNATION and some ACPI code, most
importantly the code in drivers/acpi/main.c, was written with this
assumption.  Currently, however, CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is also set when
CONFIG_XEN_SAVE_RESTORE is set.

This causes some compilation warnings to appear in
drivers/acpi/main.c if both CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION
are unset and CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is set (this was impossible before).
To fix this problem, redefine CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP do depend directly
on CONFIG_SUSPEND || CONFIG_HIBERNATION, as originally intended, and
use it instead of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP in drivers/acpi/main.c, wherever
appropriate.

Additionally, move the acpi_target_sleep_state definition from under
the #ifdef to prevent compilation from failing in some cases.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

HP xw4600 Workstation is known to require the "old" (ie. compatible
with ACPI 1.0) suspend code ordering, so blacklist it for this
purpose.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Tested-by: NJohn Brown <john.brown3@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

On some machines, like for example MSI Wind U100, the BIOS doesn't
enable ACPI before returning control to the OS, which sometimes
causes resume to fail.  This is against the ACPI specification,
which clearly states that "When the platform is waking from an S1, S2
or S3 state, OSPM assumes the hardware is already in the ACPI mode
and will not issue an ACPI_ENABLE", but it won't hurt to check the
SCI_EN bit and enable ACPI during resume from S3 if this bit is not
set.

Fortunately, we already have acpi_enable() for that, so use it in the
resume code path, before executing _BFS, in analogy with the
resume-from-hibernation code path.

NOTE: We aren't supposed to set SCI_EN directly, because it's owned
by the hardware.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

    The _TTS object is defined in the section 7.3 of acpi 3.0b spec.
    The _TTS control method is executed by the OSPM at the beginning of
the sleep transition process for S1,S2, S3, S4, and orderly S5 shutdown.
OS will invoke _TTS before it has notified any native mode device drivers
of the sleep state transition. The target sleeping state value is passed to
the _TTS control method.

    The _TTS control method is also executed by the OSPM at the end of
any sleep transition process when the system transitions to S0 from
S1, S2, S3, or S4. The _TTS object should be evaluated after it has
notified any native mode device drivers of the end of the sleep state
transition. The working state value (0) is passed to the _TTS control method.

    So it is necessary to add the support for _TTS object. The _TTS object
will be evaluated if it exists.
    At the same time a block notifier is added to the reboot notifier list so
that the _TTS object will also be evaluated when the system shutdown.

lenb: note that as of Sep 2008, I've not yet seen _TTS in any shipping BIOS.
So this patch is to future-proof Linux, rather than fix the installed base.

http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11132Signed-off-by: NZhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLi Shaohua <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

As of version 2.0, ACPI can return 64-bit integers.  The current
acpi_evaluate_integer only supports 64-bit integers on 64-bit platforms.
Change the argument to take a pointer to an acpi_integer so we support
64-bit integers on all platforms.

lenb: replaced use of "acpi_integer" with "unsigned long long"
lenb: fixed bug in acpi_thermal_trips_update()
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

There are a few BIOSes that we know of already that need to use the ACPI 1.0
suspend order.  This appears to be only be a small minority of mostly nVidia
based systems.

Based on observation of Windows behaviour, it's clear that Windows is also
doing maintaining its own list of broken hardware that needs this workaround.
Signed-off-by: NCarlos Corbacho <carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

ACPI defines a hardware signature.  BIOS calculates the signature according to
hardware configure and if hardware changes while hibernated, the signature
will change.  In that case, S4 resume should fail.

Still, there may be systems on which this mechanism does not work correctly,
so it is better to provide a workaround for them.  For this reason, add a new
switch to the acpi_sleep= command line argument allowing one to disable
hardware signature checking.

[shaohua.li@intel.com: build fix]
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Remove the obsolete workaround for a Toshiba Satellite 4030cdt
S1 problem from drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c .
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Get rid of a superfluous acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() parameter.  The
only legitimate value of that parameter must be derived from the first
parameter, which is what all the callers already do.  (However, this
does not address the fact that ACPI still doesn't set up those flags.)
Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

* Introduce function acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake() for enabling and
  disabling the system wake-up capability of devices that are power
  manageable by ACPI.

* Introduce function acpi_bus_can_wakeup() allowing other (dependent)
  subsystems to check if ACPI is able to enable the system wake-up
  capability of given device.

* Introduce callback .sleep_wake() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and
  for the ACPI PCI 'driver' make it use acpi_pm_device_sleep_wake().

* Introduce callback .can_wakeup() in struct pci_platform_pm_ops and
  for the ACPI 'driver' make it use acpi_bus_can_wakeup().

* Move the PME# handlig code out of pci_enable_wake() and split it
  into two functions, pci_pme_capable() and pci_pme_active(),
  allowing the caller to check if given device is capable of
  generating PME# from given power state and to enable/disable the
  device's PME# functionality, respectively.

* Modify pci_enable_wake() to use the new ACPI callbacks and the new
  PME#-related functions.

* Drop the generic .platform_enable_wakeup() callback that is not
  used any more.

* Introduce device_set_wakeup_capable() that will set the
  power.can_wakeup flag of given device.

* Rework PCI device PM initialization so that, if given device is
  capable of generating wake-up events, either natively through the
  PME# mechanism, or with the help of the platform, its
  power.can_wakeup flag is set and its power.should_wakeup flag is
  unset as appropriate.

* Make ACPI set the power.can_wakeup flag for devices found to be
  wake-up capable by it.

* Make the ACPI wake-up code enable/disable GPEs for devices that
  have the wakeup.flags.prepared flag set (which means that their
  wake-up power has been enabled).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

Some Dell laptops enter resume with apparent garbage in the segment
descriptor registers (almost certainly the result of a botched
transition from protected to real mode.)  The only way to clean that
up is to enter protected mode ourselves and clean out the descriptor
registers.

This fixes resume on Dell XPS M1210 and Dell D620.

Reference: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10927Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: pm list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Tested-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill@shutemov.name>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>

ACPI PM: Add possibility to change suspend sequence

There are some systems out there that don't work correctly with
our current suspend/hibernation code ordering.  Provide a workaround
for these systems allowing them to pass 'acpi_sleep=old_ordering' in
the kernel command line so that it will use the pre-ACPI 2.0 ("old")
suspend code ordering.

Unfortunately, this requires us to add a platform hook to the
resuming of devices for recovering the platform in case one of the
device drivers' .suspend() routines returns error code.  Namely,
ACPI 1.0 specifies that _PTS should be called before suspending
devices, but _WAK still should be called before resuming them in
order to undo the changes made by _PTS.  However, if there is an
error during suspending devices, they are automatically resumed
without returning control to the PM core, so the _WAK has to be
called from within device_resume() in that cases.

The patch also reorders and refactors the ACPI suspend/hibernation
code to avoid duplication as far as reasonably possible.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>

Remove the obsolete workaround for a Toshiba Satellite 4030cdt
S1 problem from drivers/acpi/sleep/main.c .
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Get rid of a superfluous acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() parameter.  The
only legitimate value of that parameter must be derived from the first
parameter, which is what all the callers already do.  (However, this
does not address the fact that ACPI still doesn't set up those flags.)
Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

... as they are platform_suspend_ops after all.

cosmetic re-name only, no functional change.
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Some time ago it turned out that our suspend code ordering broke some
NVidia-based systems that hung if _PTS was executed with one of the PCI
devices, specifically a USB controller, in a low power state.

Then, it was noticed that the suspend code ordering was not compliant
with ACPI 1.0, although it was compliant with ACPI 2.0 (and later), and
it was argued that the code had to be changed for that reason (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).

So we did, but evidently we did wrong, because it's now turning out that
some systems have been broken by this change. Refs:
	http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10340
	https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374217#c16

[ I said at that time that something like this might happend, but the
  majority of people involved thought that it was improbable due to the
  necessity to preserve the compliance of hardware with ACPI 1.0. ]

This actually is a quite serious regression from 2.6.24.

Moreover, the ACPI 1.0 ordering of suspend code introduced another issue
that I have only noticed recently.  Namely, if the suspend of one of
devices fails, the already suspended devices will be resumed without
executing _WAK before, which leads to problems on some systems (for
example, in such situations thermal management is broken on my HP
nx6325).  Consequently, it also breaks suspend debugging on the affected
systems.

Note also, that the requirement to execute _PTS before suspending
devices does not really make sense, because the device in question may
be put into a low power state at run time for a reason unrelated to a
system-wide suspend.

For the reasons outlined above, the change of the suspend ordering
should be reverted, which is done by the patch below.

[ Felix Möller: "I am the reporter from the original Novell Bug:

	https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=374217

  I just tried current git head (two hours ago) with the patch (the one
  from the beginning of this thread) from Rafael and without it.  With
  the patch my MacBook does suspend without it does not." ]
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Tested-by: NFelix Möller <felix@derklecks.de>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__
Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Make acpi_sleep_prepare() static and cause it to print a message
specifying the ACPI system sleep state to be entered (helpful for
debugging the suspend/hibernation code).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power
states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI
2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order.  The current
hibernation code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which may cause some
ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during hibernation (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).

Make the hibernation code execute _PTS before putting devices into
low power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) with the
possibility to override that using the 'acpi_new_pts_ordering' kernel
command line option.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Introduce global hibernation callback .end() and rename global
hibernation callback .start() to .begin(), in analogy with the
recent modifications of the global suspend callbacks.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The ACPI 1.0 specification wants us to put devices into low power
states after executing the _PTS global control method, while ACPI
2.0 and later want us to do that in the reverse order.  The current
suspend code follows ACPI 2.0 in that respect which causes some
ACPI 1.0x systems to hang during suspend (ref.
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9528).

Make the suspend code execute _PTS before putting devices into low
power states (ie. in accordance with ACPI 1.0x) and provide a command
line option to override the default if need be.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The preparation to enter an ACPI system sleep state is now tied to
the disabling of GPEs, but the GPEs should not be disabled before
suspending devices.  Since on ACPI 1.0x systems the _PTS global
control method should be executed before suspending devices, we
need to disable GPEs separately.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The execution of ACPI global control methods _GTS and _BFS is
currently tied to the preparation to enter a sleep state and to the
leaving of the sleep state, respectively.  However, these functions
are called before disabling the nonboot CPUs and after enabling
them, respectively (in fact, on ACPI 1.0x systems the first of them
ought to be called before suspending devices), while according to the
ACPI specification, _GTS is to be executed right prior to entering
the system sleep state and _BFS is to be executed right after the
platfor firmware has returned control to the OS on wake up.

Move the execution of _GTS and _BFS to the right places.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

On ACPI systems the target state set by acpi_pm_set_target() is
reset by acpi_pm_finish(), but that need not be called if the
suspend fails.  All platforms that use the .set_target() global
suspend callback are affected by analogous issues.

For this reason, we need an additional global suspend callback that
will reset the target state regardless of whether or not the suspend
is successful.  Also, it is reasonable to rename the .set_target()
callback, since it will be used for a different purpose on ACPI
systems (due to ACPI 1.0x code ordering requirements).

Introduce the global suspend callback .end() to be executed at the
end of the suspend sequence and rename the .set_target() global
suspend callback to .begin().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Wakeup GPE hasn't a handler. If system is waked up by such GPE like a
USB hotplug, I saw a lot of error reporting the GPE hasn't handler.
acpi_leave_sleep_state will clear the GPE but it's too late, we should
do it before interrupt is re-enabled.
Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Some code in acpi_hibernation_finish() was moved to acpi_hibernation_leave(),
but the old copy had been left (it's harmless, but also useless).  Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Fix acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() to return the value returned
by _SxD if the device is supposed to wake up the system from
given sleep state and the evaluation of _SxW fails (e.g. _SxW
is not present).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

acpi_leave_sleep_state() should have correct list of wake and
runtime GPEs, which is available only after disable_wakeup_device()
is called.
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Commit 9b039330 removed
acpi_gpe_sleep_prepare(), the only function used at S5 transition
Add call to generic acpi_enable_wake_device().

Reference: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=299882Signed-off-by: NAlexey Starikovskiy <astarikovskiy@suse.de>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

The following scenario leads to total confusion of the platform firmware on
some boxes (eg. HPC nx6325):
* Hibernate with ACPI enabled
* Resume passing "acpi=off" to the boot kernel

To prevent this from happening it's necessary to check if ACPI is enabled (and
enable it if that's not the case) _right_ _after_ control has been transfered
from the boot kernel to the image kernel, before device_power_up() is called
(ie.  with interrupts disabled).   Enabling ACPI after calling
device_power_up() turns out to be insufficient.

For this reason, introduce new hibernation callback ->leave() that will be
executed before device_power_up() by the restored image kernel.   To make it
work, it also is necessary to move swsusp_suspend() from swsusp.c to disk.c
(it's name is changed to "create_image", which is more up to the point).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Rename 'struct hibernation_ops' to 'struct platform_hibernation_ops' in
analogy with 'struct platform_suspend_ops'.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>