Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 05 9月, 2005 10 次提交
  3. 31 8月, 2005 3 次提交
    • J
      [SCSI] embryonic RAID class · 61a7afa2
      由 James Bottomley 提交于 
      The idea behind a RAID class is to provide a uniform interface to all
RAID subsystems (both hardware and software) in the kernel.

To do that, I've made this class a transport class that's entirely
subsystem independent (although the matching routines have to match per
subsystem, as you'll see looking at the code).  I put it in the scsi
subdirectory purely because I needed somewhere to play with it, but it's
not a scsi specific module.

I used a fusion raid card as the test bed for this; with that kind of
card, this is the type of class output you get:

jejb@titanic> ls -l /sys/class/raid_devices/20\:0\:0\:0/
total 0
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     0 Aug 16 17:21 component-0 -> ../../../devices/pci0000:80/0000:80:04.0/host20/target20:1:0/20:1:0:0/
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     0 Aug 16 17:21 component-1 -> ../../../devices/pci0000:80/0000:80:04.0/host20/target20:1:1/20:1:1:0/
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root     0 Aug 16 17:21 device -> ../../../devices/pci0000:80/0000:80:04.0/host20/target20:0:0/20:0:0:0/
-r--r--r--  1 root root 16384 Aug 16 17:21 level
-r--r--r--  1 root root 16384 Aug 16 17:21 resync
-r--r--r--  1 root root 16384 Aug 16 17:21 state

So it's really simple: for a SCSI device representing a hardware raid,
it shows the raid level, the array state, the resync % complete (if the
state is resyncing) and the underlying components of the RAID (these are
exposed in fusion on the virtual channel 1).

As you can see, this type of information can be exported by almost
anything, including software raid.

The more difficult trick, of course, is going to be getting it to
perform configuration type actions with writable attributes.
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
      61a7afa2
    • J
      [SCSI] attribute container final klist fixes · 2b7d6a8c
      由 James Bottomley 提交于 
      Since the attribute container deletes from a klist while it's walking
it, it is vulnerable to the problem (and fix) here:

http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-scsi&m=112485448830217

The attached fixes this (but won't compile without the above).

It also fixes the logical reversal in the traversal loop which meant
that we were never actually traversing the loop to hit this bug in the
first place.
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
      2b7d6a8c
    • J
      [SCSI] correct attribute_container list usage · 53c165e0
      由 James Bottomley 提交于 
      One of the changes in the attribute_container code in the scsi-misc tree
was to add a lock to protect the list of devices per container.  This,
unfortunately, leads to potential scheduling while atomic problems if
there's a sleep in the function called by a trigger.

The correct solution is to use the kernel klist infrastructure instead
which allows lockless traversal of a list.
Signed-off-by: NJames Bottomley <James.Bottomley@SteelEye.com>
      53c165e0
  5. 29 8月, 2005 7 次提交
  7. 15 8月, 2005 5 次提交
  9. 13 8月, 2005 12 次提交
  11. 10 8月, 2005 1 次提交
  13. 09 8月, 2005 2 次提交