Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 28 1月, 2011 8 次提交
  3. 27 1月, 2011 2 次提交
  5. 26 1月, 2011 3 次提交
    • E
      percpu, x86: Fix percpu_xchg_op() · 889a7a6a
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      These recent percpu commits:

  2485b646: x86,percpu: Move out of place 64 bit ops into X86_64 section
  8270137a: cpuops: Use cmpxchg for xchg to avoid lock semantics

Caused this 'perf top' crash:

 Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
 Pid: 0, comm: swapper Tainted: G     D
 2.6.38-rc2-00181-gef71723 #413 Call Trace: <IRQ> [<ffffffff810465b5>]
    ? panic
    ? kmsg_dump
    ? kmsg_dump
    ? oops_end
    ? no_context
    ? __bad_area_nosemaphore
    ? perf_output_begin
    ? bad_area_nosemaphore
    ? do_page_fault
    ? __task_pid_nr_ns
    ? perf_event_tid
    ? __perf_event_header__init_id
    ? validate_chain
    ? perf_output_sample
    ? trace_hardirqs_off
    ? page_fault
    ? irq_work_run
    ? update_process_times
    ? tick_sched_timer
    ? tick_sched_timer
    ? __run_hrtimer
    ? hrtimer_interrupt
    ? account_system_vtime
    ? smp_apic_timer_interrupt
    ? apic_timer_interrupt
 ...

Looking at assembly code, I found:

list = this_cpu_xchg(irq_work_list, NULL);

gives this wrong code : (gcc-4.1.2 cross compiler)

ffffffff810bc45e:
	mov    %gs:0xead0,%rax
	cmpxchg %rax,%gs:0xead0
	jne    ffffffff810bc45e <irq_work_run+0x3e>
	test   %rax,%rax
	je     ffffffff810bc4aa <irq_work_run+0x8a>

Tell gcc we dirty eax/rax register in percpu_xchg_op()

Compiler must use another register to store pxo_new__

We also dont need to reload percpu value after a jump,
since a 'failed' cmpxchg already updated eax/rax

Wrong generated code was :
	xor     %rax,%rax   /* load 0 into %rax */
1:	mov     %gs:0xead0,%rax
	cmpxchg %rax,%gs:0xead0
	jne     1b
	test    %rax,%rax

After patch :

	xor     %rdx,%rdx   /* load 0 into %rdx */
	mov     %gs:0xead0,%rax
1:	cmpxchg %rdx,%gs:0xead0
	jne     1b:
	test    %rax,%rax
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <1295973114.3588.312.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      889a7a6a
    • Y
      x86: Remove left over system_64.h · 9a57c3e4
      由 Yinghai Lu 提交于 
      Left-over from the x86 merge ...
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
LKML-Reference: <4D3E23D1.7010405@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      9a57c3e4
    • A
      thp: fix PARAVIRT x86 32bit noPAE · cacf061c
      由 Andrea Arcangeli 提交于 
      This fixes TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=y with PARAVIRT=y and HIGHMEM64=n.

The #ifdef that this patch removes was erratically introduced to fix a
build error for noPAE (where pmd.pmd doesn't exist).  So then the kernel
built but it failed at runtime because set_pmd_at was a noop.  This will
correct it by enabling set_pmd_at for noPAE mode too.
Signed-off-by: NAndrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Reported-by: Nwerner <w.landgraf@ru.ru>
Reported-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NMinchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      cacf061c
  7. 25 1月, 2011 1 次提交
    • J
      x86-64: Don't use pointer to out-of-scope variable in dump_trace() · 2e5aa682
      由 Jesper Juhl 提交于 
      In arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack_64.c::dump_trace() we have this code:

...
  		if (!stack) {
  			unsigned long dummy;
  			stack = &dummy;
  			if (task && task != current)
  				stack = (unsigned long *)task->thread.sp;
  		}

  		bp = stack_frame(task, regs);
  		/*
  		 * Print function call entries in all stacks, starting at the
  		 * current stack address. If the stacks consist of nested
  		 * exceptions
  		 */
  		tinfo = task_thread_info(task);

  		for (;;) {
  			char *id;
  			unsigned long *estack_end;
  			estack_end = in_exception_stack(cpu, (unsigned long)stack,
  							&used, &id);
...

You'll notice that we assign to 'stack' the address of the variable
'dummy' which is only in-scope inside the 'if (!stack)'. So when we later
access stack (at the end of the above, and assuming we did not take the
'if (task && task != current)' branch) we'll be using the address of a
variable that is no longer in scope. I believe this patch is the proper
fix, but I freely admit that I'm not 100% certain.
Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net>
LKML-Reference: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1101242232590.10252@swampdragon.chaosbits.net>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      2e5aa682
  9. 23 1月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      x86: Fix jump label with RO/NX module protection crash · 89696913
      由 matthieu castet 提交于 
      If we use jump table in module init, there are marked
as removed in __jump_table section after init is done.

But we already applied ro permissions on the module, so
we can't modify a read only section (crash in
remove_jump_label_module_init).

Make the __jump_table section rw.
Signed-off-by: NMatthieu CASTET <castet.matthieu@free.fr>
Cc: Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@gmail.com>
Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@gmail.com>
Cc: Xuxian Jiang <jiang@cs.ncsu.edu>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <4D3C3F20.7030203@free.fr>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      89696913
  11. 22 1月, 2011 2 次提交
    • B
      x86, hotplug: Fix powersavings with offlined cores on AMD · 93789b32
      由 Borislav Petkov 提交于 
      ea530692 made a CPU use monitor/mwait
when offline. This is not the optimal choice for AMD wrt to powersavings
and we'd prefer our cores to halt (i.e. enter C1) instead. For this, the
same selection whether to use monitor/mwait has to be used as when we
select the idle routine for the machine.

With this patch, offlining cores 1-5 on a X6 machine allows core0 to
boost again.

[ hpa: putting this in urgent since it is a (power) regression fix ]
Reported-by: NAndreas Herrmann <andreas.herrmann3@amd.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org # 37.x
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.hl>
Signed-off-by: NBorislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
LKML-Reference: <1295534572-10730-1-git-send-email-bp@amd64.org>
Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
      93789b32
    • S
      xen: p2m: correctly initialize partial p2m leaf · 8e1b4cf2
      由 Stefan Bader 提交于 
      After changing the p2m mapping to a tree by

  commit 58e05027
    xen: convert p2m to a 3 level tree

and trying to boot a DomU with 615MB of memory, the following crash was
observed in the dump:

kernel direct mapping tables up to 26f00000 @ 1ec4000-1fff000
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
IP: [<c0107397>] xen_set_pte+0x27/0x60
*pdpt = 0000000000000000 *pde = 0000000000000000

Adding further debug statements showed that when trying to set up
pfn=0x26700 the returned mapping was invalid.

pfn=0x266ff calling set_pte(0xc1fe77f8, 0x6b3003)
pfn=0x26700 calling set_pte(0xc1fe7800, 0x3)

Although the last_pfn obtained from the startup info is 0x26700, which
should in turn not be hit, the additional 8MB which are added as extra
memory normally seem to be ok. This lead to looking into the initial
p2m tree construction, which uses the smaller value and assuming that
there is other code handling the extra memory.

When the p2m tree is set up, the leaves are directly pointed to the
array which the domain builder set up. But if the mapping is not on a
boundary that fits into one p2m page, this will result in the last leaf
being only partially valid. And as the invalid entries are not
initialized in that case, things go badly wrong.

I am trying to fix that by checking whether the current leaf is a
complete map and if not, allocate a completely new page and copy only
the valid pointers there. This may not be the most efficient or elegant
solution, but at least it seems to allow me booting DomUs with memory
assignments all over the range.

BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/686692
[v2: Redid a bit of commit wording and fixed a compile warning]
Signed-off-by: NStefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NKonrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
      8e1b4cf2
  13. 21 1月, 2011 4 次提交
  15. 20 1月, 2011 5 次提交
  17. 19 1月, 2011 2 次提交
  19. 18 1月, 2011 2 次提交
    • B
      x86: Clear irqstack thread_info · 7b698ea3
      由 Brian Gerst 提交于 
      Mathias Merz reported that v2.6.37 failed to boot on his
system.

Make sure that the thread_info part of the irqstack is
initialized to zeroes.
Reported-and-Tested-by: NMatthias Merz <linux@merz-ka.de>
Signed-off-by: NBrian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NPekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <AANLkTimyKXfJ1x8tgwrr1hYnNLrPfgE1NTe4z7L6tUDm@mail.gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      7b698ea3
    • S
      x86: Make relocatable kernel work with new binutils · 86b1e8dd
      由 Shaohua Li 提交于 
      The CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y option is broken with new binutils, which will make
boot panic.

According to Lu Hongjiu, the affected binutils are from 2.20.51.0.12 to
2.21.51.0.3, which are release since Oct 22 this year. At least ubuntu 10.10 is
using such binutils. See:

    http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12327

The reason of the boot panic is that we have 'jiffies = jiffies_64;' in
vmlinux.lds.S. The jiffies isn't in any section. In kernel build, there is
warning saying jiffies is an absolute address and can't be relocatable. At
runtime, jiffies will have virtual address 0.

Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li<shaohua.li@intel.com>
Cc: Lu Hongjiu<hongjiu.lu@intel.com>
Cc: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
LKML-Reference: <1295312269.1949.725.camel@sli10-conroe>
Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      86b1e8dd
  21. 15 1月, 2011 7 次提交
  23. 14 1月, 2011 3 次提交