Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
11 个月 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 25 10月, 2016 2 次提交
  3. 21 10月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 09 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  7. 05 7月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 28 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 27 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 23 6月, 2016 3 次提交
  15. 20 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  17. 15 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • S
      crypto: drbg - use CTR AES instead of ECB AES · 35591285
      由 Stephan Mueller 提交于 
      The CTR DRBG derives its random data from the CTR that is encrypted with
AES.

This patch now changes the CTR DRBG implementation such that the
CTR AES mode is employed. This allows the use of steamlined CTR AES
implementation such as ctr-aes-aesni.

Unfortunately there are the following subtile changes we need to apply
when using the CTR AES mode:

- the CTR mode increments the counter after the cipher operation, but
  the CTR DRBG requires the increment before the cipher op. Hence, the
  crypto_inc is applied to the counter (drbg->V) once it is
  recalculated.

- the CTR mode wants to encrypt data, but the CTR DRBG is interested in
  the encrypted counter only. The full CTR mode is the XOR of the
  encrypted counter with the plaintext data. To access the encrypted
  counter, the patch uses a NULL data vector as plaintext to be
  "encrypted".
Signed-off-by: NStephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      35591285
  19. 05 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  21. 01 2月, 2016 1 次提交
  23. 27 1月, 2016 2 次提交
  25. 26 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      crypto: ghash,poly1305 - select CRYPTO_HASH where needed · 578c60fb
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      The ghash and poly1305 hash implementations can be enabled when
CONFIG_CRYPTO_HASH is turned off, causing a link error:

crypto/built-in.o: In function `ghash_mod_init':
(.init.text+0xd0): undefined reference to `crypto_register_shash'
crypto/built-in.o: In function `ghash_mod_exit':
(.exit.text+0xb4): undefined reference to `crypto_unregister_shash'
crypto/built-in.o: In function `poly1305_mod_init':
(.init.text+0xb4): undefined reference to `crypto_register_shash'
crypto/built-in.o: In function `poly1305_mod_exit':
(.exit.text+0x98): undefined reference to `crypto_unregister_shash'

This adds an explicit 'select', like all other hashes have it.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      578c60fb
  27. 15 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  29. 21 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  31. 17 8月, 2015 2 次提交
  33. 14 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  35. 05 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  37. 17 7月, 2015 4 次提交
    • M
      crypto: poly1305 - Add a four block AVX2 variant for x86_64 · b1ccc8f4
      由 Martin Willi 提交于 
      Extends the x86_64 Poly1305 authenticator by a function processing four
consecutive Poly1305 blocks in parallel using AVX2 instructions.

For large messages, throughput increases by ~15-45% compared to two
block SSE2:

testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test  0 (   96 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,   6 updates): 3809514 opers/sec,  365713411 bytes/sec
test  1 (   96 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   3 updates): 5973423 opers/sec,  573448627 bytes/sec
test  2 (   96 byte blocks,   96 bytes per update,   1 updates): 9446779 opers/sec,  906890803 bytes/sec
test  3 (  288 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,  18 updates): 1364814 opers/sec,  393066691 bytes/sec
test  4 (  288 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   9 updates): 2045780 opers/sec,  589184697 bytes/sec
test  5 (  288 byte blocks,  288 bytes per update,   1 updates): 3711946 opers/sec, 1069040592 bytes/sec
test  6 ( 1056 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  33 updates):  573686 opers/sec,  605812732 bytes/sec
test  7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update,   1 updates): 1647802 opers/sec, 1740079440 bytes/sec
test  8 ( 2080 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  65 updates):  292970 opers/sec,  609378224 bytes/sec
test  9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update,   1 updates):  943229 opers/sec, 1961916528 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update,   1 updates):  494623 opers/sec, 2041804569 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update,   1 updates):  254045 opers/sec, 2089271014 bytes/sec

testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test  0 (   96 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,   6 updates): 3826224 opers/sec,  367317552 bytes/sec
test  1 (   96 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   3 updates): 5948638 opers/sec,  571069267 bytes/sec
test  2 (   96 byte blocks,   96 bytes per update,   1 updates): 9439110 opers/sec,  906154627 bytes/sec
test  3 (  288 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,  18 updates): 1367756 opers/sec,  393913872 bytes/sec
test  4 (  288 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   9 updates): 2056881 opers/sec,  592381958 bytes/sec
test  5 (  288 byte blocks,  288 bytes per update,   1 updates): 3711153 opers/sec, 1068812179 bytes/sec
test  6 ( 1056 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  33 updates):  574940 opers/sec,  607136745 bytes/sec
test  7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update,   1 updates): 1948830 opers/sec, 2057964585 bytes/sec
test  8 ( 2080 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  65 updates):  293308 opers/sec,  610082096 bytes/sec
test  9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update,   1 updates): 1235224 opers/sec, 2569267792 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update,   1 updates):  684405 opers/sec, 2825226316 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update,   1 updates):  367101 opers/sec, 3019039446 bytes/sec

Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      b1ccc8f4
    • M
      crypto: poly1305 - Add a SSE2 SIMD variant for x86_64 · c70f4abe
      由 Martin Willi 提交于 
      Implements an x86_64 assembler driver for the Poly1305 authenticator. This
single block variant holds the 130-bit integer in 5 32-bit words, but uses
SSE to do two multiplications/additions in parallel.

When calling updates with small blocks, the overhead for kernel_fpu_begin/
kernel_fpu_end() negates the perfmance gain. We therefore use the
poly1305-generic fallback for small updates.

For large messages, throughput increases by ~5-10% compared to
poly1305-generic:

testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-generic)
test  0 (   96 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,   6 updates): 4080026 opers/sec,  391682496 bytes/sec
test  1 (   96 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   3 updates): 6221094 opers/sec,  597225024 bytes/sec
test  2 (   96 byte blocks,   96 bytes per update,   1 updates): 9609750 opers/sec,  922536057 bytes/sec
test  3 (  288 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,  18 updates): 1459379 opers/sec,  420301267 bytes/sec
test  4 (  288 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   9 updates): 2115179 opers/sec,  609171609 bytes/sec
test  5 (  288 byte blocks,  288 bytes per update,   1 updates): 3729874 opers/sec, 1074203856 bytes/sec
test  6 ( 1056 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  33 updates):  593000 opers/sec,  626208000 bytes/sec
test  7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update,   1 updates): 1081536 opers/sec, 1142102332 bytes/sec
test  8 ( 2080 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  65 updates):  302077 opers/sec,  628320576 bytes/sec
test  9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update,   1 updates):  554384 opers/sec, 1153120176 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update,   1 updates):  278715 opers/sec, 1150536345 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update,   1 updates):  140202 opers/sec, 1153022070 bytes/sec

testing speed of poly1305 (poly1305-simd)
test  0 (   96 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,   6 updates): 3790063 opers/sec,  363846076 bytes/sec
test  1 (   96 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   3 updates): 5913378 opers/sec,  567684355 bytes/sec
test  2 (   96 byte blocks,   96 bytes per update,   1 updates): 9352574 opers/sec,  897847104 bytes/sec
test  3 (  288 byte blocks,   16 bytes per update,  18 updates): 1362145 opers/sec,  392297990 bytes/sec
test  4 (  288 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,   9 updates): 2007075 opers/sec,  578037628 bytes/sec
test  5 (  288 byte blocks,  288 bytes per update,   1 updates): 3709811 opers/sec, 1068425798 bytes/sec
test  6 ( 1056 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  33 updates):  566272 opers/sec,  597984182 bytes/sec
test  7 ( 1056 byte blocks, 1056 bytes per update,   1 updates): 1111657 opers/sec, 1173910108 bytes/sec
test  8 ( 2080 byte blocks,   32 bytes per update,  65 updates):  288857 opers/sec,  600823808 bytes/sec
test  9 ( 2080 byte blocks, 2080 bytes per update,   1 updates):  590746 opers/sec, 1228751888 bytes/sec
test 10 ( 4128 byte blocks, 4128 bytes per update,   1 updates):  301825 opers/sec, 1245936902 bytes/sec
test 11 ( 8224 byte blocks, 8224 bytes per update,   1 updates):  153075 opers/sec, 1258896201 bytes/sec

Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      c70f4abe
    • M
      crypto: chacha20 - Add an eight block AVX2 variant for x86_64 · 3d1e93cd
      由 Martin Willi 提交于 
      Extends the x86_64 ChaCha20 implementation by a function processing eight
ChaCha20 blocks in parallel using AVX2.

For large messages, throughput increases by ~55-70% compared to four block
SSSE3:

testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption
test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 42249230 operations in 10 seconds (675987680 bytes)
test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46441641 operations in 10 seconds (2972265024 bytes)
test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 33028112 operations in 10 seconds (8455196672 bytes)
test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 11568759 operations in 10 seconds (11846409216 bytes)
test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 1448761 operations in 10 seconds (11868250112 bytes)

testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption
test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 41999675 operations in 10 seconds (671994800 bytes)
test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 45805908 operations in 10 seconds (2931578112 bytes)
test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 32814947 operations in 10 seconds (8400626432 bytes)
test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 19777167 operations in 10 seconds (20251819008 bytes)
test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 2279321 operations in 10 seconds (18672197632 bytes)

Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      3d1e93cd
    • M
      crypto: chacha20 - Add a SSSE3 SIMD variant for x86_64 · c9320b6d
      由 Martin Willi 提交于 
      Implements an x86_64 assembler driver for the ChaCha20 stream cipher. This
single block variant works on a single state matrix using SSE instructions.
It requires SSSE3 due the use of pshufb for efficient 8/16-bit rotate
operations.

For large messages, throughput increases by ~65% compared to
chacha20-generic:

testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-generic) encryption
test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 45089207 operations in 10 seconds (721427312 bytes)
test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 43839521 operations in 10 seconds (2805729344 bytes)
test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 12702056 operations in 10 seconds (3251726336 bytes)
test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 3371173 operations in 10 seconds (3452081152 bytes)
test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 422468 operations in 10 seconds (3460857856 bytes)

testing speed of chacha20 (chacha20-simd) encryption
test 0 (256 bit key, 16 byte blocks): 43141886 operations in 10 seconds (690270176 bytes)
test 1 (256 bit key, 64 byte blocks): 46845874 operations in 10 seconds (2998135936 bytes)
test 2 (256 bit key, 256 byte blocks): 18458512 operations in 10 seconds (4725379072 bytes)
test 3 (256 bit key, 1024 byte blocks): 5360533 operations in 10 seconds (5489185792 bytes)
test 4 (256 bit key, 8192 byte blocks): 692846 operations in 10 seconds (5675794432 bytes)

Benchmark results from a Core i5-4670T.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Willi <martin@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      c9320b6d
  39. 21 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  41. 17 6月, 2015 3 次提交
  43. 11 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  45. 04 6月, 2015 5 次提交
  47. 03 6月, 2015 1 次提交
  49. 27 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • S
      crypto: jitterentropy - add jitterentropy RNG · bb5530e4
      由 Stephan Mueller 提交于 
      The CPU Jitter RNG provides a source of good entropy by
collecting CPU executing time jitter. The entropy in the CPU
execution time jitter is magnified by the CPU Jitter Random
Number Generator. The CPU Jitter Random Number Generator uses
the CPU execution timing jitter to generate a bit stream
which complies with different statistical measurements that
determine the bit stream is random.

The CPU Jitter Random Number Generator delivers entropy which
follows information theoretical requirements. Based on these
studies and the implementation, the caller can assume that
one bit of data extracted from the CPU Jitter Random Number
Generator holds one bit of entropy.

The CPU Jitter Random Number Generator provides a decentralized
source of entropy, i.e. every caller can operate on a private
state of the entropy pool.

The RNG does not have any dependencies on any other service
in the kernel. The RNG only needs a high-resolution time
stamp.

Further design details, the cryptographic assessment and
large array of test results are documented at
http://www.chronox.de/jent.html.

CC: Andreas Steffen <andreas.steffen@strongswan.org>
CC: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
CC: Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NStephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      bb5530e4
  51. 26 5月, 2015 1 次提交