- 18 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Isolating it, that will be used when we introduce a CCID2 (TCP-Like) implementation. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
As discussed in the dccp@vger mailing list: Now applications have to use setsockopt(DCCP_SOCKOPT_SERVICE, service[s]), prior to calling listen() and connect(). An array of unsigned ints can be passed meaning that the listening sock accepts connection requests for several services. With this we can ditch struct sockaddr_dccp and use only sockaddr_in (and sockaddr_in6 in the future). Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 10 9月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com>
-
- 30 8月, 2005 10 次提交
-
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
This makes the send rate calculations behave way more closely to what is specified, with the jitter previously seen on x and x_recv disappearing completely on non lossy setups. This resembles the tcp_data_snd_check code, that possibly we'll end up using in DCCP as well, perhaps moving this code to inet_connection_sock. For now I'm doing the simplest implementation tho. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
This is not quite what I think we should have long term but improves performance for now, so lets use it till we get CCID3 working well, then we can think about using sk_write_queue, perhaps using some ideas from Juwen Lai's old stack for 2.4.20. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
So that we retransmit CLOSE/CLOSEREQ packets till they elicit an answer or we hit a timeout. Most of the machinery uses TCP approaches, this code has to be polished & audited, but this is better than we had before. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Also fix step 6 when receiving SYNC or SYNCACK packets, i.e. we were not using the updated swl. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Andrew Morton should be happy now 8) Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
This way it gets closer to the TCP flow, where congestion window checks are done, it seems we can map ccid_hc_tx_send_packet in dccp_write_xmit to tcp_snd_wnd_test in tcp_write_xmit, a CCID2 decision should just fit in here as well... Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@mandriva.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Yoshifumi Nishida 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYoshifumi Nishida <nishida@csl.sony.co.jp> Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Development to this point was done on a subversion repository at: http://oops.ghostprotocols.net:81/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/dccp-2.6/ This repository will be kept at this site for the foreseable future, so that interested parties can see the history of this code, attributions, etc. If I ever decide to take this offline I'll provide the full history at some other suitable place. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-