Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 09 4月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 05 4月, 2019 2 次提交
  5. 29 3月, 2019 2 次提交
  7. 25 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  9. 04 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  11. 09 2月, 2019 1 次提交
    • J
      devlink: publish params only after driver init is done · 7c62cfb8
      由 Jiri Pirko 提交于 
      Currently, user can do dump or get of param values right after the
devlink params are registered. However the driver may not be initialized
which is an issue. The same problem happens during notification
upon param registration. Allow driver to publish devlink params
whenever it is ready to handle get() ops. Note that this cannot
be resolved by init reordering, as the "driverinit" params have
to be available before the driver is initialized (it needs the param
values there).
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Cc: Michael Chan <michael.chan@broadcom.com>
Cc: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      7c62cfb8
  13. 07 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  15. 19 12月, 2018 1 次提交
    • S
      mlxsw: core: Increase timeout during firmware flash process · cf0b70e7
      由 Shalom Toledo 提交于 
      During the firmware flash process, some of the EMADs get timed out, which
causes the driver to send them again with a limit of 5 retries. There are
some situations in which 5 retries is not enough and the EMAD access fails.
If the failed EMAD was related to the flashing process, the driver fails
the flashing.

The reason for these timeouts during firmware flashing is cache misses in
the CPU running the firmware. In case the CPU needs to fetch instructions
from the flash when a firmware is flashed, it needs to wait for the
flashing to complete. Since flashing takes time, it is possible for pending
EMADs to timeout.

Fix by increasing EMADs' timeout while flashing firmware.

Fixes: ce6ef68f ("mlxsw: spectrum: Implement the ethtool flash_device callback")
Signed-off-by: NShalom Toledo <shalomt@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      cf0b70e7
  17. 04 12月, 2018 2 次提交
  19. 30 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  21. 18 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  23. 11 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  25. 10 8月, 2018 1 次提交
  27. 06 6月, 2018 2 次提交
  29. 29 5月, 2018 2 次提交
  31. 20 5月, 2018 3 次提交
  33. 11 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  35. 01 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  37. 17 1月, 2018 3 次提交
  39. 18 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: core: Fix possible deadlock · d965465b
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      When an EMAD is transmitted, a timeout work item is scheduled with a
delay of 200ms, so that another EMAD will be retried until a maximum of
five retries.

In certain situations, it's possible for the function waiting on the
EMAD to be associated with a work item that is queued on the same
workqueue (`mlxsw_core`) as the timeout work item. This results in
flushing a work item on the same workqueue.

According to commit e159489b ("workqueue: relax lockdep annotation
on flush_work()") the above may lead to a deadlock in case the workqueue
has only one worker active or if the system in under memory pressure and
the rescue worker is in use. The latter explains the very rare and
random nature of the lockdep splats we have been seeing:

[   52.730240] ============================================
[   52.736179] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[   52.742119] 4.14.0-rc3jiri+ #4 Not tainted
[   52.746697] --------------------------------------------
[   52.752635] kworker/1:3/599 is trying to acquire lock:
[   52.758378]  (mlxsw_core_driver_name){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c4fa4>] flush_work+0x3a4/0x5e0
[   52.767837]
               but task is already holding lock:
[   52.774360]  (mlxsw_core_driver_name){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c65c4>] process_one_work+0x7d4/0x12f0
[   52.784495]
               other info that might help us debug this:
[   52.791794]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[   52.798413]        CPU0
[   52.801144]        ----
[   52.803875]   lock(mlxsw_core_driver_name);
[   52.808556]   lock(mlxsw_core_driver_name);
[   52.813236]
                *** DEADLOCK ***
[   52.819857]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[   52.827450] 3 locks held by kworker/1:3/599:
[   52.832221]  #0:  (mlxsw_core_driver_name){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c65c4>] process_one_work+0x7d4/0x12f0
[   52.842846]  #1:  ((&(&bridge->fdb_notify.dw)->work)){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811c65c4>] process_one_work+0x7d4/0x12f0
[   52.854537]  #2:  (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff822ad8e7>] rtnl_lock+0x17/0x20
[   52.863021]
               stack backtrace:
[   52.867890] CPU: 1 PID: 599 Comm: kworker/1:3 Not tainted 4.14.0-rc3jiri+ #4
[   52.875773] Hardware name: Mellanox Technologies Ltd. "MSN2100-CB2F"/"SA001017", BIOS 5.6.5 06/07/2016
[   52.886267] Workqueue: mlxsw_core mlxsw_sp_fdb_notify_work [mlxsw_spectrum]
[   52.894060] Call Trace:
[   52.909122]  __lock_acquire+0xf6f/0x2a10
[   53.025412]  lock_acquire+0x158/0x440
[   53.047557]  flush_work+0x3c4/0x5e0
[   53.087571]  __cancel_work_timer+0x3ca/0x5e0
[   53.177051]  cancel_delayed_work_sync+0x13/0x20
[   53.182142]  mlxsw_reg_trans_bulk_wait+0x12d/0x7a0 [mlxsw_core]
[   53.194571]  mlxsw_core_reg_access+0x586/0x990 [mlxsw_core]
[   53.225365]  mlxsw_reg_query+0x10/0x20 [mlxsw_core]
[   53.230882]  mlxsw_sp_fdb_notify_work+0x2a3/0x9d0 [mlxsw_spectrum]
[   53.237801]  process_one_work+0x8f1/0x12f0
[   53.321804]  worker_thread+0x1fd/0x10c0
[   53.435158]  kthread+0x28e/0x370
[   53.448703]  ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x40
[   53.453017] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:01:00.0: EMAD retries (2/5) (tid=bf4549b100000774)
[   53.453119] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:01:00.0: EMAD retries (5/5) (tid=bf4549b100000770)
[   53.453132] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:01:00.0: EMAD reg access failed (tid=bf4549b100000770,reg_id=200b(sfn),type=query,status=0(operation performed))
[   53.453143] mlxsw_spectrum 0000:01:00.0: Failed to get FDB notifications

Fix this by creating another workqueue for EMAD timeouts, thereby
preventing the situation of a work item trying to flush a work item
queued on the same workqueue.

Fixes: caf7297e ("mlxsw: core: Introduce support for asynchronous EMAD register access")
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reported-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d965465b
  41. 03 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  43. 25 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  45. 24 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  47. 07 2月, 2017 1 次提交
  49. 04 12月, 2016 1 次提交
    • I
      mlxsw: core: Create an ordered workqueue for FIB offload · a3832b31
      由 Ido Schimmel 提交于 
      We're going to start processing FIB entries addition / deletion events
in deferred work. These work items must be processed in the order they
were submitted or otherwise we can have differences between the kernel's
FIB table and the device's.

Solve this by creating an ordered workqueue to which these work items
will be submitted to. Note that we can't simply convert the current
workqueue to be ordered, as EMADs re-transmissions are also processed in
deferred work.

Later on, we can migrate other work items to this workqueue, such as FDB
notification processing and nexthop resolution, since they all take the
same lock anyway.
Signed-off-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a3832b31
  51. 30 11月, 2016 2 次提交
  53. 26 11月, 2016 3 次提交
  55. 22 11月, 2016 1 次提交