1. 27 1月, 2023 2 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: raid56: make error_bitmap update atomic · a9ad4d87
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      In the rework of raid56 code, there is very limited concurrency in the
      endio context.
      
      Most of the work is done inside the sectors arrays, which different bios
      will never touch the same sector.
      
      But there is a concurrency here for error_bitmap. Both read and write
      endio functions need to touch them, and we can have multiple write bios
      touching the same error bitmap if they all hit some errors.
      
      Here we fix the unprotected bitmap operation by going set_bit() in a
      loop.
      
      Since we have a very small ceiling of the sectors (at most 16 sectors),
      such set_bit() in a loop should be very acceptable.
      
      Fixes: 2942a50d ("btrfs: raid56: introduce btrfs_raid_bio::error_bitmap")
      Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      a9ad4d87
    • D
      btrfs: send: limit number of clones and allocated memory size · 33e17b3f
      David Sterba 提交于
      The arg->clone_sources_count is u64 and can trigger a warning when a
      huge value is passed from user space and a huge array is allocated.
      Limit the allocated memory to 8MiB (can be increased if needed), which
      in turn limits the number of clone sources to 8M / sizeof(struct
      clone_root) = 8M / 40 = 209715.  Real world number of clones is from
      tens to hundreds, so this is future proof.
      
      Reported-by: syzbot+4376a9a073770c173269@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      33e17b3f
  2. 26 1月, 2023 3 次提交
    • A
      btrfs: zlib: zero-initialize zlib workspace · eadd7dec
      Alexander Potapenko 提交于
      KMSAN reports uses of uninitialized memory in zlib's longest_match()
      called on memory originating from zlib_alloc_workspace().
      This issue is known by zlib maintainers and is claimed to be harmless,
      but to be on the safe side we'd better initialize the memory.
      
      Link: https://zlib.net/zlib_faq.html#faq36
      Reported-by: syzbot+14d9e7602ebdf7ec0a60@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
      Signed-off-by: NAlexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      eadd7dec
    • J
      btrfs: limit device extents to the device size · 3c538de0
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      There was a recent regression in btrfs/177 that started happening with
      the size class patches ("btrfs: introduce size class to block group
      allocator").  This however isn't a regression introduced by those
      patches, but rather the bug was uncovered by a change in behavior in
      these patches.  The patches triggered more chunk allocations in the
      ^free-space-tree case, which uncovered a race with device shrink.
      
      The problem is we will set the device total size to the new size, and
      use this to find a hole for a device extent.  However during shrink we
      may have device extents allocated past this range, so we could
      potentially find a hole in a range past our new shrink size.  We don't
      actually limit our found extent to the device size anywhere, we assume
      that we will not find a hole past our device size.  This isn't true with
      shrink as we're relocating block groups and thus creating holes past the
      device size.
      
      Fix this by making sure we do not search past the new device size, and
      if we wander into any device extents that start after our device size
      simply break from the loop and use whatever hole we've already found.
      
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      3c538de0
    • T
      btrfs: raid56: fix stripes if vertical errors are found · f7c11aff
      Tanmay Bhushan 提交于
      We take two stripe numbers if vertical errors are found.  In case it is
      just a pstripe it does not matter but in case of raid 6 it matters as
      both stripes need to be fixed.
      
      Fixes: 7a315072 ("btrfs: raid56: do data csum verification during RMW cycle")
      Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTanmay Bhushan <007047221b@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      f7c11aff
  3. 17 1月, 2023 4 次提交
    • F
      btrfs: fix race between quota rescan and disable leading to NULL pointer deref · b7adbf9a
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      If we have one task trying to start the quota rescan worker while another
      one is trying to disable quotas, we can end up hitting a race that results
      in the quota rescan worker doing a NULL pointer dereference. The steps for
      this are the following:
      
      1) Quotas are enabled;
      
      2) Task A calls the quota rescan ioctl and enters btrfs_qgroup_rescan().
         It calls qgroup_rescan_init() which returns 0 (success) and then joins a
         transaction and commits it;
      
      3) Task B calls the quota disable ioctl and enters btrfs_quota_disable().
         It clears the bit BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED from fs_info->flags and calls
         btrfs_qgroup_wait_for_completion(), which returns immediately since the
         rescan worker is not yet running.
         Then it starts a transaction and locks fs_info->qgroup_ioctl_lock;
      
      4) Task A queues the rescan worker, by calling btrfs_queue_work();
      
      5) The rescan worker starts, and calls rescan_should_stop() at the start
         of its while loop, which results in 0 iterations of the loop, since
         the flag BTRFS_FS_QUOTA_ENABLED was cleared from fs_info->flags by
         task B at step 3);
      
      6) Task B sets fs_info->quota_root to NULL;
      
      7) The rescan worker tries to start a transaction and uses
         fs_info->quota_root as the root argument for btrfs_start_transaction().
         This results in a NULL pointer dereference down the call chain of
         btrfs_start_transaction(). The stack trace is something like the one
         reported in Link tag below:
      
         general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000041: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN
         KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000208-0x000000000000020f]
         CPU: 1 PID: 34 Comm: kworker/u4:2 Not tainted 6.1.0-syzkaller-13872-gb6bb9676 #0
         Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 10/26/2022
         Workqueue: btrfs-qgroup-rescan btrfs_work_helper
         RIP: 0010:start_transaction+0x48/0x10f0 fs/btrfs/transaction.c:564
         Code: 48 89 fb 48 (...)
         RSP: 0018:ffffc90000ab7ab0 EFLAGS: 00010206
         RAX: 0000000000000041 RBX: 0000000000000208 RCX: ffff88801779ba80
         RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: 0000000000000000
         RBP: dffffc0000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: fffff52000156f5d
         R10: fffff52000156f5d R11: 1ffff92000156f5c R12: 0000000000000000
         R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000003
         FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff8880b9900000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
         CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
         CR2: 00007f2bea75b718 CR3: 000000001d0cc000 CR4: 00000000003506e0
         DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
         DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
         Call Trace:
          <TASK>
          btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x3bb/0x6a0 fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:3402
          btrfs_work_helper+0x312/0x850 fs/btrfs/async-thread.c:280
          process_one_work+0x877/0xdb0 kernel/workqueue.c:2289
          worker_thread+0xb14/0x1330 kernel/workqueue.c:2436
          kthread+0x266/0x300 kernel/kthread.c:376
          ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:308
          </TASK>
         Modules linked in:
      
      So fix this by having the rescan worker function not attempt to start a
      transaction if it didn't do any rescan work.
      
      Reported-by: syzbot+96977faa68092ad382c4@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/000000000000e5454b05f065a803@google.com/
      Fixes: e804861b ("btrfs: fix deadlock between quota disable and qgroup rescan worker")
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      b7adbf9a
    • F
      btrfs: fix invalid leaf access due to inline extent during lseek · 1f55ee6d
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      During lseek, for SEEK_DATA and SEEK_HOLE modes, we access the disk_bytenr
      of an extent without checking its type. However inline extents have their
      data starting the offset of the disk_bytenr field, so accessing that field
      when we have an inline extent can result in either of the following:
      
      1) Interpret the inline extent's data as a disk_bytenr value;
      
      2) In case the inline data is less than 8 bytes, we access part of some
         other item in the leaf, or unused space in the leaf;
      
      3) In case the inline data is less than 8 bytes and the extent item is
         the first item in the leaf, we can access beyond the leaf's limit.
      
      So fix this by not accessing the disk_bytenr field if we have an inline
      extent.
      
      Fixes: b6e83356 ("btrfs: make hole and data seeking a lot more efficient")
      Reported-by: NMatthias Schoepfer <matthias.schoepfer@googlemail.com>
      Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=216908
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/7f25442f-b121-2a3a-5a3d-22bcaae83cd4@leemhuis.info/
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      1f55ee6d
    • C
      btrfs: stop using write_one_page in btrfs_scratch_superblock · 26ecf243
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      write_one_page is an awkward interface that expects the page locked and
      ->writepage to be implemented.  Replace that by zeroing the signature
      bytes and synchronize the block device page using the proper bdev
      helpers.
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      [ update changelog ]
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      26ecf243
    • C
      btrfs: factor out scratching of one regular super block · 0e0078f7
      Christoph Hellwig 提交于
      btrfs_scratch_superblocks open codes scratching super block of a
      non-zoned super block.  Split the code to read, zero and write the
      superblock for regular devices into a separate helper.
      Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      [ update changelog ]
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      0e0078f7
  4. 12 1月, 2023 8 次提交
    • F
      btrfs: do not abort transaction on failure to update log root · 09e44868
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      When syncing a log, if we fail to update a log root in the log root tree,
      we are aborting the transaction if the failure was not -ENOSPC. This is
      excessive because there is a chance that a transaction commit can succeed,
      and therefore avoid to turn the filesystem into RO mode. All we need to be
      careful about is to mark the log for a full commit, which we already do,
      to make sure no one commits a super block pointing to an outdated log root
      tree.
      
      So don't abort the transaction if we fail to update a log root in the log
      root tree, and log an error if the failure is not -ENOSPC, so that it does
      not go completely unnoticed.
      
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.0+
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      09e44868
    • F
      btrfs: do not abort transaction on failure to write log tree when syncing log · 16199ad9
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      When syncing the log, if we fail to write log tree extent buffers, we mark
      the log for a full commit and abort the transaction. However we don't need
      to abort the transaction, all we really need to do is to make sure no one
      can commit a superblock pointing to new log tree roots. Just because we
      got a failure writing extent buffers for a log tree, it does not mean we
      will also fail to do a transaction commit.
      
      One particular case is if due to a bug somewhere, when writing log tree
      extent buffers, the tree checker detects some corruption and the writeout
      fails because of that. Aborting the transaction can be very disruptive for
      a user, specially if the issue happened on a root filesystem. One example
      is the scenario in the Link tag below, where an isolated corruption on log
      tree leaves was causing transaction aborts when syncing the log.
      
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/ae169fc6-f504-28f0-a098-6fa6a4dfb612@leemhuis.info/
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      16199ad9
    • F
      btrfs: add missing setup of log for full commit at add_conflicting_inode() · 94cd63ae
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      When logging conflicting inodes, if we reach the maximum limit of inodes,
      we return BTRFS_LOG_FORCE_COMMIT to force a transaction commit. However
      we don't mark the log for full commit (with btrfs_set_log_full_commit()),
      which means that once we leave the log transaction and before we commit
      the transaction, some other task may sync the log, which is incomplete
      as we have not logged all conflicting inodes, leading to some inconsistent
      in case that log ends up being replayed.
      
      So also call btrfs_set_log_full_commit() at add_conflicting_inode().
      
      Fixes: e09d94c9 ("btrfs: log conflicting inodes without holding log mutex of the initial inode")
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      94cd63ae
    • F
      btrfs: fix directory logging due to race with concurrent index key deletion · 8bb6898d
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      Sometimes we log a directory without holding its VFS lock, so while we
      logging it, dir index entries may be added or removed. This typically
      happens when logging a dentry from a parent directory that points to a
      new directory, through log_new_dir_dentries(), or when while logging
      some other inode we also need to log its parent directories (through
      btrfs_log_all_parents()).
      
      This means that while we are at log_dir_items(), we may not find a dir
      index key we found before, because it was deleted in the meanwhile, so
      a call to btrfs_search_slot() may return 1 (key not found). In that case
      we return from log_dir_items() with a success value (the variable 'err'
      has a value of 0). This can lead to a few problems, specially in the case
      where the variable 'last_offset' has a value of (u64)-1 (and it's
      initialized to that when it was declared):
      
      1) By returning from log_dir_items() with success (0) and a value of
         (u64)-1 for '*last_offset_ret', we end up not logging any other dir
         index keys that follow the missing, just deleted, index key. The
         (u64)-1 value makes log_directory_changes() not call log_dir_items()
         again;
      
      2) Before returning with success (0), log_dir_items(), will log a dir
         index range item covering a range from the last old dentry index
         (stored in the variable 'last_old_dentry_offset') to the value of
         'last_offset'. If 'last_offset' has a value of (u64)-1, then it means
         if the log is persisted and replayed after a power failure, it will
         cause deletion of all the directory entries that have an index number
         between last_old_dentry_offset + 1 and (u64)-1;
      
      3) We can end up returning from log_dir_items() with
         ctx->last_dir_item_offset having a lower value than
         inode->last_dir_index_offset, because the former is set to the current
         key we are processing at process_dir_items_leaf(), and at the end of
         log_directory_changes() we set inode->last_dir_index_offset to the
         current value of ctx->last_dir_item_offset. So if for example a
         deletion of a lower dir index key happened, we set
         ctx->last_dir_item_offset to that index value, then if we return from
         log_dir_items() because btrfs_search_slot() returned 1, we end up
         returning from log_dir_items() with success (0) and then
         log_directory_changes() sets inode->last_dir_index_offset to a lower
         value than it had before.
         This can result in unpredictable and unexpected behaviour when we
         need to log again the directory in the same transaction, and can result
         in ending up with a log tree leaf that has duplicated keys, as we do
         batch insertions of dir index keys into a log tree.
      
      So fix this by making log_dir_items() move on to the next dir index key
      if it does not find the one it was looking for.
      Reported-by: NDavid Arendt <admin@prnet.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/ae169fc6-f504-28f0-a098-6fa6a4dfb612@leemhuis.info/
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      8bb6898d
    • F
      btrfs: fix missing error handling when logging directory items · 6d3d970b
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      When logging a directory, at log_dir_items(), if we get an error when
      attempting to search the subvolume tree for a dir index item, we end up
      returning 0 (success) from log_dir_items() because 'err' is left with a
      value of 0.
      
      This can lead to a few problems, specially in the case the variable
      'last_offset' has a value of (u64)-1 (and it's initialized to that when
      it was declared):
      
      1) By returning from log_dir_items() with success (0) and a value of
         (u64)-1 for '*last_offset_ret', we end up not logging any other dir
         index keys that follow the missing, just deleted, index key. The
         (u64)-1 value makes log_directory_changes() not call log_dir_items()
         again;
      
      2) Before returning with success (0), log_dir_items(), will log a dir
         index range item covering a range from the last old dentry index
         (stored in the variable 'last_old_dentry_offset') to the value of
         'last_offset'. If 'last_offset' has a value of (u64)-1, then it means
         if the log is persisted and replayed after a power failure, it will
         cause deletion of all the directory entries that have an index number
         between last_old_dentry_offset + 1 and (u64)-1;
      
      3) We can end up returning from log_dir_items() with
         ctx->last_dir_item_offset having a lower value than
         inode->last_dir_index_offset, because the former is set to the current
         key we are processing at process_dir_items_leaf(), and at the end of
         log_directory_changes() we set inode->last_dir_index_offset to the
         current value of ctx->last_dir_item_offset. So if for example a
         deletion of a lower dir index key happened, we set
         ctx->last_dir_item_offset to that index value, then if we return from
         log_dir_items() because btrfs_search_slot() returned an error, we end up
         returning without any error from log_dir_items() and then
         log_directory_changes() sets inode->last_dir_index_offset to a lower
         value than it had before.
         This can result in unpredictable and unexpected behaviour when we
         need to log again the directory in the same transaction, and can result
         in ending up with a log tree leaf that has duplicated keys, as we do
         batch insertions of dir index keys into a log tree.
      
      Fix this by setting 'err' to the value of 'ret' in case
      btrfs_search_slot() or btrfs_previous_item() returned an error. That will
      result in falling back to a full transaction commit.
      Reported-by: NDavid Arendt <admin@prnet.org>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/ae169fc6-f504-28f0-a098-6fa6a4dfb612@leemhuis.info/
      Fixes: e02119d5 ("Btrfs: Add a write ahead tree log to optimize synchronous operations")
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+
      Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      6d3d970b
    • N
      btrfs: zoned: enable metadata over-commit for non-ZNS setup · 85e79ec7
      Naohiro Aota 提交于
      The commit 79417d04 ("btrfs: zoned: disable metadata overcommit for
      zoned") disabled the metadata over-commit to track active zones properly.
      
      However, it also introduced a heavy overhead by allocating new metadata
      block groups and/or flushing dirty buffers to release the space
      reservations. Specifically, a workload (write only without any sync
      operations) worsen its performance from 343.77 MB/sec (v5.19) to 182.89
      MB/sec (v6.0).
      
      The performance is still bad on current misc-next which is 187.95 MB/sec.
      And, with this patch applied, it improves back to 326.70 MB/sec (+73.82%).
      
      This patch introduces a new fs_info->flag BTRFS_FS_NO_OVERCOMMIT to
      indicate it needs to disable the metadata over-commit. The flag is enabled
      when a device with max active zones limit is loaded into a file-system.
      
      Fixes: 79417d04 ("btrfs: zoned: disable metadata overcommit for zoned")
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.0+
      Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
      Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@wdc.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      85e79ec7
    • Q
      btrfs: qgroup: do not warn on record without old_roots populated · 75181406
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      [BUG]
      There are some reports from the mailing list that since v6.1 kernel, the
      WARN_ON() inside btrfs_qgroup_account_extent() gets triggered during
      rescan:
      
        WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 6424 at fs/btrfs/qgroup.c:2756 btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0x1ae/0x260 [btrfs]
        CPU: 3 PID: 6424 Comm: snapperd Tainted: P           OE      6.1.2-1-default #1 openSUSE Tumbleweed 05c7a1b1b61d5627475528f71f50444637b5aad7
        RIP: 0010:btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0x1ae/0x260 [btrfs]
        Call Trace:
         <TASK>
        btrfs_commit_transaction+0x30c/0xb40 [btrfs c39c9c546c241c593f03bd6d5f39ea1b676250f6]
         ? start_transaction+0xc3/0x5b0 [btrfs c39c9c546c241c593f03bd6d5f39ea1b676250f6]
        btrfs_qgroup_rescan+0x42/0xc0 [btrfs c39c9c546c241c593f03bd6d5f39ea1b676250f6]
         btrfs_ioctl+0x1ab9/0x25c0 [btrfs c39c9c546c241c593f03bd6d5f39ea1b676250f6]
         ? __rseq_handle_notify_resume+0xa9/0x4a0
         ? mntput_no_expire+0x4a/0x240
         ? __seccomp_filter+0x319/0x4d0
         __x64_sys_ioctl+0x90/0xd0
         do_syscall_64+0x5b/0x80
         ? syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x17/0x40
         ? do_syscall_64+0x67/0x80
        entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x63/0xcd
        RIP: 0033:0x7fd9b790d9bf
         </TASK>
      
      [CAUSE]
      Since commit e15e9f43 ("btrfs: introduce
      BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting"), if
      our qgroup is already in inconsistent state, we will no longer do the
      time-consuming backref walk.
      
      This can leave some qgroup records without a valid old_roots ulist.
      Normally this is fine, as btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() would also skip
      those records if we have NO_ACCOUNTING flag set.
      
      But there is a small window, if we have NO_ACCOUNTING flag set, and
      inserted some qgroup_record without a old_roots ulist, but then the user
      triggered a qgroup rescan.
      
      During btrfs_qgroup_rescan(), we firstly clear NO_ACCOUNTING flag, then
      commit current transaction.
      
      And since we have a qgroup_record with old_roots = NULL, we trigger the
      WARN_ON() during btrfs_qgroup_account_extents().
      
      [FIX]
      Unfortunately due to the introduction of NO_ACCOUNTING flag, the
      assumption that every qgroup_record would have its old_roots populated
      is no longer correct.
      
      Fix the false alerts and drop the WARN_ON().
      Reported-by: NLukas Straub <lukasstraub2@web.de>
      Reported-by: NHanatoK <summersnow9403@gmail.com>
      Fixes: e15e9f43 ("btrfs: introduce BTRFS_QGROUP_RUNTIME_FLAG_NO_ACCOUNTING to skip qgroup accounting")
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/2403c697-ddaf-58ad-3829-0335fc89df09@gmail.com/Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      75181406
    • Q
      btrfs: add extra error messages to cover non-ENOMEM errors from device_add_list() · ed02363f
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      [BUG]
      When test case btrfs/219 (aka, mount a registered device but with a lower
      generation) failed, there is not any useful information for the end user
      to find out what's going wrong.
      
      The mount failure just looks like this:
      
        #  mount -o loop /tmp/219.img2 /mnt/btrfs/
        mount: /mnt/btrfs: mount(2) system call failed: File exists.
               dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
      
      While the dmesg contains nothing but the loop device change:
      
        loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 524288
      
      [CAUSE]
      In device_list_add() we have a lot of extra checks to reject invalid
      cases.
      
      That function also contains the regular device scan result like the
      following prompt:
      
        BTRFS: device fsid 6222333e-f9f1-47e6-b306-55ddd4dcaef4 devid 1 transid 8 /dev/loop0 scanned by systemd-udevd (3027)
      
      But unfortunately not all errors have their own error messages, thus if
      we hit something wrong in device_add_list(), there may be no error
      messages at all.
      
      [FIX]
      Add errors message for all non-ENOMEM errors.
      
      For ENOMEM, I'd say we're in a much worse situation, and there should be
      some OOM messages way before our call sites.
      
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.0+
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      ed02363f
  5. 03 1月, 2023 7 次提交
    • Q
      btrfs: fix compat_ro checks against remount · 2ba48b20
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      [BUG]
      Even with commit 81d5d614 ("btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO
      flags handling"), btrfs can still mount a fs with unsupported compat_ro
      flags read-only, then remount it RW:
      
        # btrfs ins dump-super /dev/loop0 | grep compat_ro_flags -A 3
        compat_ro_flags		0x403
      			( FREE_SPACE_TREE |
      			  FREE_SPACE_TREE_VALID |
      			  unknown flag: 0x400 )
      
        # mount /dev/loop0 /mnt/btrfs
        mount: /mnt/btrfs: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, missing codepage or helper program, or other error.
               dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
        ^^^ RW mount failed as expected ^^^
      
        # dmesg -t | tail -n5
        loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 1048576
        BTRFS: device fsid cb5b82f5-0fdd-4d81-9b4b-78533c324afa devid 1 transid 7 /dev/loop0 scanned by mount (1146)
        BTRFS info (device loop0): using crc32c (crc32c-intel) checksum algorithm
        BTRFS info (device loop0): using free space tree
        BTRFS error (device loop0): cannot mount read-write because of unknown compat_ro features (0x403)
        BTRFS error (device loop0): open_ctree failed
      
        # mount /dev/loop0 -o ro /mnt/btrfs
        # mount -o remount,rw /mnt/btrfs
        ^^^ RW remount succeeded unexpectedly ^^^
      
      [CAUSE]
      Currently we use btrfs_check_features() to check compat_ro flags against
      our current mount flags.
      
      That function get reused between open_ctree() and btrfs_remount().
      
      But for btrfs_remount(), the super block we passed in still has the old
      mount flags, thus btrfs_check_features() still believes we're mounting
      read-only.
      
      [FIX]
      Replace the existing @sb argument with @is_rw_mount.
      
      As originally we only use @sb to determine if the mount is RW.
      
      Now it's callers' responsibility to determine if the mount is RW, and
      since there are only two callers, the check is pretty simple:
      
      - caller in open_ctree()
        Just pass !sb_rdonly().
      
      - caller in btrfs_remount()
        Pass !(*flags & SB_RDONLY), as our check should be against the new
        flags.
      
      Now we can correctly reject the RW remount:
      
        # mount /dev/loop0 -o ro /mnt/btrfs
        # mount -o remount,rw /mnt/btrfs
        mount: /mnt/btrfs: mount point not mounted or bad option.
               dmesg(1) may have more information after failed mount system call.
        # dmesg -t | tail -n 1
        BTRFS error (device loop0: state M): cannot mount read-write because of unknown compat_ro features (0x403)
      Reported-by: NChung-Chiang Cheng <shepjeng@gmail.com>
      Fixes: 81d5d614 ("btrfs: enhance unsupported compat RO flags handling")
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.15+
      Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      2ba48b20
    • Q
      btrfs: always report error in run_one_delayed_ref() · 39f501d6
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      Currently we have a btrfs_debug() for run_one_delayed_ref() failure, but
      if end users hit such problem, there will be no chance that
      btrfs_debug() is enabled.  This can lead to very little useful info for
      debugging.
      
      This patch will:
      
      - Add extra info for error reporting
        Including:
        * logical bytenr
        * num_bytes
        * type
        * action
        * ref_mod
      
      - Replace the btrfs_debug() with btrfs_err()
      
      - Move the error reporting into run_one_delayed_ref()
        This is to avoid use-after-free, the @node can be freed in the caller.
      
      This error should only be triggered at most once.
      
      As if run_one_delayed_ref() failed, we trigger the error message, then
      causing the call chain to error out:
      
      btrfs_run_delayed_refs()
      `- btrfs_run_delayed_refs()
         `- btrfs_run_delayed_refs_for_head()
            `- run_one_delayed_ref()
      
      And we will abort the current transaction in btrfs_run_delayed_refs().
      If we have to run delayed refs for the abort transaction,
      run_one_delayed_ref() will just cleanup the refs and do nothing, thus no
      new error messages would be output.
      Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      39f501d6
    • Q
      btrfs: handle case when repair happens with dev-replace · d73a27b8
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      [BUG]
      There is a bug report that a BUG_ON() in btrfs_repair_io_failure()
      (originally repair_io_failure() in v6.0 kernel) got triggered when
      replacing a unreliable disk:
      
        BTRFS warning (device sda1): csum failed root 257 ino 2397453 off 39624704 csum 0xb0d18c75 expected csum 0x4dae9c5e mirror 3
        kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2380!
        invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI
        CPU: 9 PID: 3614331 Comm: kworker/u257:2 Tainted: G           OE      6.0.0-5-amd64 #1  Debian 6.0.10-2
        Hardware name: Micro-Star International Co., Ltd. MS-7C60/TRX40 PRO WIFI (MS-7C60), BIOS 2.70 07/01/2021
        Workqueue: btrfs-endio btrfs_end_bio_work [btrfs]
        RIP: 0010:repair_io_failure+0x24a/0x260 [btrfs]
        Call Trace:
         <TASK>
         clean_io_failure+0x14d/0x180 [btrfs]
         end_bio_extent_readpage+0x412/0x6e0 [btrfs]
         ? __switch_to+0x106/0x420
         process_one_work+0x1c7/0x380
         worker_thread+0x4d/0x380
         ? rescuer_thread+0x3a0/0x3a0
         kthread+0xe9/0x110
         ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
         ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
      
      [CAUSE]
      
      Before the BUG_ON(), we got some read errors from the replace target
      first, note the mirror number (3, which is beyond RAID1 duplication,
      thus it's read from the replace target device).
      
      Then at the BUG_ON() location, we are trying to writeback the repaired
      sectors back the failed device.
      
      The check looks like this:
      
      		ret = btrfs_map_block(fs_info, BTRFS_MAP_WRITE, logical,
      				      &map_length, &bioc, mirror_num);
      		if (ret)
      			goto out_counter_dec;
      		BUG_ON(mirror_num != bioc->mirror_num);
      
      But inside btrfs_map_block(), we can modify bioc->mirror_num especially
      for dev-replace:
      
      	if (dev_replace_is_ongoing && mirror_num == map->num_stripes + 1 &&
      	    !need_full_stripe(op) && dev_replace->tgtdev != NULL) {
      		ret = get_extra_mirror_from_replace(fs_info, logical, *length,
      						    dev_replace->srcdev->devid,
      						    &mirror_num,
      					    &physical_to_patch_in_first_stripe);
      		patch_the_first_stripe_for_dev_replace = 1;
      	}
      
      Thus if we're repairing the replace target device, we're going to
      trigger that BUG_ON().
      
      But in reality, the read failure from the replace target device may be
      that, our replace hasn't reached the range we're reading, thus we're
      reading garbage, but with replace running, the range would be properly
      filled later.
      
      Thus in that case, we don't need to do anything but let the replace
      routine to handle it.
      
      [FIX]
      Instead of a BUG_ON(), just skip the repair if we're repairing the
      device replace target device.
      Reported-by: N小太 <nospam@kota.moe>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CACsxjPYyJGQZ+yvjzxA1Nn2LuqkYqTCcUH43S=+wXhyf8S00Ag@mail.gmail.com/
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.0+
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      d73a27b8
    • F
      btrfs: fix off-by-one in delalloc search during lseek · 2f2e84ca
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      During lseek, when searching for delalloc in a range that represents a
      hole and that range has a length of 1 byte, we end up not doing the actual
      delalloc search in the inode's io tree, resulting in not correctly
      reporting the offset with data or a hole. This actually only happens when
      the start offset is 0 because with any other start offset we round it down
      by sector size.
      
      Reproducer:
      
        $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdc
        $ mount /dev/sdc /mnt/sdc
      
        $ xfs_io -f -c "pwrite -q 0 1" /mnt/sdc/foo
      
        $ xfs_io -c "seek -d 0" /mnt/sdc/foo
        Whence   Result
        DATA	   EOF
      
      It should have reported an offset of 0 instead of EOF.
      
      Fix this by updating btrfs_find_delalloc_in_range() and count_range_bits()
      to deal with inclusive ranges properly. These functions are already
      supposed to work with inclusive end offsets, they just got it wrong in a
      couple places due to off-by-one mistakes.
      
      A test case for fstests will be added later.
      Reported-by: NJoan Bruguera Micó <joanbrugueram@gmail.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/20221223020509.457113-1-joanbrugueram@gmail.com/
      Fixes: b6e83356 ("btrfs: make hole and data seeking a lot more efficient")
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.1
      Tested-by: NJoan Bruguera Micó <joanbrugueram@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      2f2e84ca
    • Q
      btrfs: fix false alert on bad tree level check · 1d854e4f
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      [BUG]
      There is a bug report that on a RAID0 NVMe btrfs system, under heavy
      write load the filesystem can flip RO randomly.
      
      With extra debugging, it shows some tree blocks failed to pass their
      level checks, and if that happens at critical path of a transaction, we
      abort the transaction:
      
        BTRFS error (device nvme0n1p3): level verify failed on logical 5446121209856 mirror 1 wanted 0 found 1
        BTRFS error (device nvme0n1p3: state A): Transaction aborted (error -5)
        BTRFS: error (device nvme0n1p3: state A) in btrfs_finish_ordered_io:3343: errno=-5 IO failure
        BTRFS info (device nvme0n1p3: state EA): forced readonly
      
      [CAUSE]
      The reporter has already bisected to commit 947a6299 ("btrfs: move
      tree block parentness check into validate_extent_buffer()").
      
      And with extra debugging, it shows we can have btrfs_tree_parent_check
      filled with all zeros in the following call trace:
      
        submit_one_bio+0xd4/0xe0
        submit_extent_page+0x142/0x550
        read_extent_buffer_pages+0x584/0x9c0
        ? __pfx_end_bio_extent_readpage+0x10/0x10
        ? folio_unlock+0x1d/0x50
        btrfs_read_extent_buffer+0x98/0x150
        read_tree_block+0x43/0xa0
        read_block_for_search+0x266/0x370
        btrfs_search_slot+0x351/0xd30
        ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140
        btrfs_lookup_csum+0x63/0x150
        btrfs_csum_file_blocks+0x197/0x6c0
        ? sched_clock_cpu+0x9f/0xc0
        ? lock_release+0x14b/0x440
        ? _raw_read_unlock+0x29/0x50
        btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x441/0x860
        btrfs_work_helper+0xfe/0x400
        ? lock_is_held_type+0xe8/0x140
        process_one_work+0x294/0x5b0
        worker_thread+0x4f/0x3a0
        ? __pfx_worker_thread+0x10/0x10
        kthread+0xf5/0x120
        ? __pfx_kthread+0x10/0x10
        ret_from_fork+0x2c/0x50
      
      Currently we only copy the btrfs_tree_parent_check structure into bbio
      at read_extent_buffer_pages() after we have assembled the bbio.
      
      But as shown above, submit_extent_page() itself can already submit the
      bbio, leaving the bbio->parent_check uninitialized, and cause the false
      alert.
      
      [FIX]
      Instead of copying @check into bbio after bbio is assembled, we pass
      @check in btrfs_bio_ctrl::parent_check, and copy the content of
      parent_check in submit_one_bio() for metadata read.
      
      By this we should be able to pass the needed info for metadata endio
      verification, and fix the false alert.
      Reported-by: NMikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CABXGCsNzVxo4iq-tJSGm_kO1UggHXgq6CdcHDL=z5FL4njYXSQ@mail.gmail.com/
      Fixes: 947a6299 ("btrfs: move tree block parentness check into validate_extent_buffer()")
      Tested-by: NMikhail Gavrilov <mikhail.v.gavrilov@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      1d854e4f
    • Q
      btrfs: add error message for metadata level mismatch · 77177ed1
      Qu Wenruo 提交于
      From a recent regression report, we found that after commit 947a6299
      ("btrfs: move tree block parentness check into
      validate_extent_buffer()") if we have a level mismatch (false alert
      though), there is no error message at all.
      
      This makes later debugging harder.  This patch will add the proper error
      message for such case.
      
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-btrfs/CABXGCsNzVxo4iq-tJSGm_kO1UggHXgq6CdcHDL=z5FL4njYXSQ@mail.gmail.com/Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      77177ed1
    • T
      btrfs: fix ASSERT em->len condition in btrfs_get_extent · 946c2923
      Tanmay Bhushan 提交于
      The em->len value is supposed to be verified in the assertion condition
      though we expect it to be same as the sectorsize.
      
      Fixes: a196a894 ("btrfs: do not reset extent map members for inline extents read")
      Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTanmay Bhushan <007047221b@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      946c2923
  6. 21 12月, 2022 3 次提交
    • F
      btrfs: fix fscrypt name leak after failure to join log transaction · fee4c199
      Filipe Manana 提交于
      When logging a new name, we don't expect to fail joining a log transaction
      since we know at least one of the inodes was logged before in the current
      transaction. However if we fail for some unexpected reason, we end up not
      freeing the fscrypt name we previously allocated. So fix that by freeing
      the name in case we failed to join a log transaction.
      
      Fixes: ab3c5c18 ("btrfs: setup qstr from dentrys using fscrypt helper")
      Reviewed-by: NSweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      fee4c199
    • J
      btrfs: scrub: fix uninitialized return value in recover_scrub_rbio · e7fc357e
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Commit 75b47033 ("btrfs: raid56: migrate recovery and scrub recovery
      path to use error_bitmap") introduced an uninitialized return variable.
      
      This can be caught by gcc 12.1 by -Wmaybe-uninitialized:
      
        CC [M]  fs/btrfs/raid56.o
      fs/btrfs/raid56.c: In function ‘scrub_rbio’:
      fs/btrfs/raid56.c:2801:15: warning: ‘ret’ may be used uninitialized [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
       2801 |         ret = recover_scrub_rbio(rbio);
            |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      fs/btrfs/raid56.c:2649:13: note: ‘ret’ was declared here
       2649 |         int ret;
      
      The warning is disabled by default so we haven't caught that.
      
      Due to the bug the raid56 scrub fstests have been failing since the
      patch was merged, so initialize that.
      
      Fixes: 75b47033 ("btrfs: raid56: migrate recovery and scrub recovery path to use error_bitmap")
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      e7fc357e
    • B
      btrfs: fix resolving backrefs for inline extent followed by prealloc · 560840af
      Boris Burkov 提交于
      If a file consists of an inline extent followed by a regular or prealloc
      extent, then a legitimate attempt to resolve a logical address in the
      non-inline region will result in add_all_parents reading the invalid
      offset field of the inline extent. If the inline extent item is placed
      in the leaf eb s.t. it is the first item, attempting to access the
      offset field will not only be meaningless, it will go past the end of
      the eb and cause this panic:
      
        [17.626048] BTRFS warning (device dm-2): bad eb member end: ptr 0x3fd4 start 30834688 member offset 16377 size 8
        [17.631693] general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0x5088000000000: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
        [17.635041] CPU: 2 PID: 1267 Comm: btrfs Not tainted 5.12.0-07246-g75175d5adc74-dirty #199
        [17.637969] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.14.0-0-g155821a1990b-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
        [17.641995] RIP: 0010:btrfs_get_64+0xe7/0x110
        [17.649890] RSP: 0018:ffffc90001f73a08 EFLAGS: 00010202
        [17.651652] RAX: 0000000000000001 RBX: ffff88810c42d000 RCX: 0000000000000000
        [17.653921] RDX: 0005088000000000 RSI: ffffc90001f73a0f RDI: 0000000000000001
        [17.656174] RBP: 0000000000000ff9 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: c0000000fffeffff
        [17.658441] R10: ffffc90001f73790 R11: ffffc90001f73788 R12: ffff888106afe918
        [17.661070] R13: 0000000000003fd4 R14: 0000000000003f6f R15: cdcdcdcdcdcdcdcd
        [17.663617] FS:  00007f64e7627d80(0000) GS:ffff888237c80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
        [17.666525] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
        [17.668664] CR2: 000055d4a39152e8 CR3: 000000010c596002 CR4: 0000000000770ee0
        [17.671253] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
        [17.673634] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
        [17.676034] PKRU: 55555554
        [17.677004] Call Trace:
        [17.677877]  add_all_parents+0x276/0x480
        [17.679325]  find_parent_nodes+0xfae/0x1590
        [17.680771]  btrfs_find_all_leafs+0x5e/0xa0
        [17.682217]  iterate_extent_inodes+0xce/0x260
        [17.683809]  ? btrfs_inode_flags_to_xflags+0x50/0x50
        [17.685597]  ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0xa1/0xd0
        [17.687404]  iterate_inodes_from_logical+0xa1/0xd0
        [17.689121]  ? btrfs_inode_flags_to_xflags+0x50/0x50
        [17.691010]  btrfs_ioctl_logical_to_ino+0x131/0x190
        [17.692946]  btrfs_ioctl+0x104a/0x2f60
        [17.694384]  ? selinux_file_ioctl+0x182/0x220
        [17.695995]  ? __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0
        [17.697394]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x84/0xc0
        [17.698697]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
        [17.700017]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
        [17.701753] RIP: 0033:0x7f64e72761b7
        [17.709355] RSP: 002b:00007ffefb067f58 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
        [17.712088] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000000003 RCX: 00007f64e72761b7
        [17.714667] RDX: 00007ffefb067fb0 RSI: 00000000c0389424 RDI: 0000000000000003
        [17.717386] RBP: 00007ffefb06d188 R08: 000055d4a390d2b0 R09: 00007f64e7340a60
        [17.719938] R10: 0000000000000231 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000001
        [17.722383] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 00000000c0389424 R15: 000055d4a38fd2a0
        [17.724839] Modules linked in:
      
      Fix the bug by detecting the inline extent item in add_all_parents and
      skipping to the next extent item.
      
      CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.9+
      Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NBoris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      560840af
  7. 16 12月, 2022 5 次提交
  8. 06 12月, 2022 8 次提交