- 09 6月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Dave reported a NULL pointer deref. This is caused because he thought he'd be smart and add sanity checks to the extent_io bit operations, but he didn't expect a tree to have a NULL mapping. To fix this we just need to init the relocation's processed_blocks with the btree_inode->i_mapping. Thanks, Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Naohiro Aota 提交于
There is a path where btrfs_drop_inode() is called with its inode's root is NULL: In btrfs_new_inode(), when btrfs_set_inode_index() fails, iput() is called. We should handle this case before taking look at the root->root_item. Signed-off-by: NNaohiro Aota <naota@elisp.net> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We get a use after free if we had a transaction to cleanup since there could be delayed inodes which refer to their respective fs_root. Thanks Reported-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 18 5月, 2013 26 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
Btrfs has been pointer tagging bi_private and using bi_bdev to store the stripe index and mirror number of failed IOs. As bios bubble back up through the call chain, we use these to decide if and how to retry our IOs. They are also used to count IO failures on a per device basis. Recently a bio tracepoint was added lead to crashes because we were abusing bi_bdev. This commit adds a btrfs bioset, and creates explicit fields for the mirror number and stripe index. The plan is to extend this structure for all of the fields currently in struct btrfs_bio, which will mean one less kmalloc in our IO path. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com> Reported-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If we fail to load the chunk tree we'll call free_root_pointers, except we may not have assigned the roots for the dev_root/extent_root/csum_root yet, so we could NULL pointer deref at this point. Just add checks to make sure these roots are set to keep us from panicing. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
The quota_tree was set up to use the empty_block_rsv before which would be problematic when the filesystem is filled up and ENOSPC happens during internal operations while the quota tree is updated and COWed (when the btrfs_qgroup_info_item items) are written. In fact, use_block_rsv() which is used in btrfs_cow_block() falls back to the global_block_rsv in this case. But just in order to make it more clear what is happening, change it to explicitly use the global_block_rsv. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Alexandre Oliva 提交于
end_bio_extent_readpage computes whole_page based on bv_offset and bv_len, without taking into account that blk_update_request may modify them when some of the blocks to be read into a page produce a read error. This would cause the read to unlock only part of the file range associated with the page, which would in turn leave the entire page locked, which would not only keep the process blocked instead of returning -EIO to it, but also prevent any further access to the file. It turns out that btrfs always issues whole-page reads and writes. The special handling of non-whole_page appears to be a mistake or a left-over from a time when this wasn't the case. Indeed, end_bio_extent_writepage distinguished between whole_page and non-whole_page writes but behaved identically in both cases! I've replaced the whole_page computations with warnings, just to be sure that we're not issuing partial page reads or writes. The warnings should probably just go away some time. Signed-off-by: NAlexandre Oliva <oliva@gnu.org> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
btrfs_invalidate_inodes() may sleep, so we should not invoke it in the spin lock context. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We have checked if ->node is NULL or not, so it is unnecessary to use BUG_ON() to check again. Remove it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The root node of the rb-tree may be changed, so we should get it under the lock. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
inode_tree_del() will move the tree root into the dead root list, and then the tree will be destroyed by the cleaner. So if we remove the delayed node which is cached in the inode after inode_tree_del(), we may access a freed tree root. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
We need to set return value explicitly, otherwise we'll lose the error value. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Before applying this patch, we reserved the space for the global reserve by the minimum unit if we found it is empty, it was unreasonable and inefficient, because if the global reserve space was depleted, it implied that the size of the global reserve was too small. In this case, we shoud update the global reserve and fill it. Cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
If the type of the space we need is different with the global reserve, we can not steal the space from the global reserve, because we can not allocate the space from the free space cache that the global reserve points to. Cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
It is very likely that there are lots of subvolumes/snapshots in the filesystem, so if we use global block reservation to do inode cache truncation, we may hog all the free space that is reserved in global rsv. So it is better that we do the free space reservation for inode cache truncation by ourselves. Cc: Tsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The filesystem with inode cache was forced to be read-only when we umounted it. Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs -f ${DEV} # mount -o inode_cache ${DEV} ${MNT} # dd if=/dev/zero of=${MNT}/file1 bs=1M count=8192 # btrfs fi syn ${MNT} # dd if=${MNT}/file1 of=/dev/null bs=1M # rm -f ${MNT}/file1 # btrfs fi syn ${MNT} # umount ${MNT} It is because there was no enough space to do inode cache truncation, and then we aborted the current transaction. But no space error is not a serious problem when we write out the inode cache, and it is safe that we just skip this step if we meet this problem. So we need not abort the current transaction. Reported-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Andreas Philipp 提交于
Raid5 with 3 devices is well defined while the old logic allowed raid5 only with a minimum of 4 devices when converting the block group profile via btrfs balance. Creating a raid5 with just three devices using mkfs.btrfs worked always as expected. This is now fixed and the whole logic is rewritten. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Philipp <philipp.andreas@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
In replace_path(), if read_tree_block() fails, we cannot return directly, we should free some allocated memory otherwise memory leak happens. Similar to Wang's "Btrfs: fix possible memory leak in the find_parent_nodes()" patch, the current commit fixes an issue that is related to the "Btrfs: fix all callers of read_tree_block" commit. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
In the find_parent_nodes(), if read_tree_block() fails, we can not return directly, we should free some allocated memory otherwise memory leak happens. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl-fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Stefan Behrens 提交于
This is not yet supported and causes crashes. One sad user reported that it destroyed his filesystem. One failure is in __btrfs_map_block+0xc1f calling kmalloc(0). 0x5f21f is in __btrfs_map_block (fs/btrfs/volumes.c:4923). 4918 num_stripes = map->num_stripes; 4919 max_errors = nr_parity_stripes(map); 4920 4921 raid_map = kmalloc(sizeof(u64) * num_stripes, 4922 GFP_NOFS); 4923 if (!raid_map) { 4924 ret = -ENOMEM; 4925 goto out; 4926 } 4927 There might be more issues. Until this is really tested, don't allow users to start the procedure on RAID5/RAID6 filesystems. Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Chris hit a bug where we weren't finding extent records when running extent ops. This is because we use the delayed_ref_head when running the extent op, which means we can't use the ->type checks to see if we are metadata. We also lose the level of the metadata we are working on. So to fix this we can just check the ->is_data section of the extent_op, and we can store the level of the buffer we were modifying in the extent_op. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This catches block groups that are too large to properly cache. We deal with this case fine, so the warning just confuses users. Remove the warning. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I'm sorry, theres no excuse for this sort of work. We need to use root->leafsize since eb may be NULL. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Gabriel de Perthuis 提交于
The search ioctl skips items that are too large for a result buffer, but inline items of a certain size occuring before any search result is found would trigger an overflow and stop the search entirely. Bug: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=57641 Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NGabriel de Perthuis <g2p.code+btrfs@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
lock_extent/unlock_extent expect an exclusive end. Tested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Quota tree has been missing from lockdep annotations, though no warning has been seen in the wild. There's currently one entry that does not belong there, BTRFS_ORPHAN_OBJECTID. No such tree exists, it's probably a copy & paste mistake, the id is defined among tree ids. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
- 07 5月, 2013 11 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
We've added new checks to make sure the super block crc is correct during mount. A fresh filesystem from an older mkfs won't have the crc set. This adds a warning when it finds a newly created filesystem but doesn't fail the mount. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The superblock checksum is not verified upon mount. <awkward silence> Add that check and also reorder existing checks to a more logical order. Current mkfs.btrfs does not calculate the correct checksum of super_block and thus a freshly created filesytem will fail to mount when this patch is applied. First transaction commit calculates correct superblock checksum and saves it to disk. Reproducer: $ mfks.btrfs /dev/sda $ mount /dev/sda /mnt $ btrfs scrub start /mnt $ sleep 5 $ btrfs scrub status /mnt ... super:2 ... Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The variable was named 'data' in btrfs_reserve_extent and that's the only function that actually uses it to let btrfs_get_alloc_profile know what profile we want. Then it's passed down as u64 flags. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
1) Right now scrub_stripe() is looping in some unnecessary cases: * when the found extent item's objectid has been out of the dev extent's range but we haven't finish scanning all the range within the dev extent * when all the items has been processed but we haven't finish scanning all the range within the dev extent In both cases, we can just finish the loop to save costs. 2) Besides, when the found extent item's length is larger than the stripe len(64k), we don't have to release the path and search again as it'll get at the same key used in the last loop, we can instead increase the logical cursor in place till all space of the extent is scanned. 3) And we use 0 as the key's offset to search btree, then get to previous item to find a smaller item, and again have to move to the next one to get the right item. Setting offset=-1 and previous_item() is the correct way. 4) As we won't find any checksum at offset unless this 'offset' is in a data extent, we can just find checksum when we're really going to scrub an extent. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
There's a theoretical possibility of reading stale (or even more theoretically, freed) data from DEV_INFO ioctl when the device would disappear between an early mutex unlock and data being copied from the device structure. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
It's unused since 0b32f4bb. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
Big patch, but all it does is add statics to functions which are in fact static, then remove the associated dead-code fallout. removed functions: btrfs_iref_to_path() __btrfs_lookup_delayed_deletion_item() __btrfs_search_delayed_insertion_item() __btrfs_search_delayed_deletion_item() find_eb_for_page() btrfs_find_block_group() range_straddles_pages() extent_range_uptodate() btrfs_file_extent_length() btrfs_scrub_cancel_devid() btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() btrfs_print_tree() is left because it is used for debugging. btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() and btrfs_reada_detach() are left for symmetry. ulist.c functions are left, another patch will take care of those. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
If you try to mount -o loop a restored file system it will panic if the file ends up being smaller than the original disk. This is because we go to try and get a block for a super that may be past the EOF which makes __getblk return NULL for a buffer head when we aren't expecting it to. Fix this by dealing with this case and just jacking up the errors count. With this patch we no longer panic when mounting a restored file system loopback. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
There were a whole bunch and I was doing it for other things. I haven't tested these error paths but at the very least this is better than panicing. I've only left 2 BUG_ON()'s since they are logic errors and I want to replace them with a ASSERT framework that we can compile out for production users. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-