- 01 10月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Sorenson 提交于
Add a hash_cred() function for RPCSEC_GSS, using only the uid from the auth_cred. Signed-off-by: NFrank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Frank Sorenson 提交于
Add a hash_cred() function for auth_unix, using both the uid and gid from the auth_cred. Signed-off-by: NFrank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Frank Sorenson 提交于
Add a hash_cred() function for generic_auth, using both the uid and gid from the auth_cred. Signed-off-by: NFrank Sorenson <sorenson@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 28 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ke Wang 提交于
sunrpc uses workqueue to clean cache regulary. There is no real dependency of executing work on the cpu which queueing it. On a idle system, especially for a heterogeneous systems like big.LITTLE, it is observed that the big idle cpu was woke up many times just to service this work, which against the principle of power saving. It would be better if we can schedule it on a cpu which the scheduler believes to be the most appropriate one. After apply this patch, system_wq will be replaced by system_power_efficient_wq for sunrpc. This functionality is enabled when CONFIG_WQ_POWER_EFFICIENT is selected. Signed-off-by: NKe Wang <ke.wang@spreadtrum.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 23 9月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Wagner 提交于
There is only one waiter for the completion, therefore there is no need to use complete_all(). Let's make that clear by using complete() instead of complete_all(). The usage pattern of the completion is: waiter context waker context frwr_op_unmap_sync() reinit_completion() ib_post_send() wait_for_completion() frwr_wc_localinv_wake() complete() Signed-off-by: NDaniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de> Cc: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Cc: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Use xdr->nwords to tell us how much buffer remains. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
When we copy the first part of the data, we need to ensure that value of xdr->nwords is updated as well. Do so by calling __xdr_inline_decode() Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 20 9月, 2016 29 次提交
-
-
由 David Vrabel 提交于
Write space becoming available may race with putting the task to sleep in xprt_wait_for_buffer_space(). The existing mechanism to avoid the race does not work. This (edited) partial trace illustrates the problem: [1] rpc_task_run_action: task:43546@5 ... action=call_transmit [2] xs_write_space <-xs_tcp_write_space [3] xprt_write_space <-xs_write_space [4] rpc_task_sleep: task:43546@5 ... [5] xs_write_space <-xs_tcp_write_space [1] Task 43546 runs but is out of write space. [2] Space becomes available, xs_write_space() clears the SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE bit. [3] xprt_write_space() attemts to wake xprt->snd_task (== 43546), but this has not yet been queued and the wake up is lost. [4] xs_nospace() is called which calls xprt_wait_for_buffer_space() which queues task 43546. [5] The call to sk->sk_write_space() at the end of xs_nospace() (which is supposed to handle the above race) does not call xprt_write_space() as the SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE bit is clear and thus the task is not woken. Fix the race by resetting the SOCKWQ_ASYNC_NOSPACE bit in xs_nospace() so the second call to sk->sk_write_space() calls xprt_write_space(). Suggested-by: NTrond Myklebust <trondmy@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Vrabel <david.vrabel@citrix.com> cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4 Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: the extra layer of indirection doesn't add value. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: When converting xprtrdma to use the new CQ API, I missed a spot. The naming convention elsewhere is: {svc_rdma,rpcrdma}_wc_{operation} Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Tie frwr debugging messages together by always reporting the address of the frwr. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The Version One default inline threshold is still 1KB. But allow testing with thresholds up to 64KB. This maximum is somewhat arbitrary. There's no fundamental architectural limit I'm aware of, but it's good to keep the size of Receive buffers reasonable. Now that Send can use a s/g list, a Send buffer is only as large as each RPC requires. Receive buffers are always the size of the inline threshold, however. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
An RPC Call message that is sent inline but that has a data payload (ie, one or more items in rq_snd_buf's page list) must be "pulled up:" - call_allocate has to reserve enough RPC Call buffer space to accommodate the data payload - call_transmit has to memcopy the rq_snd_buf's page list and tail into its head iovec before it is sent As the inline threshold is increased beyond its current 1KB default, however, this means data payloads of more than a few KB are copied by the host CPU. For example, if the inline threshold is increased just to 4KB, then NFS WRITE requests up to 4KB would involve a memcpy of the NFS WRITE's payload data into the RPC Call buffer. This is an undesirable amount of participation by the host CPU. The inline threshold may be much larger than 4KB in the future, after negotiation with a peer server. Instead of copying the components of rq_snd_buf into its head iovec, construct a gather list of these components, and send them all in place. The same approach is already used in the Linux server's RPC-over-RDMA reply path. This mechanism also eliminates the need for rpcrdma_tail_pullup, which is used to manage the XDR pad and trailing inline content when a Read list is present. This requires that the pages in rq_snd_buf's page list be DMA-mapped during marshaling, and unmapped when a data-bearing RPC is completed. This is slightly less efficient for very small I/O payloads, but significantly more efficient as data payload size and inline threshold increase past a kilobyte. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Have frwr's ro_unmap_sync recognize an invalidated rkey that appears as part of a Receive completion. Local invalidation can be skipped for that rkey. Use an out-of-band signaling mechanism to indicate to the server that the client is prepared to receive RDMA Send With Invalidate. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Send an RDMA-CM private message on connect, and look for one during a connection-established event. Both sides can communicate their various implementation limits. Implementations that don't support this sideband protocol ignore it. Once the client knows the server's inline threshold maxima, it can adjust the use of Reply chunks, and eliminate most use of Position Zero Read chunks. Moderately-sized I/O can be done using a pure inline RDMA Send instead of RDMA operations that require memory registration. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: The fields in the recv_wr do not vary. There is no need to initialize them before each ib_post_recv(). This removes a large-ish data structure from the stack. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: Most of the fields in each send_wr do not vary. There is no need to initialize them before each ib_post_send(). This removes a large-ish data structure from the stack. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up. Since commit fc664485 ("xprtrdma: Split the completion queue"), rpcrdma_ep_post_recv() no longer uses the "ep" argument. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up. The "ia" argument is no longer used. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Currently, each regbuf is allocated and DMA mapped at the same time. This is done during transport creation. When a device driver is unloaded, every DMA-mapped buffer in use by a transport has to be unmapped, and then remapped to the new device if the driver is loaded again. Remapping will have to be done _after_ the connect worker has set up the new device. But there's an ordering problem: call_allocate, which invokes xprt_rdma_allocate which calls rpcrdma_alloc_regbuf to allocate Send buffers, happens _before_ the connect worker can run to set up the new device. Instead, at transport creation, allocate each buffer, but leave it unmapped. Once the RPC carries these buffers into ->send_request, by which time a transport connection should have been established, check to see that the RPC's buffers have been DMA mapped. If not, map them there. When device driver unplug support is added, it will simply unmap all the transport's regbufs, but it doesn't have to deallocate the underlying memory. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
The use of DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL is discouraged by DMA-API.txt. Fortunately, xprtrdma now knows which direction I/O is going as soon as it allocates each regbuf. The RPC Call and Reply buffers are no longer the same regbuf. They can each be labeled correctly now. The RPC Reply buffer is never part of either a Send or Receive WR, but it can be part of Reply chunk, which is mapped and registered via ->ro_map . So it is not DMA mapped when it is allocated (DMA_NONE), to avoid a double- mapping. Since Receive buffers are no longer DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL and their contents are never modified by the host CPU, DMA-API-HOWTO.txt suggests that a DMA sync before posting each buffer should be unnecessary. (See my_card_interrupt_handler). Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Commit 94931746 ("xprtrdma: Limit number of RDMA segments in RPC-over-RDMA headers") capped the number of chunks that may appear in RPC-over-RDMA headers. The maximum header size can be estimated and fixed to avoid allocating buffer space that is never used. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
RPC-over-RDMA needs to separate its RPC call and reply buffers. o When an RPC Call is sent, rq_snd_buf is DMA mapped for an RDMA Send operation using DMA_TO_DEVICE o If the client expects a large RPC reply, it DMA maps rq_rcv_buf as part of a Reply chunk using DMA_FROM_DEVICE The two mappings are for data movement in opposite directions. DMA-API.txt suggests that if these mappings share a DMA cacheline, bad things can happen. This could occur in the final bytes of rq_snd_buf and the first bytes of rq_rcv_buf if the two buffers happen to share a DMA cacheline. On x86_64 the cacheline size is typically 8 bytes, and RPC call messages are usually much smaller than the send buffer, so this hasn't been a noticeable problem. But the DMA cacheline size can be larger on other platforms. Also, often rq_rcv_buf starts most of the way into a page, thus an additional RDMA segment is needed to map and register the end of that buffer. Try to avoid that scenario to reduce the cost of registering and invalidating Reply chunks. Instead of carrying a single regbuf that covers both rq_snd_buf and rq_rcv_buf, each struct rpcrdma_req now carries one regbuf for rq_snd_buf and one regbuf for rq_rcv_buf. Some incidental changes worth noting: - To clear out some spaghetti, refactor xprt_rdma_allocate. - The value stored in rg_size is the same as the value stored in the iov.length field, so eliminate rg_size Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Currently there's a hidden and indirect mechanism for finding the rpcrdma_req that goes with an rpc_rqst. It depends on getting from the rq_buffer pointer in struct rpc_rqst to the struct rpcrdma_regbuf that controls that buffer, and then to the struct rpcrdma_req it goes with. This was done back in the day to avoid the need to add a per-rqst pointer or to alter the buf_free API when support for RPC-over-RDMA was introduced. I'm about to change the way regbuf's work to support larger inline thresholds. Now is a good time to replace this indirect mechanism with something that is more straightforward. I guess this should be considered a clean up. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
For xprtrdma, the RPC Call and Reply buffers are involved in real I/O operations. To start with, the DMA direction of the I/O for a Call is opposite that of a Reply. In the current arrangement, the Reply buffer address is on a four-byte alignment just past the call buffer. Would be friendlier on some platforms if that was at a DMA cache alignment instead. Because the current arrangement allocates a single memory region which contains both buffers, the RPC Reply buffer often contains a page boundary in it when the Call buffer is large enough (which is frequent). It would be a little nicer for setting up DMA operations (and possible registration of the Reply buffer) if the two buffers were separated, well-aligned, and contained as few page boundaries as possible. Now, I could just pad out the single memory region used for the pair of buffers. But frequently that would mean a lot of unused space to ensure the Reply buffer did not have a page boundary. Add a separate pointer to rpc_rqst that points right to the RPC Reply buffer. This makes no difference to xprtsock, but it will help xprtrdma in subsequent patches. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
xprtrdma needs to allocate the Call and Reply buffers separately. TBH, the reliance on using a single buffer for the pair of XDR buffers is transport implementation-specific. Instead of passing just the rq_buffer into the buf_free method, pass the task structure and let buf_free take care of freeing both XDR buffers at once. There's a micro-optimization here. In the common case, both xprt_release and the transport's buf_free method were checking if rq_buffer was NULL. Now the check is done only once per RPC. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
xprtrdma needs to allocate the Call and Reply buffers separately. TBH, the reliance on using a single buffer for the pair of XDR buffers is transport implementation-specific. Transports that want to allocate separate Call and Reply buffers will ignore the "size" argument anyway. Don't bother passing it. The buf_alloc method can't return two pointers. Instead, make the method's return value an error code, and set the rq_buffer pointer in the method itself. This gives call_allocate an opportunity to terminate an RPC instead of looping forever when a permanent problem occurs. If a request is just bogus, or the transport is in a state where it can't allocate resources for any request, there needs to be a way to kill the RPC right there and not loop. This immediately fixes a rare problem in the backchannel send path, which loops if the server happens to send a CB request whose call+reply size is larger than a page (which it shouldn't do yet). One more issue: looks like xprt_inject_disconnect was incorrectly placed in the failure path in call_allocate. It needs to be in the success path, as it is for other call-sites. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: there is some XDR initialization logic that is common to the forward channel and backchannel. Move it to an XDR header so it can be shared. rpc_rqst::rq_buffer points to a buffer containing big-endian data. Update its annotation as part of the clean up. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
Clean up: r_xprt is already available everywhere these macros are invoked, so just dereference that directly. RPCRDMA_INLINE_PAD_VALUE is no longer used, so it can simply be removed. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Use a setup function to call into the NFS layer to test an rpc_xprt for session trunking so as to not leak the rpc_xprt_switch into the nfs layer. Search for the address in the rpc_xprt_switch first so as not to put an unnecessary EXCHANGE_ID on the wire. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Give the NFS layer access to the rpc_xprt_switch_add_xprt function Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Give the NFS layer access to the xprt_switch_put function Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
rpc_task_set_client is only called from rpc_run_task after rpc_new_task and rpc_task_release_client is not needed as the task is new. When called from rpc_new_task, rpc_task_set_client also removed the assigned rpc_xprt which is not desired. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Clean up. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
由 Amitoj Kaur Chawla 提交于
The variable `err` is not used anywhere and just returns the predefined value `0` at the end of the function. Hence, remove the variable and return 0 explicitly. Signed-off-by: NAmitoj Kaur Chawla <amitoj1606@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
-
- 13 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chuck Lever 提交于
rsc_lookup steals the passed-in memory to avoid doing an allocation of its own, so we can't just pass in a pointer to memory that someone else is using. If we really want to avoid allocation there then maybe we should preallocate somwhere, or reference count these handles. For now we should revert. On occasion I see this on my server: kernel: kernel BUG at /home/cel/src/linux/linux-2.6/mm/slub.c:3851! kernel: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP kernel: Modules linked in: cts rpcsec_gss_krb5 sb_edac edac_core x86_pkg_temp_thermal intel_powerclamp coretemp kvm_intel kvm irqbypass crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel lrw gf128mul glue_helper ablk_helper cryptd btrfs xor iTCO_wdt iTCO_vendor_support raid6_pq pcspkr i2c_i801 i2c_smbus lpc_ich mfd_core mei_me sg mei shpchp wmi ioatdma ipmi_si ipmi_msghandler acpi_pad acpi_power_meter rpcrdma ib_ipoib rdma_ucm ib_ucm ib_uverbs ib_umad rdma_cm ib_cm iw_cm nfsd nfs_acl lockd grace auth_rpcgss sunrpc ip_tables xfs libcrc32c mlx4_ib mlx4_en ib_core sr_mod cdrom sd_mod ast drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops ttm drm crc32c_intel igb mlx4_core ahci libahci libata ptp pps_core dca i2c_algo_bit i2c_core dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod kernel: CPU: 7 PID: 145 Comm: kworker/7:2 Not tainted 4.8.0-rc4-00006-g9d06b0b #15 kernel: Hardware name: Supermicro Super Server/X10SRL-F, BIOS 1.0c 09/09/2015 kernel: Workqueue: events do_cache_clean [sunrpc] kernel: task: ffff8808541d8000 task.stack: ffff880854344000 kernel: RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff811e7075>] [<ffffffff811e7075>] kfree+0x155/0x180 kernel: RSP: 0018:ffff880854347d70 EFLAGS: 00010246 kernel: RAX: ffffea0020fe7660 RBX: ffff88083f9db064 RCX: 146ff0f9d5ec5600 kernel: RDX: 000077ff80000000 RSI: ffff880853f01500 RDI: ffff88083f9db064 kernel: RBP: ffff880854347d88 R08: ffff8808594ee000 R09: ffff88087fdd8780 kernel: R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffffea0020fe76c0 R12: ffff880853f01500 kernel: R13: ffffffffa013cf76 R14: ffffffffa013cff0 R15: ffffffffa04253a0 kernel: FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88087fdc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 kernel: CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 kernel: CR2: 00007fed60b020c3 CR3: 0000000001c06000 CR4: 00000000001406e0 kernel: Stack: kernel: ffff8808589f2f00 ffff880853f01500 0000000000000001 ffff880854347da0 kernel: ffffffffa013cf76 ffff8808589f2f00 ffff880854347db8 ffffffffa013d006 kernel: ffff8808589f2f20 ffff880854347e00 ffffffffa0406f60 0000000057c7044f kernel: Call Trace: kernel: [<ffffffffa013cf76>] rsc_free+0x16/0x90 [auth_rpcgss] kernel: [<ffffffffa013d006>] rsc_put+0x16/0x30 [auth_rpcgss] kernel: [<ffffffffa0406f60>] cache_clean+0x2e0/0x300 [sunrpc] kernel: [<ffffffffa04073ee>] do_cache_clean+0xe/0x70 [sunrpc] kernel: [<ffffffff8109a70f>] process_one_work+0x1ff/0x3b0 kernel: [<ffffffff8109b15c>] worker_thread+0x2bc/0x4a0 kernel: [<ffffffff8109aea0>] ? rescuer_thread+0x3a0/0x3a0 kernel: [<ffffffff810a0ba4>] kthread+0xe4/0xf0 kernel: [<ffffffff8169c47f>] ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40 kernel: [<ffffffff810a0ac0>] ? kthread_stop+0x110/0x110 kernel: Code: f7 ff ff eb 3b 65 8b 05 da 30 e2 7e 89 c0 48 0f a3 05 a0 38 b8 00 0f 92 c0 84 c0 0f 85 d1 fe ff ff 0f 1f 44 00 00 e9 f5 fe ff ff <0f> 0b 49 8b 03 31 f6 f6 c4 40 0f 85 62 ff ff ff e9 61 ff ff ff kernel: RIP [<ffffffff811e7075>] kfree+0x155/0x180 kernel: RSP <ffff880854347d70> kernel: ---[ end trace 3fdec044969def26 ]--- It seems to be most common after a server reboot where a client has been using a Kerberos mount, and reconnects to continue its workload. Signed-off-by: NChuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 10 9月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcelo Ricardo Leitner 提交于
Previously, without GSO, it was easy to identify it: if the chunk didn't fit and there was no data chunk in the packet yet, we could fragment at IP level. So if there was an auth chunk and we were bundling a big data chunk, it would fragment regardless of the size of the auth chunk. This also works for the context of PMTU reductions. But with GSO, we cannot distinguish such PMTU events anymore, as the packet is allowed to exceed PMTU. So we need another check: to ensure that the chunk that we are adding, actually fits the current PMTU. If it doesn't, trigger a flush and let it be fragmented at IP level in the next round. Signed-off-by: NMarcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 9月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Artem Germanov 提交于
Commit 76174004 (tcp: do not slow start when cwnd equals ssthresh ) introduced regression in TCP YeAH. Using 100ms delay 1% loss virtual ethernet link kernel 4.2 shows bandwidth ~500KB/s for single TCP connection and kernel 4.3 and above (including 4.8-rc4) shows bandwidth ~100KB/s. That is caused by stalled cwnd when cwnd equals ssthresh. This patch fixes it by proper increasing cwnd in this case. Signed-off-by: NArtem Germanov <agermanov@anchorfree.com> Acked-by: NDmitry Adamushko <d.adamushko@anchorfree.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
When DATA and/or FIN are carried in a SYN/ACK message or SYN message, we append an skb in socket receive queue, but we forget to call sk_forced_mem_schedule(). Effect is that the socket has a negative sk->sk_forward_alloc as long as the message is not read by the application. Josh Hunt fixed a similar issue in commit d22e1537 ("tcp: fix tcp fin memory accounting") Fixes: 168a8f58 ("tcp: TCP Fast Open Server - main code path") Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Hunt <johunt@akamai.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-