1. 24 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  2. 22 10月, 2019 5 次提交
  3. 18 10月, 2019 2 次提交
  4. 16 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  5. 10 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  6. 09 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 08 10月, 2019 2 次提交
  8. 28 9月, 2019 1 次提交
    • M
      drm/i915: check for kernel_context · b178a3f6
      Matthew Auld 提交于
      Explosions during early driver init on the error path. Make sure we fail
      gracefully.
      
      [ 9547.672258] BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 000000000000007c
      [ 9547.672288] #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode
      [ 9547.672292] #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page
      [ 9547.672296] PGD 8000000846b41067 P4D 8000000846b41067 PUD 797034067 PMD 0
      [ 9547.672303] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP PTI
      [ 9547.672307] CPU: 1 PID: 25634 Comm: i915_selftest Tainted: G     U            5.3.0-rc8+ #73
      [ 9547.672313] Hardware name:  /NUC6i7KYB, BIOS KYSKLi70.86A.0050.2017.0831.1924 08/31/2017
      [ 9547.672395] RIP: 0010:intel_context_unpin+0x9/0x100 [i915]
      [ 9547.672400] Code: 6b 60 00 e9 17 ff ff ff bd fc ff ff ff e9 7c ff ff ff 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
       00 0f 1f 40 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 55 53 <8b> 47 7c 83 f8 01 74 26 8d 48 ff f0 0f b1 4f 7c 48 8d 57 7c
       75 05
      [ 9547.672413] RSP: 0018:ffffae8ac24ff878 EFLAGS: 00010246
      [ 9547.672417] RAX: ffff944a1b7842d0 RBX: ffff944a1b784000 RCX: ffff944a12dd6fa8
      [ 9547.672422] RDX: ffff944a1b7842c0 RSI: ffff944a12dd5328 RDI: 0000000000000000
      [ 9547.672428] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: ffff944a11e5d840 R09: 0000000000000000
      [ 9547.672433] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
      [ 9547.672438] R13: ffffffffc11aaf00 R14: 00000000ffffffe4 R15: ffff944a0e29bf38
      [ 9547.672443] FS:  00007fc259b88ac0(0000) GS:ffff944a1f880000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [ 9547.672449] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
      [ 9547.672454] CR2: 000000000000007c CR3: 0000000853346003 CR4: 00000000003606e0
      [ 9547.672459] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
      [ 9547.672464] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
      [ 9547.672469] Call Trace:
      [ 9547.672518]  intel_engine_cleanup_common+0xe3/0x270 [i915]
      [ 9547.672567]  execlists_destroy+0xe/0x30 [i915]
      [ 9547.672669]  intel_engines_init+0x94/0xf0 [i915]
      [ 9547.672749]  i915_gem_init+0x191/0x950 [i915]
      Signed-off-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190927173409.31175-2-matthew.auld@intel.com
      b178a3f6
  9. 20 9月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Mark i915_request.timeline as a volatile, rcu pointer · d19d71fc
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      The request->timeline is only valid until the request is retired (i.e.
      before it is completed). Upon retiring the request, the context may be
      unpinned and freed, and along with it the timeline may be freed. We
      therefore need to be very careful when chasing rq->timeline that the
      pointer does not disappear beneath us. The vast majority of users are in
      a protected context, either during request construction or retirement,
      where the timeline->mutex is held and the timeline cannot disappear. It
      is those few off the beaten path (where we access a second timeline) that
      need extra scrutiny -- to be added in the next patch after first adding
      the warnings about dangerous access.
      
      One complication, where we cannot use the timeline->mutex itself, is
      during request submission onto hardware (under spinlocks). Here, we want
      to check on the timeline to finalize the breadcrumb, and so we need to
      impose a second rule to ensure that the request->timeline is indeed
      valid. As we are submitting the request, it's context and timeline must
      be pinned, as it will be used by the hardware. Since it is pinned, we
      know the request->timeline must still be valid, and we cannot submit the
      idle barrier until after we release the engine->active.lock, ergo while
      submitting and holding that spinlock, a second thread cannot release the
      timeline.
      
      v2: Don't be lazy inside selftests; hold the timeline->mutex for as long
      as we need it, and tidy up acquiring the timeline with a bit of
      refactoring (i915_active_add_request)
      Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190919111912.21631-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      d19d71fc
  10. 17 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  11. 29 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  12. 24 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  13. 20 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  14. 17 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  15. 16 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  16. 14 8月, 2019 2 次提交
  17. 12 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  18. 10 8月, 2019 2 次提交
  19. 09 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  20. 08 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  21. 07 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  22. 06 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  23. 04 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  24. 03 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  25. 29 7月, 2019 2 次提交
  26. 19 7月, 2019 3 次提交
  27. 16 7月, 2019 2 次提交
  28. 13 7月, 2019 1 次提交