- 03 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
We're using macro EXT4_B2C() to convert number of blocks to number of clusters for bigalloc file systems. However, we should be using EXT4_NUM_B2C(). Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 23 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lukas Czerner 提交于
ext4_has_free_clusters() should tell us whether there is enough free clusters to allocate, however number of free clusters in the file system is converted to blocks using EXT4_C2B() which is not only wrong use of the macro (we should have used EXT4_NUM_B2C) but it's also completely wrong concept since everything else is in cluster units. Moreover when calculating number of root clusters we should be using macro EXT4_NUM_B2C() instead of EXT4_B2C() otherwise the result might be off by one. However r_blocks_count should always be a multiple of the cluster ratio so doing a plain bit shift should be enough here. We avoid using EXT4_B2C() because it's confusing. As a result of the first problem number of free clusters is much bigger than it should have been and ext4_has_free_clusters() would return 1 even if there is really not enough free clusters available. Fix this by removing the EXT4_C2B() conversion of free clusters and using bit shift when calculating number of root clusters. This bug affects number of xfstests tests covering file system ENOSPC situation handling. With this patch most of the ENOSPC problems with bigalloc file system disappear, especially the errors caused by delayed allocation not having enough space when the actual allocation is finally requested. Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 13 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eryu Guan 提交于
Validate the bh pointer before using it, since ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait() might return NULL. I've seen this in fsfuzz testing. EXT4-fs error (device loop0): ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait:385: comm touch: Cannot get buffer for block bitmap - block_group = 0, block_bitmap = 3925999616 BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null) IP: [<ffffffff8121de25>] ext4_wait_block_bitmap+0x25/0xe0 ... Call Trace: [<ffffffff8121e1e5>] ext4_read_block_bitmap+0x35/0x60 [<ffffffff8125e9c6>] ext4_free_blocks+0x236/0xb80 [<ffffffff811d0d36>] ? __getblk+0x36/0x70 [<ffffffff811d0a5f>] ? __find_get_block+0x8f/0x210 [<ffffffff81191ef3>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x33/0x140 [<ffffffff812678e5>] ext4_xattr_release_block+0x1b5/0x1d0 [<ffffffff812679be>] ext4_xattr_delete_inode+0xbe/0x100 [<ffffffff81222a7c>] ext4_free_inode+0x7c/0x4d0 [<ffffffff812277b8>] ? ext4_mark_inode_dirty+0x88/0x230 [<ffffffff8122993c>] ext4_evict_inode+0x32c/0x490 [<ffffffff811b8cd7>] evict+0xa7/0x1c0 [<ffffffff811b8ed3>] iput_final+0xe3/0x170 [<ffffffff811b8f9e>] iput+0x3e/0x50 [<ffffffff812316fd>] ext4_add_nondir+0x4d/0x90 [<ffffffff81231d0b>] ext4_create+0xeb/0x170 [<ffffffff811aae9c>] vfs_create+0xac/0xd0 [<ffffffff811ac845>] lookup_open+0x185/0x1c0 [<ffffffff8129e3b9>] ? selinux_inode_permission+0xa9/0x170 [<ffffffff811acb54>] do_last+0x2d4/0x7a0 [<ffffffff811af743>] path_openat+0xb3/0x480 [<ffffffff8116a8a1>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x251/0x3b0 [<ffffffff811afc49>] do_filp_open+0x49/0xa0 [<ffffffff811bbaad>] ? __alloc_fd+0xdd/0x150 [<ffffffff8119da28>] do_sys_open+0x108/0x1f0 [<ffffffff8119db51>] sys_open+0x21/0x30 [<ffffffff81618959>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Also fix comment for ext4_read_block_bitmap_nowait() Signed-off-by: NEryu Guan <guaneryu@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 22 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tao Ma 提交于
In mke2fs, we only checksum the whole bitmap block and it is right. While in the kernel, we use EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP to indicate the size of the checksumed bitmap which is wrong when we enable bigalloc. The right size should be EXT4_CLUSTERS_PER_GROUP and this patch fixes it. Also as every caller of ext4_block_bitmap_csum_set and ext4_block_bitmap_csum_verify pass in EXT4_BLOCKS_PER_GROUP(sb)/8, we'd better removes this parameter and sets it in the function itself. Signed-off-by: NTao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 17 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
While in ext4_validate_block_bitmap(), if an block allocation bitmap is found to be invalid, we call ext4_error() while the block group is still locked. This causes ext4_commit_super() to call a function which might sleep while in an atomic context. There's no need to keep the block group locked at this point, so hoist the ext4_error() call up to ext4_validate_block_bitmap() and release the block group spinlock before calling ext4_error(). The reported stack trace can be found at: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.ext4/33731Reported-by: NDave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 01 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Make it possible for ext4_count_free to operate on buffers and not just data in buffer_heads. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 08 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Ext3 filesystems that are converted to use as many ext4 file system features as possible will enable uninit_bg to speed up e2fsck times. These file systems will have a native ext3 layout of inode tables and block allocation bitmaps (as opposed to ext4's flex_bg layout). Unfortunately, in these cases, when first allocating a block in an uninitialized block group, ext4 would incorrectly calculate the number of free blocks in that block group, and then errorneously report that the file system was corrupt: EXT4-fs error (device vdd): ext4_mb_generate_buddy:741: group 30, 32254 clusters in bitmap, 32258 in gd This problem can be reproduced via: mke2fs -q -t ext4 -O ^flex_bg /dev/vdd 5g mount -t ext4 /dev/vdd /mnt fallocate -l 4600m /mnt/test The problem was caused by a bone headed mistake in the check to see if a particular metadata block was part of the block group. Many thanks to Kees Cook for finding and bisecting the buggy commit which introduced this bug (commit fd034a84, present since v3.2). Reported-by: NSander Eikelenboom <linux@eikelenboom.it> Reported-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Tested-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 16 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 30 4月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
metadata_csum supersedes uninit_bg. Convert the ROCOMPAT uninit_bg flag check to a helper function that covers both, and make the checksum calculation algorithm use either crc16 or the metadata_csum chosen algorithm depending on which flag is set. Print a warning if we try to mount a filesystem with both feature flags set. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Darrick J. Wong 提交于
Compute and verify the checksum of the block bitmap; this checksum is stored in the block group descriptor. Signed-off-by: NDarrick J. Wong <djwong@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 21 2月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Heiko Carstens 提交于
Get rid of this one: fs/ext4/balloc.c: In function 'ext4_wait_block_bitmap': fs/ext4/balloc.c:405:3: warning: format '%llu' expects argument of type 'long long unsigned int', but argument 6 has type 'sector_t' [-Wformat] Happens because sector_t is u64 (unsigned long long) or unsigned long dependent on CONFIG_64BIT. Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
In ext4_read_{inode,block}_bitmap() we were setting bitmap_uptodate() before submitting the buffer for read. The is bad, since we check bitmap_uptodate() without locking the buffer, and so if another process is racing with us, it's possible that they will think the bitmap is uptodate even though the read has not completed yet, resulting in inodes and blocks potentially getting allocated more than once if we get really unlucky. Addresses-Google-Bug: 2828254 Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 05 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
A couple more functions can reasonably be made static if desired. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 22 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yongqiang Yang 提交于
sbi is not defined, so let ext4_free_blocks use EXT4_SB(sb) instead when EXT4FS_DEBUG is defined. Signed-off-by: NYongqiang Yang <xiaoqiangnk@gmail.com>
-
- 10 9月, 2011 11 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Rename the function so it is more clear what is going on. Also rename the various variables so it's clearer what's happening. Also fix a missing blocks to cluster conversion when reading the number of reserved blocks for root. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This function really claims a number of free clusters, not blocks, so rename it so it's clearer what's going on. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This function really returns the number of clusters after initializing an uninitalized block bitmap has been initialized. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This function really counts the free clusters reported in the block group descriptors, so rename it to reduce confusion. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The field bg_free_blocks_count_{lo,high} in the block group descriptor has been repurposed to hold the number of free clusters for bigalloc functions. So rename the functions so it makes it easier to read and audit the block allocation and block freeing code. Note: at this point in bigalloc development we doesn't support online resize, so this also makes it really obvious all of the places we need to fix up to add support for online resize. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Aditya Kali 提交于
With bigalloc changes, the i_blocks value was not correctly set (it was still set to number of blocks being used, but in case of bigalloc, we want i_blocks to represent the number of clusters being used). Since the quota subsystem sets the i_blocks value, this patch fixes the quota accounting and makes sure that the i_blocks value is set correctly. Signed-off-by: NAditya Kali <adityakali@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Convert the percpu counters s_dirtyblocks_counter and s_freeblocks_counter in struct ext4_super_info to be s_dirtyclusters_counter and s_freeclusters_counter. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Certain parts of the ext4 code base, primarily in mballoc.c, use a block group number and offset from the beginning of the block group. This offset is invariably used to index into the allocation bitmap, so change the offset to be denominated in units of clusters. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Add bigalloc support to ext4_init_block_bitmap() and ext4_free_blocks_after_init(). Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
The function ext4_free_blocks_after_init() used to be a #define of ext4_init_block_bitmap(). This actually made it difficult to understand how the function worked, and made it hard make changes to support clusters. So as an initial cleanup, I've separated out the functionality of initializing block bitmap from calculating the number of free blocks in the new block group. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
This makes it easier to understand how ext4_init_block_bitmap() works, and it will assist when we split out ext4_free_blocks_after_init() in the next commit. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 28 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
I found that ext4_ext_find_goal() and ext4_find_near() share the same code for returning a coloured start block based on i_block_group. We can refactor this into a common function so that they don't diverge in the future. Thanks to adilger for suggesting the new function name. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 25 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Allison Henderson 提交于
This patch adds an allocation request flag to the ext4_has_free_blocks function which enables the use of reserved blocks. This will allow a punch hole to proceed even if the disk is full. Punching a hole may require additional blocks to first split the extents. Because ext4_has_free_blocks is a low level function, the flag needs to be passed down through several functions listed below: ext4_ext_insert_extent ext4_ext_create_new_leaf ext4_ext_grow_indepth ext4_ext_split ext4_ext_new_meta_block ext4_mb_new_blocks ext4_claim_free_blocks ext4_has_free_blocks [ext4 punch hole patch series 1/5 v7] Signed-off-by: NAllison Henderson <achender@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Reviewed-by: NMingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
-
- 09 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Amir Goldstein 提交于
In preparation for the next patch, the function ext4_add_groupblocks() is moved to mballoc.c, where it could use some static functions. Signed-off-by: NAmir Goldstein <amir73il@users.sf.net> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 02 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shaohua Li 提交于
percpu_counter_sum_positive() never returns a negative value. Signed-off-by: NShaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
Fixes generated by 'codespell' and manually reviewed. Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi>
-
- 22 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiaying Zhang 提交于
- Add more ext4 tracepoints. - Change ext4 tracepoints to use dev_t field with MAJOR/MINOR macros so that we can save 4 bytes in the ring buffer on some platforms. - Add sync_mode to ext4_da_writepages, ext4_da_write_pages, and ext4_da_writepages_result tracepoints. Also remove for_reclaim field from ext4_da_writepages since it is usually not very useful. Signed-off-by: NJiaying Zhang <jiayingz@google.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 11 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Remove the short element i_delalloc_reserved_flag from the ext4_inode_info structure and replace it a new bit in i_state_flags. Since we have an ext4_inode_info for every ext4 inode cached in the inode cache, any savings we can produce here is a very good thing from a memory utilization perspective. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 28 10月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
Fix a namespace leak from fs/ext4 Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
These functions have no need to be exported beyond file context. No functions needed to be moved for this commit; just some function declarations changed to be static and removed from header files. (A similar patch was submitted by Eric Sandeen, but I wanted to handle code movement in separate patches to make sure code changes didn't accidentally get dropped.) Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 12 6月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
We don't need to set s_dirt in most of the ext4 code when journaling is enabled. In ext3/4 some of the summary statistics for # of free inodes, blocks, and directories are calculated from the per-block group statistics when the file system is mounted or unmounted. As a result the superblock doesn't have to be updated, either via the journal or by setting s_dirt. There are a few exceptions, most notably when resizing the file system, where the superblock needs to be modified --- and in that case it should be done as a journalled operation if possible, and s_dirt set only in no-journal mode. This patch will optimize out some unneeded disk writes when using ext4 with a journal. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 16 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
Because we can badly over-reserve metadata when we calculate worst-case, it complicates things for quota, since we must reserve and then claim later, retry on EDQUOT, etc. Quota is also a generally smaller pool than fs free blocks, so this over-reservation hurts more, and more often. I'm of the opinion that it's not the worst thing to allow metadata to push a user slightly over quota. This simplifies the code and avoids the false quota rejections that result from worst-case speculation. This patch stops the speculative quota-charging for worst-case metadata requirements, and just charges quota when the blocks are allocated at writeout. It also is able to remove the try-again loop on EDQUOT. This patch has been tested indirectly by running the xfstests suite with a hack to mount & enable quota prior to the test. I also did a more specific test of fragmenting freespace and then doing a large delalloc write under quota; quota stopped me at the right amount of file IO, and then the writeout generated enough metadata (due to the fragmentation) that it put me slightly over quota, as expected. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 04 3月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Akinobu Mita 提交于
There are duplicate macro definitions of in_range() in mballoc.h and balloc.c. This consolidates these two definitions into ext4.h, and changes extents.c to use in_range() as well. Signed-off-by: NAkinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
-
由 Akinobu Mita 提交于
This is a cleanup and simplification patch which takes some open-coded calculations to calculate the first block number of a group and converts them to use the (already defined) ext4_group_first_block_no() function. Signed-off-by: NAkinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger@sun.com>
-
- 16 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
Just a pet peeve of mine; we had a mishash of calls with either __func__ or "function_name" and the latter tends to get out of sync. I think it's easier to just hide the __func__ in a macro, and it'll be consistent from then on. Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-
- 22 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于
ext4_mb_free_blocks() is only called by ext4_free_blocks(), and the latter function doesn't really do much. So merge the two functions together, such that ext4_free_blocks() is now found in fs/ext4/mballoc.c. This saves about 200 bytes of compiled text space. Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
-