Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 11月, 2022 1 次提交
  3. 22 11月, 2022 4 次提交
  5. 16 11月, 2022 3 次提交
  7. 10 11月, 2022 1 次提交
  9. 03 11月, 2022 1 次提交
  11. 25 10月, 2022 1 次提交
  13. 15 10月, 2022 1 次提交
    • N
      drm/amd/display: Fix build breakage with CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n · 2130b87b
      由 Nathan Chancellor 提交于 
      After commit 8799c0be ("drm/amd/display: Fix vblank refcount in vrr
transition"), a build with CONFIG_DEBUG_FS=n is broken due to a
misplaced brace, along the lines of:

  In file included from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_trace.h:39,
                   from drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:41:
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c: At top level:
  ./include/drm/drm_atomic.h:864:9: error: expected identifier or ‘(’ before ‘for’
    864 |         for ((__i) = 0;                                                 \
        |         ^~~
  drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c:8317:9: note: in expansion of macro ‘for_each_new_crtc_in_state’
   8317 |         for_each_new_crtc_in_state(state, crtc, new_crtc_state, j)
        |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Move the brace within the #ifdef so that the file can be built with or
without CONFIG_DEBUG_FS.

Fixes: 8799c0be ("drm/amd/display: Fix vblank refcount in vrr transition")
Signed-off-by: NNathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      2130b87b
  15. 11 10月, 2022 2 次提交
  17. 07 10月, 2022 2 次提交
  19. 29 9月, 2022 2 次提交
  21. 22 9月, 2022 1 次提交
  23. 20 9月, 2022 2 次提交
  25. 14 9月, 2022 3 次提交
  27. 08 9月, 2022 2 次提交
    • G
      drm/amd/display: fix memory leak when using debugfs_lookup() · cbfac7fa
      由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于 
      When calling debugfs_lookup() the result must have dput() called on it,
otherwise the memory will leak over time.  Fix this up by properly
calling dput().

Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: hersen wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>
Cc: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
Cc: Thelford Williams <tdwilliamsiv@gmail.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Yongzhi Liu <lyz_cs@pku.edu.cn>
Cc: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com>
Cc: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
      cbfac7fa
    • G
      drm/amd/display: fix memory leak when using debugfs_lookup() · b73ac0ec
      由 Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于 
      When calling debugfs_lookup() the result must have dput() called on it,
otherwise the memory will leak over time.  Fix this up by properly
calling dput().

Cc: Harry Wentland <harry.wentland@amd.com>
Cc: Leo Li <sunpeng.li@amd.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com>
Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: hersen wu <hersenxs.wu@amd.com>
Cc: Wenjing Liu <wenjing.liu@amd.com>
Cc: Patrik Jakobsson <patrik.r.jakobsson@gmail.com>
Cc: Thelford Williams <tdwilliamsiv@gmail.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Yongzhi Liu <lyz_cs@pku.edu.cn>
Cc: Mikita Lipski <mikita.lipski@amd.com>
Cc: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Bhanuprakash Modem <bhanuprakash.modem@intel.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org>
Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Siqueira <Rodrigo.Siqueira@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
      b73ac0ec
  29. 03 9月, 2022 1 次提交
    • H
      drm/amdgpu: Register ACPI video backlight when skipping amdgpu backlight registration · c0f50c5d
      由 Hans de Goede 提交于 
      Typically the acpi_video driver will initialize before amdgpu, which
used to cause /sys/class/backlight/acpi_video0 to get registered and then
amdgpu would register its own amdgpu_bl# device later. After which
the drivers/acpi/video_detect.c code unregistered the acpi_video0 device
to avoid there being 2 backlight devices.

This means that userspace used to briefly see 2 devices and the
disappearing of acpi_video0 after a brief time confuses the systemd
backlight level save/restore code, see e.g.:
https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=269920

To fix this the ACPI video code has been modified to make backlight class
device registration a separate step, relying on the drm/kms driver to
ask for the acpi_video backlight registration after it is done setting up
its native backlight device.

Add a call to the new acpi_video_register_backlight() when amdgpu skips
registering its own backlight device because of either the firmware_flags
or the acpi_video_get_backlight_type() return value. This ensures that
if the acpi_video backlight device should be used, it will be available
before the amdgpu drm_device gets registered with userspace.
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
      c0f50c5d
  31. 02 9月, 2022 1 次提交
  33. 30 8月, 2022 1 次提交
  35. 26 8月, 2022 1 次提交
  37. 25 8月, 2022 1 次提交
    • H
      drm/amdgpu: Don't register backlight when another backlight should be used (v3) · da11ef83
      由 Hans de Goede 提交于 
      Before this commit when we want userspace to use the acpi_video backlight
device we register both the GPU's native backlight device and acpi_video's
firmware acpi_video# backlight device. This relies on userspace preferring
firmware type backlight devices over native ones.

Registering 2 backlight devices for a single display really is
undesirable, don't register the GPU's native backlight device when
another backlight device should be used.

Changes in v2:
- To avoid linker errors when amdgpu is builtin and video_detect.c is in
  a module, select ACPI_VIDEO and its deps if ACPI is enabled.
  When ACPI is disabled, ACPI_VIDEO is also always disabled, ensuring
  the stubs from acpi/video.h will be used.

Changes in v3:
- Use drm_info(drm_dev, "...") to log messages
- ACPI_VIDEO can now be enabled on non X86 too,
  adjust the Kconfig changes to match this.
Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
      da11ef83
  39. 24 8月, 2022 7 次提交
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Move all payload info into the atomic state · 4d07b0bc
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      Now that we've finally gotten rid of the non-atomic MST users leftover in
the kernel, we can finally get rid of all of the legacy payload code we
have and move as much as possible into the MST atomic state structs. The
main purpose of this is to make the MST code a lot less confusing to work
on, as there's a lot of duplicated logic that doesn't really need to be
here. As well, this should make introducing features like fallback link
retraining and DSC support far easier.

Since the old payload code was pretty gnarly and there's a Lot of changes
here, I expect this might be a bit difficult to review. So to make things
as easy as possible for reviewers, I'll sum up how both the old and new
code worked here (it took me a while to figure this out too!).

The old MST code basically worked by maintaining two different payload
tables - proposed_vcpis, and payloads. proposed_vcpis would hold the
modified payload we wanted to push to the topology, while payloads held the
payload table that was currently programmed in hardware. Modifications to
proposed_vcpis would be handled through drm_dp_allocate_vcpi(),
drm_dp_mst_deallocate_vcpi(), and drm_dp_mst_reset_vcpi_slots(). Then, they
would be pushed via drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step1() and
drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step2().

Furthermore, it's important to note how adding and removing VC payloads
actually worked with drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step1(). When a VC payload
is removed from the VC table, all VC payloads which come after the removed
VC payload's slots must have their time slots shifted towards the start of
the table. The old code handles this by looping through the entire payload
table and recomputing the start slot for every payload in the topology from
scratch. While very much overkill, this ends up doing the right thing
because we always order the VCPIs for payloads from first to last starting
timeslot.

It's important to also note that drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step2() isn't
actually limited to updating a single payload - the driver can use it to
queue up multiple payload changes so that as many of them can be sent as
possible before waiting for the ACT. This is -technically- not against
spec, but as Wayne Lin has pointed out it's not consistently implemented
correctly in hubs - so it might as well be.

drm_dp_mst_update_payload_step2() is pretty self explanatory and basically
the same between the old and new code, save for the fact we don't have a
second step for deleting payloads anymore -and thus rename it to
drm_dp_mst_add_payload_step2().

The new payload code stores all of the current payload info within the MST
atomic state and computes as much of the state as possible ahead of time.
This has the one exception of the starting timeslots for payloads, which
can't be determined at atomic check time since the starting time slots will
vary depending on what order CRTCs are enabled in the atomic state - which
varies from driver to driver. These are still stored in the atomic MST
state, but are only copied from the old MST state during atomic commit
time. Likewise, this is when new start slots are determined.

Adding/removing payloads now works much more closely to how things are
described in the spec. When we delete a payload, we loop through the
current list of payloads and update the start slots for any payloads whose
time slots came after the payload we just deleted. Determining the starting
time slots for new payloads being added is done by simply keeping track of
where the end of the VC table is in
drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr->next_start_slot. Additionally, it's worth noting
that we no longer have a single update_payload() function. Instead, we now
have drm_dp_mst_add_payload_step1|2() and drm_dp_mst_remove_payload(). As
such, it's now left it up to the driver to figure out when to add or remove
payloads. The driver already knows when it's disabling/enabling CRTCs, so
it also already knows when payloads should be added or removed.

Changes since v1:
* Refactor around all of the completely dead code changes that are
  happening in amdgpu for some reason when they really shouldn't even be
  there in the first place… :\
* Remove mention of sending one ACT per series of payload updates. As Wayne
  Lin pointed out, there are apparently hubs on the market that don't work
  correctly with this scheme and require a separate ACT per payload update.
* Fix accidental drop of mst_mgr.lock - Wayne Lin
* Remove mentions of allowing multiple ACT updates per payload change,
  mention that this is a result of vendors not consistently supporting this
  part of the spec and requiring a unique ACT for each payload change.
* Get rid of reference to drm_dp_mst_port in DC - turns out I just got
  myself confused by DC and we don't actually need this.
Changes since v2:
* Get rid of fix for not sending payload deallocations if ddps=0 and just
  go back to wayne's fix
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-18-lyude@redhat.com
      4d07b0bc
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Add helpers for serializing SST <-> MST transitions · a76eb429
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      There's another kind of situation where we could potentially race with
nonblocking modesets and MST, especially if we were to only use the locking
provided by atomic modesetting:

* Display 1 begins as enabled on DP-1 in SST mode
* Display 1 switches to MST mode, exposes one sink in MST mode
* Userspace does non-blocking modeset to disable the SST display
* Userspace does non-blocking modeset to enable the MST display with a
  different CRTC, but the SST display hasn't been fully taken down yet
* Execution order between the last two commits isn't guaranteed since they
  share no drm resources

We can fix this however, by ensuring that we always pull in the atomic
topology state whenever a connector capable of driving an MST display
performs its atomic check - and then tracking CRTC commits happening on the
SST connector in the MST topology state. So, let's add some simple helpers
for doing that and hook them up in various drivers.

v2:
* Use intel_dp_mst_source_support() to check for MST support in i915, fixes
  CI failures
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-14-lyude@redhat.com
      a76eb429
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Don't open code modeset checks for releasing time slots · ffac9721
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      I'm not sure why, but at the time I originally wrote the find/release time
slot helpers I thought we should avoid keeping modeset tracking out of the
MST helpers. In retrospect though there's no actual good reason to do
this, and the logic has ended up being identical across all the drivers
using the helpers. Also, it needs to be fixed anyway so we don't break
things when going atomic-only with MST.

So, let's just move this code into drm_dp_atomic_release_time_slots() and
stop open coding it.
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-10-lyude@redhat.com
      ffac9721
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Add nonblocking helpers for DP MST · a5c2c0d1
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      As Daniel Vetter pointed out, if we only use the atomic modesetting locks
with MST it's technically possible for a driver with non-blocking modesets
to race when it comes to MST displays - as we make the mistake of not doing
our own CRTC commit tracking in the topology_state object.

This could potentially cause problems if something like this happens:

* User starts non-blocking commit to disable CRTC-1 on MST topology 1
* User starts non-blocking commit to enable CRTC-2 on MST topology 1

There's no guarantee here that the commit for disabling CRTC-2 will only
occur after CRTC-1 has finished, since neither commit shares a CRTC - only
the private modesetting object for MST. Keep in mind this likely isn't a
problem for blocking modesets, only non-blocking.

So, begin fixing this by keeping track of which CRTCs on a topology have
changed by keeping track of which CRTCs we release or allocate timeslots
on. As well, add some helpers for:

* Setting up the drm_crtc_commit structs in the ->commit_setup hook
* Waiting for any CRTC dependencies from the previous topology state

v2:
* Use drm_dp_mst_atomic_setup_commit() directly - Jani
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-9-lyude@redhat.com
      a5c2c0d1
    • L
      drm/display/dp_mst: Call them time slots, not VCPI slots · df78f7f6
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      VCPI is only sort of the correct term here, originally the majority of this
code simply referred to timeslots vaguely as "slots" - and since I started
working on it and adding atomic functionality, the name "VCPI slots" has
been used to represent time slots.

Now that we actually have consistent access to the DisplayPort spec thanks
to VESA, I now know this isn't actually the proper term - as the
specification refers to these as time slots.

Since we're trying to make this code as easy to figure out as possible,
let's take this opportunity to correct this nomenclature and call them by
their proper name - timeslots. Likewise, we rename various functions
appropriately, along with replacing references in the kernel documentation
and various debugging messages.

It's important to note that this patch series leaves the legacy MST code
untouched for the most part, which is fine since we'll be removing it soon
anyhow. There should be no functional changes in this series.

v2:
* Add note that Wayne Lin from AMD suggested regarding slots being between
  the source DP Tx and the immediate downstream DP Rx
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-5-lyude@redhat.com
      df78f7f6
    • L
      drm/amdgpu/dm/mst: Rename get_payload_table() · dbaadb3c
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      This function isn't too confusing if you see the comment around the
call-site for it, but if you don't then it's not at all obvious this is
meant to copy DRM's payload table over to DC's internal state structs.
Seeing this function before finding that comment definitely threw me into a
loop a few times.

So, let's rename this to make it's purpose more obvious regardless of where
in the code you are.
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-3-lyude@redhat.com
      dbaadb3c
    • L
      drm/amdgpu/dc/mst: Rename dp_mst_stream_allocation(_table) · 8c5e9bbb
      由 Lyude Paul 提交于 
      Just to make this more clear to outside contributors that these are
DC-specific structs, as this also threw me into a loop a number of times
before I figured out the purpose of this.
Signed-off-by: NLyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com>
Cc: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin@amd.com>
Cc: Fangzhi Zuo <Jerry.Zuo@amd.com>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220817193847.557945-2-lyude@redhat.com
      8c5e9bbb
  41. 23 8月, 2022 1 次提交
    • M
      drm/amd/display: Include missing header · 441b12bc
      由 Maíra Canal 提交于 
      The file amdgpu_dm_plane.c missed the header amdgpu_dm_plane.h, which
resulted on the following warning:

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:1046:5:
warning: no previous prototype for 'fill_dc_scaling_info'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:1222:6:
warning: no previous prototype for 'handle_cursor_update'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:152:6:
warning: no previous prototype for 'modifier_has_dcc'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:1576:5:
warning: no previous prototype for 'amdgpu_dm_plane_init'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:157:10:
warning: no previous prototype for 'modifier_gfx9_swizzle_mode'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:752:5:
warning: no previous prototype for 'fill_plane_buffer_attributes'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:83:31:
warning: no previous prototype for 'amd_get_format_info'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:88:6:
warning: no previous prototype for 'fill_blending_from_plane_state'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:992:5:
warning: no previous prototype for 'dm_plane_helper_check_state'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]

Therefore, include the missing header on the file and turn global functions
that are not used outside of the file into static functions.

Fixes: 5d945cbc ("drm/amd/display: Create a file dedicated to planes")
Reported-by: Nkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMaíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
      441b12bc
  43. 20 8月, 2022 1 次提交
    • M
      drm/amd/display: Include missing header · 2035590f
      由 Maíra Canal 提交于 
      The file amdgpu_dm_plane.c missed the header amdgpu_dm_plane.h, which
resulted on the following warning:

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:1046:5:
warning: no previous prototype for 'fill_dc_scaling_info'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:1222:6:
warning: no previous prototype for 'handle_cursor_update'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:152:6:
warning: no previous prototype for 'modifier_has_dcc'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:1576:5:
warning: no previous prototype for 'amdgpu_dm_plane_init'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:157:10:
warning: no previous prototype for 'modifier_gfx9_swizzle_mode'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:752:5:
warning: no previous prototype for 'fill_plane_buffer_attributes'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:83:31:
warning: no previous prototype for 'amd_get_format_info'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:88:6:
warning: no previous prototype for 'fill_blending_from_plane_state'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/../display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_plane.c:992:5:
warning: no previous prototype for 'dm_plane_helper_check_state'
[-Wmissing-prototypes]

Therefore, include the missing header on the file and turn global functions
that are not used outside of the file into static functions.

Fixes: 5d945cbc ("drm/amd/display: Create a file dedicated to planes")
Reported-by: Nkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMaíra Canal <mairacanal@riseup.net>
Signed-off-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
      2035590f