1. 25 3月, 2011 2 次提交
    • D
      fs: move i_wb_list out from under inode_lock · a66979ab
      Dave Chinner 提交于
      Protect the inode writeback list with a new global lock
      inode_wb_list_lock and use it to protect the list manipulations and
      traversals. This lock replaces the inode_lock as the inodes on the
      list can be validity checked while holding the inode->i_lock and
      hence the inode_lock is no longer needed to protect the list.
      Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      a66979ab
    • D
      fs: protect inode->i_state with inode->i_lock · 250df6ed
      Dave Chinner 提交于
      Protect inode state transitions and validity checks with the
      inode->i_lock. This enables us to make inode state transitions
      independently of the inode_lock and is the first step to peeling
      away the inode_lock from the code.
      
      This requires that __iget() is done atomically with i_state checks
      during list traversals so that we don't race with another thread
      marking the inode I_FREEING between the state check and grabbing the
      reference.
      
      Also remove the unlock_new_inode() memory barrier optimisation
      required to avoid taking the inode_lock when clearing I_NEW.
      Simplify the code by simply taking the inode->i_lock around the
      state change and wakeup. Because the wakeup is no longer tricky,
      remove the wake_up_inode() function and open code the wakeup where
      necessary.
      Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      250df6ed
  2. 24 3月, 2011 35 次提交
  3. 23 3月, 2011 3 次提交