Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 30 6月, 2016 2 次提交
  3. 23 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 20 5月, 2016 4 次提交
  7. 07 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  9. 10 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 04 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 18 2月, 2016 3 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915: Enable PSR by default on Haswell and Broadwell. · 9b58e352
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      With a reliable frontbuffer tracking and all instability corner cases
on Haswell and Broadwell solved let's re-enabled PSR by default on
these platforms.

In case a new issue is found and PSR is the main suspect, please check
if i915.enable_psr=0 really makes your problem go away. If this is the case
PSR is the culprit so after that please check if i915.enable_psr=2
or i915.enable_psr=3 solves your issue and please let us know.
There are many panels out there and not all implementations apparently
work as we would expect.

In case you needed to force it on standby or disabled or in case of any
PSR related bug please report it at bugs.freedesktop.org.
In a bugzilla entry for PSR is desirable:
- dmesg (drm.debug=0xe)
- output of /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status
- Platform information. Vendor, model, id, pci id.
- Graphical environment: Gnome, KDE, openbox, etc...
- Details how to reproduce.
- Also good if you could run PSR test cases of Intel-gpu-tools
- Please mention if forcing main link standby or main link off helps you.

There are Intel-gpu-tools test cases that can be helpful to
determine if PSR is working as expected:
kms_psr_sink_crc and kms_psr_frontbuffer_tracking.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1455278893-1307-2-git-send-email-rodrigo.vivi@intel.comSigned-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      9b58e352
    • R
      drm/i915: Enable PSR by default on Valleyview and Cherryview. · a38c274f
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      With a reliable frontbuffer tracking and all instability corner cases
solved for this platform let's re-enabled PSR by default.

In case a new issue is found and PSR is the main suspect, please check
if i915.enable_psr=0 really makes your problem go away,
please report it at bugs.freedesktop.org.

In a bugzilla entry for PSR is desirable:
- dmesg (drm.debug=0xe)
- output of /sys/kernel/debug/dri/0/i915_edp_psr_status
- Platform information. Vendor, model, id, pci id.
- Graphical environment: Gnome, KDE, openbox, etc...
- Details how to reproduce.
- Also good if you could run PSR test cases of Intel-gpu-tools
- Please mention if forcing main link standby or main link off helps you.

There are Intel-gpu-tools test cases that can be helpful to
determine if PSR is working as expected:
 kms_psr_sink_crc and kms_psr_frontbuffer_tracking.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      a38c274f
    • R
      drm/i915: Change i915.enable_psr parameter to use per platform default. · d94d6e87
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      This will give us flexibility to enable PSR by default independently so
issues and corner cases in one platform won't affect others were we have
it working properly.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      d94d6e87
  15. 02 2月, 2016 3 次提交
  17. 12 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 10 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  21. 08 12月, 2015 1 次提交
  23. 24 11月, 2015 4 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915: Also disable PSR on Sink when disabling it on Source. · b6e4d534
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      It is not a bad idea to disable the PSR feature on Sink
when we are disabling on the Source.

v2: Move dpcd write inside mutex protected area as suggested by Sonika.

Cc: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Suggested-by: NSonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NSonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      b6e4d534
    • R
      drm/i915: PSR: Mask LPSP hw tracking back again. · bb929cbc
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      When we introduced PSR we let LPSP masked allowing us to get PSR
independently from the audio runtime PM. However in one of the
attempts to get PSR enabled by default one user reported one specific
case where he would miss screen updates if scrolling the firefox in a
Gnome environment when i915 runtime pm was enabled. So for
this specific case that (I could never create an i-g-t test case)
we decided to remove the LPSP mask and let HW tracking taking care of
this case. The mask got removed later by my
commit 09108b90 ("drm/i915: PSR: Remove Low Power HW tracking mask.")

So we started depending on audio driver again, what is bad.

With previous commit
"drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking."
we transfered the PSR exit responsability totally to SW frontbuffer
tracking. So now can safelly shut off a bit the HW tracking, or
at least this case that makes us to depend on other drivers.

v2: Update commit message since this patch by itself doesn't solve
    the bugzilla entries.

v3: Another attempt to improve commit message.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: NBrian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau@intel.com
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      bb929cbc
    • R
      drm/i915: PSR: Let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking. · 921ec285
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      The ultimate goal here is to remove the dependency we
currently have on audio driver power to get PSR working.
Since with audio driver runtime PM disabled the Hardware tracking
believes graphics is fully active and prevent PSR Entry, or
in other words continuously exit PSR.

So, the idea is to transfer the PSR exit responsability
from the HW tracking to the SW tracking (frontbuffer tracking),
who is really mature right now.

However with LPSP masked out there might be cases where we could
miss exit from HW tracking since it can be relying on this,
like a specific case reported at our mailing list who
user reported he would miss screen updates if scrolling firefox
in a Gnome environment when i915 runtimepm was enabled.

So before masking out LPSP again to make us independent from
the audio driver we need to make sure that all our cases
are coverred from the frontbuffer tracking perspective,
where the flush means invalidate and flush.

Without this patch for HSW, BDW and SKL we just do the
invalidate part when the flush wasn't originated by a page flip
because we were trusting the HW tracking for the flip case.

So let's rely more on frontbuffer tracking and do the
invalidation regardless the origin as expected for all platforms.

v2: Improve commit message as suggested by Paulo.

v3: Another attempt to let commit message more clear.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau@intel.com
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      921ec285
    • R
      drm/i915: Remove duplicated dpcd write on hsw_psr_enable_sink. · ca1a9533
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      Commit (89251b17) intended to remove this line and let only one
DP_PSR_EN_CFG set, but it was wrong and this call is now duplicated
at the code.

Also "& ~DP_PSR_MAIN_LINK_ACTIVE" doesn't do anything at all. It
was like that since I introduced this call but probably the idea
was to be informative and make clear statement that we were not using
the link standby. So it is better to remove this one here and let
the code a bit cleaner.

v2: Improve commit message as requested by Paulo.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Tested-by: NBrian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau damien.lespiau@intel.com
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      ca1a9533
  25. 18 11月, 2015 5 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915: Send TP1 TP2/3 even when panel claims no NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT. · 81e4e0c9
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      On the commit 3301d409 ("drm/i915: PSR: Fix DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT logic")'
we already had identified that DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT
doesn't mean we shouldn't send TPS patterns, however we start sending the
minimal TP1 as possible and no TP2.

For most of the panels this is ok, but we found a reported case where
this is not true and panel keeps frozen without updating the screen for a while.

We could just get this case after patch "PSR: Don't Skip aux handshake on
DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT." is applied since that one fix the
hard freeze on this kind of panels.

Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91436#c19

Cc: Ivan Mitev <ivan.mitev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDurgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      81e4e0c9
    • R
      drm/i915: PSR: Don't Skip aux handshake on DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT. · bebbeaca
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      Since the beginning there is a confusion on the meaning of this bit.

A previous patch had identified this already and fixed it partially:
'commit 3301d409 ("drm/i915: PSR: Fix DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT logic")

DP_PSR_NO_TRAIN_ON_EXIT means the source doesn't need to do the
training, but it doesn't tell to avoid TP patterns or to skip
aux handshake.

This patch fixes the hard freeze reported.

Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91436
Reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91437

Cc: Ivan Mitev <ivan.mitev@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDurgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      bebbeaca
    • R
      drm/i915: Reduce PSR re-activation time for VLV/CHV. · 20bb97fe
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      With 'commit 30886c5a ("drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR: Increase wait delay
 time before active PSR.")' we fixed a blank screen when first
activation was happening immediately after PSR being enabled.
There we gave more time for idleness by increasing the delay
between re-activating sequences.

However, commit "drm/i915: Delay first PSR activation."
delay the first activation in a better way keeping a good PSR
residency. So, we can now reduce the delay on re-enable.
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDurgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      20bb97fe
    • R
      drm/i915: Delay first PSR activation. · d0ac896a
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      When debuging the frozen screen caused by HW tracking with low
power state I noticed that if we keep moving the mouse non stop
you will miss the screen updates for a while. At least
until we stop moving the mouse for a small time and move again.

The actual enabling should happen immediately after
Display Port enabling sequence finished with links trained and
everything enabled. However we face many issues when enabling PSR
right after a modeset.

On VLV/CHV we face blank screens on this scenario and on HSW+
we face a recoverable frozen screen, at least until next
exit-activate sequence.

Another workaround for the same issue here would be to increase
re-enable idle time from 100 to 500 as we did for VLV/CHV.
However this patch workaround this issue in a better
way since it doesn't reduce PSR residency and also
allow us to reduce the delay time between re-enables at least
on VLV/CHV.

This is also important to make the sysfs toggle working properly.
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDurgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      d0ac896a
    • V
      drm/i915: Type safe register read/write · f0f59a00
      由 Ville Syrjälä 提交于 
      Make I915_READ and I915_WRITE more type safe by wrapping the register
offset in a struct. This should eliminate most of the fumbles we've had
with misplaced parens.

This only takes care of normal mmio registers. We could extend the idea
to other register types and define each with its own struct. That way
you wouldn't be able to accidentally pass the wrong thing to a specific
register access function.

The gpio_reg setup is probably the ugliest thing left. But I figure I'd
just leave it for now, and wait for some divine inspiration to strike
before making it nice.

As for the generated code, it's actually a bit better sometimes. Eg.
looking at i915_irq_handler(), we can see the following change:
  lea    0x70024(%rdx,%rax,1),%r9d
  mov    $0x1,%edx
- movslq %r9d,%r9
- mov    %r9,%rsi
- mov    %r9,-0x58(%rbp)
- callq  *0xd8(%rbx)
+ mov    %r9d,%esi
+ mov    %r9d,-0x48(%rbp)
 callq  *0xd8(%rbx)

So previously gcc thought the register offset might be signed and
decided to sign extend it, just in case. The rest appears to be
mostly just minor shuffling of instructions.

v2: i915_mmio_reg_{offset,equal,valid}() helpers added
    s/_REG/_MMIO/ in the register defines
    mo more switch statements left to worry about
    ring_emit stuff got sorted in a prep patch
    cmd parser, lrc context and w/a batch buildup also in prep patch
    vgpu stuff cleaned up and moved to a prep patch
    all other unrelated changes split out
v3: Rebased due to BXT DSI/BLC, MOCS, etc.
v4: Rebased due to churn, s/i915_mmio_reg_t/i915_reg_t/
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1447853606-2751-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
      f0f59a00
  27. 16 11月, 2015 3 次提交
  29. 13 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  31. 05 8月, 2015 1 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR: Increase wait delay time before active PSR. · 30886c5a
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
time for idleness. Different from core platforms where we have idle_frames
count.

Also kms_psr_sink_crc now is automated and always get this:

[drm:intel_enable_pipe] enabling pipe A
[drm:intel_edp_backlight_on]
[drm:intel_panel_enable_backlight] pipe
[drm:intel_panel_enable_backlight] pipe A
[drm:intel_panel_actually_set_backlight] set backlight PWM = 7812

PSR gets enabled somewhere here after backlight.

[drm:intel_get_hpd_pins] hotplug event received, stat 0x00000000, dig 0x0
[drm:vlv_pipe_set_fifo_size] Pipe A FIFO split 511 / 511 / 511
[drm:vlv_update_wm] Setting FIFO watermarks - A: plane=391, cursor=63, sp

PSR gets flushed around here by intel_atomic_commit

[drm:vlv_pipe_set_fifo_size] Pipe A FIFO split 511 / 511 / 511
[drm:vlv_update_wm] Setting FIFO watermarks - A: plane=391, cursor=63, sp
[drm:intel_set_memory_cxsr] memory self-refresh is enabled
[drm:intel_connector_check_state] [CONNECTOR:39:eDP-1]
[drm:check_encoder_state] [ENCODER:30:DAC-30]
[drm:check_encoder_state] [ENCODER:31:TMDS-31]
[drm:check_encoder_state] [ENCODER:36:TMDS-36]
[drm:check_encoder_state] [ENCODER:38:TMDS-38]
[drm:check_crtc_state] [CRTC:21]
[drm:check_crtc_state] [CRTC:26]
[drm:intel_psr_activate [i915]] *ERROR* PSR Active
[drm:intel_get_hpd_pins] hotplug event received, stat 0x00000000, dig 0x
[drm:intel_set_cpu_fifo_underrun_reporting [i915]] *ERROR* pipe A underrun
[drm:intel_cpu_fifo_underrun_irq_handler [i915]] *ERROR* CPU pipe A FIFO
Underrun.

It is true that in a product we won't keep disabling and enabling planes so
frequently, but for safeness let's stay conservative.

It is also true that 500ms is an etternity. But PSR is anyway a power saving
feature for idle scenario. So if it is idle feature stays on and 500ms to get
it reanabled is not that insane.

v2: Rebase over intel_psr.c and fix typo.
v3: Revival: Manual tests indicated that this is needed. With a short delay
    there is a huge risk of getting blank screens when planes are being enabled.
v4: Revival 2 with reasonable delay. 1/2 sec instead of 5. VBT is 10 sec but
    actually time for link training what we aren't doing, but with only 100 sec
    in some cases kms_psr_sink_crc manual was showing blank screen,
    so let's use this for now. Also changed comment by a FIXME.
v5: Rebase after a long time, remove FIXME and update comment above.
v6: msecs_to_jiffies is already on delay. remove duplication.
v7: use msecs_to_jiffies on schedule_delayed_work call.

Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com> (v4)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact: shuang.he@intel.com)
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      30886c5a
  33. 10 7月, 2015 2 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915: PSR: Increase idle_frames · 97173eaf
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      Idle frames the number of identical frames needed
before panel can enter PSR.

There are some panels that requires up to minimum of 4 idle
frames available on the market. For these cases usually
VBT should be used to configure the number of idle frames,
but unfortunately this isn't always true and VBT isn't being
set at all.

Let's trust VBT when it is set + 1  and use minimum of 4 + 1
when VBT isn't set. "+1" covers the "of-by-one" case.
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      97173eaf
    • R
      drm/i915: PSR: Remove Low Power HW tracking mask. · 09108b90
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      By Spec we should only mask memup and hotplug detection
for hardware tracking cases. However we always masked
LPSP because with power well always enabled on audio
PSR was never being activated and residency was always
zeroed.

Apparently audio driver is tying power well management
and runtime PM for some reason. But with audio runtime
PM working or with audio completely out of picture
we should remove this mask, otherwise we have a high
risk of miss screen updates as faced by Matthew.

WARNING: With this patch if snd_intel_hda driver is
running and not releasing power well properly PSR will
constant Exit and Performance Counter will be 0.

But the best thing of this patch is that with one more
HW tracking working the risks of missed blank screen
are minimized at most.

This affects just core platforms where PSR exit are also
helped by HW tracking: Haswell, Broadwell and Skylake
for now.

v2: Fix commit message explanation. It has nothing to do
with runtime PM on i915 as previously advertised.

Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      09108b90
  35. 09 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915: PSR: Flush means invalidate + flush · 169de131
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      Since flush actually means invalidate + flush we need to force psr
exit on PSR flush.

On Core platforms there is no way to disable hw tracking and
do the pure sw tracking so we simulate it by fully disable psr and
reschedule a enable back.
So a good idea is to minimize sequential disable/enable in cases we
know that HW tracking like when flush has been originated by a flip.
Also flip had just invalidated it already.

It also uses origin to minimize the a bit the amount of
disable/enabled, mainly when flip already had invalidated.

With this patch in place it is possible to do a flush on dirty areas
properly in a following patch.

v2: Remove duplicated exit on HSW+Sprites as pointed out by Paulo.

Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      169de131
  37. 24 6月, 2015 2 次提交
  39. 15 4月, 2015 2 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915: PSR VLV: Add single frame update. · c7240c3b
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      According to spec: "In PSR HW or SW mode, SW set this bit before writing
registers for a flip. It will be self-clear when it gets to the PSR
active state."

Some versions of spec mention that this is needed when in
"Persistent mode" but define it as same as "SW mode". Since this
fix the page flip case let's assume this is exactly what we need.

Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan <dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c7240c3b
    • R
      drm/i915: PSR: deprecate link_standby support for core platforms. · 89251b17
      由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于 
      On Haswell and Broadwell with link in standby when exit event happens
between vblank and VSC packet, PSR exit on panel but DPA transmitter
still sends black pixel. When this condition hits, panel will intermittently
display black frame.

The known W/A for this case involve the of single_frame update
that isn't supported on Haswell and to be supported on Broadwell
3 other workarounds would be required. So it is better and safe to
just deprecate link_standby for now.

Also, link fully off saves more power than link_standby and afwk
no OEM is requesting link standby on VBT. There is no reason for that.

For Skylake let's just consider it behaves like Broadwell until
we prove otherwise.

v2: Fix commit message (Durga).

v3: Fix conflict with PSR2.

Reference: HSD: bdwgfx/1912559
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDurgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      89251b17