1. 16 5月, 2008 1 次提交
    • P
      [POWERPC] Defer processing of interrupts when the CPU wakes from sleep mode · a560643e
      Paul Mackerras 提交于
      This provides a way to defer processing of an interrupt that wakes the
      processor out of sleep mode.  On 32-bit platforms that use an
      interrupt to wake the processor, we have to have interrupts enabled in
      hardware at the point where we go to sleep, otherwise the processor
      will never wake up.  However, because interrupts are logically
      disabled at this point, we don't want to process the interrupt
      straight away.
      
      This is handled by setting the _TLF_SLEEPING flag.  When we get an
      interrupt and _TLF_SLEEPING is set, we firstly clear the MSR_EE
      (external interrupt enable) bit in the saved MSR value, and secondly
      we then return to the address in the link register, like we do for
      _TLF_NAPPING, but without actually handling the interrupt.
      
      Note that this is handled somewhat differently on powerbooks, so this
      new code will only be used on non-Apple machines.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      a560643e
  2. 14 5月, 2008 1 次提交
  3. 24 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  4. 01 8月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 14 6月, 2007 1 次提交
  6. 14 12月, 2006 1 次提交
    • R
      [PATCH] PM: Fix SMP races in the freezer · 8a102eed
      Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
      Currently, to tell a task that it should go to the refrigerator, we set the
      PF_FREEZE flag for it and send a fake signal to it.  Unfortunately there
      are two SMP-related problems with this approach.  First, a task running on
      another CPU may be updating its flags while the freezer attempts to set
      PF_FREEZE for it and this may leave the task's flags in an inconsistent
      state.  Second, there is a potential race between freeze_process() and
      refrigerator() in which freeze_process() running on one CPU is reading a
      task's PF_FREEZE flag while refrigerator() running on another CPU has just
      set PF_FROZEN for the same task and attempts to reset PF_FREEZE for it.  If
      the refrigerator wins the race, freeze_process() will state that PF_FREEZE
      hasn't been set for the task and will set it unnecessarily, so the task
      will go to the refrigerator once again after it's been thawed.
      
      To solve first of these problems we need to stop using PF_FREEZE to tell
      tasks that they should go to the refrigerator.  Instead, we can introduce a
      special TIF_*** flag and use it for this purpose, since it is allowed to
      change the other tasks' TIF_*** flags and there are special calls for it.
      
      To avoid the freeze_process()-refrigerator() race we can make
      freeze_process() to always check the task's PF_FROZEN flag after it's read
      its "freeze" flag.  We should also make sure that refrigerator() will
      always reset the task's "freeze" flag after it's set PF_FROZEN for it.
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
      Cc: Russell King <rmk@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@muc.de>
      Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      8a102eed
  7. 26 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 18 4月, 2006 1 次提交
    • P
      powerpc: Use correct sequence for putting CPU into nap mode · f39224a8
      Paul Mackerras 提交于
      We weren't using the recommended sequence for putting the CPU into
      nap mode.  When I changed the idle loop, for some reason 7447A cpus
      started hanging when we put them into nap mode.  Changing to the
      recommended sequence fixes that.
      
      The complexity here is that the recommended sequence is a loop that
      keeps putting the cpu back into nap mode.  Clearly we need some way
      to break out of the loop when an interrupt (external interrupt,
      decrementer, performance monitor) occurs.  Here we use a bit in
      the thread_info struct to indicate that we need this, and the exception
      entry code notices this and arranges for the exception to return
      to the value in the link register, thus breaking out of the loop.
      We use a new `local_flags' field in the thread_info which we can
      alter without needing to use an atomic update sequence.
      
      The PPC970 has the same recommended sequence, so we do the same thing
      there too.
      
      This also fixes a bug in the kernel stack overflow handling code on
      32-bit, since it was causing a value that we needed in a register to
      get trashed.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      f39224a8
  9. 08 3月, 2006 1 次提交
    • P
      powerpc: Fix various syscall/signal/swapcontext bugs · 1bd79336
      Paul Mackerras 提交于
      A careful reading of the recent changes to the system call entry/exit
      paths revealed several problems, plus some things that could be
      simplified and improved:
      
      * 32-bit wasn't testing the _TIF_NOERROR bit in the syscall fast exit
        path, so it was only doing anything with it once it saw some other
        bit being set.  In other words, the noerror behaviour would apply to
        the next system call where we had to reschedule or deliver a signal,
        which is not necessarily the current system call.
      
      * 32-bit wasn't doing the call to ptrace_notify in the syscall exit
        path when the _TIF_SINGLESTEP bit was set.
      
      * _TIF_RESTOREALL was in both _TIF_USER_WORK_MASK and
        _TIF_PERSYSCALL_MASK, which is odd since _TIF_RESTOREALL is only set
        by system calls.  I took it out of _TIF_USER_WORK_MASK.
      
      * On 64-bit, _TIF_RESTOREALL wasn't causing the non-volatile registers
        to be restored (unless perhaps a signal was delivered or the syscall
        was traced or single-stepped).  Thus the non-volatile registers
        weren't restored on exit from a signal handler.  We probably got
        away with it mostly because signal handlers written in C wouldn't
        alter the non-volatile registers.
      
      * On 32-bit I simplified the code and made it more like 64-bit by
        making the syscall exit path jump to ret_from_except to handle
        preemption and signal delivery.
      
      * 32-bit was calling do_signal unnecessarily when _TIF_RESTOREALL was
        set - but I think because of that 32-bit was actually restoring the
        non-volatile registers on exit from a signal handler.
      
      * I changed the order of enabling interrupts and saving the
        non-volatile registers before calling do_syscall_trace_leave; now we
        enable interrupts first.
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      1bd79336
  10. 24 2月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] powerpc: Fix runlatch performance issues · cb2c9b27
      Anton Blanchard 提交于
      The runlatch SPR can take a lot of time to write. My original runlatch
      code would set it on every exception entry even though most of the time
      this was not required. It would also continually set it in the idle
      loop, which is an issue on an SMT capable processor.
      
      Now we cache the runlatch value in a threadinfo bit, and only check for
      it in decrementer and hardware interrupt exceptions as well as the idle
      loop. Boot on POWER3, POWER5 and iseries, and compile tested on pmac32.
      Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      cb2c9b27
  11. 08 2月, 2006 1 次提交
  12. 19 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  13. 13 1月, 2006 1 次提交
  14. 09 1月, 2006 1 次提交
    • D
      [PATCH] syscall entry/exit revamp · 401d1f02
      David Woodhouse 提交于
      This cleanup patch speeds up the null syscall path on ppc64 by about 3%,
      and brings the ppc32 and ppc64 code slightly closer together.
      
      The ppc64 code was checking current_thread_info()->flags twice in the
      syscall exit path; once for TIF_SYSCALL_T_OR_A before disabling
      interrupts, and then again for TIF_SIGPENDING|TIF_NEED_RESCHED etc after
      disabling interrupts. Now we do the same as ppc32 -- check the flags
      only once in the fast path, and re-enable interrupts if necessary in the
      ptrace case.
      
      The patch abolishes the 'syscall_noerror' member of struct thread_info
      and replaces it with a TIF_NOERROR bit in the flags, which is handled in
      the slow path. This shortens the syscall entry code, which no longer
      needs to clear syscall_noerror.
      
      The patch adds a TIF_SAVE_NVGPRS flag which causes the syscall exit slow
      path to save the non-volatile GPRs into a signal frame. This removes the
      need for the assembly wrappers around sys_sigsuspend(),
      sys_rt_sigsuspend(), et al which existed solely to save those registers
      in advance. It also means I don't have to add new wrappers for ppoll()
      and pselect(), which is what I was supposed to be doing when I got
      distracted into this...
      
      Finally, it unifies the ppc64 and ppc32 methods of handling syscall exit
      directly into a signal handler (as required by sigsuspend et al) by
      introducing a TIF_RESTOREALL flag which causes _all_ the registers to be
      reloaded from the pt_regs by taking the ret_from_exception path, instead
      of the normal syscall exit path which stomps on the callee-saved GPRs.
      
      It appears to pass an LTP test run on ppc64, and passes basic testing on
      ppc32 too. Brief tests of ptrace functionality with strace and gdb also
      appear OK. I wouldn't send it to Linus for 2.6.15 just yet though :)
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      401d1f02
  15. 07 11月, 2005 1 次提交
    • B
      [PATCH] ppc64: support 64k pages · 3c726f8d
      Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
      Adds a new CONFIG_PPC_64K_PAGES which, when enabled, changes the kernel
      base page size to 64K.  The resulting kernel still boots on any
      hardware.  On current machines with 4K pages support only, the kernel
      will maintain 16 "subpages" for each 64K page transparently.
      
      Note that while real 64K capable HW has been tested, the current patch
      will not enable it yet as such hardware is not released yet, and I'm
      still verifying with the firmware architects the proper to get the
      information from the newer hypervisors.
      Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      3c726f8d
  16. 27 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  17. 21 10月, 2005 1 次提交
    • D
      [PATCH] powerpc: Merge thread_info.h · 6cb7bfeb
      David Gibson 提交于
      Merge ppc32 and ppc64 versions of thread_info.h.  They were pretty
      similar already, the chief changes are:
      
      	- Instead of inline asm to implement current_thread_info(),
      which needs to be different for ppc32 and ppc64, we use C with an
      asm("r1") register variable.  gcc turns it into the same asm as we
      used to have for both platforms.
      	- We replace ppc32's 'local_flags' with the ppc64
      'syscall_noerror' field.  The noerror flag was in fact the only thing
      in the local_flags field anyway, so the ppc64 approach is simpler, and
      means we only need a load-immediate/store instead of load/mask/store
      when clearing the flag.
      	- In readiness for 64k pages, when THREAD_SIZE will be less
      than a page, ppc64 used kmalloc() rather than get_free_pages() to
      allocate the kernel stack.  With this patch we do the same for ppc32,
      since there's no strong reason not to.
      	- For ppc64, we no longer export THREAD_SHIFT and THREAD_SIZE
      via asm-offsets, thread_info.h can now be safely included in asm, as
      on ppc32.
      
      Built and booted on G4 Powerbook (ARCH=ppc and ARCH=powerpc) and
      Power5 (ARCH=ppc64 and ARCH=powerpc).
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
      Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      6cb7bfeb
  18. 21 9月, 2005 1 次提交
  19. 24 6月, 2005 1 次提交
    • J
      [PATCH] streamline preempt_count type across archs · dcd497f9
      Jesper Juhl 提交于
      The preempt_count member of struct thread_info is currently either defined
      as int, unsigned int or __s32 depending on arch.  This patch makes the type
      of preempt_count an int on all archs.
      
      Having preempt_count be an unsigned type prevents the catching of
      preempt_count < 0 bugs, and using int on some archs and __s32 on others is
      not exactely "neat" - much nicer when it's just int all over.
      
      A previous version of this patch was already ACK'ed by Robert Love, and the
      only change in this version of the patch compared to the one he ACK'ed is
      that this one also makes sure the preempt_count member is consistently
      commented.
      Signed-off-by: NJesper Juhl <juhl-lkml@dif.dk>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      dcd497f9
  20. 03 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  21. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4