- 05 1月, 2022 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
It was already assuming a head page, so this is a straightforward conversion. Convert the one caller to call page_folio(), even though it must currently be passing in a head page. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Convert all three callers of put_and_wait_on_page_locked() to folio_put_wait_locked(). This shrinks the kernel overall by 19 bytes. filemap_update_page() shrinks by 19 bytes while __migration_entry_wait() is unchanged. folio_put_wait_locked() is 14 bytes smaller than put_and_wait_on_page_locked(), but pmd_migration_entry_wait() grows by 14 bytes. It removes the assumption from pmd_migration_entry_wait() that pages cannot be larger than a PMD (which is true today, but may be interesting to explore in the future). Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
-
- 03 1月, 2022 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Pages are individually marked as suffering from hardware poisoning. Checking that the head page is not hardware poisoned doesn't make sense; we might be after a subpage. We check each page individually before we use it, so this was an optimisation gone wrong. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com>
-
- 10 11月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Weiner 提交于
Historically (pre-2.5), the inode shrinker used to reclaim only empty inodes and skip over those that still contained page cache. This caused problems on highmem hosts: struct inode could put fill lowmem zones before the cache was getting reclaimed in the highmem zones. To address this, the inode shrinker started to strip page cache to facilitate reclaiming lowmem. However, this comes with its own set of problems: the shrinkers may drop actively used page cache just because the inodes are not currently open or dirty - think working with a large git tree. It further doesn't respect cgroup memory protection settings and can cause priority inversions between containers. Nowadays, the page cache also holds non-resident info for evicted cache pages in order to detect refaults. We've come to rely heavily on this data inside reclaim for protecting the cache workingset and driving swap behavior. We also use it to quantify and report workload health through psi. The latter in turn is used for fleet health monitoring, as well as driving automated memory sizing of workloads and containers, proactive reclaim and memory offloading schemes. The consequences of dropping page cache prematurely is that we're seeing subtle and not-so-subtle failures in all of the above-mentioned scenarios, with the workload generally entering unexpected thrashing states while losing the ability to reliably detect it. To fix this on non-highmem systems at least, going back to rotating inodes on the LRU isn't feasible. We've tried (commit a76cf1a4 ("mm: don't reclaim inodes with many attached pages")) and failed (commit 69056ee6 ("Revert "mm: don't reclaim inodes with many attached pages"")). The issue is mostly that shrinker pools attract pressure based on their size, and when objects get skipped the shrinkers remember this as deferred reclaim work. This accumulates excessive pressure on the remaining inodes, and we can quickly eat into heavily used ones, or dirty ones that require IO to reclaim, when there potentially is plenty of cold, clean cache around still. Instead, this patch keeps populated inodes off the inode LRU in the first place - just like an open file or dirty state would. An otherwise clean and unused inode then gets queued when the last cache entry disappears. This solves the problem without reintroducing the reclaim issues, and generally is a bit more scalable than having to wade through potentially hundreds of thousands of busy inodes. Locking is a bit tricky because the locks protecting the inode state (i_lock) and the inode LRU (lru_list.lock) don't nest inside the irq-safe page cache lock (i_pages.xa_lock). Page cache deletions are serialized through i_lock, taken before the i_pages lock, to make sure depopulated inodes are queued reliably. Additions may race with deletions, but we'll check again in the shrinker. If additions race with the shrinker itself, we're protected by the i_lock: if find_inode() or iput() win, the shrinker will bail on the elevated i_count or I_REFERENCED; if the shrinker wins and goes ahead with the inode, it will set I_FREEING and inhibit further igets(), which will cause the other side to create a new instance of the inode instead. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210614211904.14420-4-hannes@cmpxchg.orgSigned-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 11月, 2021 7 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
Patch series "Remove dependency on congestion_wait in mm/", v5. This series that removes all calls to congestion_wait in mm/ and deletes wait_iff_congested. It's not a clever implementation but congestion_wait has been broken for a long time [1]. Even if congestion throttling worked, it was never a great idea. While excessive dirty/writeback pages at the tail of the LRU is one possibility that reclaim may be slow, there is also the problem of too many pages being isolated and reclaim failing for other reasons (elevated references, too many pages isolated, excessive LRU contention etc). This series replaces the "congestion" throttling with 3 different types. - If there are too many dirty/writeback pages, sleep until a timeout or enough pages get cleaned - If too many pages are isolated, sleep until enough isolated pages are either reclaimed or put back on the LRU - If no progress is being made, direct reclaim tasks sleep until another task makes progress with acceptable efficiency. This was initially tested with a mix of workloads that used to trigger corner cases that no longer work. A new test case was created called "stutterp" (pagereclaim-stutterp-noreaders in mmtests) using a freshly created XFS filesystem. Note that it may be necessary to increase the timeout of ssh if executing remotely as ssh itself can get throttled and the connection may timeout. stutterp varies the number of "worker" processes from 4 up to NR_CPUS*4 to check the impact as the number of direct reclaimers increase. It has four types of worker. - One "anon latency" worker creates small mappings with mmap() and times how long it takes to fault the mapping reading it 4K at a time - X file writers which is fio randomly writing X files where the total size of the files add up to the allowed dirty_ratio. fio is allowed to run for a warmup period to allow some file-backed pages to accumulate. The duration of the warmup is based on the best-case linear write speed of the storage. - Y file readers which is fio randomly reading small files - Z anon memory hogs which continually map (100-dirty_ratio)% of memory - Total estimated WSS = (100+dirty_ration) percentage of memory X+Y+Z+1 == NR_WORKERS varying from 4 up to NR_CPUS*4 The intent is to maximise the total WSS with a mix of file and anon memory where some anonymous memory must be swapped and there is a high likelihood of dirty/writeback pages reaching the end of the LRU. The test can be configured to have no background readers to stress dirty/writeback pages. The results below are based on having zero readers. The short summary of the results is that the series works and stalls until some event occurs but the timeouts may need adjustment. The test results are not broken down by patch as the series should be treated as one block that replaces a broken throttling mechanism with a working one. Finally, three machines were tested but I'm reporting the worst set of results. The other two machines had much better latencies for example. First the results of the "anon latency" latency stutterp 5.15.0-rc1 5.15.0-rc1 vanilla mm-reclaimcongest-v5r4 Amean mmap-4 31.4003 ( 0.00%) 2661.0198 (-8374.52%) Amean mmap-7 38.1641 ( 0.00%) 149.2891 (-291.18%) Amean mmap-12 60.0981 ( 0.00%) 187.8105 (-212.51%) Amean mmap-21 161.2699 ( 0.00%) 213.9107 ( -32.64%) Amean mmap-30 174.5589 ( 0.00%) 377.7548 (-116.41%) Amean mmap-48 8106.8160 ( 0.00%) 1070.5616 ( 86.79%) Stddev mmap-4 41.3455 ( 0.00%) 27573.9676 (-66591.66%) Stddev mmap-7 53.5556 ( 0.00%) 4608.5860 (-8505.23%) Stddev mmap-12 171.3897 ( 0.00%) 5559.4542 (-3143.75%) Stddev mmap-21 1506.6752 ( 0.00%) 5746.2507 (-281.39%) Stddev mmap-30 557.5806 ( 0.00%) 7678.1624 (-1277.05%) Stddev mmap-48 61681.5718 ( 0.00%) 14507.2830 ( 76.48%) Max-90 mmap-4 31.4243 ( 0.00%) 83.1457 (-164.59%) Max-90 mmap-7 41.0410 ( 0.00%) 41.0720 ( -0.08%) Max-90 mmap-12 66.5255 ( 0.00%) 53.9073 ( 18.97%) Max-90 mmap-21 146.7479 ( 0.00%) 105.9540 ( 27.80%) Max-90 mmap-30 193.9513 ( 0.00%) 64.3067 ( 66.84%) Max-90 mmap-48 277.9137 ( 0.00%) 591.0594 (-112.68%) Max mmap-4 1913.8009 ( 0.00%) 299623.9695 (-15555.96%) Max mmap-7 2423.9665 ( 0.00%) 204453.1708 (-8334.65%) Max mmap-12 6845.6573 ( 0.00%) 221090.3366 (-3129.64%) Max mmap-21 56278.6508 ( 0.00%) 213877.3496 (-280.03%) Max mmap-30 19716.2990 ( 0.00%) 216287.6229 (-997.00%) Max mmap-48 477923.9400 ( 0.00%) 245414.8238 ( 48.65%) For most thread counts, the time to mmap() is unfortunately increased. In earlier versions of the series, this was lower but a large number of throttling events were reaching their timeout increasing the amount of inefficient scanning of the LRU. There is no prioritisation of reclaim tasks making progress based on each tasks rate of page allocation versus progress of reclaim. The variance is also impacted for high worker counts but in all cases, the differences in latency are not statistically significant due to very large maximum outliers. Max-90 shows that 90% of the stalls are comparable but the Max results show the massive outliers which are increased to to stalling. It is expected that this will be very machine dependant. Due to the test design, reclaim is difficult so allocations stall and there are variances depending on whether THPs can be allocated or not. The amount of memory will affect exactly how bad the corner cases are and how often they trigger. The warmup period calculation is not ideal as it's based on linear writes where as fio is randomly writing multiple files from multiple tasks so the start state of the test is variable. For example, these are the latencies on a single-socket machine that had more memory Amean mmap-4 42.2287 ( 0.00%) 49.6838 * -17.65%* Amean mmap-7 216.4326 ( 0.00%) 47.4451 * 78.08%* Amean mmap-12 2412.0588 ( 0.00%) 51.7497 ( 97.85%) Amean mmap-21 5546.2548 ( 0.00%) 51.8862 ( 99.06%) Amean mmap-30 1085.3121 ( 0.00%) 72.1004 ( 93.36%) The overall system CPU usage and elapsed time is as follows 5.15.0-rc3 5.15.0-rc3 vanilla mm-reclaimcongest-v5r4 Duration User 6989.03 983.42 Duration System 7308.12 799.68 Duration Elapsed 2277.67 2092.98 The patches reduce system CPU usage by 89% as the vanilla kernel is rarely stalling. The high-level /proc/vmstats show 5.15.0-rc1 5.15.0-rc1 vanilla mm-reclaimcongest-v5r2 Ops Direct pages scanned 1056608451.00 503594991.00 Ops Kswapd pages scanned 109795048.00 147289810.00 Ops Kswapd pages reclaimed 63269243.00 31036005.00 Ops Direct pages reclaimed 10803973.00 6328887.00 Ops Kswapd efficiency % 57.62 21.07 Ops Kswapd velocity 48204.98 57572.86 Ops Direct efficiency % 1.02 1.26 Ops Direct velocity 463898.83 196845.97 Kswapd scanned less pages but the detailed pattern is different. The vanilla kernel scans slowly over time where as the patches exhibits burst patterns of scan activity. Direct reclaim scanning is reduced by 52% due to stalling. The pattern for stealing pages is also slightly different. Both kernels exhibit spikes but the vanilla kernel when reclaiming shows pages being reclaimed over a period of time where as the patches tend to reclaim in spikes. The difference is that vanilla is not throttling and instead scanning constantly finding some pages over time where as the patched kernel throttles and reclaims in spikes. Ops Percentage direct scans 90.59 77.37 For direct reclaim, vanilla scanned 90.59% of pages where as with the patches, 77.37% were direct reclaim due to throttling Ops Page writes by reclaim 2613590.00 1687131.00 Page writes from reclaim context are reduced. Ops Page writes anon 2932752.00 1917048.00 And there is less swapping. Ops Page reclaim immediate 996248528.00 107664764.00 The number of pages encountered at the tail of the LRU tagged for immediate reclaim but still dirty/writeback is reduced by 89%. Ops Slabs scanned 164284.00 153608.00 Slab scan activity is similar. ftrace was used to gather stall activity Vanilla ------- 1 writeback_wait_iff_congested: usec_timeout=100000 usec_delayed=16000 2 writeback_wait_iff_congested: usec_timeout=100000 usec_delayed=12000 8 writeback_wait_iff_congested: usec_timeout=100000 usec_delayed=8000 29 writeback_wait_iff_congested: usec_timeout=100000 usec_delayed=4000 82394 writeback_wait_iff_congested: usec_timeout=100000 usec_delayed=0 The fast majority of wait_iff_congested calls do not stall at all. What is likely happening is that cond_resched() reschedules the task for a short period when the BDI is not registering congestion (which it never will in this test setup). 1 writeback_congestion_wait: usec_timeout=100000 usec_delayed=120000 2 writeback_congestion_wait: usec_timeout=100000 usec_delayed=132000 4 writeback_congestion_wait: usec_timeout=100000 usec_delayed=112000 380 writeback_congestion_wait: usec_timeout=100000 usec_delayed=108000 778 writeback_congestion_wait: usec_timeout=100000 usec_delayed=104000 congestion_wait if called always exceeds the timeout as there is no trigger to wake it up. Bottom line: Vanilla will throttle but it's not effective. Patch series ------------ Kswapd throttle activity was always due to scanning pages tagged for immediate reclaim at the tail of the LRU 1 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=72000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 4 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=20000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 5 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=12000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 6 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=16000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 11 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=100000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 11 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=8000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 94 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=0 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 112 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=4000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK The majority of events did not stall or stalled for a short period. Roughly 16% of stalls reached the timeout before expiry. For direct reclaim, the number of times stalled for each reason were 6624 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_ISOLATED 93246 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 96934 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK The most common reason to stall was due to excessive pages tagged for immediate reclaim at the tail of the LRU followed by a failure to make forward. A relatively small number were due to too many pages isolated from the LRU by parallel threads For VMSCAN_THROTTLE_ISOLATED, the breakdown of delays was 9 usec_timeout=20000 usect_delayed=4000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_ISOLATED 12 usec_timeout=20000 usect_delayed=16000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_ISOLATED 83 usec_timeout=20000 usect_delayed=20000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_ISOLATED 6520 usec_timeout=20000 usect_delayed=0 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_ISOLATED Most did not stall at all. A small number reached the timeout. For VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS, the breakdown of stalls were all over the map 1 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=324000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 1 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=332000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 1 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=348000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 1 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=360000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 2 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=228000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 2 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=260000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 2 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=340000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 2 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=364000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 2 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=372000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 2 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=428000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 2 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=460000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 2 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=464000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 3 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=244000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 3 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=252000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 3 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=272000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 4 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=188000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 4 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=268000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 4 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=328000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 4 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=380000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 4 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=392000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 4 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=432000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 5 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=204000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 5 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=220000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 5 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=412000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 5 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=436000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 6 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=488000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 7 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=212000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 7 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=300000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 7 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=316000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 7 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=472000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 8 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=248000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 8 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=356000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 8 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=456000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 9 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=124000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 9 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=376000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 9 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=484000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 10 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=172000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 10 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=420000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 10 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=452000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 11 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=256000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 12 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=112000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 12 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=116000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 12 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=144000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 12 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=152000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 12 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=264000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 12 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=384000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 12 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=424000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 12 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=492000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 13 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=184000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 13 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=444000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 14 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=308000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 14 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=440000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 14 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=476000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 16 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=140000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 17 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=232000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 17 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=240000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 17 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=280000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 18 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=404000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 20 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=148000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 20 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=216000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 20 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=468000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 21 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=448000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 23 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=168000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 23 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=296000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 25 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=132000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 25 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=352000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 26 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=180000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 27 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=284000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 28 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=164000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 29 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=136000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 30 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=200000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 30 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=400000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 31 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=196000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 32 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=156000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 33 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=224000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 35 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=128000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 35 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=176000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 36 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=368000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 36 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=496000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 37 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=312000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 38 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=304000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 40 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=288000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 43 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=408000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 55 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=416000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 56 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=76000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 58 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=120000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 59 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=208000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 61 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=68000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 71 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=192000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 71 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=480000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 79 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=60000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 82 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=320000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 82 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=92000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 85 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=64000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 85 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=80000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 88 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=84000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 90 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=160000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 90 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=292000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 94 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=56000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 118 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=88000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 119 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=72000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 126 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=108000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 146 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=52000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 148 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=36000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 148 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=48000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 159 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=28000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 178 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=44000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 183 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=40000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 237 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=100000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 266 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=32000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 313 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=24000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 347 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=96000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 470 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=20000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 559 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=16000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 964 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=12000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 2001 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=104000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 2447 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=8000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 7888 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=4000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 22727 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=0 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS 51305 usec_timeout=500000 usect_delayed=500000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS The full timeout is often hit but a large number also do not stall at all. The remainder slept a little allowing other reclaim tasks to make progress. While this timeout could be further increased, it could also negatively impact worst-case behaviour when there is no prioritisation of what task should make progress. For VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK, the breakdown was 1 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=44000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 2 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=76000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 3 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=80000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 5 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=48000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 5 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=84000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 6 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=72000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 7 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=88000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 11 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=56000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 12 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=64000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 16 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=92000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 24 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=68000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 28 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=32000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 30 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=60000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 30 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=96000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 32 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=52000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 42 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=40000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 77 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=28000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 99 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=36000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 137 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=24000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 190 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=20000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 339 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=16000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 518 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=12000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 852 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=8000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 3359 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=4000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 7147 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=0 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK 83962 usec_timeout=100000 usect_delayed=100000 reason=VMSCAN_THROTTLE_WRITEBACK The majority hit the timeout in direct reclaim context although a sizable number did not stall at all. This is very different to kswapd where only a tiny percentage of stalls due to writeback reached the timeout. Bottom line, the throttling appears to work and the wakeup events may limit worst case stalls. There might be some grounds for adjusting timeouts but it's likely futile as the worst-case scenarios depend on the workload, memory size and the speed of the storage. A better approach to improve the series further would be to prioritise tasks based on their rate of allocation with the caveat that it may be very expensive to track. This patch (of 5): Page reclaim throttles on wait_iff_congested under the following conditions: - kswapd is encountering pages under writeback and marked for immediate reclaim implying that pages are cycling through the LRU faster than pages can be cleaned. - Direct reclaim will stall if all dirty pages are backed by congested inodes. wait_iff_congested is almost completely broken with few exceptions. This patch adds a new node-based workqueue and tracks the number of throttled tasks and pages written back since throttling started. If enough pages belonging to the node are written back then the throttled tasks will wake early. If not, the throttled tasks sleeps until the timeout expires. [neilb@suse.de: Uninterruptible sleep and simpler wakeups] [hdanton@sina.com: Avoid race when reclaim starts] [vbabka@suse.cz: vmstat irq-safe api, clarifications] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/45d8b7a6-8548-65f5-cccf-9f451d4ae3d4@kernel.dk/ [1] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211022144651.19914-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211022144651.19914-2-mgorman@techsingularity.netSigned-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Cc: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Cc: Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca> Cc: "Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@kernel.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> -
由 Yang Shi 提交于
Patch series "Solve silent data loss caused by poisoned page cache (shmem/tmpfs)", v5. When discussing the patch that splits page cache THP in order to offline the poisoned page, Noaya mentioned there is a bigger problem [1] that prevents this from working since the page cache page will be truncated if uncorrectable errors happen. By looking this deeper it turns out this approach (truncating poisoned page) may incur silent data loss for all non-readonly filesystems if the page is dirty. It may be worse for in-memory filesystem, e.g. shmem/tmpfs since the data blocks are actually gone. To solve this problem we could keep the poisoned dirty page in page cache then notify the users on any later access, e.g. page fault, read/write, etc. The clean page could be truncated as is since they can be reread from disk later on. The consequence is the filesystems may find poisoned page and manipulate it as healthy page since all the filesystems actually don't check if the page is poisoned or not in all the relevant paths except page fault. In general, we need make the filesystems be aware of poisoned page before we could keep the poisoned page in page cache in order to solve the data loss problem. To make filesystems be aware of poisoned page we should consider: - The page should be not written back: clearing dirty flag could prevent from writeback. - The page should not be dropped (it shows as a clean page) by drop caches or other callers: the refcount pin from hwpoison could prevent from invalidating (called by cache drop, inode cache shrinking, etc), but it doesn't avoid invalidation in DIO path. - The page should be able to get truncated/hole punched/unlinked: it works as it is. - Notify users when the page is accessed, e.g. read/write, page fault and other paths (compression, encryption, etc). The scope of the last one is huge since almost all filesystems need do it once a page is returned from page cache lookup. There are a couple of options to do it: 1. Check hwpoison flag for every path, the most straightforward way. 2. Return NULL for poisoned page from page cache lookup, the most callsites check if NULL is returned, this should have least work I think. But the error handling in filesystems just return -ENOMEM, the error code will incur confusion to the users obviously. 3. To improve #2, we could return error pointer, e.g. ERR_PTR(-EIO), but this will involve significant amount of code change as well since all the paths need check if the pointer is ERR or not just like option #1. I did prototypes for both #1 and #3, but it seems #3 may require more changes than #1. For #3 ERR_PTR will be returned so all the callers need to check the return value otherwise invalid pointer may be dereferenced, but not all callers really care about the content of the page, for example, partial truncate which just sets the truncated range in one page to 0. So for such paths it needs additional modification if ERR_PTR is returned. And if the callers have their own way to handle the problematic pages we need to add a new FGP flag to tell FGP functions to return the pointer to the page. It may happen very rarely, but once it happens the consequence (data corruption) could be very bad and it is very hard to debug. It seems this problem had been slightly discussed before, but seems no action was taken at that time. [2] As the aforementioned investigation, it needs huge amount of work to solve the potential data loss for all filesystems. But it is much easier for in-memory filesystems and such filesystems actually suffer more than others since even the data blocks are gone due to truncating. So this patchset starts from shmem/tmpfs by taking option #1. TODO: * The unpoison has been broken since commit 0ed950d1 ("mm,hwpoison: make get_hwpoison_page() call get_any_page()"), and this patch series make refcount check for unpoisoning shmem page fail. * Expand to other filesystems. But I haven't heard feedback from filesystem developers yet. Patch breakdown: Patch #1: cleanup, depended by patch #2 Patch #2: fix THP with hwpoisoned subpage(s) PMD map bug Patch #3: coding style cleanup Patch #4: refactor and preparation. Patch #5: keep the poisoned page in page cache and handle such case for all the paths. Patch #6: the previous patches unblock page cache THP split, so this patch add page cache THP split support. This patch (of 4): A minor cleanup to the indent. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211020210755.23964-1-shy828301@gmail.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211020210755.23964-4-shy828301@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NYang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NNaoya Horiguchi <naoya.horiguchi@nec.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> -
由 Qi Zheng 提交于
Patch series "Do some code cleanups related to mm", v3. This patch (of 2): Currently we have three times the same few lines repeated in the code. Deduplicate them by newly introduced pmd_install() helper. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210901102722.47686-1-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210901102722.47686-2-zhengqi.arch@bytedance.comSigned-off-by: NQi Zheng <zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NMuchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com> Cc: Mika Penttila <mika.penttila@nextfour.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
The fast path here is not needing any writeback, yet we spend time setting up the xarray lookup data upfront. Move the part that actually needs to iterate the address space mapping into a separate helper, saving ~30% of the time here. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/49f67983-b802-8929-edab-d807f745c9ca@kernel.dkSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
It is not safe to check page->index without holding the page lock. It can be changed if the page is moved between the swap cache and the page cache for a shmem file, for example. There is a VM_BUG_ON below which checks page->index is correct after taking the page lock. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210818144932.940640-1-willy@infradead.org Fixes: 5c211ba2 ("mm: add and use find_lock_entries") Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reported-by: <syzbot+c87be4f669d920c76330@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Jens Axboe 提交于
We always go through i_size_read(), and we rarely end up needing it. Push the read to down where we need to check it, which avoids it for most cases. It looks like we can even remove this check entirely, which might be worth pursuing. But at least this takes it out of the hot path. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/6b67981f-57d4-c80e-bc07-6020aa601381@kernel.dkSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Acked-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Under some circumstances, filemap_read() will allocate sufficient pages to read to the end of the file, call readahead/readpages on them and copy the data over - and then it will allocate another page at the EOF and call readpage on that and then ignore it. This is unnecessary and a waste of time and resources. filemap_read() *does* check for this, but only after it has already done the allocation and I/O. Fix this by checking before calling filemap_get_pages() also. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/163472463105.3126792.7056099385135786492.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/160588481358.3465195.16552616179674485179.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/163456863216.2614702.6384850026368833133.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk/Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 18 10月, 2021 10 次提交
-
-
由 Andreas Gruenbacher 提交于
Turn iov_iter_fault_in_readable into a function that returns the number of bytes not faulted in, similar to copy_to_user, instead of returning a non-zero value when any of the requested pages couldn't be faulted in. This supports the existing users that require all pages to be faulted in as well as new users that are happy if any pages can be faulted in. Rename iov_iter_fault_in_readable to fault_in_iov_iter_readable to make sure this change doesn't silently break things. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> -
由 Andreas Gruenbacher 提交于
Turn fault_in_pages_{readable,writeable} into versions that return the number of bytes not faulted in, similar to copy_to_user, instead of returning a non-zero value when any of the requested pages couldn't be faulted in. This supports the existing users that require all pages to be faulted in as well as new users that are happy if any pages can be faulted in. Rename the functions to fault_in_{readable,writeable} to make sure this change doesn't silently break things. Neither of these functions is entirely trivial and it doesn't seem useful to inline them, so move them to mm/gup.c. Signed-off-by: NAndreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com> -
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Various files have acquired spurious includes of <linux/blkdev.h> over time. Remove them. Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210920123328.1399408-5-hch@lst.deSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Allow filemap_get_folio() to wait for writeback to complete (if the filesystem wants that behaviour). This is the folio equivalent of grab_cache_page_write_begin(), which is moved into the folio-compat file as a reminder to migrate all the code using it. This paves the way for getting rid of AOP_FLAG_NOFS once grab_cache_page_write_begin() is removed. Kernel grows by 11 bytes. filemap_get_folio() grows by 33 bytes but grab_cache_page_write_begin() shrinks by 22 bytes to make up for it. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
filemap_get_folio() is a replacement for find_get_page(). Turn pagecache_get_page() into a wrapper around __filemap_get_folio(). Remove find_lock_head() as this use case is now covered by filemap_get_folio(). Reduces overall kernel size by 209 bytes. __filemap_get_folio() is 316 bytes shorter than pagecache_get_page() was, but the new pagecache_get_page() wrapper is 99 bytes. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
The pagecache only contains folios, so indicate that this is definitely not a tail page. Shrinks mapping_get_entry() by 56 bytes, but grows pagecache_get_page() by 21 bytes as gcc makes slightly different hot/cold code decisions. A net reduction of 35 bytes of text. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Convert __add_to_page_cache_locked() into __filemap_add_folio(). Add an assertion to it that (for !hugetlbfs), the folio is naturally aligned within the file. Move the prototype from mm.h to pagemap.h. Convert add_to_page_cache_lru() into filemap_add_folio(). Add a compatibility wrapper for unconverted callers. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Reimplement __page_cache_alloc as a wrapper around filemap_alloc_folio to allow filesystems to be converted at our leisure. Increases kernel text size by 133 bytes, mostly in cachefiles_read_backing_file(). pagecache_get_page() shrinks by 32 bytes, though. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
This nets us 178 bytes of savings from removing calls to compound_head. The three callers all grow a little, but each of them will be converted to use folios soon, so that's fine. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
test_clear_page_writeback() is actually an mm-internal function, although it's named as if it's a pagecache function. Move it to mm/internal.h, rename it to __folio_end_writeback() and change the return type to bool. The conversion from page to folio is mostly about accounting the number of pages being written back, although it does eliminate a couple of calls to compound_head(). Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
-
- 27 9月, 2021 16 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Convert all callers of mem_cgroup_migrate() to call page_folio() first. They all look like they're using head pages already, but this proves it. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Convert all the callers to call page_folio(). Most of them were already using a head page, but a few of them I can't prove were, so this may actually fix a bug. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Convert all callers of mem_cgroup_charge() to call page_folio() on the page they're currently passing in. Many of them will be converted to use folios themselves soon. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
end_page_private_2() becomes folio_end_private_2(), wait_on_page_private_2() becomes folio_wait_private_2() and wait_on_page_private_2_killable() becomes folio_wait_private_2_killable(). Adjust the fscache equivalents to call page_folio() before calling these functions to avoid adding wrappers. Ends up costing 1 byte of text in ceph & netfs, but the core shrinks by three calls to page_folio(). Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Reinforce that page flags are actually in the head page by changing the type from page to folio. Increases the size of cachefiles by two bytes, but the kernel core is unchanged in size. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Convert wake_up_page_bit() to folio_wake_bit(). All callers have a folio, so use it directly. Saves 66 bytes of text in end_page_private_2(). Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Rename wait_on_page_bit() to folio_wait_bit(). We must always wait on the folio, otherwise we won't be woken up due to the tail page hashing to a different bucket from the head page. This commit shrinks the kernel by 770 bytes, mostly due to moving the page waitqueue lookup into folio_wait_bit_common(). Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Add an end_page_writeback() wrapper function for users that are not yet converted to folios. folio_end_writeback() is less than half the size of end_page_writeback() at just 105 bytes compared to 228 bytes, due to removing all the compound_head() calls. The 30 byte wrapper function makes this a net saving of 93 bytes. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Convert rotate_reclaimable_page() to folio_rotate_reclaimable(). This eliminates all five of the calls to compound_head() in this function, saving 75 bytes at the cost of adding 15 bytes to its one caller, end_page_writeback(). We also save 36 bytes from pagevec_move_tail_fn() due to using folios there. Net 96 bytes savings. Also move its declaration to mm/internal.h as it's only used by filemap.c. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Convert __lock_page_or_retry() to __folio_lock_or_retry(). This actually saves 4 bytes in the only caller of lock_page_or_retry() (due to better register allocation) and saves the 14 byte cost of calling page_folio() in __folio_lock_or_retry() for a total saving of 18 bytes. Also use a bool for the return type. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Also add folio_wait_locked_killable(). Turn wait_on_page_locked() and wait_on_page_locked_killable() into wrappers. This eliminates a call to compound_head() from each call-site, reducing text size by 193 bytes for me. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
There aren't any actual callers of lock_page_async(), so remove it. Convert filemap_update_page() to call __folio_lock_async(). __folio_lock_async() is 21 bytes smaller than __lock_page_async(), but the real savings come from using a folio in filemap_update_page(), shrinking it from 515 bytes to 404 bytes, saving 110 bytes. The text shrinks by 132 bytes in total. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
This is like lock_page_killable() but for use by callers who know they have a folio. Convert __lock_page_killable() to be __folio_lock_killable(). This saves one call to compound_head() per contended call to lock_page_killable(). __folio_lock_killable() is 19 bytes smaller than __lock_page_killable() was. filemap_fault() shrinks by 74 bytes and __lock_page_or_retry() shrinks by 71 bytes. That's a total of 164 bytes of text saved. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
This is like lock_page() but for use by callers who know they have a folio. Convert __lock_page() to be __folio_lock(). This saves one call to compound_head() per contended call to lock_page(). Saves 455 bytes of text; mostly from improved register allocation and inlining decisions. __folio_lock is 59 bytes while __lock_page was 79. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
Convert unlock_page() to call folio_unlock(). By using a folio we avoid a call to compound_head(). This shortens the function from 39 bytes to 25 and removes 4 instructions on x86-64. Because we still have unlock_page(), it's a net increase of 16 bytes of text for the kernel as a whole, but any path that uses folio_unlock() will execute 4 fewer instructions. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) 提交于
This is the equivalent of page_cache_get_speculative(). Also add folio_ref_try_add_rcu (the equivalent of page_cache_add_speculative) and folio_get_unless_zero() (the equivalent of get_page_unless_zero()). The new kernel-doc attempts to explain from the user's point of view when to use folio_try_get_rcu() and when to use folio_get_unless_zero(), because there seems to be some confusion currently between the users of page_cache_get_speculative() and get_page_unless_zero(). Reimplement page_cache_add_speculative() and page_cache_get_speculative() as wrappers around the folio equivalents, but leave get_page_unless_zero() alone for now. This commit reduces text size by 3 bytes due to slightly different register allocation & instruction selections. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: NWilliam Kucharski <william.kucharski@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Acked-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Weiner 提交于
The page cache deletion paths all have interrupts enabled, so no need to use irqsafe/irqrestore locking variants. They used to have irqs disabled by the memcg lock added in commit c4843a75 ("memcg: add per cgroup dirty page accounting"), but that has since been replaced by memcg taking the page lock instead, commit 0a31bc97 ("mm: memcontrol: rewrite uncharge AP"). Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210614211904.14420-1-hannes@cmpxchg.orgSigned-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 23 8月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Btrfs sometimes needs to flush dirty pages on a bunch of dirty inodes in order to reclaim metadata reservations. Unfortunately most helpers in this area are too smart for us: 1) The normal filemap_fdata* helpers only take range and sync modes, and don't give any indication of how much was written, so we can only flush full inodes, which isn't what we want in most cases. 2) The normal writeback path requires us to have the s_umount sem held, but we can't unconditionally take it in this path because we could deadlock. 3) The normal writeback path also skips inodes with I_SYNC set if we write with WB_SYNC_NONE. This isn't the behavior we want under heavy ENOSPC pressure, we want to actually make sure the pages are under writeback before returning, and if another thread is in the middle of writing the file we may return before they're under writeback and miss our ordered extents and not properly wait for completion. 4) sync_inode() uses the normal writeback path and has the same problem as #3. What we really want is to call do_writepages() with our wbc. This way we can make sure that writeback is actually started on the pages, and we can control how many pages are written as a whole as we write many inodes using the same wbc. Accomplish this with a new helper that does just that so we can use it for our ENOSPC flushing infrastructure. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 13 7月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Some operations such as reflinking blocks among files will need to lock invalidate_lock for two mappings. Add helper functions to do that. Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
-