1. 10 6月, 2009 11 次提交
  2. 09 6月, 2009 1 次提交
    • A
      kvm: fix kvm reboot crash when MAXSMP is used · 8437a617
      Avi Kivity 提交于
      one system was found there is crash during reboot then kvm/MAXSMP
      Sending all processes the KILL signal...                              done
      Please stand by while rebooting the system...
      [ 1721.856538] md: stopping all md devices.
      [ 1722.852139] kvm: exiting hardware virtualization
      [ 1722.854601] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
      [ 1722.872219] IP: [<ffffffff8102c6b6>] hardware_disable+0x4c/0xb4
      [ 1722.877955] PGD 0
      [ 1722.880042] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP
      [ 1722.892548] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:01.0/0000:01:00.0/host0/target0:2:0/0:2:0:0/vendor
      [ 1722.900977] CPU 9
      [ 1722.912606] Modules linked in:
      [ 1722.914226] Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.30-rc7-tip-01843-g2305324-dirty #299 ...
      [ 1722.932589] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff8102c6b6>]  [<ffffffff8102c6b6>] hardware_disable+0x4c/0xb4
      [ 1722.942709] RSP: 0018:ffffc900010b6ed8  EFLAGS: 00010046
      [ 1722.956121] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffffc9000e253140 RCX: 0000000000000009
      [ 1722.972202] RDX: 000000000000b020 RSI: ffffc900010c3220 RDI: ffffffffffffd790
      [ 1722.977399] RBP: ffffc900010b6f08 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
      [ 1722.995149] R10: 00000000000004b8 R11: 966912b6c78fddbd R12: 0000000000000009
      [ 1723.011551] R13: 000000000000b020 R14: 0000000000000009 R15: 0000000000000000
      [ 1723.019898] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffffc900010b3000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
      [ 1723.034389] CS:  0010 DS: 0018 ES: 0018 CR0: 000000008005003b
      [ 1723.041164] CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000001001000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
      [ 1723.056192] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
      [ 1723.072546] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
      [ 1723.080562] Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo ffff88107e464000, task ffff88047e5a2550)
      [ 1723.096144] Stack:
      [ 1723.099071]  0000000000000046 ffffc9000e253168 966912b6c78fddbd ffffc9000e253140
      [ 1723.115471]  ffff880c7d4304d0 ffffc9000e253168 ffffc900010b6f28 ffffffff81011022
      [ 1723.132428]  ffffc900010b6f48 966912b6c78fddbd ffffc900010b6f48 ffffffff8100b83b
      [ 1723.141973] Call Trace:
      [ 1723.142981]  <IRQ> <0> [<ffffffff81011022>] kvm_arch_hardware_disable+0x26/0x3c
      [ 1723.158153]  [<ffffffff8100b83b>] hardware_disable+0x3f/0x55
      [ 1723.172168]  [<ffffffff810b95f6>] generic_smp_call_function_interrupt+0x76/0x13c
      [ 1723.178836]  [<ffffffff8104cbea>] smp_call_function_interrupt+0x3a/0x5e
      [ 1723.194689]  [<ffffffff81035bf3>] call_function_interrupt+0x13/0x20
      [ 1723.199750]  <EOI> <0> [<ffffffff814ad3b4>] ? acpi_idle_enter_c1+0xd3/0xf4
      [ 1723.217508]  [<ffffffff814ad3ae>] ? acpi_idle_enter_c1+0xcd/0xf4
      [ 1723.232172]  [<ffffffff814ad4bc>] ? acpi_idle_enter_bm+0xe7/0x2ce
      [ 1723.235141]  [<ffffffff81a8d93f>] ? __atomic_notifier_call_chain+0x0/0xac
      [ 1723.253381]  [<ffffffff818c3dff>] ? menu_select+0x58/0xd2
      [ 1723.258179]  [<ffffffff818c2c9d>] ? cpuidle_idle_call+0xa4/0xf3
      [ 1723.272828]  [<ffffffff81034085>] ? cpu_idle+0xb8/0x101
      [ 1723.277085]  [<ffffffff81a80163>] ? start_secondary+0x1bc/0x1d7
      [ 1723.293708] Code: b0 00 00 65 48 8b 04 25 28 00 00 00 48 89 45 e0 31 c0 48 8b 04 cd 30 ee 27 82 49 89 cc 49 89 d5 48 8b 04 10 48 8d b8 90 d7 ff ff <48> 8b 87 70 28 00 00 48 8d 98 90 d7 ff ff eb 16 e8 e9 fe ff ff
      [ 1723.335524] RIP  [<ffffffff8102c6b6>] hardware_disable+0x4c/0xb4
      [ 1723.342076]  RSP <ffffc900010b6ed8>
      [ 1723.352021] CR2: 0000000000000000
      [ 1723.354348] ---[ end trace e2aec53dae150aa1 ]---
      
      it turns out that we need clear cpus_hardware_enabled in that case.
      Reported-and-tested-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
      8437a617
  3. 08 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  4. 22 4月, 2009 2 次提交
  5. 24 3月, 2009 13 次提交
  6. 15 2月, 2009 5 次提交
  7. 03 1月, 2009 6 次提交
  8. 31 12月, 2008 1 次提交
    • M
      KVM: fix handling of ACK from shared guest IRQ · defaf158
      Mark McLoughlin 提交于
      If an assigned device shares a guest irq with an emulated
      device then we currently interpret an ack generated by the
      emulated device as originating from the assigned device
      leading to e.g. "Unbalanced enable for IRQ 4347" from the
      enable_irq() in kvm_assigned_dev_ack_irq().
      
      The fix is fairly simple - don't enable the physical device
      irq unless it was previously disabled.
      
      Of course, this can still lead to a situation where a
      non-assigned device ACK can cause the physical device irq to
      be reenabled before the device was serviced. However, being
      level sensitive, the interrupt will merely be regenerated.
      Signed-off-by: NMark McLoughlin <markmc@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      defaf158