- 01 2月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
tk_xprt is just a shortcut for tk_client->cl_xprt, however cl_xprt is defined as an __rcu variable. Replace dereferences of tk_xprt with non-rcu dereferences where it is safe to do so. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 31 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This fixes a livelock in the xprt->sending queue where we end up never making progress on lower priority tasks because sleep_on_priority() keeps adding new tasks with the same owner to the head of the queue, and priority bumps mean that we keep resetting the queue->owner to whatever task is at the head of the queue. Regression introduced by commit c05eecf6 (SUNRPC: Don't allow low priority tasks to pre-empt higher priority ones). Reported-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 11 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Fix new kernel-doc warnings in clnt.c: Warning(net/sunrpc/clnt.c:561): No description found for parameter 'flavor' Warning(net/sunrpc/clnt.c:561): Excess function parameter 'auth' description in 'rpc_clone_client_set_auth' Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 09 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the rpc_task exits while holding the socket write lock before it has allocated an rpc slot, then the usual mechanism for releasing the write lock in xprt_release() is defeated. The problem occurs if the call to xprt_lock_write() initially fails, so that the rpc_task is put on the xprt->sending wait queue. If the task exits after being assigned the lock by __xprt_lock_write_func, but before it has retried the call to xprt_lock_and_alloc_slot(), then it calls xprt_release() while holding the write lock, but will immediately exit due to the test for task->tk_rqstp != NULL. Reported-by: NChris Perl <chris.perl@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [>= 3.1]
-
- 05 1月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Partially revert commit (SUNRPC: add WARN_ON_ONCE for potential deadlock). The looping behaviour has been tracked down to a knownn issue with workqueues, and a workaround has now been implemented. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [>= 3.7]
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This patch ensures that we free the rpc_task after the cleanup callbacks are done in order to avoid a deadlock problem that can be triggered if the callback needs to wait for another workqueue item to complete. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 18 12月, 2012 3 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
It may be a matter of personal taste, but I find this makes the code clearer. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Stanislav Kinsbursky 提交于
There are SUNRPC clients, which program doesn't have pipe_dir_name. These clients can be skipped on PipeFS events, because nothing have to be created or destroyed. But instead of breaking in case of such a client was found, search for suitable client over clients list have to be continued. Otherwise some clients could not be covered by PipeFS event handler. Signed-off-by: NStanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [>= v3.4] Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 16 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Silence a compile time warning. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Silence the unnecessary warning "unhandled error (111) connecting to..." and convert it to a dprintk for debugging purposes. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 13 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Currently, when an RPCSEC_GSS context has expired or is non-existent and the users (Kerberos) credentials have also expired or are non-existent, the client receives the -EKEYEXPIRED error and tries to refresh the context forever. If an application is performing I/O, or other work against the share, the application hangs, and the user is not prompted to refresh/establish their credentials. This can result in a denial of service for other users. Users are expected to manage their Kerberos credential lifetimes to mitigate this issue. Move the -EKEYEXPIRED handling into the RPC layer. Try tk_cred_retry number of times to refresh the gss_context, and then return -EACCES to the application. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Only use the default GSSD_MIN_TIMEOUT if the gss downcall timeout is zero. Store the full lifetime in gc_expiry (not 3/4 of the lifetime) as subsequent patches will use the gc_expiry to determine buffered WRITE behavior in the face of expired or soon to be expired gss credentials. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 11 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stanislav Kinsbursky 提交于
This is a cleanup patch. Signed-off-by: NStanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 06 12月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently, the priority queues attempt to be 'fair' to lower priority tasks by scheduling them after a certain number of higher priority tasks have run. The problem is that both the transport send queue and the NFSv4.1 session slot queue have strong ordering requirements. This patch therefore removes the fairness code in favour of strong ordering of task priorities. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We want to preserve the rpc_task priority for things like writebacks, that may have differing levels of urgency. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 04 12月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Over TCP, RPC's are preceded by a single 4-byte field telling you how long the rpc is (in bytes). The spec also allows you to send an RPC in multiple such records (the high bit of the length field is used to tell you whether this is the final record). We've survived for years without supporting this because in practice the clients we care about don't use it. But the userland rpc libraries do, and every now and then an experimental client will run into this. (Most recently I noticed it while trying to write a pynfs check.) And we're really on the wrong side of the spec here--let's fix this. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Keep a separate field, sk_datalen, that tracks only the data contained in a fragment, not including the fragment header. For now, this is always just max(0, sk_tcplen - 4), but after we allow multiple fragments sk_datalen will accumulate the total rpc data size while sk_tcplen only tracks progress receiving the current fragment. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The full reclen doesn't include the fragment header, but sk_tcplen does. Fix this to make it an apples-to-apples comparison. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Soon we want to support multiple fragments, in which case it may be legal for a single fragment to be smaller than 8 bytes, so we'll want to delay this check till we've reached the last fragment. Also fix an outdated comment. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Byte-swapping in place is always a little dubious. Let's instead define this field to always be big-endian, and do the swapping on demand where we need it. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 09 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
rpc_kill_sb() must defer calling put_net() until after the notifier has been called, since most (all?) of the notifier callbacks assume that sb->s_fs_info points to a valid net namespace. It also must not call put_net() if the call to rpc_fill_super was unsuccessful. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48421Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [>= v3.4]
-
- 08 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
In general I'd rather random bad behavior on the network won't trigger a printk. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 05 11月, 2012 17 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We can and should use the rpc_create_args and __rpc_clone_client() to change the program and version number on the resulting rpc_client. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Use WARN_ON_ONCE instead of calling BUG_ON and return -EINVAL when RPC_TASK_ASYNC flag is passed to rpc_call_sync. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE(). Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE(). Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace two BUG_ON() calls with WARN_ON_ONCE() and early returns. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE(). Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Instead of calling BUG_ON(), do a WARN_ON_ONCE() and return -EINVAL. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE() and truncate the encoded string if len > max. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE() and NULL return - the caller will handle this like a memory allocation failure. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace bounds checking BUG_ON() with a WARN_ON_ONCE() and resetting the requested len to the max. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace two bounds checking BUG_ON() calls with WARN_ON_ONCE() and resetting the requested size to RPCSVC_MAXPAGES. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace BUG_ON() with a WARN_ON_ONCE() and early return. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace multiple BUG_ON() calls with WARN_ON_ONCE() and early return when sanity checking socket ownership (lock). The bind call will fail if the socket was unsuccessfully reclassified. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace BUG_ON() with a WARN() and early return. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace two BUG_ON() calls checking the RPC_BC_PA_IN_USE flag with WARN_ON_ONCE(). Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON() - the condition is definitely a misuse of the API, but shouldn't cause a crash. Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Weston Andros Adamson 提交于
Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE() in two parts of cache_read(). Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-