Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

Thanks to Broadcom releasing some code we can use better names.
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

In MMIO dumps of ndiswrapper there are following PHY ops:
phy_read(0x0118) -> 0x013d
phy_read(0x01ed) -> 0x993d
phy_read(0x0119) -> 0x012f
phy_read(0x01ee) -> 0x992f
phy_read(0x011a) -> 0x0139
phy_read(0x0969) -> 0x9939
It matches the code of wlc_phy_txpower_est_power_nphy (from brcm80211),
so we know the registers meaning.
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

After b43_phy_ht_tx_power_ctl_setup there are some extra radio ops:
 radio_read(0x08bf) -> 0x0001
radio_write(0x08bf) <- 0x0001
radio_write(0x0159) <- 0x0011
On N-PHY we write 0x11 to TSSI regs, so it's probably sth similar.
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

Now when we know many radio regs at 0x000 are core-generic, I've noticed
we duplicate some values in the tables.
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

After comparing writes to registers at 0x000, 0x400 and 0x800 it seems
there are many very similar writes. So 0x000 offset is not for accessing
something totally different, but probably just the first out of three
cores.
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>

Do not implement this in b43, but use bcma_pmu_spuravoid_pllupdate().
Signed-off-by: NHauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NHauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

This fixes some sparse warnings.

b43_nphy_set_rxantenna() was not used anywhere.
Signed-off-by: NHauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Instead of defining the magic values in the code use constants.
Signed-off-by: NHauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

When calculating "offset" for final RSSI calibration we're using numbers
bigger than s8 can hold. We have for example:
offset[j] = 232 - poll_results[j];
formula. If poll_results[j] is small enough (it usually is) we treat
number's bit as a sign bit. For example 232 - 1 becomes:
0xE8 - 0x1 = 0xE7, which is not 231 but -25.

This code was introduced in e0c9a021
and caused stability regression on some cards, for ex. BCM4322.
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Intermittently, b43 will report "Out of order TX status report on DMA ring".
When this happens, the driver must be reset before communication can resume.
The cause of the problem is believed to be an error in the closed-source
firmware; however, all versions of the firmware are affected.

This change uses the observation that the expected status is always 2 less
than the observed value, and supplies a fake status report to skip one
header/data pair.

Not all devices suffer from this problem, but it can occur several times
per second under heavy load. As each occurence kills the unmodified driver,
this patch makes if possible for the affected devices to function. The patch
logs only the first instance of the reset operation to prevent spamming
the logs.
Tested-by: NChris Vine <chris@cvine.freeserve.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

We're using "mind" variable to find the VCM that got the best polling
results. For each VCM we calculte "currd" which is compared to the
"mind". For PHY rev3+ "currd" gets values around 14k-40k. Looking for a
value smaller than 40 makes no sense, so increase the initial value.

This fixes a regression introduced in 3.4 by commit:
e0c9a021
(my BCM4322 performance dropped from 18,4Mb/s to 9,26Mb/s)
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

The BCM5354 SoC has a build in ieee80211 core rev 13 with a LP-PHY on
it. This devices has a sprom version 3 stored in the nvram. This patch
removes the warning and uses the opo values from the sprom as mentioned
in the specs.
Signed-off-by: NHauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

With this patch the same registers are written, but this access is now
protected by a lock.
Signed-off-by: NHauke Mehrtens <hauke@hauke-m.de>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Drivers that don't use chanctxes cannot perform VHT association because
they still use a "backward compatibility" pair of {ieee80211_channel,
nl80211_channel_type} in ieee80211_conf and ieee80211_local.
Signed-off-by: NKarl Beldan <karl.beldan@rivierawaves.com>
[fix kernel-doc]
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

It was another sequence I recognized in HT-PHY dump:
 phy_read(0x00c7) -> 0x0001
 phy_read(0x00c3) -> 0x0000
phy_write(0x00c3) <- 0x0002
 phy_read(0x00c3) -> 0x0000
phy_write(0x00c3) <- 0x0000
The difference to N-PHY is that it writes to 6 tables instead of a one
(after above).
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Don't enable it until we have (almost?) whole TX power management
figured out. It's similar to the N-PHY, the difference is that we call a
"fix" *before* disabling power control.
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

It was just another similar-to-N-PHY and easy-to-track routine:
write32 0xb0601408 <- 0x00002057
 phy_read(0x0001) -> 0x0000
phy_write(0x0001) <- 0x4000
phy_write(0x0001) <- 0x0000
write32 0xb0601408 <- 0x00002055
(b43_phy_ht_force_rf_sequence was moved up unmodified)
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

On N-PHY it's also done after TX power fix, so it was easy to spot.
Unfortunately the MMIO logs I have from ndsiwrapper include channels
1-12 only, so enabling code for 13 and 14 is just a N-PHY-based guess.
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

On N-PHY after B43_PHY_B_TEST operation there is a call to TX power fix
function which iterates over available cores. It matches our HT-PHY code
which means it's probably also some TX fix.
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

After comparing operations on reg 0xB on N and HT it seems to be the
same register with similar ops. Implement them for HT-PHY.
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

It you take a look at N-PHY analog switch function it touches every core
on the chipset. It seems HT-PHY does they same, it just has 3 cores
instead of 2 (which make sense since BCM4331 is 3x3). Rename AFE defines
to include core id.
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

HT-PHY was found only on BCM4331 which is a BCMA-based chipset. This is
reallly unlikely we will ever see HT-PHY on SSB thus make the whole code
BCMA specific. This will allow us to call various BCMA-specific
functions directly (without extra checks).
Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Signed-off-by: NRafał Miłecki <zajec5@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

Also add a missing 'the' before 'runtime performance'.
Signed-off-by: NW. Trevor King <wking@tremily.us>
Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>

On unload, b43 produces a lockdep warning that can be summarized in the
following way:

 ======================================================
 [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
 3.8.0-wl+ #117 Not tainted
 -------------------------------------------------------
 modprobe/5557 is trying to acquire lock:
  ((&wl->firmware_load)){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81062160>] flush_work+0x0/0x2a0

 but task is already holding lock:
  (rtnl_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff813bd7d2>] rtnl_lock+0x12/0x20

 which lock already depends on the new lock.
 [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
 ======================================================

The full output is available at http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1302.3/00060.html.
To summarize, commit 6b6fa586 added a 'cancel_work_sync(&wl->firmware_load)'
call in the wrong place.

The fix is to move the cancel_work_sync() call to b43_bcma_remove() and
b43_ssb_remove(). Thanks to Johannes Berg and Michael Buesch for help in
diagnosing the log output.
Signed-off-by: NLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> [V3.5+]
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Bastian Bittorf reported that some of the silent freezes on a Linksys WRT54G
were due to overflow of the RX DMA ring buffer, which was created with 64
slots. That finding reminded me that I was seeing similar crashed on a netbook,
which also has a relatively slow processor. After increasing the number of
slots to 128, runs on the netbook that previously failed now worked; however,
I found that 109 slots had been used in one test. For that reason, the number
of slots is being increased to 256.
Signed-off-by: NLarry Finger <Larry.Finger@lwfinger.net>
Cc: Bastian Bittorf <bittorf@bluebottle.com>
Cc: Stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>