Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 25 5月, 2017 15 次提交
  3. 11 5月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 10 5月, 2017 3 次提交
    • D
      drm/vblank: drop the mode argument from drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos · 1bf6ad62
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      If we restrict this helper to only kms drivers (which is the case) we
can look up the correct mode easily ourselves. But it's a bit tricky:

- All legacy drivers look at crtc->hwmode. But that is updated already
  at the beginning of the modeset helper, which means when we disable
  a pipe. Hence the final timestamps might be a bit off. But since
  this is an existing bug I'm not going to change it, but just try to
  be bug-for-bug compatible with the current code. This only applies
  to radeon&amdgpu.

- i915 tries to get it perfect by updating crtc->hwmode when the pipe
  is off (i.e. vblank->enabled = false).

- All other atomic drivers look at crtc->state->adjusted_mode. Those
  that look at state->requested_mode simply don't adjust their mode,
  so it's the same. That has two problems: Accessing crtc->state from
  interrupt handling code is unsafe, and it's updated before we shut
  down the pipe. For nonblocking modesets it's even worse.

For atomic drivers try to implement what i915 does. To do that we add
a new hwmode field to the vblank structure, and update it from
drm_calc_timestamping_constants(). For atomic drivers that's called
from the right spot by the helper library already, so all fine. But
for safety let's enforce that.

For legacy driver this function is only called at the end (oh the
fun), which is broken, so again let's not bother and just stay
bug-for-bug compatible.

The  benefit is that we can use drm_calc_vbltimestamp_from_scanoutpos
directly to implement ->get_vblank_timestamp in every driver, deleting
a lot of code.

v2: Completely new approach, trying to mimick the i915 solution.

v3: Fixup kerneldoc.

v4: Drop the WARN_ON to check that the vblank is off, atomic helpers
currently unconditionally call this. Recomputing the same stuff should
be harmless.

v5: Fix typos and move misplaced hunks to the right patches (Neil).

v6: Undo hunk movement (kbuild).

Cc: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NNeil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170509140329.24114-4-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
      1bf6ad62
    • D
      drm/vblank: Switch to bool in_vblank_irq in get_vblank_timestamp · 3fcdcb27
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      It's overkill to have a flag parameter which is essentially used just
as a boolean. This takes care of core + adjusting drivers.

Adjusting the scanout position callback is a bit harder, since radeon
also supplies it's own driver-private flags in there.

v2: Fixup misplaced hunks (Neil).

v3: kbuild says v1 was better ...

Cc: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NNeil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170509140329.24114-2-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
      3fcdcb27
    • D
      drm/vblank: Switch drm_driver->get_vblank_timestamp to return a bool · d673c02c
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      There's really no reason for anything more:
- Calling this while the crtc vblank stuff isn't set up is a driver
  bug. Those places alrready DRM_ERROR.
- Calling this when the crtc is off is either a driver bug (calling
  drm_crtc_handle_vblank at the wrong time) or a core bug (for
  anything else). Again, we DRM_ERROR.
- EINVAL is checked at higher levels already, and if we'd use struct
  drm_crtc * instead of (dev, pipe) it would be real obvious that
  those are again core bugs.

The only valid failure mode is crap hardware that couldn't sample a
useful timestamp, to ask the core to just grab a not-so-accurate
timestamp. Bool is perfectly fine for that.

v2: Also fix up the one caller, I lost that in the shuffling (Jani).

v3: Fixup commit message (Neil).

Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mario Kleiner <mario.kleiner@tuebingen.mpg.de>
Cc: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NNeil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>
Acked-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170509140329.24114-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
      d673c02c
  7. 06 5月, 2017 2 次提交
  9. 29 4月, 2017 3 次提交
  11. 07 4月, 2017 5 次提交
  13. 05 4月, 2017 4 次提交
  15. 30 3月, 2017 7 次提交