- 19 3月, 2013 11 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
The tty core relies on the ldisc layer for synchronizing destruction of the tty. Instead, the final tty release must wait for any pending tty work to complete prior to tty destruction. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
Waiting for buffer work to complete is not required for safely performing changes to the line discipline, once the line discipline is halted. The buffer work routine, flush_to_ldisc(), will be unable to acquire an ldisc ref and all existing references were waited until released (so it can't already have one). Ensure running buffer work which may reference the soon-to-be-gone tty completes and any buffer work running after this point retrieves a NULL tty. Also, ensure all buffer work is cancelled on port destruction. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
tty_ldisc_hangup() guarantees the ldisc is enabled (or that there is no ldisc). Since __tty_hangup() was the only user, re-define tty_ldisc_enable() in file-scope. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
SAK work may schedule hangup work (if TTY_SOFT_SAK is defined), thus SAK work must be flushed before hangup work. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
The pty driver does not obtain an ldisc reference to the linked tty when writing. When the ldiscs are sequentially halted, it is possible for one ldisc to be halted, and before the second ldisc can be halted, a concurrent write schedules buffer work on the first ldisc. This can lead to an access-after-free error when the scheduled buffer work starts on the closed ldisc. Prevent subsequent use after halt by performing each stage of the halt on both ttys. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
In preparation for destructing and freeing the tty, the line discipline must first be brought to an inactive state before it can be destructed. This line discipline shutdown must: - disallow new users of the ldisc - wait for existing ldisc users to finish - only then, cancel/flush their pending/running work Factor tty_ldisc_wait_idle() from tty_set_ldisc() and tty_ldisc_kill() to ensure this shutdown order. Failure to provide this guarantee can result in scheduled work running after the tty has already been freed, as indicated in the following log message: [ 88.331234] WARNING: at drivers/tty/tty_buffer.c:435 flush_to_ldisc+0x194/0x1d0() [ 88.334505] Hardware name: Bochs [ 88.335618] tty is bad=-1 [ 88.335703] Modules linked in: netconsole configfs bnep rfcomm bluetooth ...... [ 88.345272] Pid: 39, comm: kworker/1:1 Tainted: G W 3.7.0-next-20121129+ttydebug-xeon #20121129+ttydebug [ 88.347736] Call Trace: [ 88.349024] [<ffffffff81058aff>] warn_slowpath_common+0x7f/0xc0 [ 88.350383] [<ffffffff81058bf6>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x50 [ 88.351745] [<ffffffff81432bd4>] flush_to_ldisc+0x194/0x1d0 [ 88.353047] [<ffffffff816f7fe1>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x21/0x50 [ 88.354190] [<ffffffff8108a809>] ? finish_task_switch+0x49/0xe0 [ 88.355436] [<ffffffff81077ad1>] process_one_work+0x121/0x490 [ 88.357674] [<ffffffff81432a40>] ? __tty_buffer_flush+0x90/0x90 [ 88.358954] [<ffffffff81078c84>] worker_thread+0x164/0x3e0 [ 88.360247] [<ffffffff81078b20>] ? manage_workers+0x120/0x120 [ 88.361282] [<ffffffff8107e230>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0 [ 88.362284] [<ffffffff816f0000>] ? cmos_do_probe+0x2eb/0x3bf [ 88.363391] [<ffffffff8107e170>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0 [ 88.364797] [<ffffffff816fff6c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [ 88.366087] [<ffffffff8107e170>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0xb0/0xb0 [ 88.367266] ---[ end trace 453a7c9f38fbfec0 ]--- Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
tty_ldisc_halt() will use the file-scoped function, tty_ldisc_wait_idle(), in the following patch. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
Flip buffer work cannot be cancelled until all outstanding ldisc references have been released. Convert the ldisc ref wait into a full ldisc halt with buffer work cancellation. Note that the legacy mutex is not held while cancelling. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
Since the tty->ldisc is prevented from being changed by tty_set_ldisc() when a tty is being hung up, re-testing the ldisc user count is unnecessary -- ie, it cannot be a different ldisc and the user count cannot have increased (assuming the caller meets the precondition that TTY_LDISC flag is cleared) Removal of the 'early-out' locking optimization is necessary for the subsequent patch 'tty: Fix ldisc halt sequence on hangup'. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
Refactor tty_ldisc_hangup() to extract standalone function, tty_ldisc_hangup_wait_idle(), to wait for ldisc references to be released. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Peter Hurley 提交于
Flip buffer work must not be scheduled by the line discipline after the line discipline has been halted; issue warning. Note: drivers can still schedule flip buffer work. Signed-off-by: NPeter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 16 1月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
Since commit 89c8d91e ("tty: localise the lock") I see a dead lock in one of my dummy_hcd + g_nokia test cases. The first run was usually okay, the second often resulted in a splat by lockdep and the third was usually a dead lock. Lockdep complained about tty->hangup_work and tty->legacy_mutex taken both ways: | ====================================================== | [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ] | 3.7.0-rc6+ #204 Not tainted | ------------------------------------------------------- | kworker/2:1/35 is trying to acquire lock: | (&tty->legacy_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<c14051e6>] tty_lock_nested+0x36/0x80 | | but task is already holding lock: | ((&tty->hangup_work)){+.+...}, at: [<c104f6e4>] process_one_work+0x124/0x5e0 | | which lock already depends on the new lock. | | the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: | | -> #2 ((&tty->hangup_work)){+.+...}: | [<c107fe74>] lock_acquire+0x84/0x190 | [<c104d82d>] flush_work+0x3d/0x240 | [<c12e6986>] tty_ldisc_flush_works+0x16/0x30 | [<c12e7861>] tty_ldisc_release+0x21/0x70 | [<c12e0dfc>] tty_release+0x35c/0x470 | [<c1105e28>] __fput+0xd8/0x270 | [<c1105fcd>] ____fput+0xd/0x10 | [<c1051dd9>] task_work_run+0xb9/0xf0 | [<c1002a51>] do_notify_resume+0x51/0x80 | [<c140550a>] work_notifysig+0x35/0x3b | | -> #1 (&tty->legacy_mutex/1){+.+...}: | [<c107fe74>] lock_acquire+0x84/0x190 | [<c140276c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x6c/0x2f0 | [<c14051e6>] tty_lock_nested+0x36/0x80 | [<c1405279>] tty_lock_pair+0x29/0x70 | [<c12e0bb8>] tty_release+0x118/0x470 | [<c1105e28>] __fput+0xd8/0x270 | [<c1105fcd>] ____fput+0xd/0x10 | [<c1051dd9>] task_work_run+0xb9/0xf0 | [<c1002a51>] do_notify_resume+0x51/0x80 | [<c140550a>] work_notifysig+0x35/0x3b | | -> #0 (&tty->legacy_mutex){+.+.+.}: | [<c107f3c9>] __lock_acquire+0x1189/0x16a0 | [<c107fe74>] lock_acquire+0x84/0x190 | [<c140276c>] mutex_lock_nested+0x6c/0x2f0 | [<c14051e6>] tty_lock_nested+0x36/0x80 | [<c140523f>] tty_lock+0xf/0x20 | [<c12df8e4>] __tty_hangup+0x54/0x410 | [<c12dfcb2>] do_tty_hangup+0x12/0x20 | [<c104f763>] process_one_work+0x1a3/0x5e0 | [<c104fec9>] worker_thread+0x119/0x3a0 | [<c1055084>] kthread+0x94/0xa0 | [<c140ca37>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x28 | |other info that might help us debug this: | |Chain exists of: | &tty->legacy_mutex --> &tty->legacy_mutex/1 --> (&tty->hangup_work) | | Possible unsafe locking scenario: | | CPU0 CPU1 | ---- ---- | lock((&tty->hangup_work)); | lock(&tty->legacy_mutex/1); | lock((&tty->hangup_work)); | lock(&tty->legacy_mutex); | | *** DEADLOCK *** Before the path mentioned tty_ldisc_release() look like this: | tty_ldisc_halt(tty); | tty_ldisc_flush_works(tty); | tty_lock(); As it can be seen, it first flushes the workqueue and then grabs the tty_lock. Now we grab the lock first: | tty_lock_pair(tty, o_tty); | tty_ldisc_halt(tty); | tty_ldisc_flush_works(tty); so lockdep's complaint seems valid. The earlier version of this patch took the ldisc_mutex since the other user of tty_ldisc_flush_works() (tty_set_ldisc()) did this. Peter Hurley then said that it is should not be requried. Since it wasn't done earlier, I dropped this part. The code under tty_ldisc_kill() was executed earlier with the tty lock taken so it is taken again. I was able to reproduce the deadlock on v3.8-rc1, this patch fixes the problem in my testcase. I didn't notice any problems so far. Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Cc: Peter Hurley <peter@hurleysoftware.com> Signed-off-by: NSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Ivo Sieben 提交于
Before waking up the tty line discipline idle queue first check if the queue is active (non empty). This prevents unnecessary entering the critical section in the wake_up() function and therefore avoid needless scheduling overhead on a PREEMPT_RT system caused by two processes being in the same critical section. Signed-off-by: NIvo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 25 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ivo Sieben 提交于
The global "normal" spin lock that guards the line discipline administration is replaced by a raw spin lock. On a PREEMPT_RT system this prevents unwanted scheduling overhead around the line discipline administration. On a 200 MHz AT91SAM9261 processor setup this fixes about 100us of scheduling overhead on a TTY read or write call. Signed-off-by: NIvo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 23 10月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
So this is it. The big step why we did all the work over the past kernel releases. Now everything is prepared, so nothing protects us from doing that big step. | | \ \ nnnn/^l | | | | \ / / | | | '-,.__ => \/ ,-` => | '-,.__ | O __.´´) ( .` | O __.´´) ~~~ ~~ `` ~~~ ~~ The buffers are now in the tty_port structure and we can start teaching the buffer helpers (insert char/string, flip etc.) to use tty_port instead of tty_struct all around. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Acked-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
We reintroduced tty_ldisc_wait_idle in 100eeae2 (TTY: restore tty_ldisc_wait_idle) and used in set_ldisc. Then we added it also to the hangup path in 92f6fa09 (TTY: ldisc, do not close until there are readers). And we noted that there is one more path: ~ Before 65b77046 tty_ldisc_wait_idle was called also from ~ tty_ldisc_release. It is called from tty_release, so I don't think ~ we need to restore that one. Well, I was wrong. There might still be holders of an ldisc reference. Not from userspace, but drivers. If they take a reference and a user closes the device immediately after that, we have a problem. ldisc is halted and closed by TTY, but the driver still may call some ldisc's operation and cause a crash. So restore the tty_ldisc_wait_idle call also to the third location where it was before 65b77046 (tty-ldisc: turn ldisc user count into a proper refcount). Now we should be safe with respect to the ldisc reference counting as all* tty_ldisc_close paths are safely called with reference count of one. * Not the one in tty_ldisc_setup's fail path. But that is called before the first open finishes. So userspace does not see it yet. Even thought the driver is given the TTY already via ->install, it should not take a reference to the ldisc yet. If some driver is to do this, we should put one tty_ldisc_wait_idle also in the setup. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Acked-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 21 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
flush[_delayed]_work_sync() are now spurious. Mark them deprecated and convert all users to flush[_delayed]_work(). If you're cc'd and wondering what's going on: Now all workqueues are non-reentrant and the regular flushes guarantee that the work item is not pending or running on any CPU on return, so there's no reason to use the sync flushes at all and they're going away. This patch doesn't make any functional difference. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Cc: Mattia Dongili <malattia@linux.it> Cc: Kent Yoder <key@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> Cc: Karsten Keil <isdn@linux-pingi.de> Cc: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu@canonical.com> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Alasdair Kergon <agk@redhat.com> Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org> Cc: Florian Tobias Schandinat <FlorianSchandinat@gmx.de> Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Cc: Anton Vorontsov <cbou@mail.ru> Cc: Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@samsung.com> Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@gmail.com> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com> Cc: Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
-
- 11 8月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
The termios and other changes mean the other protections needed on the driver tty arrays should be adequate. Turn it all back on. This contains pieces folded in from the fixes made to the original patches | From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> (fix m68k) | From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> (fix cris) | From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suze.cz> (lockdep) | From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> (lockdep) Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 28 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
Ian Abbott found that the tty layer would explode with the right set of parallel open and close operations. This is because we race in the handling of tty->drivers->termios[]. Correct this by Making tty_ldisc_release behave like nromal code (takes the lock, does stuff, drops the lock) Drop the tty lock earlier in tty_ldisc_release Taking the tty mutex around the driver->termios update in all cases Adding a WARN_ON to catch future screwups. I also forgot to clean up the pty resources properly. With a pty pair we need to pull both halves out of the tables. Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NIan Abbott <abbotti@mev.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 27 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shachar Shemesh 提交于
Commit acfa747b introduced the TTY_HUPPING flag to distinguish closed TTY from currently closing ones. The test in tty_set_ldisc still remained pointing at the old flag. This causes pppd to sometimes lapse into uninterruptible sleep when killed and restarted. Signed-off-by: NShachar Shemesh <shachar@liveu.tv> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 17 7月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
This will let us sort out a whole pile of tty related races. The alternative would be to keep points and refcount the termios objects. However 1. They are tiny anyway 2. Many devices don't use the stored copies 3. We can remove a pty special case Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
I sent GregKH this after the pre-requisites. He dropped the pre-requesites for good reason and unfortunately then applied this patch. Without this reverted you get random kernel memory corruption which will make bisecting anything between it and the properly applied patches a complete sod. Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 13 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Shachar Shemesh 提交于
Commit acfa747b introduced the TTY_HUPPING flag to distinguish closed TTY from currently closing ones. The test in tty_set_ldisc still remained pointing at the old flag. This causes pppd to sometimes lapse into uninterruptible sleep when killed and restarted. Signed-off-by: NShachar Shemesh <shachar@liveu.tv> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 07 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
The termios and other changes mean the other protections needed on the driver tty arrays should be adequate. Turn it all back on. This contains pieces folded in from the fixes made to the original patches | From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> (fix m68k) | From: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> (fix cris) | From: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suze.cz> (lockdep) | From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> (lockdep) Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 03 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This reverts the tty layer change to use per-tty locking, because it's not correct yet, and fixing it will require some more deep surgery. The main revert is d29f3ef3 ("tty_lock: Localise the lock"), but there are several smaller commits that built upon it, they also get reverted here. The list of reverted commits is: fde86d31 - tty: add lockdep annotations 8f6576ad - tty: fix ldisc lock inversion trace d3ca8b64 - pty: Fix lock inversion b1d679af - tty: drop the pty lock during hangup abcefe5f - tty/amiserial: Add missing argument for tty_unlock() fd11b42e - cris: fix missing tty arg in wait_event_interruptible_tty call d29f3ef3 - tty_lock: Localise the lock The revert had a trivial conflict in the 68360serial.c staging driver that got removed in the meantime. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 30 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
This is caused by tty_release using tty_lock_pair to lock both sides of the pty/tty pair, and then tty_ldisc_release dropping and relocking one side only. We can drop both fine, so drop both to avoid any lock ordering concerns. Rework the release path to fix the new locking model. Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 11 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ivo Sieben 提交于
The global wait_queue that is used for line discipline idle handling is moved to a separate wait_queue for each line instance. This prevents unnecessary blocking on one line, because of idle handling on another line. Signed-off-by: NIvo Sieben <meltedpianoman@gmail.com> Acked-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 05 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alan Cox 提交于
In each remaining case the tty_lock is associated with a specific tty. This means we can now lock on a per tty basis. We do need tty_lock_pair() for the pty case. Uglier but still a step in the right direction. [fixed up calls in 3 missing drivers - gregkh] Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 18 11月, 2011 4 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
They were cut&pasted from tty_io. Many of them are not needed in tty_ldisc. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
For /dev/console case, we do not kill all ldisc users. It's due to redirected_tty_write test in __tty_hangup. In that case there still might be a process waiting e.g. in n_tty_read for input. We wait for such processes to disappear. The problem is that we use a timeout. After this timeout, we continue closing the ldisc and start freeing tty resources. It obviously leads to crashes when the other process is woken. So to fix this, we wait infinitely before reiniting the ldisc. (The tiocsetd remains untouched -- times out after 5s.) This is nicely reproducible with this run from shell: exec 0<>/dev/console 1<>/dev/console 2<>/dev/console and stopping a getty like: systemctl stop serial-getty@ttyS0.service The crash proper may be produced only under load or with constified timing the same as for 92f6fa09. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Cc: Dmitriy Matrosov <sgf.dma@gmail.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
It is the only place where reinit is called from. And we really need to wait for the old ldisc to go once. Actually this is the place where the waiting originally was (before removed and re-added later). This will make the fix in the following patch easier to implement. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Cc: Dmitriy Matrosov <sgf.dma@gmail.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
To fix a nasty bug in ldisc hup vs. reinit we need to wait infinitely long for ldisc to be gone. So here we add a parameter to tty_ldisc_wait_idle to allow that. This is only a preparation for the real fix which is done in the following patches. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> Cc: Dmitriy Matrosov <sgf.dma@gmail.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 16 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dave Young 提交于
wait_event_timeout always return value >= 0 remove the unnecessary ret < 0 check Signed-off-by: NDave Young <dyoung@redhat.com> Acked-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 24 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
We used it really only serial and ami_serial. The rest of the callsites were BUG/WARN_ONs to check if BTM is held. Now that we pruned tty_locked from both of the real users, we can get rid of tty_lock along with __big_tty_mutex_owner. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 08 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
We restored tty_ldisc_wait_idle in 100eeae2 (TTY: restore tty_ldisc_wait_idle). We used it in the ldisc changing path to fix the case where there are tasks in n_tty_read waiting for data and somebody tries to change ldisc. Similar to the case above, there may be also tasks waiting in n_tty_read while hangup is performed. As 65b77046 (tty-ldisc: turn ldisc user count into a proper refcount) removed the wait-until-idle from all paths, hangup path won't wait for them to disappear either now. So add it back even to the hangup path. There is a difference, we need uninterruptible sleep as there is obviously HUP signal pending. So tty_ldisc_wait_idle now sleeps without possibility to be interrupted. This is what original tty_ldisc_wait_idle did. After the wait idle reintroduction (100eeae2), we have had interruptible sleeps for the ldisc changing path. But as there is a 5s timeout anyway, we don't allow it to be interrupted from now on. It's not worth the added complexity of deciding what kind of sleep we want. Before 65b77046 tty_ldisc_release was called also from tty_ldisc_release. It is called from tty_release, so I don't think we need to restore that one. This is nicely reproducible after constifying the timing when drivers/tty/n_tty.c is patched as follows ("TTY: ntty, add one more sanity check" patch is needed to actually see it explode): %% -1548,6 +1549,7 @@ static int n_tty_open(struct tty_struct *tty) /* These are ugly. Currently a malloc failure here can panic */ if (!tty->read_buf) { + msleep(100); tty->read_buf = kzalloc(N_TTY_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL); if (!tty->read_buf) return -ENOMEM; %% -1785,6 +1788,7 @@ do_it_again: break; } timeout = schedule_timeout(timeout); + msleep(20); continue; } __set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING); ===== With a process: ===== while (1) { int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR); read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf)); close(fd); } ===== and its child: ===== setsid(); while (1) { int fd = open(tty, O_RDWR|O_NOCTTY); ioctl(fd, TIOCSCTTY, 1); vhangup(); close(fd); usleep(100 * (10 + random() % 1000)); } ===== EOF ===== References: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=693374 References: https://bugzilla.novell.com/show_bug.cgi?id=694509Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> [32, 33, 34, 39] Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 20 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
Introduce deinitialize_tty_struct which should be called after initialize_tty_struct and before successfull tty_ldisc_setup. It calls tty_ldisc_deinit which is opposite of tty_ldisc_init. It only puts a reference to ldisc and assigns NULL to tty->ldisc. It will be used to shut down ldisc when tty_release cannot be called yet. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Cc: Julian Anastasov <ja@ssi.bg> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 23 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Using delayed-work for tty flip buffers ends up causing us to wait for the next tick to complete some actions. That's usually not all that noticeable, but for certain latency-critical workloads it ends up being totally unacceptable. As an extreme case of this, passing a token back-and-forth over a pty will take two ticks per iteration, so even just a thousand iterations will take 8 seconds assuming a common 250Hz configuration. Avoiding the whole delayed work issue brings that ping-pong test-case down to 0.009s on my machine. In more practical terms, this latency has been a performance problem for things like dive computer simulators (simulating the serial interface using the ptys) and for other environments (Alan mentions a CP/M emulator). Reported-by: NJef Driesen <jefdriesen@telenet.be> Acked-by: NGreg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Acked-by: NAlan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 02 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
These were missed the last time I cleaned this up globally, because of code moving around or new code getting merged. Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
-
- 04 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
flush_scheduled_work() is scheduled to be deprecated. Explicitly sync flush the used work items instead. Note that before this change, flush_scheduled_work() wouldn't have properly flushed tty->buf.work if it were on timer. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-
- 30 11月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Slaby 提交于
When a concrete ldisc open fails in tty_ldisc_open, we forget to clear TTY_LDISC_OPEN. This causes a false warning on the next ldisc open: WARNING: at drivers/char/tty_ldisc.c:445 tty_ldisc_open+0x26/0x38() Hardware name: System Product Name Modules linked in: ... Pid: 5251, comm: a.out Tainted: G W 2.6.32-5-686 #1 Call Trace: [<c1030321>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x5e/0x8a [<c1030357>] ? warn_slowpath_null+0xa/0xc [<c119311c>] ? tty_ldisc_open+0x26/0x38 [<c11936c5>] ? tty_set_ldisc+0x218/0x304 ... So clear the bit when failing... Introduced in c65c9bc3 (tty: rewrite the ldisc locking) back in 2.6.31-rc1. Signed-off-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.cz> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com> Reported-by: NSergey Lapin <slapin@ossfans.org> Tested-by: NSergey Lapin <slapin@ossfans.org> Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
-