Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 20 6月, 2006 11 次提交
  3. 18 6月, 2006 9 次提交
  5. 15 6月, 2006 1 次提交
  7. 14 6月, 2006 6 次提交
  9. 13 6月, 2006 8 次提交
  11. 12 6月, 2006 5 次提交
    • L
      Merge branch 'upstream-linus' of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev · 0e838b72
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      * 'upstream-linus' of master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev:
  [PATCH] sata_mv: grab host lock inside eng_timeout
      0e838b72
    • A
      [TCP]: continued: reno sacked_out count fix · 79320d7e
      由 Aki M Nyrhinen 提交于 
      From: Aki M Nyrhinen <anyrhine@cs.helsinki.fi>

IMHO the current fix to the problem (in_flight underflow in reno)
is incorrect.  it treats the symptons but ignores the problem. the
problem is timing out packets other than the head packet when we
don't have sack. i try to explain (sorry if explaining the obvious).

with sack, scanning the retransmit queue for timed out packets is
fine because we know which packets in our retransmit queue have been
acked by the receiver.

without sack, we know only how many packets in our retransmit queue the
receiver has acknowledged, but no idea which packets.

think of a "typical" slow-start overshoot case, where for example
every third packet in a window get lost because a router buffer gets
full.

with sack, we check for timeouts on those every third packet (as the
rest have been sacked). the packet counting works out and if there
is no reordering, we'll retransmit exactly the packets that were 
lost.

without sack, however, we check for timeout on every packet and end up
retransmitting consecutive packets in the retransmit queue. in our
slow-start example, 2/3 of those retransmissions are unnecessary. these
unnecessary retransmissions eat the congestion window and evetually
prevent fast recovery from continuing, if enough packets were lost.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      79320d7e
    • A
      [DCCP] Ackvec: fix soft lockup in ackvec handling code · afec35e3
      由 Andrea Bittau 提交于 
      A soft lockup existed in the handling of ack vector records.
Specifically, when a tail of the list of ack vector records was
removed, it was possible to end up iterating infinitely on an element
of the tail.
Signed-off-by: NAndrea Bittau <a.bittau@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Signed-off-by: NIan McDonald <ian.mcdonald@jandi.co.nz>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      afec35e3
    • D
      [SPARC64]: Do not double-export sys_close() when CONFIG_SOLARIS_EMUL_MODULE · ccefb5f3
      由 David S. Miller 提交于 
      It is already exported by fs/open.c

Noticed by Ben Collins.
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      ccefb5f3
    • P
      [PATCH] Fix for the PPTP hangs that have been reported · 289a1e99
      由 Paul Mackerras 提交于 
      People have been reporting that PPP connections over ptys, such as
used with PPTP, will hang randomly when transferring large amounts of
data, for instance in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6530.
I have managed to reproduce the problem, and the patch below fixes the
actual cause.

The problem is not in fact in ppp_async.c but in n_tty.c.  What
happens is that when pptp reads from the pty, we call read_chan() in
drivers/char/n_tty.c on the master side of the pty.  That copies all
the characters out of its buffer to userspace and then calls
check_unthrottle(), which calls the pty unthrottle routine, which
calls tty_wakeup on the slave side, which calls ppp_asynctty_wakeup,
which calls tasklet_schedule.  So far so good.  Since we are in
process context, the tasklet runs immediately and calls
ppp_async_process(), which calls ppp_async_push, which calls the
tty->driver->write function to send some more output.

However, tty->driver->write() returns zero, because the master
tty->receive_room is still zero.  We haven't returned from
check_unthrottle() yet, and read_chan() only updates tty->receive_room
_after_ calling check_unthrottle.  That means that the driver->write
call in ppp_async_process() returns 0.  That would be fine if we were
going to get a subsequent wakeup call, but we aren't (we just had it,
and the buffer is now empty).

The solution is for n_tty.c to update tty->receive_room _before_
calling the driver unthrottle routine.  The patch below does this.
With this patch I was able to transfer a 900MB file over a PPTP
connection (taking about 25 minutes), whereas without the patch the
connection would always stall in under a minute.
Signed-off-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      289a1e99