1. 24 2月, 2020 35 次提交
  2. 23 2月, 2020 5 次提交
    • A
      efi/libstub/x86: Avoid overflowing code32_start on PE entry · 04a7d0e1
      Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
      When using the native PE entry point (as opposed to the EFI handover
      protocol entry point that is used more widely), we set code32_start,
      which is a 32-bit wide field, to the effective symbol address of
      startup_32, which could overflow given that the EFI loader may have
      located the running image anywhere in memory, and we haven't reached
      the point yet where we relocate ourselves.
      
      Since we relocate ourselves if code32_start != pref_address, this
      isn't likely to lead to problems in practice, given how unlikely
      it is that the truncated effective address of startup_32 happens
      to equal pref_address. But it is better to defer the assignment
      of code32_start to after the relocation, when it is guaranteed to
      fit.
      
      While at it, move the call to efi_relocate_kernel() to an earlier
      stage so it is more likely that our preferred offset in memory has
      not been occupied by other memory allocations done in the mean time.
      Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
      04a7d0e1
    • A
      efi/libstub/x86: Remove pointless zeroing of apm_bios_info · e6d832ea
      Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
      We have some code in the EFI stub entry point that takes the address
      of the apm_bios_info struct in the newly allocated and zeroed out
      boot_params structure, only to zero it out again. This is pointless
      so remove it.
      Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
      e6d832ea
    • G
      efi/apple-properties: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member · 3b9274ea
      Gustavo A. R. Silva 提交于
      The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
      extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
      variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
      introduced in C99:
      
      struct foo {
              int stuff;
              struct boo array[];
      };
      
      By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
      in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
      will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
      inadvertenly introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
      
      This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
      
      [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
      [2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
      [3] commit 76497732 ("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
      Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200211231421.GA15697@embeddedorSigned-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
      3b9274ea
    • A
      efi/libstub/arm64: Use 1:1 mapping of RT services if property table exists · b92165d2
      Ard Biesheuvel 提交于
      The UEFI spec defines (and deprecates) a misguided and shortlived
      memory protection feature that is based on splitting memory regions
      covering PE/COFF executables into separate code and data regions,
      without annotating them as belonging to the same executable image.
      When the OS assigns the virtual addresses of these regions, it may
      move them around arbitrarily, without taking into account that the
      PE/COFF code sections may contain relative references into the data
      sections, which means the relative placement of these segments has
      to be preserved or the executable image will be corrupted.
      
      The original workaround on arm64 was to ensure that adjacent regions
      of the same type were mapped adjacently in the virtual mapping, but
      this requires sorting of the memory map, which we would prefer to
      avoid.
      
      Considering that the native physical mapping of the PE/COFF images
      does not suffer from this issue, let's preserve it at runtime, and
      install it as the virtual mapping as well.
      Signed-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
      b92165d2
    • H
      efi/bgrt: Accept BGRT tables with a version of 0 · 55087c57
      Hans de Goede 提交于
      Some (somewhat older) laptops have a correct BGRT table, except that the
      version field is 0 instead of 1.
      
      This has been seen on several Ivy Bridge based Lenovo models.
      
      For now the spec. only defines version 1, so it is reasonably safe to
      assume that tables with a version of 0 really are version 1 too,
      which is what this commit does so that the BGRT table will be accepted
      by the kernel on laptop models with this issue.
      Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
      Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200131130623.33875-1-hdegoede@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
      55087c57