- 22 10月, 2015 20 次提交
-
-
由 Luis de Bethencourt 提交于
reada is using -1 instead of the -ENOMEM defined macro to specify that a buffer allocation failed. Since the error number is propagated, the caller will get a -EPERM which is the wrong error condition. Also, updating the caller to return the exact value from reada_add_block. Smatch tool warning: reada_add_block() warn: returning -1 instead of -ENOMEM is sloppy Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLuis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Luis de Bethencourt 提交于
check-integrity is using -1 instead of the -ENOMEM defined macro to specify that a buffer allocation failed. Since the error number is propagated, the caller will get a -EPERM which is the wrong error condition. Also, the smatch tool complains with the following warnings: btrfsic_process_superblock() warn: returning -1 instead of -ENOMEM is sloppy btrfsic_read_block() warn: returning -1 instead of -ENOMEM is sloppy Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NLuis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Byongho Lee 提交于
Below variables are defined per compress type. - struct list_head comp_idle_workspace[BTRFS_COMPRESS_TYPES] - spinlock_t comp_workspace_lock[BTRFS_COMPRESS_TYPES] - int comp_num_workspace[BTRFS_COMPRESS_TYPES] - atomic_t comp_alloc_workspace[BTRFS_COMPRESS_TYPES] - wait_queue_head_t comp_workspace_wait[BTRFS_COMPRESS_TYPES] BTW, while accessing one compress type of these variables, the next or before address is other compress types of it. So this patch puts these variables in a struct to make cache friendly. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NByongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Byongho Lee 提交于
This patch eliminates the last item of prop_handlers array which is used to check end of array and instead uses ARRAY_SIZE macro. Though this is a very tiny optimization, using ARRAY_SIZE macro is a good practice to iterate array. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NByongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Geliang Tang 提交于
Just fix a typo in the code comment. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NGeliang Tang <geliangtang@163.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Alexandru Moise 提交于
rsv_count ultimately gets passed to start_transaction() which now takes an unsigned int as its num_items parameter. The value of rsv_count should always be positive so declare it as being unsigned. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Alexandru Moise 提交于
The value of num_items that start_transaction() ultimately always takes is a small one, so a 64 bit integer is overkill. Also change num_items for btrfs_start_transaction() and btrfs_start_transaction_lflush() as well. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Alexandru Moise 提交于
Improve readability by generalizing the profile validity checks. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Shan Hai 提交于
The commit b37392ea ("Btrfs: cleanup unnecessary parameter and variant of prepare_pages()") makes it redundant. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NShan Hai <haishan.bai@hotmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
btrfs_raid_array[] holds attributes of all raid types. Use btrfs_raid_array[].devs_min is best way for request in btrfs_reduce_alloc_profile(), instead of use complex condition of each raid types. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
btrfs_raid_array[] is used to define all raid attributes, use it to get tolerated_failures in btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(), instead of complex condition in function. It can make code simple and auto-support other possible raid-type in future. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Zhao Lei 提交于
This array is used to record attributes of each raid type, make it public, and many functions will benifit with this array. For example, num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(), we can avoid complex conditions in this function, and get raid attribute simply by accessing above array. It can also make code logic simple, reduce duplication code, and increase maintainability. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Alexandru Moise 提交于
Rather than have three separate if() statements for the same outcome we should just OR them together in the same if() statement. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Alexandru Moise 提交于
Use memset() to null out the btrfs_delayed_ref_root of btrfs_transaction instead of setting all the members to 0 by hand. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Byongho Lee 提交于
We can safely iterate whole list items, without using list_del macro. So remove the list_del call. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NByongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Byongho Lee 提交于
There is no removing list element while iterating over list. So, replace list_for_each_entry_safe to list_for_each_entry. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NByongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Alexandru Moise 提交于
Just call kmem_cache_zalloc() instead of calling kmem_cache_alloc(). We're just initializing most fields to 0, false and NULL later on _anyway_, so to make the code mode readable and potentially gain a bit of performance (completely untested claim), we should fill our btrfs_trans_handle with zeros on allocation then just initialize those five remaining fields (not counting the list_heads) as normal. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Alexandru Moise 提交于
old_len is used to store the return value of btrfs_item_size_nr(). The return value of btrfs_item_size_nr() is of type u32. To improve code correctness and avoid mixing signed and unsigned integers I've changed old_len to be of type u32 as well. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Alexandru Moise 提交于
The return values of btrfs_item_offset_nr and btrfs_item_size_nr are of type u32. To avoid mixing signed and unsigned integers we should also declare dsize and last_off to be of type u32. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Chandan Rajendra 提交于
btrfs_submit_bio_hook() uses integer constants instead of values from "enum btrfs_wq_endio_type". Fix this. Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2015 7 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Leandro Awa writes: "After switching to version 4.1.6, our parallelized and distributed workflows now fail consistently with errors of the form: T34: ./regex.c:39:22: error: config.h: No such file or directory From our 'git bisect' testing, the following commit appears to be the possible cause of the behavior we've been seeing: commit 766c4cbf" Al Viro says: "What happens is that 766c4cbf got the things subtly wrong. We used to treat d_is_negative() after lookup_fast() as "fall with ENOENT". That was wrong - checking ->d_flags outside of ->d_seq protection is unreliable and failing with hard error on what should've fallen back to non-RCU pathname resolution is a bug. Unfortunately, we'd pulled the test too far up and ran afoul of another kind of staleness. The dentry might have been absolutely stable from the RCU point of view (and we might be on UP, etc), but stale from the remote fs point of view. If ->d_revalidate() returns "it's actually stale", dentry gets thrown away and the original code wouldn't even have looked at its ->d_flags. What we need is to check ->d_flags where 766c4cbf does (prior to ->d_seq validation) but only use the result in cases where we do not discard this dentry outright" Reported-by: NLeandro Awa <lawa@nvidia.com> Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104911 Fixes: 766c4cbf ("namei: d_is_negative() should be checked...") Tested-by: NLeandro Awa <lawa@nvidia.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.1+ Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com> Acked-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
There are atomic operations that imply the barrier for waitqueue_active mixed in an if-condition. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Removing barriers is scary, but a call to atomic_dec_and_test implies a barrier, so we don't need to issue another one. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Reduce number of undocumented barriers out there. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Suggested-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
waitqueue_active should be preceded by a barrier, in this function we don't need to call it all the time. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Normally the waitqueue_active would need a barrier, but this is not necessary here because it's not a performance sensitive context and we can call wake_up directly. Suggested-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 08 10月, 2015 7 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Convert the simple cases, not all functions provide a way to reach the fs_info. Also skipped debugging messages (print-tree, integrity checker and pr_debug) and messages that are printed from possibly unfinished mount. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
Due to the missing variants there are messages that lack the information printed by btrfs_info etc helpers. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 07 10月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Anna Schumaker 提交于
Running xfstest generic/013 with the tracepoint nfs:nfs4_open_file enabled produces a NULL-pointer dereference when calculating fileid and filehandle of the opened file. Fix this by checking if state is NULL before trying to use the inode pointer. Reported-by: NOlga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NAnna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
-
- 06 10月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
The "fh_len" passed to ->fh_to_* is not guaranteed to be that same as that returned by encode_fh - it may be larger. With NFSv2, the filehandle is fixed length, so it may appear longer than expected and be zero-padded. So we must test that fh_len is at least some value, not exactly equal to it. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Acked-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
-
由 chandan 提交于
After reading one of chunk or tree root tree's root node from disk, if the root node does not have EXTENT_BUFFER_UPTODATE flag set, we fail to release the memory used by the root node. Fix this. Signed-off-by: NChandan Rajendra <chandan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
Josef ran into a deadlock while a transaction handle was finalizing the creation of its block groups, which produced the following trace: [260445.593112] fio D ffff88022a9df468 0 8924 4518 0x00000084 [260445.593119] ffff88022a9df468 ffffffff81c134c0 ffff880429693c00 ffff88022a9df488 [260445.593126] ffff88022a9e0000 ffff8803490d7b00 ffff8803490d7b18 ffff88022a9df4b0 [260445.593132] ffff8803490d7af8 ffff88022a9df488 ffffffff8175a437 ffff8803490d7b00 [260445.593137] Call Trace: [260445.593145] [<ffffffff8175a437>] schedule+0x37/0x80 [260445.593189] [<ffffffffa0850f37>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xa7/0x1f0 [btrfs] [260445.593197] [<ffffffff810db7c0>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0 [260445.593225] [<ffffffffa07eac44>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x34/0x50 [btrfs] [260445.593253] [<ffffffffa07eff6b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x88b/0xa00 [btrfs] [260445.593295] [<ffffffffa08389df>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0x90 [btrfs] [260445.593324] [<ffffffffa07f1a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs] [260445.593351] [<ffffffffa07ea94a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs] [260445.593394] [<ffffffffa08403b9>] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x1c9/0x570 [btrfs] [260445.593427] [<ffffffffa08002ab>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x11b/0x200 [btrfs] [260445.593459] [<ffffffffa0800964>] do_chunk_alloc+0x2a4/0x2e0 [btrfs] [260445.593491] [<ffffffffa0803815>] find_free_extent+0xa55/0xd90 [btrfs] [260445.593524] [<ffffffffa0803c22>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xd2/0x220 [btrfs] [260445.593532] [<ffffffff8119fe5d>] ? account_page_dirtied+0xdd/0x170 [260445.593564] [<ffffffffa0803e78>] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x108/0x4a0 [btrfs] [260445.593597] [<ffffffffa080c9de>] ? btree_set_page_dirty+0xe/0x10 [btrfs] [260445.593626] [<ffffffffa07eb5cd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x12d/0x5b0 [btrfs] [260445.593654] [<ffffffffa07ebbff>] btrfs_cow_block+0x11f/0x1c0 [btrfs] [260445.593682] [<ffffffffa07ef8c7>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1e7/0xa00 [btrfs] [260445.593724] [<ffffffffa08389df>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x4f/0x90 [btrfs] [260445.593752] [<ffffffffa07f1a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs] [260445.593830] [<ffffffffa07ea94a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs] [260445.593905] [<ffffffffa08403b9>] btrfs_finish_chunk_alloc+0x1c9/0x570 [btrfs] [260445.593946] [<ffffffffa08002ab>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x11b/0x200 [btrfs] [260445.593990] [<ffffffffa0815798>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0xa8/0xb40 [btrfs] [260445.594042] [<ffffffffa085abcd>] ? btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x6d/0x80 [btrfs] [260445.594089] [<ffffffffa082bc84>] btrfs_sync_file+0x294/0x350 [btrfs] [260445.594115] [<ffffffff8123e29b>] vfs_fsync_range+0x3b/0xa0 [260445.594133] [<ffffffff81023891>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase1+0x131/0x180 [260445.594149] [<ffffffff8123e35d>] do_fsync+0x3d/0x70 [260445.594169] [<ffffffff81023bb8>] ? syscall_trace_leave+0xb8/0x110 [260445.594187] [<ffffffff8123e600>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20 [260445.594204] [<ffffffff8175de6e>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x71 This happened because the same transaction handle created a large number of block groups and while finalizing their creation (inserting new items and updating existing items in the chunk and device trees) a new metadata extent had to be allocated and no free space was found in the current metadata block groups, which made find_free_extent() attempt to allocate a new block group via do_chunk_alloc(). However at do_chunk_alloc() we ended up allocating a new system chunk too and exceeded the threshold of 2Mb of reserved chunk bytes, which makes do_chunk_alloc() enter the final part of block group creation again (at btrfs_create_pending_block_groups()) and attempt to lock again the root of the chunk tree when it's already write locked by the same task. Similarly we can deadlock on extent tree nodes/leafs if while we are running delayed references we end up creating a new metadata block group in order to allocate a new node/leaf for the extent tree (as part of a CoW operation or growing the tree), as btrfs_create_pending_block_groups inserts items into the extent tree as well. In this case we get the following trace: [14242.773581] fio D ffff880428ca3418 0 3615 3100 0x00000084 [14242.773588] ffff880428ca3418 ffff88042d66b000 ffff88042a03c800 ffff880428ca3438 [14242.773594] ffff880428ca4000 ffff8803e4b20190 ffff8803e4b201a8 ffff880428ca3460 [14242.773600] ffff8803e4b20188 ffff880428ca3438 ffffffff8175a437 ffff8803e4b20190 [14242.773606] Call Trace: [14242.773613] [<ffffffff8175a437>] schedule+0x37/0x80 [14242.773656] [<ffffffffa057ff07>] btrfs_tree_lock+0xa7/0x1f0 [btrfs] [14242.773664] [<ffffffff810db7c0>] ? prepare_to_wait_event+0xf0/0xf0 [14242.773692] [<ffffffffa0519c44>] btrfs_lock_root_node+0x34/0x50 [btrfs] [14242.773720] [<ffffffffa051ef6b>] btrfs_search_slot+0x88b/0xa00 [btrfs] [14242.773750] [<ffffffffa0520a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs] [14242.773758] [<ffffffff811ef4a2>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1d2/0x200 [14242.773786] [<ffffffffa0520ad1>] btrfs_insert_item+0x71/0xf0 [btrfs] [14242.773818] [<ffffffffa052f292>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x102/0x200 [btrfs] [14242.773850] [<ffffffffa052f96e>] do_chunk_alloc+0x2ae/0x2f0 [btrfs] [14242.773934] [<ffffffffa0532825>] find_free_extent+0xa55/0xd90 [btrfs] [14242.773998] [<ffffffffa0532c22>] btrfs_reserve_extent+0xc2/0x1d0 [btrfs] [14242.774041] [<ffffffffa0532e38>] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0x108/0x4a0 [btrfs] [14242.774078] [<ffffffffa051a5cd>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x12d/0x5b0 [btrfs] [14242.774118] [<ffffffffa051abff>] btrfs_cow_block+0x11f/0x1c0 [btrfs] [14242.774155] [<ffffffffa051e8c7>] btrfs_search_slot+0x1e7/0xa00 [btrfs] [14242.774194] [<ffffffffa0528021>] ? __btrfs_free_extent.isra.70+0x2e1/0xcb0 [btrfs] [14242.774235] [<ffffffffa0520a06>] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x66/0xc0 [btrfs] [14242.774274] [<ffffffffa051994a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs] [14242.774318] [<ffffffffa052c433>] __btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0xbb3/0x1020 [btrfs] [14242.774358] [<ffffffffa052f404>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs.part.78+0x74/0x280 [btrfs] [14242.774391] [<ffffffffa052f627>] btrfs_run_delayed_refs+0x17/0x20 [btrfs] [14242.774432] [<ffffffffa05be236>] commit_cowonly_roots+0x8d/0x2bd [btrfs] [14242.774474] [<ffffffffa059d07f>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x1cf/0x210 [btrfs] [14242.774516] [<ffffffffa05adac3>] ? btrfs_qgroup_account_extents+0x83/0x130 [btrfs] [14242.774558] [<ffffffffa0544c40>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x590/0xb40 [btrfs] [14242.774599] [<ffffffffa0589b9d>] ? btrfs_log_dentry_safe+0x6d/0x80 [btrfs] [14242.774642] [<ffffffffa055ac54>] btrfs_sync_file+0x294/0x350 [btrfs] [14242.774650] [<ffffffff8123e29b>] vfs_fsync_range+0x3b/0xa0 [14242.774657] [<ffffffff81023891>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase1+0x131/0x180 [14242.774663] [<ffffffff8123e35d>] do_fsync+0x3d/0x70 [14242.774669] [<ffffffff81023bb8>] ? syscall_trace_leave+0xb8/0x110 [14242.774675] [<ffffffff8123e600>] SyS_fsync+0x10/0x20 [14242.774681] [<ffffffff8175de6e>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x71 Fix this by never recursing into the finalization phase of block group creation and making sure we never trigger the finalization of block group creation while running delayed references. Reported-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Fixes: 00d80e34 ("Btrfs: fix quick exhaustion of the system array in the superblock") Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
My previous fix in commit 005efedf ("Btrfs: fix read corruption of compressed and shared extents") was effective only if the compressed extents cover a file range with a length that is not a multiple of 16 pages. That's because the detection of when we reached a different range of the file that shares the same compressed extent as the previously processed range was done at extent_io.c:__do_contiguous_readpages(), which covers subranges with a length up to 16 pages, because extent_readpages() groups the pages in clusters no larger than 16 pages. So fix this by tracking the start of the previously processed file range's extent map at extent_readpages(). The following test case for fstests reproduces the issue: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _need_to_be_root _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _require_cloner rm -f $seqres.full test_clone_and_read_compressed_extent() { local mount_opts=$1 _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount $mount_opts # Create our test file with a single extent of 64Kb that is going to # be compressed no matter which compression algo is used (zlib/lzo). $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0K 64K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io # Now clone the compressed extent into an adjacent file offset. $CLONER_PROG -s 0 -d $((64 * 1024)) -l $((64 * 1024)) \ $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $SCRATCH_MNT/foo echo "File digest before unmount:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch # Remount the fs or clear the page cache to trigger the bug in # btrfs. Because the extent has an uncompressed length that is a # multiple of 16 pages, all the pages belonging to the second range # of the file (64K to 128K), which points to the same extent as the # first range (0K to 64K), had their contents full of zeroes instead # of the byte 0xaa. This was a bug exclusively in the read path of # compressed extents, the correct data was stored on disk, btrfs # just failed to fill in the pages correctly. _scratch_remount echo "File digest after remount:" # Must match the digest we got before. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch } echo -e "\nTesting with zlib compression..." test_clone_and_read_compressed_extent "-o compress=zlib" _scratch_unmount echo -e "\nTesting with lzo compression..." test_clone_and_read_compressed_extent "-o compress=lzo" status=0 exit Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Tested-by: NTimofey Titovets <nefelim4ag@gmail.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
When the inode given to did_overwrite_ref() matches the current progress and has a reference that collides with the reference of other inode that has the same number as the current progress, we were always telling our caller that the inode's reference was overwritten, which is incorrect because the other inode might be a new inode (different generation number) in which case we must return false from did_overwrite_ref() so that its callers don't use an orphanized path for the inode (as it will never be orphanized, instead it will be unlinked and the new inode created later). The following test case for fstests reproduces the issue: seq=`basename $0` seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq echo "QA output created by $seq" tmp=/tmp/$$ status=1 # failure is the default! trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15 _cleanup() { rm -fr $send_files_dir rm -f $tmp.* } # get standard environment, filters and checks . ./common/rc . ./common/filter # real QA test starts here _supported_fs btrfs _supported_os Linux _require_scratch _need_to_be_root send_files_dir=$TEST_DIR/btrfs-test-$seq rm -f $seqres.full rm -fr $send_files_dir mkdir $send_files_dir _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount # Create our test file with a single extent of 64K. mkdir -p $SCRATCH_MNT/foo $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xaa 0 64K" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo/bar \ | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot $SCRATCH_MNT \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 echo "File digest before being replaced:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo/bar | _filter_scratch # Remove the file and then create a new one in the same location with # the same name but with different content. This new file ends up # getting the same inode number as the previous one, because that inode # number was the highest inode number used by the snapshot's root and # therefore when attempting to find the a new inode number for the new # file, we end up reusing the same inode number. This happens because # currently btrfs uses the highest inode number summed by 1 for the # first inode created once a snapshot's root is loaded (done at # fs/btrfs/inode-map.c:btrfs_find_free_objectid in the linux kernel # tree). # Having these two different files in the snapshots with the same inode # number (but different generation numbers) caused the btrfs send code # to emit an incorrect path for the file when issuing an unlink # operation because it failed to realize they were different files. rm -f $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite -S 0xbb 0 96K" \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo/bar | _filter_xfs_io _run_btrfs_util_prog subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro _run_btrfs_util_prog send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $send_files_dir/1.snap _run_btrfs_util_prog send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 \ $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro -f $send_files_dir/2.snap echo "File digest in the original filesystem after being replaced:" md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch # Now recreate the filesystem by receiving both send streams and verify # we get the same file contents that the original filesystem had. _scratch_unmount _scratch_mkfs >>$seqres.full 2>&1 _scratch_mount _run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/1.snap _run_btrfs_util_prog receive -vv $SCRATCH_MNT -f $send_files_dir/2.snap echo "File digest in the new filesystem:" # Must match the digest from the new file. md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2_ro/foo/bar | _filter_scratch status=0 exit Reported-by: NMartin Raiber <martin@urbackup.org> Fixes: 8b191a68 ("Btrfs: incremental send, check if orphanized dir inode needs delayed rename") Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
-