- 29 4月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth stack uses a reference counting for all established ACL links and if no user (L2CAP connection) is present, the link will be terminated to save power. The problem part is the dedicated pairing when using Legacy Pairing (Bluetooth 2.0 and before). At that point no user is present and pairing attempts will be disconnected within 10 seconds or less. In previous kernel version this was not a problem since the disconnect timeout wasn't triggered on incoming connections for the first time. However this caused issues with broken host stacks that kept the connections around after dedicated pairing. When the support for Simple Pairing got added, the link establishment procedure needed to be changed and now causes issues when using Legacy Pairing When using Simple Pairing it is possible to do a proper reference counting of ACL link users. With Legacy Pairing this is not possible since the specification is unclear in some areas and too many broken Bluetooth devices have already been deployed. So instead of trying to deal with all the broken devices, a special pairing timeout will be introduced that increases the timeout to 60 seconds when pairing is triggered. If a broken devices now puts the stack into an unforeseen state, the worst that happens is the disconnect timeout triggers after 120 seconds instead of 4 seconds. This allows successful pairings with legacy and broken devices now. Based on a report by Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Roger Quadros 提交于
Use a different work_struct variables for add_conn() and del_conn() and use single work queue instead of two for adding and deleting connections. It eliminates the following error on a preemptible kernel: [ 204.358032] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 0000000c [ 204.370697] pgd = c0004000 [ 204.373443] [0000000c] *pgd=00000000 [ 204.378601] Internal error: Oops: 17 [#1] PREEMPT [ 204.383361] Modules linked in: vfat fat rfcomm sco l2cap sd_mod scsi_mod iphb pvr2d drm omaplfb ps [ 204.438537] CPU: 0 Not tainted (2.6.28-maemo2 #1) [ 204.443664] PC is at klist_put+0x2c/0xb4 [ 204.447601] LR is at klist_put+0x18/0xb4 [ 204.451568] pc : [<c0270f08>] lr : [<c0270ef4>] psr: a0000113 [ 204.451568] sp : cf1b3f10 ip : cf1b3f10 fp : cf1b3f2c [ 204.463104] r10: 00000000 r9 : 00000000 r8 : bf08029c [ 204.468353] r7 : c7869200 r6 : cfbe2690 r5 : c78692c8 r4 : 00000001 [ 204.474945] r3 : 00000001 r2 : cf1b2000 r1 : 00000001 r0 : 00000000 [ 204.481506] Flags: NzCv IRQs on FIQs on Mode SVC_32 ISA ARM Segment kernel [ 204.488861] Control: 10c5387d Table: 887fc018 DAC: 00000017 [ 204.494628] Process btdelconn (pid: 515, stack limit = 0xcf1b22e0) Signed-off-by: NRoger Quadros <ext-roger.quadros@nokia.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 27 2月, 2009 4 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Some of the qualification tests demand that in case of failures in L2CAP the HCI disconnect should indicate a reason why L2CAP fails. This is a bluntly layer violation since multiple L2CAP connections could be using the same ACL and thus forcing a disconnect reason is not a good idea. To comply with the Bluetooth test specification, the disconnect reason is now stored in the L2CAP connection structure and every time a new L2CAP channel is added it will set back to its default. So only in the case where the L2CAP channel with the disconnect reason is really the last one, it will propagated to the HCI layer. The HCI layer has been extended with a disconnect indication that allows it to ask upper layers for a disconnect reason. The upper layer must not support this callback and in that case it will nicely default to the existing behavior. If an upper layer like L2CAP can provide a disconnect reason that one will be used to disconnect the ACL or SCO link. No modification to the ACL disconnect timeout have been made. So in case of Linux to Linux connection the initiator will disconnect the ACL link before the acceptor side can signal the specific disconnect reason. That is perfectly fine since Linux doesn't make use of this value anyway. The L2CAP layer has a perfect valid error code for rejecting connection due to a security violation. It is unclear why the Bluetooth specification insists on having specific HCI disconnect reason. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The recommendation for the L2CAP PSM 1 (SDP) is to not use any kind of authentication or encryption. So don't trigger authentication for incoming and outgoing SDP connections. For L2CAP PSM 3 (RFCOMM) there is no clear requirement, but with Bluetooth 2.1 the initiator is required to enable authentication and encryption first and this gets enforced. So there is no need to trigger an additional authentication step. The RFCOMM service security will make sure that a secure enough link key is present. When the encryption gets enabled after the SDP connection setup, then switch the security level from SDP to low security. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
When receiving incoming connection to specific services, always use general bonding. This ensures that the link key gets stored and can be used for further authentications. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The current security model is based around the flags AUTH, ENCRYPT and SECURE. Starting with support for the Bluetooth 2.1 specification this is no longer sufficient. The different security levels are now defined as SDP, LOW, MEDIUM and SECURE. Previously it was possible to set each security independently, but this actually doesn't make a lot of sense. For Bluetooth the encryption depends on a previous successful authentication. Also you can only update your existing link key if you successfully created at least one before. And of course the update of link keys without having proper encryption in place is a security issue. The new security levels from the Bluetooth 2.1 specification are now used internally. All old settings are mapped to the new values and this way it ensures that old applications still work. The only limitation is that it is no longer possible to set authentication without also enabling encryption. No application should have done this anyway since this is actually a security issue. Without encryption the integrity of the authentication can't be guaranteed. As default for a new L2CAP or RFCOMM connection, the LOW security level is used. The only exception here are the service discovery sessions on PSM 1 where SDP level is used. To have similar security strength as with a Bluetooth 2.0 and before combination key, the MEDIUM level should be used. This is according to the Bluetooth specification. The MEDIUM level will not require any kind of man-in-the-middle (MITM) protection. Only the HIGH security level will require this. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 09 9月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Security Mode 4 of the Bluetooth 2.1 specification has strict authentication and encryption requirements. It is the initiators job to create a secure ACL link. However in case of malicious devices, the acceptor has to make sure that the ACL is encrypted before allowing any kind of L2CAP connection. The only exception here is the PSM 1 for the service discovery protocol, because that is allowed to run on an insecure ACL link. Previously it was enough to reject a L2CAP connection during the connection setup phase, but with Bluetooth 2.1 it is forbidden to do any L2CAP protocol exchange on an insecure link (except SDP). The new hci_conn_check_link_mode() function can be used to check the integrity of an ACL link. This functions also takes care of the cases where Security Mode 4 is disabled or one of the devices is based on an older specification. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
With the introduction of Security Mode 4 and Simple Pairing from the Bluetooth 2.1 specification it became mandatory that the initiator requires authentication and encryption before any L2CAP channel can be established. The only exception here is PSM 1 for the service discovery protocol (SDP). It is meant to be used without any encryption since it contains only public information. This is how Bluetooth 2.0 and before handle connections on PSM 1. For Bluetooth 2.1 devices the pairing procedure differentiates between no bonding, general bonding and dedicated bonding. The L2CAP layer wrongly uses always general bonding when creating new connections, but it should not do this for SDP connections. In this case the authentication requirement should be no bonding and the just-works model should be used, but in case of non-SDP connection it is required to use general bonding. If the new connection requires man-in-the-middle (MITM) protection, it also first wrongly creates an unauthenticated link key and then later on requests an upgrade to an authenticated link key to provide full MITM protection. With Simple Pairing the link key generation is an expensive operation (compared to Bluetooth 2.0 and before) and doing this twice during a connection setup causes a noticeable delay when establishing a new connection. This should be avoided to not regress from the expected Bluetooth 2.0 connection times. The authentication requirements are known up-front and so enforce them. To fulfill these requirements the hci_connect() function has been extended with an authentication requirement parameter that will be stored inside the connection information and can be retrieved by userspace at any time. This allows the correct IO capabilities exchange and results in the expected behavior. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 15 7月, 2008 6 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
With the Simple Pairing support, the authentication requirements are an explicit setting during the bonding process. Track and enforce the requirements and allow higher layers like L2CAP and RFCOMM to increase them if needed. This patch introduces a new IOCTL that allows to query the current authentication requirements. It is also possible to detect Simple Pairing support in the kernel this way. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth technology introduces new features on a regular basis and for some of them it is important that the hardware on both sides support them. For features like Simple Pairing it is important that the host stacks on both sides have switched this feature on. To make valid decisions, a config stage during ACL link establishment has been introduced that retrieves remote features and if needed also the remote extended features (known as remote host features) before signalling this link as connected. This change introduces full reference counting of incoming and outgoing ACL links and the Bluetooth core will disconnect both if no owner of it is present. To better handle interoperability during the pairing phase the disconnect timeout for incoming connections has been increased to 10 seconds. This is five times more than for outgoing connections. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Simple Pairing process can only be used if both sides have the support enabled in the host stack. The current Bluetooth specification has three ways to detect this support. If an Extended Inquiry Result has been sent during inquiry then it is safe to assume that Simple Pairing is enabled. It is not allowed to enable Extended Inquiry without Simple Pairing. During the remote name request phase a notification with the remote host supported features will be sent to indicate Simple Pairing support. Also the second page of the remote extended features can indicate support for Simple Pairing. For all three cases the value of remote Simple Pairing mode is stored in the inquiry cache for later use. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Simple Pairing feature is optional and needs to be enabled by the host stack first. The Linux kernel relies on the Bluetooth daemon to either enable or disable it, but at any time it needs to know the current state of the Simple Pairing mode. So track any changes made by external entities and store the current mode in the HCI device structure. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The connection packet type can be changed after the connection has been established and thus needs to be properly tracked to ensure that the host stack has always correct and valid information about it. On incoming connections the Bluetooth core switches the supported packet types to the configured list for this controller. However the usefulness of this feature has been questioned a lot. The general consent is that every Bluetooth host stack should enable as many packet types as the hardware actually supports and leave the decision to the link manager software running on the Bluetooth chip. When running on Bluetooth 2.0 or later hardware, don't change the packet type for incoming connections anymore. This hardware likely supports Enhanced Data Rate and thus leave it completely up to the link manager to pick the best packet type. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth specification allows to enable or disable the encryption of an ACL link at any time by either the peer or the remote device. If a L2CAP or RFCOMM connection requested an encrypted link, they will now disconnect that link if the encryption gets disabled. Higher protocols that don't care about encryption (like SDP) are not affected. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 22 10月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
With the Bluetooth 1.2 specification the Extended SCO feature for better audio connections was introduced. So far the Bluetooth core wasn't able to handle any eSCO connections correctly. This patch adds simple eSCO support while keeping backward compatibility with older devices. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The Bluetooth HCI commands are divided into logical OGF groups for easier identification of their purposes. While this still makes sense for the written specification, its makes the code only more complex and harder to read. So instead of using separate OGF and OCF values to identify the commands, use a common 16-bit opcode that combines both values. As a side effect this also reduces the complexity of OGF and OCF calculations during command header parsing. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 11 7月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
To better support and handle eSCO links in the future a bunch of constants needs to be added and some basic routines need to be updated. This is the initial step. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Most drivers must handle fragmented HCI data packets and events. This patch adds a generic function for their reassembly to the Bluetooth core layer and thus allows to shrink the complexity of the drivers. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 16 10月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
Most Bluetooth chips don't support concurrent connect requests, because this would involve a multiple baseband page with only one radio. In the case an upper layer like L2CAP requests a concurrent connect these chips return the error "Command Disallowed" for the second request. If this happens it the responsibility of the Bluetooth core to queue the request and try again after the previous connect attempt has been completed. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 29 9月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
In case of non-blocking connects it is possible that the last user of an ACL link quits before the connection has been fully established. This will lead to a race condition where the internal state of a connection is closed, but the actual link has been established and is active. In case of Bluetooth 1.2 and later devices it is possible to call create connection cancel to abort the connect. For older devices the disconnect timer will be used to trigger the needed disconnect. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
The local version information are needed to identify certain feature sets of devices. They must be read on device init and stored for later use. It is also possible to access them through the device model. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
This patch integrates the low-level connections (ACL and SCO) into the driver model. Every connection is presented as device with the parent set to its host controller device. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 04 7月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
This patch converts the Bluetooth class devices into real devices. The Bluetooth class is kept and the driver core provides the appropriate symlinks for backward compatibility. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
This patch adds a generic Bluetooth platform device that can be used as parent device by virtual and serial devices. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
This patch introduces the automatic sniff mode feature. This allows the host to switch idle connections into sniff mode to safe power. Signed-off-by: NUlisses Furquim <ulissesf@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
-
- 09 11月, 2005 2 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
This patch removes all relics of the /proc usage from the Bluetooth subsystem core and its upper layers. All the previous information are now available via /sys/class/bluetooth through appropriate functions. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Marcel Holtmann 提交于
This patch adds the endian annotations to the Bluetooth core. Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 8月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Patrick McHardy 提交于
Reduces skb size by 8 bytes on 64-bit. Signed-off-by: NPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-