- 20 12月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Keep the intel_context as being the primary state for i915_request, with the GEM context a backpointer from the low level state for the rarer cases we need client information. Our goal is to remove such references to clients from the backend, and leave the HW submission agnostic to client interfaces and self-contained. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191220101230.256839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 18 12月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
Since we started using CT buffers on all gens, the function pointers can only be set to either the _nop() or the _ct() functions. Since the _nop() case applies to when the CT are disabled, we can just handle that case in the _ct() functions and call them directly. v2: keep intel_guc_send() and make the CT send/receive functions work on intel_guc_ct. (Michal) Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
- 14 12月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
New macros ENGINE_TRACE(), CE_TRACE(), RQ_TRACE() and GT_TRACE() are introduce to tag device name and engine name with contexts and requests tracing in i915. Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVenkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213155152.69182-2-venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com
-
- 10 12月, 2019 4 次提交
-
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
We now only use 1 client without any plan to add more. The client is also only holding information about the WQ and the process desc, so we can just move those in the intel_guc structure and always use stage_id 0. v2: fix comment (John) v3: fix the comment for real, fix kerneldoc Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205220243.27403-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
Instead of relying on the workqueue, the upcoming reworked GuC submission flow will offer the host driver indipendent control over the execution status of each context submitted to GuC. As part of this, the doorbell usage model has been reworked, with each doorbell being paired to a single lrc and a doorbell ring representing new work available for that specific context. This mechanism, however, limits the number of contexts that can be registered with GuC to the number of doorbells, which is an undesired limitation. To avoid this limitation, we requested the GuC team to also provide a H2G that will allow the host to notify the GuC of work available for a specified lrc, so we can use that mechanism instead of relying on the doorbells. We can therefore drop the doorbell code we currently have, also given the fact that in the unlikely case we'd want to switch back to using doorbells we'd have to heavily rework it. The workqueue will still have a use in the new interface to pass special commands, so that code has been retained for now. With the doorbells gone and the GuC client becoming even simpler, the existing GuC selftests don't give us any meaningful coverage so we can remove them as well. Some selftests might come with the new code, but they will look different from what we have now so if doesn't seem worth it to keep the file around in the meantime. v2: fix comments and commit message (John) Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205220243.27403-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
We already have a couple of use-cases in the code and another one will come in one of the later patches in the series. v2: use the new function for the CT object as well Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1 Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205220243.27403-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
Remove unused enums and ctx_save_restore_disabled() function, leftover from the legacy preemption removal. Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205220243.27403-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
- 08 12月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Brost 提交于
The preferred way to access the uncore is through the GT structure. Update the GuC function, flush_ggtt_writes, to use this path. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191207010033.24667-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com
-
- 21 11月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Assume that intel_wakeref_get() may take the mutex, and perform other sleeping actions in the course of its callbacks and so use might_sleep() to ensure that all callers abide. Anything that cannot sleep has to use e.g. intel_wakeref_get_if_active() to guarantee its avoidance of the non-atomic paths. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191121130528.309474-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Stuart Summers 提交于
GuC submission path can be called from an interrupt context and so should use a worker to avoid holding a mutex. References: 07779a76 ("drm/i915: Mark up the calling context for intel_wakeref_put()") Signed-off-by: NStuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191120211321.88021-1-stuart.summers@intel.com
-
- 15 11月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
With the new interrupt re-partitioning in Gen11, GuC controls by itself the interrupts it receives, so steering bits and registers have been defeatured. Being this the case, when the GuC is in control of submissions we won't know what to do with the ctx switch interrupt in the driver, so disable it. v2 (Daniele): replace the gen9 paths instead of keeping gen9 and gen11 functions since we won't support guc submission on any pre-gen11 platform. Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191105225321.26642-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
- 29 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Janusz Krzysztofik 提交于
Commit 50d84418 ("drm/i915: Add i915 to i915_inject_probe_failure") introduced new functions unfortunately named incompatibly with rules established by commit f2db53f1 ("drm/i915: Replace "_load" with "_probe" consequently"). Fix it for consistency. Suggested-by: NMichał Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJanusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michał Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Piotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com> Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191029102036.6326-2-janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com
-
- 27 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Shyti 提交于
i915_irq.c is large. One reason for this is that has a large chunk of the GT render power management stashed away in it. Extract that logic out of i915_irq.c and intel_pm.c and put it under one roof. Based on a patch by Chris Wilson. Signed-off-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191024211642.7688-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 24 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Split the legacy submission backend from the common CS ring buffer handling. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191024100344.5041-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 18 10月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于
Where the function, or code segment, operates on intel_gt, we need to start passing it instead of i915 to for_each_engine(_masked). This is another partial step in migration of i915->engines[] to gt->engines[]. Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191017094500.21831-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
Add a short description of what we expect from GuC and some minor improvements to existing documentation. Also remove a comment about a difference between GuC and HuC that is not true anymore. v2: add that the GuC is not mandatory (Martin) v3: add extra newline for better text organization (Martin) Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: Martin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NAnna Karas <anna.karas@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMartin Peres <martin.peres@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191014183602.3643-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
- 14 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
The engine->guc_id is GuC FW defined and it is not guaranteed to be below I915_NUM_ENGINES, so we shouldn't use it with the i915-defined client->submissions, as we might overflow. Instead of fixing it, just get rid of client->submissions, because the information we get from it is not interesting anymore now that we only have 1 client. Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190814002145.29056-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
- 13 8月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Since execlists and the guc have diverged in their port tracking, we cannot simply reuse the execlists cancellation code as it leads to unbalanced reference counting. Use a local, simpler routine for the guc. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190812203626.3948-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
We rely on the tasklet to update the GT PM refcount, so we can't disable it even if we've processed all the requests for the engine because we might have detected the request completion before the interrupt arrived. Since on all platforms on which we plan to support guc submission we don't allow disabling the breadcrumb interrupts, we can further siplify the park/unpark flow by removing the interrupt pin/unpin. A BUG_ON has been added to catch changes to this flow that would require us to restore some kind of pinning. v2: split removal of engine_pin/unpin_breadcrumbs_irq to its own patch (chris) Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190812233152.2172-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
- 12 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Wajdeczko 提交于
Include 2019 in copyright years and start using SPDX tag. Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190812092935.21048-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
-
- 09 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
As we need to acquire a mutex to serialise the final intel_wakeref_put, we need to ensure that we are in process context at that time. However, we want to allow operation on the intel_wakeref from inside timer and other hardirq context, which means that need to defer that final put to a workqueue. Inside the final wakeref puts, we are safe to operate in any context, as we are simply marking up the HW and state tracking for the potential sleep. It's only the serialisation with the potential sleeping getting that requires careful wait avoidance. This allows us to retain the immediate processing as before (we only need to sleep over the same races as the current mutex_lock). v2: Add a selftest to ensure we exercise the code while lockdep watches. v3: That test was extremely loud and complained about many things! v4: Not a whale! Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111295 References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111245 References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111256 Fixes: 18398904 ("drm/i915: Only recover active engines") Fixes: 51fbd8de ("drm/i915/pmu: Atomically acquire the gt_pm wakeref") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190808202758.10453-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 07 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jani Nikula 提交于
Disentangle i915_drv.h from intel_drv.h, which gets included via i915_trace.h. This necessitates including i915_trace.h wherever it's needed. Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ed82bf259d3b725a1a1a3c3e9d6fb5c08bc4d489.1565085691.git.jani.nikula@intel.com
-
- 06 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
To maintain a fast lookup from a GT centric irq handler, we want the engine lookup tables on the intel_gt. To avoid having multiple copies of the same multi-dimension lookup table, move the generic user engine lookup into an rbtree (for fast and flexible indexing). v2: Split uabi_instance cf uabi_class v3: Set uabi_class/uabi_instance after collating all engines to provide a stable uabi across parallel unordered construction. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> #v2 Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190806124300.24945-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 03 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Wajdeczko 提交于
Inject probe errors into intel_uc_init_hw to make sure we correctly handle any uC initialization failure. To avoid complains from CI about injected errors use i915_probe_error to lower message level. v4: rebased after moving hot fixes moved to separate patches Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1 Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190802184055.31988-6-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
-
- 02 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Wajdeczko 提交于
Instead of relying on enable_guc modparam to represent actual GuC submission mode, use dedicated flag and look at modparam only to check if submission was explicitly disabled by the user. v2: rebased, simplified condition (Chris) Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190731223321.36436-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
-
- 25 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
We currently track fetch and load status separately, but the 2 are actually sequential in the uc lifetime (fetch must complete before we can attempt the load!). Unifying the 2 variables we can better follow the sequential states and improve our trackng of the uC state. Also, sprinkle some GEM_BUG_ON to make sure we transition correctly between states. v2: rename states, add the running state (Michal), drop some logs in the fetch path (Michal, Chris) v3: re-rename states, extend early status check to all helpers (Michal) Suggested-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190725001813.4740-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
- 14 7月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
With our HW interface logic moving from i915 to gt and with GuC and HuC being part of the gt HW, it makes sense to use the intel_gt structure instead of i915 as our reference object in GuC/HuC paths. Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-9-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
Being part of the GT HW, it make sense to keep the guc/huc structures inside the GT structure. To help with the encapsulation work done by the following patches, both structures are placed inside a new intel_uc container. Although this results in code with ugly nested dereferences (i915->gt.uc.guc...), it saves us the extra work required in moving the structures twice (i915 -> gt -> uc). The following patches will reduce the number of places where we try to access the guc/huc structures directly from i915 and reduce the ugliness. Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-7-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
Both microcontrollers are part of the GT HW and are closely related to GT operations. To keep all the files cleanly together, they've been placed in their own subdir inside the gt/ folder Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Acked-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190713100016.8026-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 13 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Having taken the first step in encapsulating the functionality by moving the related files under gt/, the next step is to start encapsulating by passing around the relevant structs rather than the global drm_i915_private. In this step, we pass intel_gt to intel_reset.c Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190712192953.9187-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 12 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_guc_submission.c:799: warning: Excess function parameter 'ctx' description in 'guc_client_alloc' Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190711162415.2938-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 11 7月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
We originally added support, in some cases partial, for different modes of operations via guc clients: - proxy vs direct submission; - variable engine mask per-client. We only ever used one flow (all submissions via a single proxy), so the other code paths haven't been exercised and are most likely non-functional. The guc firmware interface is also in the process of being updated to better fit the i915 flow and our client abstraction will need to change accordingly (or possibly go away entirely), so these old unused paths can be considered dead and removed. Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Acked-by: NMatthew Brost <Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190710005437.3496-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Preemption via GuC submission is not being supported with its current legacy incarnation. The current FW does support a similar pre-emption flow via H2G, but it is class-based instead of being instance-based, which doesn't fit well with the i915 tracking. To fix this, the firmware is being updated to better support our needs with a new flow, so we can safely remove the old code. v2 (Daniele): resurrect & rebase, reword commit message, remove preempt_context as well Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Acked-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMichał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190710005437.3496-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com
-
- 10 7月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lionel Landwerlin 提交于
We want to set this flag in the next commit on requests containing perf queries so that the result of the perf query can just be a delta of global counters, rather than doing post processing of the OA buffer. Signed-off-by: NLionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> [ickle: add basic selftest for nopreempt] Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190709164227.25859-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 20 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
When using a global seqno, we required a precise stop-the-workd event to handle preemption and unwind the global seqno counter. To accomplish this, we would preempt to a special out-of-band context and wait for the machine to report that it was idle. Given an idle machine, we could very precisely see which requests had completed and which we needed to feed back into the run queue. However, now that we have scrapped the global seqno, we no longer need to precisely unwind the global counter and only track requests by their per-context seqno. This allows us to loosely unwind inflight requests while scheduling a preemption, with the enormous caveat that the requests we put back on the run queue are still _inflight_ (until the preemption request is complete). This makes request tracking much more messy, as at any point then we can see a completed request that we believe is not currently scheduled for execution. We also have to be careful not to rewind RING_TAIL past RING_HEAD on preempting to the running context, and for this we use a semaphore to prevent completion of the request before continuing. To accomplish this feat, we change how we track requests scheduled to the HW. Instead of appending our requests onto a single list as we submit, we track each submission to ELSP as its own block. Then upon receiving the CS preemption event, we promote the pending block to the inflight block (discarding what was previously being tracked). As normal CS completion events arrive, we then remove stale entries from the inflight tracker. v2: Be a tinge paranoid and ensure we flush the write into the HWS page for the GPU semaphore to pick in a timely fashion. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190620142052.19311-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 15 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
To continue the onslaught of removing the assumption of a global execution ordering, another casualty is the engine->timeline. Without an actual timeline to track, it is overkill and we can replace it with a much less grand plain list. We still need a list of requests inflight, for the simple purpose of finding inflight requests (for retiring, resetting, preemption etc). Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190614164606.15633-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 12 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于
Only a few call sites remain which have been converted to uncore mmio accessors and so the macro can be removed. Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190611104548.30545-2-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
-
- 07 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于
Remove a couple dev_priv locals as a consequence. Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190607084521.16845-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
-
- 28 5月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Continuing the theme of separating out the GEM clutter. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190528092956.14910-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Michal Wajdeczko 提交于
With newer GuC firmware it is always ok to ask GuC to update power domain states. Make it an unconditional initialization step. Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: John Spotswood <john.a.spotswood@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Spotswood <john.a.spotswood@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190527183613.17076-6-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com
-