- 13 12月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
btrfs_wait_ordered_range expects for 'len' instead of 'end'. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
-
- 09 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Konstantin Khlebnikov 提交于
Move actual pte filling for non-linear file mappings into the new special vma operation: ->remap_pages(). Filesystems must implement this method to get non-linear mapping support, if it uses filemap_fault() then generic_file_remap_pages() can be used. Now device drivers can implement this method and obtain nonlinear vma support. Signed-off-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Carsten Otte <cotte@de.ibm.com> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@tilera.com> #arch/tile Cc: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com> Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: James Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com> Cc: Jason Baron <jbaron@redhat.com> Cc: Kentaro Takeda <takedakn@nttdata.co.jp> Cc: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com> Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Cc: Robert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com> Cc: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@intel.com> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@google.com> Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 04 10月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I saw the warning in btrfs_drop_extent_cache where our end is less than our start while running xfstests 68 in a loop. This is because we unconditionally do drop_end = min(end, extent_end) in __btrfs_drop_extents(), even though we may not have found an extent in the range we were looking to drop. So keep track of wether or not we found something, and if we didn't just use our end. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 02 10月, 2012 10 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
This reverts commit 0885ef5b After applying the above patch, the performance slowed down because the dirty page flush can only be done by one task, so revert it. The following is the test result of sysbench: Before After 24MB/s 39MB/s Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
We're going to use this flag EXTENT_DEFRAG to indicate which range belongs to defragment so that we can implement snapshow-aware defrag: We set the EXTENT_DEFRAG flag when dirtying the extents that need defragmented, so later on writeback thread can differentiate between normal writeback and writeback started by defragmentation. Original-Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we ran fsstress(a program in xfstests), the filesystem hung up when it is full. It was because the space reserved in btrfs_fallocate() was wrong, btrfs_fallocate() just used the size of the pre-allocation to reserve the space, didn't took the block size aligning into account, so the size of the reserved space was less than the allocated space, it caused the over reserve problem and made the filesystem hung up when invoking cow_file_range(). Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
We forget to protect ->log_batch when syncing a file, this patch fix this problem by atomic operation. And ->log_batch is used to check if there are parallel sync operations or not, so it is unnecessary to reset it to 0 after the sync operation of the current log tree complete. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Sometimes we need choose the method of the reservation according to the type of the block reservation, such as the reservation for the delayed inode update. Now we identify the type just by comparing the address of the reservation variants, it is very ugly if it is a temporary one because we need compare it with all the common reservation variants. So we add a new "type" field to keep the type the reservation variants. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I noticed this when I was doing the fsync stuff, we allocate split extents if we drop an extent range that is in the middle of an existing extent. This BUG()'s if we fail to allocate memory, but the fact is this is just a cache, we will just regenerate the cache if we need it, the important part is that we free the range we are given. This can be done without allocations, so if we fail to allocate splits just skip the splitting stage and free our em and look for more extents to drop. This also makes btrfs_drop_extent_cache a void since nobody was checking the return value anyway. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
This patch adds hole punching via fallocate. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
I audited all users of btrfs_drop_extents and found that nobody actually uses the hint_byte argument. I'm sure it was used for something at some point but it's not used now, and the way the pinning works the disk bytenr would never be immediately useful anyway so lets just remove it. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
At least for the vm workload. Currently on fsync we will 1) Truncate all items in the log tree for the given inode if they exist and 2) Copy all items for a given inode into the log The problem with this is that for things like VMs you can have lots of extents from the fragmented writing behavior, and worst yet you may have only modified a few extents, not the entire thing. This patch fixes this problem by tracking which transid modified our extent, and then when we do the tree logging we find all of the extents we've modified in our current transaction, sort them and commit them. We also only truncate up to the xattrs of the inode and copy that stuff in normally, and then just drop any extents in the range we have that exist in the log already. Here are some numbers of a 50 meg fio job that does random writes and fsync()s after every write Original Patched SATA drive 82KB/s 140KB/s Fusion drive 431KB/s 2532KB/s So around 2-6 times faster depending on your hardware. There are a few corner cases, for example if you truncate at all we have to do it the old way since there is no way to be sure what is in the log is ok. This probably could be done smarter, but if you write-fsync-truncate-write-fsync you deserve what you get. All this work is in RAM of course so if your inode gets evicted from cache and you read it in and fsync it we'll do it the slow way if we are still in the same transaction that we last modified the inode in. The biggest cool part of this is that it requires no changes to the recovery code, so if you fsync with this patch and crash and load an old kernel, it will run the recovery and be a-ok. I have tested this pretty thoroughly with an fsync tester and everything comes back fine, as well as xfstests. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
While working on my fsync patch my fsync tester kept hitting mismatching md5sums when I would randomly write to a prealloc'ed region, syncfs() and then write to the prealloced region some more and then fsync() and then immediately reboot. This is because the tree logging code will skip writing csums for file extents who's generation is less than the current running transaction. When we mark extents as written we haven't been updating their generation so they were always being skipped. This wouldn't happen if you were to preallocate and then write in the same transaction, but if you for example prealloced a VM you could definitely run into this problem. This patch makes my fsync tester happy again. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
-
- 31 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
We convert btrfs_file_aio_write() to use new freeze check. We also add proper freeze protection to btrfs_page_mkwrite(). We also add freeze protection to the transaction mechanism to avoid starting transactions on frozen filesystem. At minimum this is necessary to stop iput() of unlinked file to change frozen filesystem during truncation. Checks in cleaner_kthread() and transaction_kthread() can be safely removed since btrfs_freeze() will lock the mutexes and thus block the threads (and they shouldn't have anything to do anyway). CC: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org CC: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 03 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Miao pointed out there's a problem with mixing dio writes and buffered reads. If the read happens between us invalidating the page range and actually locking the extent we can bring in pages into page cache. Then once the write finishes if somebody tries to read again it will just find uptodate pages and we'll read stale data. So we need to lock the extent and check for uptodate bits in the range. If there are uptodate bits we need to unlock and invalidate again. This will keep this race from happening since we will hold the extent locked until we create the ordered extent, and then teh read side always waits for ordered extents. There was also a race in how we updated i_size, previously we were relying on the generic DIO stuff to adjust the i_size after the DIO had completed, but this happens outside of the extent lock which means reads could come in and not see the updated i_size. So instead move this work into where we create the extents, and then this way the update ordered i_size stuff works properly in the endio handlers. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 02 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Btrfs had been doing it's own file_update_time so we could catch ENOSPC properly, so just update our btrfs_update_time to work with the new stuff and then we'll be fancy later. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2012 5 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We have this check down in the actual logging code, but this is after we start a transaction and all that good stuff. So move the helper inode_in_log() out so we can call it in fsync() and avoid starting a transaction altogether and just exit if we've already fsync()'ed this file recently. You would notice this issue if you fsync()'ed a file over and over again until the transaction committed. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Two files in the different subvolumes may have the same inode id, so The rb-tree which is used to manage the defragment object must take it into account. This patch fix this problem. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Miao pointed this out while I was working on an orphan problem that messing with a bitfield where different ranges are protected by different locks doesn't work out right. Turns out we've been doing this forever where we have different parts of the bit field protected by either no lock at all or different locks which could cause all sorts of weird problems including the issue I was hitting. So instead make a runtime_flags thing that we use the normal bit operations on that are all atomic so we can keep having our no/different locking for the different flags and then make force_compress it's own thing so it can be treated normally. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We already do the btrfs_wait_ordered_range which will do this for us, so just remove this call so we don't call it twice. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
We've been keeping around the inode sequence number in hopes that somebody would use it, but nobody uses it and people actually use i_version which serves the same purpose, so use i_version where we used the incore inode's sequence number and that way the sequence is updated properly across the board, and not just in file write. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 28 4月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
We're spending huge amounts of time on lock contention during end_io processing because we unconditionally assume we are overwriting an existing extent in the file for each IO. This checks to see if we are outside i_size, and if so, it uses a less expensive readonly search of the btree to look for existing extents. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 22 3月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
btrfs currently handles most errors with BUG_ON. This patch is a work-in- progress but aims to handle most errors other than internal logic errors and ENOMEM more gracefully. This iteration prevents most crashes but can run into lockups with the page lock on occasion when the timing "works out." Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于
lock_extent and unlock_extent are always called with GFP_NOFS, drop the argument and use GFP_NOFS consistently. Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
-
- 15 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Liu 提交于
Btrfs: return the internal error unchanged if btrfs_get_extent_fiemap() call failed for SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE inquiry Given that ENXIO only means "offset beyond EOF" for either SEEK_DATA or SEEK_HOLE inquiry in a desired file range, so we should return the internal error unchanged if btrfs_get_extent_fiemap() call failed, rather than ENXIO. Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Signed-off-by: NJie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
-
- 01 2月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Mason 提交于
btrfs_fallocate tries to allocate space only if ranges in the file don't already exist. But the enospc checks it does are not allowed with extents locked. Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Btrfs_throttle will make us wait if there is a currently committing transaction until we can open new transactions, which is ridiculous since we don't actually start any transactions within the file write path anyway, so all this does is introduce big latencies if we have a sync/fsync heavy workload going on while somebody else is trying to do work. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 11 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Johannes Weiner 提交于
Tell the page allocator that pages allocated for a buffered write are expected to become dirty soon. Signed-off-by: NJohannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Acked-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@gmail.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Cc: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Cc: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arne Jansen 提交于
Add a for_cow parameter to add_delayed_*_ref and pass the appropriate value from every call site. The for_cow parameter will later on be used to determine if a ref will change anything with respect to qgroups. Delayed refs coming from relocation are always counted as for_cow, as they don't change subvol quota. Also pass in the fs_info for later use. btrfs_find_all_roots() will use this as an optimization, as changes that are for_cow will not change anything with respect to which root points to a certain leaf. Thus, we don't need to add the current sequence number to those delayed refs. Signed-off-by: NArne Jansen <sensille@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
-
- 18 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
When doing 1KB sequential writes to the same page, balance_dirty_pages_ratelimited_nr() should be called once instead of 4 times, the latter makes the dirtier tasks be throttled much too heavy. Fix it with proper de-accounting on clear_page_dirty_for_io(). CC: Chris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
-
- 17 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wu Fengguang 提交于
Tests show that the original large intervals can easily make the dirty limit exceeded on 100 concurrent dd's. So adapt to as large as the next check point selected by the dirty throttling algorithm. Signed-off-by: NWu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 16 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Now that we're properly keeping track of delayed inode space we've been getting a lot of warnings out of btrfs_dirty_inode() when running xfstest 83. This is because a bunch of people call mark_inode_dirty, which is void so we can't return ENOSPC. This needs to be fixed in a few areas 1) file_update_time - this updates the mtime and such when writing to a file, which will call mark_inode_dirty. So copy file_update_time into btrfs so we can call btrfs_dirty_inode directly and return an error if we get one appropriately. 2) fix symlinks to use btrfs_setattr for ->setattr. For some reason we weren't setting ->setattr for symlinks, even though we should have been. This catches one of the cases where we were getting errors in mark_inode_dirty. 3) Fix btrfs_setattr and btrfs_setsize to call btrfs_dirty_inode directly instead of mark_inode_dirty. This lets us return errors properly for truncate and chown/anything related to setattr. 4) Add a new btrfs_fs_dirty_inode which will just call btrfs_dirty_inode and print an error if we have one. The only remaining user we can't control for this is touch_atime(), but we don't really want to keep people from walking down the tree if we don't have space to save the atime update, so just complain but don't worry about it. With this patch xfstests 83 complains a handful of times instead of hundreds of times. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 28 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andi Kleen 提交于
The i_mutex lock use of generic _file_llseek hurts. Independent processes accessing the same file synchronize over a single lock, even though they have no need for synchronization at all. Under high utilization this can cause llseek to scale very poorly on larger systems. This patch does some rethinking of the llseek locking model: First the 64bit f_pos is not necessarily atomic without locks on 32bit systems. This can already cause races with read() today. This was discussed on linux-kernel in the past and deemed acceptable. The patch does not change that. Let's look at the different seek variants: SEEK_SET: Doesn't really need any locking. If there's a race one writer wins, the other loses. For 32bit the non atomic update races against read() stay the same. Without a lock they can also happen against write() now. The read() race was deemed acceptable in past discussions, and I think if it's ok for read it's ok for write too. => Don't need a lock. SEEK_END: This behaves like SEEK_SET plus it reads the maximum size too. Reading the maximum size would have the 32bit atomic problem. But luckily we already have a way to read the maximum size without locking (i_size_read), so we can just use that instead. Without i_mutex there is no synchronization with write() anymore, however since the write() update is atomic on 64bit it just behaves like another racy SEEK_SET. On non atomic 32bit it's the same as SEEK_SET. => Don't need a lock, but need to use i_size_read() SEEK_CUR: This has a read-modify-write race window on the same file. One could argue that any application doing unsynchronized seeks on the same file is already broken. But for the sake of not adding a regression here I'm using the file->f_lock to synchronize this. Using this lock is much better than the inode mutex because it doesn't synchronize between processes. => So still need a lock, but can use a f_lock. This patch implements this new scheme in generic_file_llseek. I dropped generic_file_llseek_unlocked and changed all callers. Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
-
- 20 10月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Johannes pointed out we were allocating only kernel pages for doing writes, which is kind of a big deal if you are on 32bit and have more than a gig of ram. So fix our allocations to use the mapping's gfp but still clear __GFP_FS so we don't re-enter. Thanks, Reported-by: NJohannes Weiner <jweiner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
Lukas found a problem where if he tries to fallocate over the same region twice and the first fallocate took up all the space we would fail with ENOSPC. This is because we reserve the total space we want to use for fallocate, regardless of wether or not we will have to actually preallocate. So instead move the check into the loop where we actually have to do the preallocate. Thanks, Tested-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
-
- 01 10月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
A user reported a problem where ceph was getting into 100% cpu usage while doing some writing. It turns out it's because we were doing a short write on a not uptodate page, which means we'd fall back at one page at a time and fault the page in. The problem is our position is on the page boundary, so our fault in logic wasn't actually reading the page, so we'd just spin forever or until the page got read in by somebody else. This will force a readpage if we end up doing a short copy. Alexandre could reproduce this easily with ceph and reports it fixes his problem. I also wrote a reproducer that no longer hangs my box with this patch. Thanks, Reported-and-tested-by: NAlexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 18 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Liu 提交于
The recent reworking of btrfs' lseek lead to incorrect values being returned. This adds checks for seeking beyond EOF in SEEK_HOLE and makes sure the error values come back correct. Andi Kleen also sent in similar patches. Signed-off-by: NJie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com> Reported-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 11 9月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
When we write some data to the place that is beyond the end of the file in direct I/O mode, a data hole will be created. And Btrfs should insert a file extent item that point to this hole into the fs tree. But unfortunately Btrfs forgets doing it. The following is a simple way to reproduce it: # mkfs.btrfs /dev/sdc2 # mount /dev/sdc2 /test4 # touch /test4/a # dd if=/dev/zero of=/test4/a seek=8 count=1 bs=4K oflag=direct conv=nocreat,notrunc # umount /test4 # btrfsck /dev/sdc2 root 5 inode 257 errors 100 Reported-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NTsutomu Itoh <t-itoh@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
- 18 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
xfstests exposed a problem with preallocate when it fallocates a range that already has an extent. We don't set the new i_size properly because we see that we already have an extent. This isn't right and we should update i_size if the space already exists. With this patch we now pass xfstests 075. Thanks, Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-
由 Dan Carpenter 提交于
There were some unlocks on error missing in a recent patch to btrfs_file_llseek(). Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>
-