- 27 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Samuel Ortiz 提交于
Now that we have a way to pass MFD cells down to the sub drivers, we can gradually get rid of mfd_data by putting the platform pointer back in place. Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
- 12 4月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Samuel Ortiz 提交于
In order for MFD drivers to fetch their cell pointer but also their platform data one, an mfd cell pointer is added to the platform_device structure. That allows all MFD sub devices drivers to be MFD agnostic, unless they really need to access their MFD cell data. Most of them don't, especially the ones for IPs used by both MFD and non MFD SoCs. Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca> Acked-by: NGreg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
- 27 3月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andres Salomon 提交于
Replace mfd_shared_platform_driver_register with mfd_clone_cell. The former was called by an mfd client, and registered both a platform driver and device. The latter is called by an mfd driver, and registers only a platform device. The downside of this is that mfd drivers need to be modified whenever new clients are added that share a cell; the upside is that it fits Linux's driver model better. It's also simpler. This also converts cs5535-mfd/olpc-xo1 from the old API. cs5535-mfd now creates the olpc-xo1-{acpi,pms} devices, while olpc-xo1 binds to them via platform drivers. Signed-off-by: NAndres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
- 23 3月, 2011 5 次提交
-
-
由 Andres Salomon 提交于
As requested by Samuel, there's not really any reason to have "shared" in the name. This also modifies the only user of the function, as well. Signed-off-by: NAndres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Andres Salomon 提交于
This adds functions to enable platform_device sharing for mfd clients. Each platform driver (mfd client) that wants to share an mfd_cell's platform_device uses the mfd_shared_platform_driver_{un,}register() functions instead of platform_driver_{un,}register(). Along with registering the platform driver, these also register a new platform device with the same characteristics as the original cell, but a different name. Given an mfd_cell with the name "foo", drivers that want to share access to its resources can call mfd_shared_platform_driver_register with platform drivers named (for example) "bar" and "baz". This will register two platform devices and drivers named "bar" and "baz" that share the same cell as the platform device "foo". The drivers can then call "foo" cell's enable hooks (or mfd_shared_cell_enable) to enable resources, and obtain platform resources as they normally would. This deals with platform handling only; mfd driver-specific details, hardware handling, refcounting, etc are all dealt with separately. Signed-off-by: NAndres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Andres Salomon 提交于
This provides convenience functions for sharing of cells across multiple mfd clients. Mfd drivers can provide enable/disable hooks to actually tweak the hardware, and clients can call mfd_shared_cell_{en,dis}able without having to worry about whether or not another client happens to have enabled or disabled the cell/hardware. Note that this is purely optional; drivers can continue to use the mfd_cell's enable/disable hooks for their own purposes, if desired. Signed-off-by: NAndres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Andres Salomon 提交于
All users of this have now been switched over to using mfd_data; it can go away now. Signed-off-by: NAndres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Andres Salomon 提交于
Previously, one would set the mfd_cell's platform_data/data_size to point to the current mfd_cell in order to pass that information along to drivers. This causes the current mfd_cell to always be available to drivers. It also adds a wrapper function for fetching the mfd cell from a platform device, similar to what originally existed for mfd devices. Drivers who previously used platform_data for other purposes can still use it; the difference is that mfd_get_data() must be used to access it (and the pdata structure is no longer allocated in mfd_add_devices). Note that mfd_get_data is intentionally vague (in name) about where the data is stored; variable name changes can come later without having to touch brazillions of drivers. Signed-off-by: NAndres Salomon <dilinger@queued.net> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
- 14 1月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Allow MFD cells to have pm_runtime_no_callbacks() called on them during registration. This causes the runtime PM framework to ignore them, allowing use of runtime PM to suspend the device as a whole even if not all drivers for the MFD can usefully implement runtime PM. For example, RTCs are likely to run continuously regardless of the power state of the system. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
- 29 10月, 2010 2 次提交
-
-
由 Brian Harring 提交于
When the cell data_size is 0, the resulting platform_data pointer will be set to ZERO_SIZE_PTR. That could be misleading for device drivers running a NULL check on thei platform_data pointer before dereferencing it. Signed-off-by: NBrian Harring <ferringb@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Daniel Drake 提交于
The upcoming VIA VX855 MFD driver needs to communicate resources to subdevices where the resources may be claimed by ACPI. Add a flag to mfd_cell to request that resources are not policed. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
- 12 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Axel Lin 提交于
platform_device_add_resources may fail, thus add error checking for it. Signed-off-by: NAxel Lin <axel.lin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
- 28 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Samuel Ortiz 提交于
If mem_base is NULL, then we fall back to the default case, just copying the original resource. Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
- 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being included when building most .c files. percpu.h includes slab.h which in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies. percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed. Prepare for this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those headers directly instead of assuming availability. As this conversion needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is used as the basis of conversion. http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py The script does the followings. * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that only the necessary includes are there. ie. if only gfp is used, gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h. * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms to its surrounding. It's put in the include block which contains core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered - alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there doesn't seem to be any matching order. * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the file. The conversion was done in the following steps. 1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h and ~3000 slab.h inclusions. The script emitted errors for ~400 files. 2. Each error was manually checked. Some didn't need the inclusion, some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or embedding .c file was more appropriate for others. This step added inclusions to around 150 files. 3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits from #2 to make sure no file was left behind. 4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed. e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually. 5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell. Most gfp.h inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros. Each slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as necessary. 6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h. 7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures were fixed. CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq). * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config. * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig * ia64 SMP allmodconfig * s390 SMP allmodconfig * alpha SMP allmodconfig * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig 8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as a separate patch and serve as bisection point. Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step 6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch. If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of the specific arch. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
-
- 08 3月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Samuel Ortiz 提交于
For ACPI based systems, we should check for ACPI conflicts when adding the platform devices. The test will always succeed for non ACPI platforms. Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
- 17 9月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
Provide basic support for MFDs having multiple cells of a given type with different IDs by adding an id to the mfd_cell structure and then adding that to the id passed in to mfd_add_devices(). As it stands this approach requires that MFDs using this feature deal with ensuring that there aren't any ID collisions resulting from multiple MFDs of the same type being instantiated. This needs to happen with the existing code too, but with this approach there is a knock on effect on the IDs for non-duplicated devices. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
-
- 04 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
The MFD cell structure provides a driver_data field but doesn't pass it on to the child devices when instantiating them - do that. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
-
- 20 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ian Molton 提交于
This patch moves the allocation of the resources off the stack in mfd_add_device(). Signed-off-by: NIan Molton <spyro@f2s.com> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
-
- 29 7月, 2008 4 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Baryshkov 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
-
由 Mike Rapoport 提交于
Adding platform_data to mfd_cell allows passing of platform data directly to the platform_device created for each cell and thus reuse of existing drivers. On the other side it can be used as a hook to mfd_cell itself removing the need in mfd_get_cell method. Signed-off-by: NMike Rapoport <mike@compulab.co.il> Acked-by: NDmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
-
由 Ben Dooks 提交于
Fix some coding style fixes in the mfd core driver. Signed-off-by: NBen Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
-
由 Ben Dooks 提交于
Convert mfd_remove_devices_fn() to use to_platform_device() instead of doing container_of(). Signed-off-by: NBen Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org> Acked-by: NDmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@openedhand.com>
-
- 26 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
For it doesn't exist on i386. Cc: Ian Molton <spyro@f2s.com> Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Baryshkov 提交于
This patch provides a common subdevice registration system for MFD type chips, using platfrom device. Signed-off-by: NIan Molton <spyro@f2s.com> Signed-off-by: NDmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-