Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 4月, 2014 2 次提交
    • R
      ARM: bcm: clean-up unneeded kconfig selects · 9f0db8b9
      由 Rob Herring 提交于 
      Multi-platform support implies all these options are already selected and
individual platforms don't need to select them.
Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Christian Daudt <bcm@fixthebug.org>
Cc: Matt Porter <mporter@linaro.org>
Cc: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com
      9f0db8b9
    • R
      ARM: mvebu: clean-up unneeded kconfig selects · 55400f3a
      由 Rob Herring 提交于 
      Multi-platform support implies all these options are already selected and
individual platforms don't need to select them.
Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
Cc: Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
      55400f3a
  3. 19 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 14 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 11 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  9. 09 4月, 2014 4 次提交
  11. 08 4月, 2014 2 次提交
    • R
      ARM: add missing system_misc.h include to process.c · 779dd959
      由 Russell King 提交于 
      arm_pm_restart(), arm_pm_idle() and soft_restart() are all declared in
system_misc.h, but this file is not included in process.c.  Add this
missing include.  Found via sparse:

arch/arm/kernel/process.c:98:6: warning: symbol 'soft_restart' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/kernel/process.c:127:6: warning: symbol 'arm_pm_restart' was not declared. Should it be static?
arch/arm/kernel/process.c:134:6: warning: symbol 'arm_pm_idle' was not declared. Should it be static?
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      779dd959
    • U
      Kconfig: rename HAS_IOPORT to HAS_IOPORT_MAP · ce816fa8
      由 Uwe Kleine-König 提交于 
      If the renamed symbol is defined lib/iomap.c implements ioport_map and
ioport_unmap and currently (nearly) all platforms define the port
accessor functions outb/inb and friend unconditionally.  So
HAS_IOPORT_MAP is the better name for this.

Consequently NO_IOPORT is renamed to NO_IOPORT_MAP.

The motivation for this change is to reintroduce a symbol HAS_IOPORT
that signals if outb/int et al are available.  I will address that at
least one merge window later though to keep surprises to a minimum and
catch new introductions of (HAS|NO)_IOPORT.

The changes in this commit were done using:

	$ git grep -l -E '(NO|HAS)_IOPORT' | xargs perl -p -i -e 's/\b((?:CONFIG_)?(?:NO|HAS)_IOPORT)\b/$1_MAP/'
Signed-off-by: NUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      ce816fa8
  13. 07 4月, 2014 4 次提交
  15. 04 4月, 2014 18 次提交
  17. 02 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  19. 01 4月, 2014 5 次提交
  21. 31 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • J
      locks: add new fcntl cmd values for handling file private locks · 5d50ffd7
      由 Jeff Layton 提交于 
      Due to some unfortunate history, POSIX locks have very strange and
unhelpful semantics. The thing that usually catches people by surprise
is that they are dropped whenever the process closes any file descriptor
associated with the inode.

This is extremely problematic for people developing file servers that
need to implement byte-range locks. Developers often need a "lock
management" facility to ensure that file descriptors are not closed
until all of the locks associated with the inode are finished.

Additionally, "classic" POSIX locks are owned by the process. Locks
taken between threads within the same process won't conflict with one
another, which renders them useless for synchronization between threads.

This patchset adds a new type of lock that attempts to address these
issues. These locks conflict with classic POSIX read/write locks, but
have semantics that are more like BSD locks with respect to inheritance
and behavior on close.

This is implemented primarily by changing how fl_owner field is set for
these locks. Instead of having them owned by the files_struct of the
process, they are instead owned by the filp on which they were acquired.
Thus, they are inherited across fork() and are only released when the
last reference to a filp is put.

These new semantics prevent them from being merged with classic POSIX
locks, even if they are acquired by the same process. These locks will
also conflict with classic POSIX locks even if they are acquired by
the same process or on the same file descriptor.

The new locks are managed using a new set of cmd values to the fcntl()
syscall. The initial implementation of this converts these values to
"classic" cmd values at a fairly high level, and the details are not
exposed to the underlying filesystem. We may eventually want to push
this handing out to the lower filesystem code but for now I don't
see any need for it.

Also, note that with this implementation the new cmd values are only
available via fcntl64() on 32-bit arches. There's little need to
add support for legacy apps on a new interface like this.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
      5d50ffd7