- 02 5月, 2013 40 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Separate rbd_osd_req_format() into two functions, one for read requests and the other for write requests. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Add the ability to provide an array of pages as outbound request data for object class method calls. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch makes four small changes in the ceph messenger. While getting copyup functionality working I found two bugs in the messenger. Existing paths through the code did not trigger these problems, but they're fixed here: - In ceph_msg_data_pagelist_cursor_init(), the cursor's last_piece field was being checked against the length supplied. This was OK until this commit: ccba6d98 libceph: implement multiple data items in a message That commit changed the cursor init routines to allow lengths to be supplied that exceeded the size of the current data item. Because of this, we have to use the assigned cursor resid field rather than the provided length in determining whether the cursor points to the last piece of a data item. - In ceph_msg_data_add_pages(), a BUG_ON() was erroneously catching attempts to add page data to a message if the message already had data assigned to it. That was OK until that same commit, at which point it was fine for messages to have multiple data items. It slipped through because that BUG_ON() call was present twice in that function. (You can never be too careful.) In addition two other minor things are changed: - In ceph_msg_data_cursor_init(), the local variable "data" was getting assigned twice. - In ceph_msg_data_advance(), it was assumed that the type-specific advance routine would set new_piece to true after it advanced past the last piece. That may have been fine, but since we check for that case we might as well set it explicitly in ceph_msg_data_advance(). This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4762Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This is a step toward fully implementing layered writes. Add checks before request submission for the object(s) associated with an image request. For write requests, if we don't know that the target object exists, issue a STAT request to find out. When that request completes, mark the known and exists flags for the original object request accordingly and re-submit the object request. (Note that this still does the existence check only; the copyup operation is not yet done.) A new object request is created to perform the existence check. A pointer to the original request is added to that object request to allow the stat request to re-issue the original request after updating its flags. If there is a failure with the stat request the error code is stored with the original request, which is then completed. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3418Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This creates two new flags for object requests to indicate what is known about the existence of the object to which a request is to be sent. The KNOWN flag will be true if the the EXISTS flag is meaningful. That is: KNOWN EXISTS ----- ------ 0 0 don't know whether the object exists 0 1 (not used/invalid) 1 0 object is known to not exist 1 0 object is known to exist This will be used in determining how to handle write requests for data objects for layered rbd images. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In a few spots, whether the an object request's img_request pointer is null is used to determine whether an object request is being done as part of an image data request. Stop doing that, and instead always use the object request IMG_DATA flag for that purpose. Swap the order of the definition of the IMG_DATA and DONE flag helpers, because obj_request_done_set() now refers to obj_request_img_data_set() to get its rbd_dev value. This will become important because the img_request pointer is about to become part of a union. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An extra reference is taken when an object request is added as one of the requests making up an image object. A reference is dropped again when the image's object requests get submitted. The original reference for the object request will remain throughout this period, so we don't need to add and then take away an extra one. This can be interpreted as the image request inheriting the original object request's reference. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Allow osd request ops that aren't otherwise structured (not class, extent, or watch ops) to specify "raw" data to be used to hold incoming data for the op. Make use of this capability for the osd STAT op. Prefix the name of the private function osd_req_op_init() with "_", and expose a new function by that (earlier) name whose purpose is to initialize osd ops with (only) implied data. For now we'll just support the use of a page array for an osd op with incoming raw data. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are a bunch of functions defined to encapsulate getting the address of a data field for a particular op in an osd request. They're all defined the same way, so create a macro to take the place of all of them. Two of these are used outside the osd client code, so preserve them (but convert them to use the new macro internally). Stop exporting the ones that aren't used elsewhere. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In the incremental move toward supporting distinct data items in an osd request some of the functions had "write_request" parameters to indicate, basically, whether the data belonged to in_data or the out_data. Now that we maintain the data fields in the op structure there is no need to indicate the direction, so get rid of the "write_request" parameters. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Randy Dunlap 提交于
Fix printk format warnings by using %zd for 'ssize_t' variables: fs/ceph/file.c:751:2: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 11 has type 'ssize_t' [-Wformat] fs/ceph/file.c:762:2: warning: format '%ld' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 11 has type 'ssize_t' [-Wformat] Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Cc: ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Yan, Zheng 提交于
ceph_writepages_start() reads inode->i_size in two places. It can get different values between successive read, because truncate can change inode->i_size at any time. The race can lead to mismatch between data length of osd request and pages marked as writeback. When osd request finishes, it clear writeback page according to its data length. So some pages can be left in writeback state forever. The fix is only read inode->i_size once, save its value to a local variable and use the local variable when i_size is needed. Signed-off-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Yan, Zheng 提交于
copy write checks in __generic_file_aio_write to ceph_aio_write. To make these checks cover sync write path. Signed-off-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Yan, Zheng 提交于
There is deadlock as illustrated bellow. The fix is taking i_mutex before getting Fw cap reference. write truncate MDS --------------------- -------------------- -------------- get Fw cap lock i_mutex lock i_mutex (blocked) request setattr.size -> <- revoke Fw cap Signed-off-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
An osd request currently has two callbacks. They inform the initiator of the request when we've received confirmation for the target osd that a request was received, and when the osd indicates all changes described by the request are durable. The only time the second callback is used is in the ceph file system for a synchronous write. There's a race that makes some handling of this case unsafe. This patch addresses this problem. The error handling for this callback is also kind of gross, and this patch changes that as well. In ceph_sync_write(), if a safe callback is requested we want to add the request on the ceph inode's unsafe items list. Because items on this list must have their tid set (by ceph_osd_start_request()), the request added *after* the call to that function returns. The problem with this is that there's a race between starting the request and adding it to the unsafe items list; the request may already be complete before ceph_sync_write() even begins to put it on the list. To address this, we change the way the "safe" callback is used. Rather than just calling it when the request is "safe", we use it to notify the initiator the bounds (start and end) of the period during which the request is *unsafe*. So the initiator gets notified just before the request gets sent to the osd (when it is "unsafe"), and again when it's known the results are durable (it's no longer unsafe). The first call will get made in __send_request(), just before the request message gets sent to the messenger for the first time. That function is only called by __send_queued(), which is always called with the osd client's request mutex held. We then have this callback function insert the request on the ceph inode's unsafe list when we're told the request is unsafe. This will avoid the race because this call will be made under protection of the osd client's request mutex. It also nicely groups the setup and cleanup of the state associated with managing unsafe requests. The name of the "safe" callback field is changed to "unsafe" to better reflect its new purpose. It has a Boolean "unsafe" parameter to indicate whether the request is becoming unsafe or is now safe. Because the "msg" parameter wasn't used, we drop that. This resolves the original problem reportedin: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4706Reported-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSage Weil <sage@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In ceph_sync_write(), if a safe callback is supplied with a request, and an error is returned by ceph_osdc_wait_request(), a block of code is executed to remove the request from the unsafe writes list and drop references to capabilities acquired just prior to a call to ceph_osdc_wait_request(). The only function used for this callback is sync_write_commit(), and it does *exactly* what that block of error handling code does. Now in ceph_osdc_wait_request(), if an error occurs (due to an interupt during a wait_for_completion_interruptible() call), complete_request() gets called, and that calls the request's safe_callback method if it's defined. So this means that this cleanup activity gets called twice in this case, which is erroneous (and in fact leads to a crash). Fix this by just letting the osd client handle the cleanup in the event of an interrupt. This resolves one problem mentioned in: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4706Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com>
-
由 Yan, Zheng 提交于
add getattr/setattr and xattrs related methods. Signed-off-by: NYan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NGreg Farnum <greg@inktank.com>
-
由 Sam Lang 提交于
We don't need to use up entropy to choose an mds, so use prandom_u32() to get a pseudo-random number. Also, we don't need to choose a random mds if only one mds is available, so add special casing for the common case. Fixes http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3579Signed-off-by: NSam Lang <sam.lang@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NGreg Farnum <greg@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Implement layered read requests for format 2 rbd images. If an rbd image is a clone of a snapshot, the snapshot will be the clone's "parent" image. When an object read request on a clone comes back with ENOENT it indicates that the clone is not yet populated with that portion of the image's data, and the parent image should be consulted to satisfy the read. When this occurs, a new image request is created, directed to the parent image. The offset and length of the image are the same as the image-relative offset and length of the object request that produced ENOENT. Data from the parent image therefore satisfies the object read request for the original image request. While this code works, it will not be active until we enable the layering feature (by adding RBD_FEATURE_LAYERING to the value of RBD_FEATURES_SUPPORTED). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Call the probe function for the parent device if one is present. Since we don't formally support the layering feature we won't be using this functionality just yet. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Add a flag to distinguish between object requests being done on standalone objects and requests being sent for objects representing rbd image data (i.e., object requests that are the result of image request). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
We're going to need some more Boolean values for object requests, so create a flags bit field and use it to record whether the request is done. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Encapsulate the code that completes processing of an object request that's part of an image request. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define a flag indicating whether an image request is for a layered image (one with a parent image to which requests will be redirected if the target object of a request does not exist). The code that checks this flag will be added shortly. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Define a flag indicating whether an image request originated from the Linux block layer (from blk_fetch_request()) or whether it was initiated in order to satisfy an object request for a child image of a layered rbd device. For image requests initiated by objects of child images we'll save a pointer to the object request rather than the Linux block request. For now, only block requests are used. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There are several Boolean values we'll be maintaining for image requests. Switch from the single write_request field to a general-purpose flags field, and use one if its bits to represent the direction of I/O for the image request. Define helper functions for setting and testing that flag. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
For an image object request we will need to know what offset within the rbd image the request covers. Record that when the object request gets created. Update the I/O error warnings so they use this so what's reported is more informative. Rename a local variable to fit the convention used everywhere else. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Compute the total number of bytes transferred for an image request--the sum across each of the request's object requests. To avoid contention do it only when all object requests are complete, in rbd_img_request_complete(). Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
If any image object request produces a non-zero result, preserve that as the result of the overall image request. If multiple objects have non-zero results, save only the first one. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
There is a new rbd feature bit defined for "fancy striping." Add it to the ones defined in the kernel client. Change RBD_FEATURES_ALL so it represents the set of all feature bits (rather than just the ones we support). Define a new symbol RBD_FEATURES_SUPPORTED to indicate the supported ones. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Right now the data for a method call is specified via a pointer and length, and it's copied--along with the class and method name--into a pagelist data item to be sent to the osd. Instead, encode the data in a data item separate from the class and method names. This will allow large amounts of data to be supplied to methods without copying. Only rbd uses the class functionality right now, and when it really needs this it will probably need to use a page array rather than a page list. But this simple implementation demonstrates the functionality on the osd client, and that's enough for now. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4104Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Change the names of the functions that put data on a pagelist to reflect that we're adding to whatever's already there rather than just setting it to the one thing. Currently only one data item is ever added to a message, but that's about to change. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/2770Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch adds support to the messenger for more than one data item in its data list. A message data cursor has two more fields to support this: - a count of the number of bytes left to be consumed across all data items in the list, "total_resid" - a pointer to the head of the list (for validation only) The cursor initialization routine has been split into two parts: the outer one, which initializes the cursor for traversing the entire list of data items; and the inner one, which initializes the cursor to start processing a single data item. When a message cursor is first initialized, the outer initialization routine sets total_resid to the length provided. The data pointer is initialized to the first data item on the list. From there, the inner initialization routine finishes by setting up to process the data item the cursor points to. Advancing the cursor consumes bytes in total_resid. If the resid field reaches zero, it means the current data item is fully consumed. If total_resid indicates there is more data, the cursor is advanced to point to the next data item, and then the inner initialization routine prepares for using that. (A check is made at this point to make sure we don't wrap around the front of the list.) The type-specific init routines are modified so they can be given a length that's larger than what the data item can support. The resid field is initialized to the smaller of the provided length and the length of the entire data item. When total_resid reaches zero, we're done. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3761Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
In place of the message data pointer, use a list head which links through message data items. For now we only support a single entry on that list. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Rather than having a ceph message data item point to the cursor it's associated with, have the cursor point to a data item. This will allow a message cursor to be used for more than one data item. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
A message will only be processing a single data item at a time, so there's no need for each data item to have its own cursor. Move the cursor embedded in the message data structure into the message itself. To minimize the impact, keep the data->cursor field, but make it be a pointer to the cursor in the message. Move the definition of ceph_msg_data above ceph_msg_data_cursor so the cursor can point to the data without a forward definition rather than vice-versa. This and the upcoming patches are part of: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/3761Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
The bio is the only data item type that doesn't record its full length. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
We know the length of our message buffers. If we get a message that's too long, just dump it and ignore it. If skip was set then con->in_msg won't be valid, so be careful not to dereference a null pointer in the process. This resolves: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4664Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
This patch: 15a0d7b libceph: record message data length did not enclose some bio-specific code inside CONFIG_BLOCK as it should have. Fix that. Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-
由 Alex Elder 提交于
Finally! Convert the osd op data pointers into real structures, and make the switch over to using them instead of having all ops share the in and/or out data structures in the osd request. Set up a new function to traverse the set of ops and release any data associated with them (pages). This and the patches leading up to it resolve: http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/4657Signed-off-by: NAlex Elder <elder@inktank.com> Reviewed-by: NJosh Durgin <josh.durgin@inktank.com>
-