Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 21 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 15 3月, 2019 3 次提交
  5. 06 3月, 2019 2 次提交
  7. 05 3月, 2019 2 次提交
  9. 28 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  11. 22 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  13. 06 2月, 2019 2 次提交
  15. 29 1月, 2019 2 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Pull VM lists under the VM mutex. · 09d7e46b
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      A starting point to counter the pervasive struct_mutex. For the goal of
avoiding (or at least blocking under them!) global locks during user
request submission, a simple but important step is being able to manage
each clients GTT separately. For which, we want to replace using the
struct_mutex as the guard for all things GTT/VM and switch instead to a
specific mutex inside i915_address_space.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190128102356.15037-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      09d7e46b
    • C
      drm/i915: Stop tracking MRU activity on VMA · 499197dc
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Our goal is to remove struct_mutex and replace it with fine grained
locking. One of the thorny issues is our eviction logic for reclaiming
space for an execbuffer (or GTT mmaping, among a few other examples).
While eviction itself is easy to move under a per-VM mutex, performing
the activity tracking is less agreeable. One solution is not to do any
MRU tracking and do a simple coarse evaluation during eviction of
active/inactive, with a loose temporal ordering of last
insertion/evaluation. That keeps all the locking constrained to when we
are manipulating the VM itself, neatly avoiding the tricky handling of
possible recursive locking during execbuf and elsewhere.

Note that discarding the MRU (currently implemented as a pair of lists,
to avoid scanning the active list for a NONBLOCKING search) is unlikely
to impact upon our efficiency to reclaim VM space (where we think a LRU
model is best) as our current strategy is to use random idle replacement
first before doing a search, and over time the use of softpinned 48b
per-ppGTT is growing (thereby eliminating any need to perform any eviction
searches, in theory at least) with the remaining users being found on
much older devices (gen2-gen6).

v2: Changelog and commentary rewritten to elaborate on the duality of a
single list being both an inactive and active list.
v3: Consolidate bool parameters into a single set of flags; don't
comment on the duality of a single variable being a multiplicity of
bits.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190128102356.15037-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      499197dc
  17. 17 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  19. 15 1月, 2019 5 次提交
  21. 10 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  23. 09 1月, 2019 1 次提交
  25. 08 1月, 2019 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Return immediately if trylock fails for direct-reclaim · d25f71a1
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      Ignore trying to shrink from i915 if we fail to acquire the struct_mutex
in the shrinker while performing direct-reclaim. The trade-off being
(much) lower latency for non-i915 clients at an increased risk of being
unable to obtain a page from direct-reclaim without hitting the
oom-notifier. The proviso being that we still keep trying to hard
obtain the lock for kswapd so that we can reap under heavy memory
pressure.

v2: Taint all mutexes taken within the shrinker with the struct_mutex
subclass as an early warning system, and drop I915_SHRINK_ACTIVE from
vmap to reduce the number of dangerous paths. We also have to drop
I915_SHRINK_ACTIVE from oom-notifier to be able to make the same claim
that ACTIVE is only used from outside context, which fits in with a
longer strategy of avoiding stalls due to scanning active during
shrinking.

The danger in using the subclass struct_mutex is that we declare
ourselves more knowledgable than lockdep and deprive ourselves of
automatic coverage. Instead, we require ourselves to mark up any mutex
taken inside the shrinker in order to detect lock-inversion, and if we
miss any we are doomed to a deadlock at the worst possible moment.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20190107115509.12523-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      d25f71a1
  27. 27 12月, 2018 1 次提交
  29. 22 12月, 2018 1 次提交
  31. 13 12月, 2018 1 次提交
  33. 07 12月, 2018 1 次提交
  35. 20 11月, 2018 2 次提交
  37. 06 11月, 2018 1 次提交
  39. 31 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  41. 30 10月, 2018 2 次提交
  43. 26 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  45. 19 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  47. 27 9月, 2018 2 次提交
  49. 25 9月, 2018 1 次提交
  51. 20 9月, 2018 1 次提交
  53. 18 9月, 2018 1 次提交