In order to be valid to dereference during the i915_fence_release, after
retiring the fence and releasing its refererences, we assume that
rq->engine can only be a real engine (that stay intact until the device
is shutdown after all fences have been flushed). However, due to a quirk
of preempt-to-busy, we may retire a request that still belongs to a
virtual engine and so eventually free it with rq->engine being invalid.
To avoid dereferencing that invalid engine, we look at the
execution_mask which if it indicates it may be executed on more than one
engine, we know it originated on a virtual engine and may still be on
one.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/1906
Fixes: 43acd651 ("drm/i915: Keep a per-engine request pool")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200521140617.30015-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Now that we have fast timeslicing on semaphores, we no longer need to
prioritise none-semaphore work as we will yield any work blocked on a
semaphore to the next in the queue. Previously with no timeslicing,
blocking on the semaphore caused extremely bad scheduling with multiple
clients utilising multiple rings. Now, there is no impact and we can
remove the complication.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200513173504.28322-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The initial-breadcrumb is used to mark the end of the awaiting and the
beginning of the user payload. We verify that we do not start the user
payload before all signaler are completed, checking our semaphore setup
by looking for the initial breadcrumb being written too early. We also
want to ensure that we do not add semaphore waits after we have already
closed the semaphore section, an issue for later deferred waits.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200513165937.9508-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Expose the hardcoded timeout for unsignaled foreign fences as a Kconfig
option, primarily to allow brave systems to disable the timeout and
solely rely on correct signaling.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichael J. Ruhl <michael.j.ruhl@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200509105021.12542-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The downside of using semaphores is that we lose metadata passing
along the signaling chain. This is particularly nasty when we
need to pass along a fatal error such as EFAULT or EDEADLK. For
fatal errors we want to scrub the request before it is executed,
which means that we cannot preload the request onto HW and have
it wait upon a semaphore.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200508092933.738-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

To allow faster engine to engine synchronization, peel the layer of
dma-fence-chain to expose potential i915 fences so that the
i915_request code can emit HW semaphore wait/signal operations in the
ring which is faster than waking up the host to submit unblocked
workloads after interrupt notification.

This is similar to the peeling we do for e.g. dma_fence_array.
Signed-off-by: NLionel Landwerlin <lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200508185448.29709-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As a means for a small code consolidation, but primarily to start
thinking more carefully about internal-vs-external linkage, pull the
pair of i915_sw_fence_await_dma_fence() calls into a common routine.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200508092933.738-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

While we ordinarily do not skip submit-fences due to the accompanying
hook that we want to callback on execution, a submit-fence on the same
timeline is meaningless.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200508092933.738-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Upon waiting a request (when asked), we gave that request a small
priority boost, not enough for it to cause preemption, but enough for it
to be scheduled next before all equals. We also used that bit to give
new clients a small priority boost, similar to FQ_CODEL, such that we
favoured short interactive tasks ahead of long running streams.

However, this is causing lots of complications with timeslicing where we
both want to honour the boost and yet ignore it. Those complications
cause unexpected user behaviour (tasks not being timesliced and run
concurrently as epxected), and the easiest way to resolve that is to
remove the boost. Hopefully, we can find a compromise again if we need
to, but in theory timeslicing itself and future more advanced schedulers
should give us the interactivity boost we seek.

Testcase: igt/gem_exec_schedule/lateslice
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200507152338.7452-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We recorded the dependencies for WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT in order that we could
correctly perform priority inheritance from the parallel branches to the
common trunk. However, for the purpose of timeslicing and reset
handling, the dependency is weak -- as we the pair of requests are
allowed to run in parallel and not in strict succession.

The real significance though is that this allows us to rearrange
groups of WAIT_FOR_SUBMIT linked requests along the single engine, and
so can resolve user level inter-batch scheduling dependencies from user
semaphores.

Fixes: c81471f5 ("drm/i915: Copy across scheduler behaviour flags across submit fences")
Testcase: igt/gem_exec_fence/submit
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.6+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200507155109.8892-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We need to preserve fatal errors from fences that are being terminated
as we hook them up.

Fixes: ef468849 ("drm/i915: Propagate fence errors")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200506162136.3325-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Add a tiny per-engine request mempool so that we should always have a
request available for powermanagement allocations from tricky
contexts. This reserve is expected to be only used for kernel
contexts when barriers must be emitted [almost] without fail.

The main consumer for this reserved request is expected to be engine-pm,
for which we know that there will always be at least the previous pm
request that we can reuse under mempressure (so there should always be
a spare request for engine_park()).

This is an alternative to using a comparatively bulky mempool, which
requires custom handling for both our reserved allocation requirement
and to protect our TYPESAFE_BY_RCU slab cache. The advantage of mempool
would be that it would allow us to keep a larger per-engine request
pool. However, converting over to mempool is straightforward should the
need arise.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Janusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-and-tested-by: NJanusz Krzysztofik <janusz.krzysztofik@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200402184037.21630-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Drop the pretense of kicking the tasklet (used only for the defunct guc
submission backend, it should just take ownership of the submit!) and so
remove the bh-kicking from around submission.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200323092841.22240-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since the semaphore fence may be signaled from inside an interrupt
handler from inside a request holding its request->lock, we cannot then
enter into the engine->active.lock for processing the semaphore priority
bump as we may traverse our call tree and end up on another held
request.

CPU 0:
[ 2243.218864]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x9a/0xb0
[ 2243.218867]  i915_schedule_bump_priority+0x49/0x80 [i915]
[ 2243.218869]  semaphore_notify+0x6d/0x98 [i915]
[ 2243.218871]  __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x61/0x420 [i915]
[ 2243.218874]  ? kmem_cache_free+0x211/0x290
[ 2243.218876]  i915_sw_fence_complete+0x58/0x80 [i915]
[ 2243.218879]  dma_i915_sw_fence_wake+0x3e/0x80 [i915]
[ 2243.218881]  signal_irq_work+0x571/0x690 [i915]
[ 2243.218883]  irq_work_run_list+0xd7/0x120
[ 2243.218885]  irq_work_run+0x1d/0x50
[ 2243.218887]  smp_irq_work_interrupt+0x21/0x30
[ 2243.218889]  irq_work_interrupt+0xf/0x20

CPU 1:
[ 2242.173107]  _raw_spin_lock+0x8f/0xa0
[ 2242.173110]  __i915_request_submit+0x64/0x4a0 [i915]
[ 2242.173112]  __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x8ee/0x2120 [i915]
[ 2242.173114]  ? i915_sched_lookup_priolist+0x1e3/0x2b0 [i915]
[ 2242.173117]  execlists_submit_request+0x2e8/0x2f0 [i915]
[ 2242.173119]  submit_notify+0x8f/0xc0 [i915]
[ 2242.173121]  __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x61/0x420 [i915]
[ 2242.173124]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x40
[ 2242.173137]  i915_sw_fence_complete+0x58/0x80 [i915]
[ 2242.173140]  i915_sw_fence_commit+0x16/0x20 [i915]

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1318
Fixes: b7404c7e ("drm/i915: Bump ready tasks ahead of busywaits")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.2+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200310101720.9944-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 209df10b)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Requests within a timeline are ordered by that timeline, so awaiting for
the start of a request within the timeline is a no-op. This used to work
by falling out of the mutex_trylock() as the signaler and waiter had the
same timeline and not returning an error.

Fixes: 6a79d848 ("drm/i915: Lock signaler timeline while navigating")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200305134822.2750496-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit ab7a6902)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Fix the inverted test to emit the wait on the end of the previous
request if we /haven't/ already.

Fixes: 6a79d848 ("drm/i915: Lock signaler timeline while navigating")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200305104210.2619967-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 07e9c59d)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

As a virtual engine may change the rq->engine to point to the active
request in flight, we need to warn the compiler that an active request's
engine is volatile.

[   95.017686] write (marked) to 0xffff8881e8386b10 of 8 bytes by interrupt on cpu 2:
[   95.018123]  execlists_dequeue+0x762/0x2150 [i915]
[   95.018539]  __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x48/0x60 [i915]
[   95.018955]  execlists_submission_tasklet+0xd3/0x170 [i915]
[   95.018986]  tasklet_action_common.isra.0+0x42/0xa0
[   95.019016]  __do_softirq+0xd7/0x2cd
[   95.019043]  irq_exit+0xbe/0xe0
[   95.019068]  irq_work_interrupt+0xf/0x20
[   95.019491]  i915_request_retire+0x2c5/0x670 [i915]
[   95.019937]  retire_requests+0xa1/0xf0 [i915]
[   95.020348]  engine_retire+0xa1/0xe0 [i915]
[   95.020376]  process_one_work+0x3b1/0x690
[   95.020403]  worker_thread+0x80/0x670
[   95.020429]  kthread+0x19a/0x1e0
[   95.020454]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[   95.020476]
[   95.020498] read to 0xffff8881e8386b10 of 8 bytes by task 8909 on cpu 3:
[   95.020918]  __i915_request_commit+0x177/0x220 [i915]
[   95.021329]  i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x38c4/0x4e50 [i915]
[   95.021750]  i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x2c3/0x580 [i915]
[   95.021784]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe4/0x120
[   95.021809]  drm_ioctl+0x297/0x4c7
[   95.021832]  ksys_ioctl+0x89/0xb0
[   95.021865]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x42/0x60
[   95.021901]  do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x2c0
[   95.021927]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200310142403.5953-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since the semaphore fence may be signaled from inside an interrupt
handler from inside a request holding its request->lock, we cannot then
enter into the engine->active.lock for processing the semaphore priority
bump as we may traverse our call tree and end up on another held
request.

CPU 0:
[ 2243.218864]  _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x9a/0xb0
[ 2243.218867]  i915_schedule_bump_priority+0x49/0x80 [i915]
[ 2243.218869]  semaphore_notify+0x6d/0x98 [i915]
[ 2243.218871]  __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x61/0x420 [i915]
[ 2243.218874]  ? kmem_cache_free+0x211/0x290
[ 2243.218876]  i915_sw_fence_complete+0x58/0x80 [i915]
[ 2243.218879]  dma_i915_sw_fence_wake+0x3e/0x80 [i915]
[ 2243.218881]  signal_irq_work+0x571/0x690 [i915]
[ 2243.218883]  irq_work_run_list+0xd7/0x120
[ 2243.218885]  irq_work_run+0x1d/0x50
[ 2243.218887]  smp_irq_work_interrupt+0x21/0x30
[ 2243.218889]  irq_work_interrupt+0xf/0x20

CPU 1:
[ 2242.173107]  _raw_spin_lock+0x8f/0xa0
[ 2242.173110]  __i915_request_submit+0x64/0x4a0 [i915]
[ 2242.173112]  __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x8ee/0x2120 [i915]
[ 2242.173114]  ? i915_sched_lookup_priolist+0x1e3/0x2b0 [i915]
[ 2242.173117]  execlists_submit_request+0x2e8/0x2f0 [i915]
[ 2242.173119]  submit_notify+0x8f/0xc0 [i915]
[ 2242.173121]  __i915_sw_fence_complete+0x61/0x420 [i915]
[ 2242.173124]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x40
[ 2242.173137]  i915_sw_fence_complete+0x58/0x80 [i915]
[ 2242.173140]  i915_sw_fence_commit+0x16/0x20 [i915]

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/1318
Fixes: b7404c7e ("drm/i915: Bump ready tasks ahead of busywaits")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.2+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200310101720.9944-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Always wait on the start of the signaler request to reduce the problem
of dequeueing the bonded pair too early -- we want both payloads to
start at the same time, with no latency, and yet still allow others to
make full use of the slack in the system. This reduce the amount of time
we spend waiting on the semaphore used to synchronise the start of the
bonded payload.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306133852.3420322-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

[ 3783.276728] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in __i915_request_submit [i915] / i915_request_await_dma_fence [i915]
[ 3783.276766]
[ 3783.276787] write to 0xffff8881f1bc60a0 of 1 bytes by interrupt on cpu 2:
[ 3783.277187]  __i915_request_submit+0x47e/0x4a0 [i915]
[ 3783.277580]  __execlists_submission_tasklet+0x997/0x2780 [i915]
[ 3783.277973]  execlists_submission_tasklet+0xd3/0x170 [i915]
[ 3783.278006]  tasklet_action_common.isra.0+0x42/0xa0
[ 3783.278035]  __do_softirq+0xd7/0x2cd
[ 3783.278063]  irq_exit+0xbe/0xe0
[ 3783.278089]  do_IRQ+0x51/0x100
[ 3783.278114]  ret_from_intr+0x0/0x1c
[ 3783.278140]  finish_task_switch+0x72/0x260
[ 3783.278170]  __schedule+0x1e5/0x510
[ 3783.278198]  schedule+0x45/0xb0
[ 3783.278226]  smpboot_thread_fn+0x23e/0x300
[ 3783.278256]  kthread+0x19a/0x1e0
[ 3783.278283]  ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
[ 3783.278305]
[ 3783.278327] read to 0xffff8881f1bc60a0 of 1 bytes by task 19440 on cpu 3:
[ 3783.278724]  i915_request_await_dma_fence+0x2a6/0x530 [i915]
[ 3783.279130]  i915_request_await_object+0x2fe/0x470 [i915]
[ 3783.279524]  i915_gem_do_execbuffer+0x45dc/0x4c20 [i915]
[ 3783.279908]  i915_gem_execbuffer2_ioctl+0x2c3/0x580 [i915]
[ 3783.279940]  drm_ioctl_kernel+0xe4/0x120
[ 3783.279968]  drm_ioctl+0x297/0x4c7
[ 3783.279996]  ksys_ioctl+0x89/0xb0
[ 3783.280021]  __x64_sys_ioctl+0x42/0x60
[ 3783.280047]  do_syscall_64+0x6e/0x2c0
[ 3783.280074]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200309132726.28358-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Do not poison the timeline link on the i915_request to allow both
forward/backward list traversal under RCU.

[ 9759.139229] RIP: 0010:active_request+0x2a/0x90 [i915]
[ 9759.139240] Code: 41 56 41 55 41 54 55 48 89 fd 53 48 89 f3 48 83 c5 60 e8 49 de dc e0 48 8b 83 e8 01 00 00 48 39 c5 74 12 48 8d 90 20 fe ff ff <48> 8b 80 50 fe ff ff a8 01 74 11 e8 66 20 dd e0 48 89 d8 5b 5d 41
[ 9759.139251] RSP: 0018:ffffc9000014ce80 EFLAGS: 00010012
[ 9759.139260] RAX: dead000000000122 RBX: ffff888817cac040 RCX: 0000000000022000
[ 9759.139267] RDX: deacffffffffff42 RSI: ffff888817cac040 RDI: ffff888851fee900
[ 9759.139275] RBP: ffff888851fee960 R08: 000000000000001a R09: ffffffffa04702e0
[ 9759.139282] R10: ffffffff82187ea0 R11: 0000000000000002 R12: 0000000000000004
[ 9759.139289] R13: ffffffffa04d5179 R14: ffff8887f994ae40 R15: ffff888857b9a068
[ 9759.139296] FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88885ed80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[ 9759.139304] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[ 9759.139311] CR2: 00007fff5bdec000 CR3: 00000008534fe001 CR4: 00000000001606e0
[ 9759.139318] Call Trace:
[ 9759.139325]  <IRQ>
[ 9759.139389]  execlists_reset+0x14d/0x310 [i915]
[ 9759.139400]  ? _raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0xf/0x30
[ 9759.139445]  ? fwtable_read32+0x90/0x230 [i915]
[ 9759.139499]  execlists_submission_tasklet+0xf6/0x150 [i915]
[ 9759.139508]  tasklet_action_common.isra.17+0x32/0xa0
[ 9759.139516]  __do_softirq+0x114/0x3dc
[ 9759.139525]  ? handle_irq_event_percpu+0x59/0x70
[ 9759.139533]  irq_exit+0xa1/0xc0
[ 9759.139540]  do_IRQ+0x76/0x150
[ 9759.139547]  common_interrupt+0xf/0xf
[ 9759.139554]  </IRQ>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306140115.3495686-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Check the flow of requests into the hardware to verify that are
submitted in order along their timeline.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200306071614.2846708-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Requests within a timeline are ordered by that timeline, so awaiting for
the start of a request within the timeline is a no-op. This used to work
by falling out of the mutex_trylock() as the signaler and waiter had the
same timeline and not returning an error.

Fixes: 6a79d848 ("drm/i915: Lock signaler timeline while navigating")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200305134822.2750496-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Fix the inverted test to emit the wait on the end of the previous
request if we /haven't/ already.

Fixes: 6a79d848 ("drm/i915: Lock signaler timeline while navigating")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.5+
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200305104210.2619967-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Trying to use i915_request_skip() prior to i915_request_add() causes us
to try and fill the ring upto request->postfix, which has not yet been
set, and so may cause us to memset() past the end of the ring.

Instead of skipping the request immediately, just flag the error on the
request (only accepting the first fatal error we see) and then clear the
request upon submission.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200304121849.2448028-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As setup takes a long time, the user may close the context during the
construction of the execbuf. In order to make sure we correctly track
all outstanding work with non-persistent contexts, we need to serialise
the submission with the context closure and mop up any leaks.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200303080546.1140508-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We need to be extremely careful inside i915_request_await_start() as it
needs to walk the list of requests in the foreign timeline with very
little protection. As we hold our own timeline mutex, we can not nest
inside the signaler's timeline mutex, so all that remains is our RCU
protection. However, to be safe we need to tell the compiler that we may
be traversing the list only under RCU protection, and furthermore we
need to start declaring requests as elements of the timeline from their
construction.

Fixes: 9ddc8ec0 ("drm/i915: Eliminate the trylock for awaiting an earlier request")
Fixes: 6a79d848 ("drm/i915: Lock signaler timeline while navigating")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200227085723.1961649-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit d22d2d07)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

We busywait on an inflight request (one that is currently executing on
HW, and so might complete quickly) prior to setting up an interrupt and
sleeping. The trade off is that we keep an expensive CPU core busy in
order to avoid wake up latency: where that trade off should lie is best
left to the sysadmin.

The busywait mechanism can be compiled out with

	./scripts/config --set-val DRM_I915_SPIN_REQUEST 0

The maximum busywait duration can be adjusted per-engine using,

	/sys/class/drm/card?/engine/*/ms_busywait_duration_ns
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NSteve Carbonari <steven.carbonari@intel.com>
Tested-by: NSteve Carbonari <steven.carbonari@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200228131716.3243616-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We need to be extremely careful inside i915_request_await_start() as it
needs to walk the list of requests in the foreign timeline with very
little protection. As we hold our own timeline mutex, we can not nest
inside the signaler's timeline mutex, so all that remains is our RCU
protection. However, to be safe we need to tell the compiler that we may
be traversing the list only under RCU protection, and furthermore we
need to start declaring requests as elements of the timeline from their
construction.

Fixes: 9ddc8ec0 ("drm/i915: Eliminate the trylock for awaiting an earlier request")
Fixes: 6a79d848 ("drm/i915: Lock signaler timeline while navigating")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200227085723.1961649-11-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The real one can be found in i915_scheduler.c.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200220105707.344522-1-matthew.auld@intel.com

Inside the intel_timeline_get_seqno(), we currently track the retirement
of the old cachelines by listening to the new request. This requires
that the new request is ready to be used and so requires a minimum bit
of initialisation prior to getting the new seqno.

Fixes: b1e3177b ("drm/i915: Coordinate i915_active with its own mutex")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200203094152.4150550-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 855e39e6)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Keep the rq->fence.flags consistent with the status of the
rq->sched.link, and clear the associated bits when decoupling the link
on retirement (as we may wish to inspect those flags independent of
other state).

Fixes: c3f1ed90 ("drm/i915/gt: Allow temporary suspension of inflight requests")
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/997Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit b4a9a149)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

If we keep track of when the i915_request.sched.link is on the HW
runlist, or in the priority queue we can simplify our interactions with
the request (such as during rescheduling). This also simplifies the next
patch where we introduce a new in-between list, for requests that are
ready but neither on the run list or in the queue.

v2: Update i915_sched_node.link explanation for current usage where it
is a link on both the queue and on the runlists.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
(cherry picked from commit 672c368f)
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

On retiring the request, we should not re-use these elements in the ring
(at least not until we fill the ringbuffer and knowingly reuse the space).
Leave behind some poison to (hopefully) trap ourselves if we make a
mistake.
Suggested-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200211205615.1190127-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Currently on execlists, we use a local hwsp for the kernel_context,
rather than the engine's HWSP, as this is the default for execlists.
However, seqno wrap requires allocating a new HWSP cacheline, and may
require pinning a new HWSP page in the GGTT. This operation requiring
pinning in the GGTT is not allowed within the kernel_context timeline,
as doing so may require re-entering the kernel_context in order to evict
from the GGTT. As we want to avoid requiring a new HWSP for the
kernel_context, we can use the permanently pinned engine's HWSP instead.
However to do so we must prevent the use of semaphores reading the
kernel_context's HWSP, as the use of semaphores do not support rollover
onto the same cacheline. Fortunately, the kernel_context is mostly
isolated, so unlikely to give benefit to semaphores.
Reported-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200210205722.794180-5-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Rather than flushing the submission tasklets just before we sleep, flush
before we check the request status. Ideally this gives us a moment to
process the tasklets after sleeping just before we timeout.

v2: Compromise by pushing the flush prior to the timeout, but after the
check on completion so that we do not further delay the ready client.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200205095441.1769599-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Inside the intel_timeline_get_seqno(), we currently track the retirement
of the old cachelines by listening to the new request. This requires
that the new request is ready to be used and so requires a minimum bit
of initialisation prior to getting the new seqno.

Fixes: b1e3177b ("drm/i915: Coordinate i915_active with its own mutex")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200203094152.4150550-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Keep the rq->fence.flags consistent with the status of the
rq->sched.link, and clear the associated bits when decoupling the link
on retirement (as we may wish to inspect those flags independent of
other state).

Fixes: 32ff621f ("drm/i915/gt: Allow temporary suspension of inflight requests")
References: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/997Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200122140243.495621-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If we keep track of when the i915_request.sched.link is on the HW
runlist, or in the priority queue we can simplify our interactions with
the request (such as during rescheduling). This also simplifies the next
patch where we introduce a new in-between list, for requests that are
ready but neither on the run list or in the queue.

v2: Update i915_sched_node.link explanation for current usage where it
is a link on both the queue and on the runlists.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200116184754.2860848-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As we already have a flags field buried within i915_request, reuse it!
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200106114234.2529613-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk