- 21 12月, 2012 40 次提交
-
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...as always, rename is the messiest of the bunch. We have to track whether to retry or not via a separate flag since the error handling is already quite complex. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
...so we can pass in LOOKUP_REVAL. For now, nothing does yet. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Where we can pass in LOOKUP_DIRECTORY or LOOKUP_REVAL. Any other flags passed in here are currently ignored. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jeff Layton 提交于
This function is expected to be called from path-based syscalls to help them decide whether to try the lookup and call again in the event that they got an -ESTALE return back on an earier try. Currently, we only retry the call once on an ESTALE error, but in the event that we decide that that's not enough in the future, we should be able to change the logic in this helper without too much effort. Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Merge branch 'fscache' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-fs into for-linus
-
由 NeilBrown 提交于
NFS appears to use d_obtain_alias() to create the root dentry rather than d_make_root. This can cause 'prepend_path()' to complain that the root has a weird name if an NFS filesystem is lazily unmounted. e.g. if "/mnt" is an NFS mount then { cd /mnt; umount -l /mnt ; ls -l /proc/self/cwd; } will cause a WARN message like WARNING: at /home/git/linux/fs/dcache.c:2624 prepend_path+0x1d7/0x1e0() ... Root dentry has weird name <> to appear in kernel logs. So change d_obtain_alias() to use "/" rather than "" as the anonymous name. Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Alessio Igor Bogani 提交于
Commit 8e22cc88 removes the (un)lock_super function definitions but forgets to remove their prototypes. Signed-off-by: NAlessio Igor Bogani <abogani@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Marco Stornelli 提交于
Removed vmtruncate Signed-off-by: NMarco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Marco Stornelli 提交于
Removed vmtruncate Signed-off-by: NMarco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Marco Stornelli 提交于
Removed vmtruncate Signed-off-by: NMarco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Marco Stornelli 提交于
Removed vmtruncate Signed-off-by: NMarco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NAnton Altaparmakov <anton@tuxera.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Marco Stornelli 提交于
Removed vmtruncate Signed-off-by: NMarco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Marco Stornelli 提交于
Removed vmtruncate Signed-off-by: NMarco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Marco Stornelli 提交于
Removed vmtruncate Signed-off-by: NMarco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Marco Stornelli 提交于
Removed vmtruncate Signed-off-by: NMarco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Marco Stornelli 提交于
Removed vmtruncate Signed-off-by: NMarco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Marco Stornelli 提交于
Removed vmtruncate Signed-off-by: NMarco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Marco Stornelli 提交于
Removed vmtruncate Signed-off-by: NMarco Stornelli <marco.stornelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Provide fscache_cancel_op() with a pointer to a function it should invoke under lock if it cancels an operation. Use this to clear the remaining page count upon cancellation of a pending retrieval operation so that fscache_release_retrieval_op() doesn't get an assertion failure (see below). This can happen when a signal occurs, say from CTRL-C being pressed during data retrieval. FS-Cache: Assertion failed 3 == 0 is false ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/fscache/page.c:237! invalid opcode: 0000 [#641] SMP Modules linked in: cachefiles(F) nfsv4(F) nfsv3(F) nfsv2(F) nfs(F) fscache(F) auth_rpcgss(F) nfs_acl(F) lockd(F) sunrpc(F) CPU 0 Pid: 6075, comm: slurp-q Tainted: GF D 3.7.0-rc8-fsdevel+ #411 /DG965RY RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa007f328>] [<ffffffffa007f328>] fscache_release_retrieval_op+0x75/0xff [fscache] RSP: 0000:ffff88001c6d7988 EFLAGS: 00010296 RAX: 000000000000000f RBX: ffff880014cdfe00 RCX: ffffffff6c102000 RDX: ffffffff8102d1ad RSI: ffffffff6c102000 RDI: ffffffff8102d1d6 RBP: ffff88001c6d7998 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 00000000fffffe00 R13: ffff88001c6d7ab4 R14: ffff88001a8638a0 R15: ffff88001552b190 FS: 00007f877aaf0700(0000) GS:ffff88003bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 00007fff11378fd2 CR3: 000000001c6c6000 CR4: 00000000000007f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process slurp-q (pid: 6075, threadinfo ffff88001c6d6000, task ffff88001c6c4080) Stack: ffffffffa007ec07 ffff880014cdfe00 ffff88001c6d79c8 ffffffffa007db4d ffffffffa007ec07 ffff880014cdfe00 00000000fffffe00 ffff88001c6d7ab4 ffff88001c6d7a38 ffffffffa008116d 0000000000000000 ffff88001c6c4080 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa007ec07>] ? fscache_cancel_op+0x194/0x1cf [fscache] [<ffffffffa007db4d>] fscache_put_operation+0x135/0x2ed [fscache] [<ffffffffa007ec07>] ? fscache_cancel_op+0x194/0x1cf [fscache] [<ffffffffa008116d>] __fscache_read_or_alloc_pages+0x413/0x4bc [fscache] [<ffffffff810ac8ae>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x195/0x75c [<ffffffffa00aab0f>] __nfs_readpages_from_fscache+0x86/0x13d [nfs] [<ffffffffa00a5fe0>] nfs_readpages+0x186/0x1bd [nfs] [<ffffffff810d23c8>] ? alloc_pages_current+0xc7/0xe4 [<ffffffff810a68b5>] ? __page_cache_alloc+0x84/0x91 [<ffffffff810af912>] ? __do_page_cache_readahead+0xa6/0x2e0 [<ffffffff810afaa3>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x237/0x2e0 [<ffffffff810af912>] ? __do_page_cache_readahead+0xa6/0x2e0 [<ffffffff810afe3e>] ra_submit+0x1c/0x20 [<ffffffff810b019b>] ondemand_readahead+0x359/0x382 [<ffffffff810b0279>] page_cache_sync_readahead+0x38/0x3a [<ffffffff810a77b5>] generic_file_aio_read+0x26b/0x637 [<ffffffffa00f1852>] ? nfs_mark_delegation_referenced+0xb/0xb [nfsv4] [<ffffffffa009cc85>] nfs_file_read+0xaa/0xcf [nfs] [<ffffffff810db5b3>] do_sync_read+0x91/0xd1 [<ffffffff810dbb8b>] vfs_read+0x9b/0x144 [<ffffffff810dbc78>] sys_read+0x44/0x75 [<ffffffff81422892>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Mark as cancelled an operation that is in progress rather than pending at the time it is cancelled, and call fscache_complete_op() to cancel an operation so that blocked ops can be started. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
In fscache_write_op(), if the object is determined to have become inactive or to have lost its cookie, we don't move the operation state from in-progress, and so an assertion in fscache_put_operation() fails with an assertion (see below). Instrumenting fscache_op_work_func() indicates that it called fscache_write_op() before calling fscache_put_operation() - where the assertion failed. The assertion at line 433 indicates that the operation state is IN_PROGRESS rather than being COMPLETE or CANCELLED. Instrumenting fscache_write_op() showed that it was being called on an object that had had its cookie removed and that this was due to relinquishment of the cookie by the netfs. At this point fscache no longer has access to the pages of netfs data that were requested to be written, and so simply cancelling the operation is the thing to do. FS-Cache: Assertion failed 3 == 5 is false ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/fscache/operation.c:433! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: cachefiles(F) nfsv4(F) nfsv3(F) nfsv2(F) nfs(F) fscache(F) auth_rpcgss(F) nfs_acl(F) lockd(F) sunrpc(F) CPU 0 Pid: 1035, comm: kworker/u:3 Tainted: GF 3.7.0-rc8-fsdevel+ #411 /DG965RY RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa007db22>] [<ffffffffa007db22>] fscache_put_operation+0x11a/0x2ed [fscache] RSP: 0018:ffff88003e32bcf8 EFLAGS: 00010296 RAX: 000000000000000f RBX: ffff88001818eb78 RCX: ffffffff6c102000 RDX: ffffffff8102d1ad RSI: ffffffff6c102000 RDI: ffffffff8102d1d6 RBP: ffff88003e32bd18 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffffffffa00811da R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 0000000100625d26 R15: 0000000000000000 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88003bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 00007fff7dd31c68 CR3: 000000003d730000 CR4: 00000000000007f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process kworker/u:3 (pid: 1035, threadinfo ffff88003e32a000, task ffff88003bb38080) Stack: ffffffff8102d1ad ffff88001818eb78 ffffffffa00811da 0000000000000001 ffff88003e32bd48 ffffffffa007f0ad ffff88001818eb78 ffffffff819583c0 ffff88003df24e00 ffff88003882c3e0 ffff88003e32bde8 ffffffff81042de0 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8102d1ad>] ? vprintk_emit+0x3c6/0x41a [<ffffffffa00811da>] ? __fscache_read_or_alloc_pages+0x4bc/0x4bc [fscache] [<ffffffffa007f0ad>] fscache_op_work_func+0xec/0x123 [fscache] [<ffffffff81042de0>] process_one_work+0x21c/0x3b0 [<ffffffff81042d82>] ? process_one_work+0x1be/0x3b0 [<ffffffffa007efc1>] ? fscache_operation_gc+0x23e/0x23e [fscache] [<ffffffff8104332e>] worker_thread+0x202/0x2df [<ffffffff8104312c>] ? rescuer_thread+0x18e/0x18e [<ffffffff81047c1c>] kthread+0xd0/0xd8 [<ffffffff81421bfa>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x29/0x3e [<ffffffff81047b4c>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x55/0x55 [<ffffffff814227ec>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 [<ffffffff81047b4c>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x55/0x55 Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
wait_on_bit() with TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE returns 1 rather than a negative error code, so change what we check for. This means that the signal handling in fscache_wait_for_retrieval_activation() should now work properly. Without this, the following bug can be seen if CTRL-C is pressed during fscache read operation: FS-Cache: Assertion failed 2 == 3 is false ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/fscache/page.c:347! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP Modules linked in: cachefiles(F) nfsv4(F) nfsv3(F) nfsv2(F) nfs(F) fscache(F) auth_rpcgss(F) nfs_acl(F) lockd(F) sunrpc(F) CPU 1 Pid: 15006, comm: slurp-q Tainted: GF 3.7.0-rc8-fsdevel+ #411 /DG965RY RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa007fcb4>] [<ffffffffa007fcb4>] fscache_wait_for_retrieval_activation+0x167/0x177 [fscache] RSP: 0018:ffff88002a4c39a8 EFLAGS: 00010292 RAX: 000000000000001a RBX: ffff88002d3dc158 RCX: 0000000000008685 RDX: ffffffff8102ccd6 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff8102d1d6 RBP: ffff88002a4c39c8 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: ffffffff8163afa0 R11: ffff88003bd11900 R12: ffffffffa00868c8 R13: ffff880028306458 R14: ffff88002d3dc1b0 R15: ffff88001372e538 FS: 00007f17426a0700(0000) GS:ffff88003bd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 00007f1742494a44 CR3: 0000000031bd7000 CR4: 00000000000007e0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process slurp-q (pid: 15006, threadinfo ffff88002a4c2000, task ffff880023de3040) Stack: ffff88002d3dc158 ffff88001372e538 ffff88002a4c3ab4 ffff8800283064e0 ffff88002a4c3a38 ffffffffa0080f6d 0000000000000000 ffff880023de3040 ffff88002a4c3ac8 ffffffff810ac8ae ffff880028306458 ffff88002a4c3bc8 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa0080f6d>] __fscache_read_or_alloc_pages+0x24f/0x4bc [fscache] [<ffffffff810ac8ae>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x195/0x75c [<ffffffffa00aab0f>] __nfs_readpages_from_fscache+0x86/0x13d [nfs] [<ffffffffa00a5fe0>] nfs_readpages+0x186/0x1bd [nfs] [<ffffffff810d23c8>] ? alloc_pages_current+0xc7/0xe4 [<ffffffff810a68b5>] ? __page_cache_alloc+0x84/0x91 [<ffffffff810af912>] ? __do_page_cache_readahead+0xa6/0x2e0 [<ffffffff810afaa3>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x237/0x2e0 [<ffffffff810af912>] ? __do_page_cache_readahead+0xa6/0x2e0 [<ffffffff810afe3e>] ra_submit+0x1c/0x20 [<ffffffff810b019b>] ondemand_readahead+0x359/0x382 [<ffffffff810b0279>] page_cache_sync_readahead+0x38/0x3a [<ffffffff810a77b5>] generic_file_aio_read+0x26b/0x637 [<ffffffffa00f1852>] ? nfs_mark_delegation_referenced+0xb/0xb [nfsv4] [<ffffffffa009cc85>] nfs_file_read+0xaa/0xcf [nfs] [<ffffffff810db5b3>] do_sync_read+0x91/0xd1 [<ffffffff810dbb8b>] vfs_read+0x9b/0x144 [<ffffffff810dbc78>] sys_read+0x44/0x75 [<ffffffff81422892>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
nfs4_file_open() should open files for fscaching. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add a missing transition to the FS-Cache object state machine to handle an invalidation event occuring between the back end completing the object lookup by calling fscache_obtained_object() (which moves to state OBJECT_AVAILABLE) and the backend returning to fscache_lookup_object() and thence to fscache_object_state_machine() which then does a goto lookup_transit to handle the transition - but lookup_transit doesn't handle EV_INVALIDATE. Without this, the following BUG can be logged: FS-Cache: Unsupported event 2 [5/f7] in state OBJECT_AVAILABLE ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/fscache/object.c:357! Where event 2 is EV_INVALIDATE. Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
nfs_migrate_page() does not wait for FS-Cache to finish with a page, probably leading to the following bad-page-state: BUG: Bad page state in process python-bin pfn:17d39b page:ffffea00053649e8 flags:004000000000100c count:0 mapcount:0 mapping:(null) index:38686 (Tainted: G B ---------------- ) Pid: 31053, comm: python-bin Tainted: G B ---------------- 2.6.32-71.24.1.el6.x86_64 #1 Call Trace: [<ffffffff8111bfe7>] bad_page+0x107/0x160 [<ffffffff8111ee69>] free_hot_cold_page+0x1c9/0x220 [<ffffffff8111ef19>] __pagevec_free+0x59/0xb0 [<ffffffff8104b988>] ? flush_tlb_others_ipi+0x128/0x130 [<ffffffff8112230c>] release_pages+0x21c/0x250 [<ffffffff8115b92a>] ? remove_migration_pte+0x28a/0x2b0 [<ffffffff8115f3f8>] ? mem_cgroup_get_reclaim_stat_from_page+0x18/0x70 [<ffffffff81122687>] ____pagevec_lru_add+0x167/0x180 [<ffffffff811226f8>] __lru_cache_add+0x58/0x70 [<ffffffff81122731>] lru_cache_add_lru+0x21/0x40 [<ffffffff81123f49>] putback_lru_page+0x69/0x100 [<ffffffff8115c0bd>] migrate_pages+0x13d/0x5d0 [<ffffffff81122687>] ? ____pagevec_lru_add+0x167/0x180 [<ffffffff81152ab0>] ? compaction_alloc+0x0/0x370 [<ffffffff8115255c>] compact_zone+0x4cc/0x600 [<ffffffff8111cfac>] ? get_page_from_freelist+0x15c/0x820 [<ffffffff810672f4>] ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x1c4/0x3c0 [<ffffffff8115290e>] compact_zone_order+0x7e/0xb0 [<ffffffff81152a49>] try_to_compact_pages+0x109/0x170 [<ffffffff8111e94d>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x5ed/0x850 [<ffffffff814c9136>] ? thread_return+0x4e/0x778 [<ffffffff81150d43>] alloc_pages_vma+0x93/0x150 [<ffffffff81167ea5>] do_huge_pmd_anonymous_page+0x135/0x340 [<ffffffff814cb6f6>] ? rwsem_down_read_failed+0x26/0x30 [<ffffffff81136755>] handle_mm_fault+0x245/0x2b0 [<ffffffff814ce383>] do_page_fault+0x123/0x3a0 [<ffffffff814cbdf5>] page_fault+0x25/0x30 nfs_migrate_page() calls nfs_fscache_release_page() which doesn't actually wait - even if __GFP_WAIT is set. The reason that doesn't wait is that fscache_maybe_release_page() might deadlock the allocator as the work threads writing to the cache may all end up sleeping on memory allocation. However, I wonder if that is actually a problem. There are a number of things I can do to deal with this: (1) Make nfs_migrate_page() wait. (2) Make fscache_maybe_release_page() honour the __GFP_WAIT flag. (3) Set a timeout around the wait. (4) Make nfs_migrate_page() return an error if the page is still busy. For the moment, I'll select (2) and (4). Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
The function to submit an exclusive op (fscache_submit_exclusive_op()) can BUG if there's been an I/O error because it may see the parent cache object in an unexpected state. It should only BUG if there hasn't been an I/O error. In this case the problem was produced by remounting the cache partition to be R/O. The EROFS state was detected and the cache was aborted, but not everything handled the aborting correctly. SysRq : Emergency Remount R/O EXT4-fs (sda6): re-mounted. Opts: (null) Emergency Remount complete CacheFiles: I/O Error: Failed to update xattr with error -30 FS-Cache: Cache cachefiles stopped due to I/O error ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/fscache/operation.c:128! invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] SMP CPU 0 Modules linked in: cachefiles nfs fscache auth_rpcgss nfs_acl lockd sunrpc Pid: 6612, comm: kworker/u:2 Not tainted 3.1.0-rc8-fsdevel+ #1093 /DG965RY RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa00739c0>] [<ffffffffa00739c0>] fscache_submit_exclusive_op+0x2ad/0x2c2 [fscache] RSP: 0018:ffff880000853d40 EFLAGS: 00010206 RAX: ffff880038ac72a8 RBX: ffff8800181f2260 RCX: ffffffff81f2b2b0 RDX: 0000000000000001 RSI: ffffffff8179a478 RDI: ffff8800181f2280 RBP: ffff880000853d60 R08: 0000000000000002 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff880038ac7268 R13: ffff8800181f2280 R14: ffff88003a359190 R15: 000000010122b162 FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88003bc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b CR2: 00000034cc4a77f0 CR3: 0000000010e96000 CR4: 00000000000006f0 DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000 DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400 Process kworker/u:2 (pid: 6612, threadinfo ffff880000852000, task ffff880014c3c040) Stack: ffff8800181f2260 ffff8800181f2310 ffff880038ac7268 ffff8800181f2260 ffff880000853dc0 ffffffffa0072375 ffff880037ecfe00 ffff88003a359198 ffff880000853dc0 0000000000000246 0000000000000000 ffff88000a91d308 Call Trace: [<ffffffffa0072375>] fscache_object_work_func+0x792/0xe65 [fscache] [<ffffffff81047e44>] process_one_work+0x1eb/0x37f [<ffffffff81047de6>] ? process_one_work+0x18d/0x37f [<ffffffffa0071be3>] ? fscache_enqueue_dependents+0xd8/0xd8 [fscache] [<ffffffff810482e4>] worker_thread+0x15a/0x21a [<ffffffff8104818a>] ? rescuer_thread+0x188/0x188 [<ffffffff8104bf96>] kthread+0x7f/0x87 [<ffffffff813ad6f4>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10 [<ffffffff81026b98>] ? finish_task_switch+0x45/0xc0 [<ffffffff813abd1d>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe [<ffffffff8104bf17>] ? __init_kthread_worker+0x53/0x53 [<ffffffff813ad6f0>] ? gs_change+0xb/0xb Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
-