Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 17 2月, 2015 3 次提交
  3. 10 11月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 08 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      percpu_counter: add @gfp to percpu_counter_init() · 908c7f19
      由 Tejun Heo 提交于 
      Percpu allocator now supports allocation mask.  Add @gfp to
percpu_counter_init() so that !GFP_KERNEL allocation masks can be used
with percpu_counters too.

We could have left percpu_counter_init() alone and added
percpu_counter_init_gfp(); however, the number of users isn't that
high and introducing _gfp variants to all percpu data structures would
be quite ugly, so let's just do the conversion.  This is the one with
the most users.  Other percpu data structures are a lot easier to
convert.

This patch doesn't make any functional difference.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Acked-by: N"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: x86@kernel.org
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      908c7f19
  7. 16 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  9. 13 3月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      fs: push sync_filesystem() down to the file system's remount_fs() · 02b9984d
      由 Theodore Ts'o 提交于 
      Previously, the no-op "mount -o mount /dev/xxx" operation when the
file system is already mounted read-write causes an implied,
unconditional syncfs().  This seems pretty stupid, and it's certainly
documented or guaraunteed to do this, nor is it particularly useful,
except in the case where the file system was mounted rw and is getting
remounted read-only.

However, it's possible that there might be some file systems that are
actually depending on this behavior.  In most file systems, it's
probably fine to only call sync_filesystem() when transitioning from
read-write to read-only, and there are some file systems where this is
not needed at all (for example, for a pseudo-filesystem or something
like romfs).
Signed-off-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@gmail.com>
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Cc: Anders Larsen <al@alarsen.net>
Cc: Phillip Lougher <phillip@squashfs.org.uk>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: Petr Vandrovec <petr@vandrovec.name>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: samba-technical@lists.samba.org
Cc: codalist@coda.cs.cmu.edu
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: cluster-devel@redhat.com
Cc: linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org
Cc: jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-ntfs-dev@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
Cc: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
      02b9984d
  11. 03 3月, 2014 1 次提交
  13. 04 12月, 2013 1 次提交
  15. 04 3月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      fs: Limit sys_mount to only request filesystem modules. · 7f78e035
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      Modify the request_module to prefix the file system type with "fs-"
and add aliases to all of the filesystems that can be built as modules
to match.

A common practice is to build all of the kernel code and leave code
that is not commonly needed as modules, with the result that many
users are exposed to any bug anywhere in the kernel.

Looking for filesystems with a fs- prefix limits the pool of possible
modules that can be loaded by mount to just filesystems trivially
making things safer with no real cost.

Using aliases means user space can control the policy of which
filesystem modules are auto-loaded by editing /etc/modprobe.d/*.conf
with blacklist and alias directives.  Allowing simple, safe,
well understood work-arounds to known problematic software.

This also addresses a rare but unfortunate problem where the filesystem
name is not the same as it's module name and module auto-loading
would not work.  While writing this patch I saw a handful of such
cases.  The most significant being autofs that lives in the module
autofs4.

This is relevant to user namespaces because we can reach the request
module in get_fs_type() without having any special permissions, and
people get uncomfortable when a user specified string (in this case
the filesystem type) goes all of the way to request_module.

After having looked at this issue I don't think there is any
particular reason to perform any filtering or permission checks beyond
making it clear in the module request that we want a filesystem
module.  The common pattern in the kernel is to call request_module()
without regards to the users permissions.  In general all a filesystem
module does once loaded is call register_filesystem() and go to sleep.
Which means there is not much attack surface exposed by loading a
filesytem module unless the filesystem is mounted.  In a user
namespace filesystems are not mounted unless .fs_flags = FS_USERNS_MOUNT,
which most filesystems do not set today.
Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge.hallyn@canonical.com>
Acked-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Reported-by: NKees Cook <keescook@google.com>
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      7f78e035
  17. 21 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  19. 10 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  21. 03 10月, 2012 1 次提交
  23. 31 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      ext2: Implement freezing · 1e8b212f
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      The only missing piece to make freezing work reliably with ext2 is to
stop iput() of unlinked inode from deleting the inode on frozen filesystem.
So add a necessary protection to ext2_evict_inode().

We also provide appropriate ->freeze_fs and ->unfreeze_fs functions.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      1e8b212f
  25. 23 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • J
      quota: Move quota syncing to ->sync_fs method · a1177825
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      Since the moment writes to quota files are using block device page cache and
space for quota structures is reserved at the moment they are first accessed we
have no reason to sync quota before inode writeback. In fact this order is now
only harmful since quota information can easily change during inode writeback
(either because conversion of delayed-allocated extents or simply because of
allocation of new blocks for simple filesystems not using page_mkwrite).

So move syncing of quota information after writeback of inodes into ->sync_fs
method. This way we do not have to use ->quota_sync callback which is primarily
intended for use by quotactl syscall anyway and we get rid of calling
->sync_fs() twice unnecessarily. We skip quota syncing for OCFS2 since it does
proper quota journalling in all cases (unlike ext3, ext4, and reiserfs which
also support legacy non-journalled quotas) and thus there are no dirty quota
structures.

CC: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
CC: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org>
CC: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
Acked-by: NSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NDave Kleikamp <shaggy@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      a1177825
  27. 09 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  29. 16 5月, 2012 3 次提交
  31. 11 4月, 2012 3 次提交
    • A
      ext2: do not register write_super within VFS · f72cf5e2
      由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于 
      Jan Kara removed 'sb->s_dirt' VFS flag references, so we do not need to
register the ext2 'ext2_write_super()' method in the VFS superblock operations,
because 'sb->s_dirt' won't be ever set to 1 and VFS won't ever call
'->write_super()' anyway. Thus, remove the method.

Tested using xfstests.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      f72cf5e2
    • J
      ext2: Remove s_dirt handling · b838ec22
      由 Jan Kara 提交于 
      Places which modify superblock feature / state fields mark the superblock
buffer dirty so it is written out by flusher thread. Thus there's no need to
set s_dirt there.

The only other fields changing in the superblock are the numbers of free
blocks, free inodes and s_wtime. There's no real need to write (or even
compute) these periodically. Free blocks / inodes counters are recomputed on
every mount from group counters anyway and value of s_wtime is only
informational and imprecise anyway. So it should be enough to write these
opportunistically on mount, remount, umount, and sync_fs times.
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      b838ec22
    • A
      ext2: write superblock only once on unmount · f2b22420
      由 Artem Bityutskiy 提交于 
      Currently on unmount if we are mounted R/W, we first write the superblock to
the media if it is dirty, and then write it again, which is not optimal. This
patch makes ext2 write the superblock on unmount less times.
Signed-off-by: NArtem Bityutskiy <artem.bityutskiy@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      f2b22420
  33. 21 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  35. 09 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  37. 07 1月, 2012 1 次提交
  39. 04 1月, 2012 1 次提交
    • A
      vfs: fix the stupidity with i_dentry in inode destructors · 6b520e05
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      Seeing that just about every destructor got that INIT_LIST_HEAD() copied into
it, there is no point whatsoever keeping this INIT_LIST_HEAD in inode_init_once();
the cost of taking it into inode_init_always() will be negligible for pipes
and sockets and negative for everything else.  Not to mention the removal of
boilerplate code from ->destroy_inode() instances...
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      6b520e05
  41. 30 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  43. 17 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  45. 31 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  47. 07 1月, 2011 1 次提交
    • N
      fs: icache RCU free inodes · fa0d7e3d
      由 Nick Piggin 提交于 
      RCU free the struct inode. This will allow:

- Subsequent store-free path walking patch. The inode must be consulted for
  permissions when walking, so an RCU inode reference is a must.
- sb_inode_list_lock to be moved inside i_lock because sb list walkers who want
  to take i_lock no longer need to take sb_inode_list_lock to walk the list in
  the first place. This will simplify and optimize locking.
- Could remove some nested trylock loops in dcache code
- Could potentially simplify things a bit in VM land. Do not need to take the
  page lock to follow page->mapping.

The downsides of this is the performance cost of using RCU. In a simple
creat/unlink microbenchmark, performance drops by about 10% due to inability to
reuse cache-hot slab objects. As iterations increase and RCU freeing starts
kicking over, this increases to about 20%.

In cases where inode lifetimes are longer (ie. many inodes may be allocated
during the average life span of a single inode), a lot of this cache reuse is
not applicable, so the regression caused by this patch is smaller.

The cache-hot regression could largely be avoided by using SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU,
however this adds some complexity to list walking and store-free path walking,
so I prefer to implement this at a later date, if it is shown to be a win in
real situations. I haven't found a regression in any non-micro benchmark so I
doubt it will be a problem.
Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@kernel.dk>
      fa0d7e3d
  49. 06 1月, 2011 1 次提交
  51. 29 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  53. 26 10月, 2010 1 次提交
  55. 05 10月, 2010 2 次提交
    • J
      BKL: Remove BKL from ext2 filesystem · 3e44f9f1
      由 Jan Blunck 提交于 
      The BKL is still used in ext2_put_super(), ext2_fill_super(), ext2_sync_fs()
ext2_remount() and ext2_write_inode(). From these calls ext2_put_super(),
ext2_fill_super() and ext2_remount() are protected against each other by
the struct super_block s_umount rw semaphore. The call in ext2_write_inode()
could only protect the modification of the ext2_sb_info through
ext2_update_dynamic_rev() against concurrent ext2_sync_fs() or ext2_remount().
ext2_fill_super() and ext2_put_super() can be left out because you need a
valid filesystem reference in all three cases, which you do not have when
you are one of these functions.

If the BKL is only protecting the modification of the ext2_sb_info it can
safely be removed since this is protected by the struct ext2_sb_info s_lock.
Signed-off-by: NJan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      3e44f9f1
    • J
      BKL: Explicitly add BKL around get_sb/fill_super · db719222
      由 Jan Blunck 提交于 
      This patch is a preparation necessary to remove the BKL from do_new_mount().
It explicitly adds calls to lock_kernel()/unlock_kernel() around
get_sb/fill_super operations for filesystems that still uses the BKL.

I've read through all the code formerly covered by the BKL inside
do_kern_mount() and have satisfied myself that it doesn't need the BKL
any more.

do_kern_mount() is already called without the BKL when mounting the rootfs
and in nfsctl. do_kern_mount() calls vfs_kern_mount(), which is called
from various places without BKL: simple_pin_fs(), nfs_do_clone_mount()
through nfs_follow_mountpoint(), afs_mntpt_do_automount() through
afs_mntpt_follow_link(). Both later functions are actually the filesystems
follow_link inode operation. vfs_kern_mount() is calling the specified
get_sb function and lets the filesystem do its job by calling the given
fill_super function.

Therefore I think it is safe to push down the BKL from the VFS to the
low-level filesystems get_sb/fill_super operation.

[arnd: do not add the BKL to those file systems that already
       don't use it elsewhere]
Signed-off-by: NJan Blunck <jblunck@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
      db719222
  57. 10 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  59. 24 5月, 2010 3 次提交