1. 07 10月, 2009 1 次提交
    • R
      Blackfin: mass clean up of copyright/licensing info · 96f1050d
      Robin Getz 提交于
      Bill Gatliff & David Brownell pointed out we were missing some
      copyrights, and licensing terms in some of the files in
      ./arch/blackfin, so this fixes things, and cleans them up.
      
      It also removes:
       - verbose GPL text(refer to the top level ./COPYING file)
       - file names (you are looking at the file)
       - bug url (it's in the ./MAINTAINERS file)
       - "or later" on GPL-2, when we did not have that right
      
      It also allows some Blackfin-specific assembly files to be under a BSD
      like license (for people to use them outside of Linux).
      Signed-off-by: NRobin Getz <robin.getz@analog.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
      96f1050d
  2. 23 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 21 9月, 2009 1 次提交
    • I
      perf: Do the big rename: Performance Counters -> Performance Events · cdd6c482
      Ingo Molnar 提交于
      Bye-bye Performance Counters, welcome Performance Events!
      
      In the past few months the perfcounters subsystem has grown out its
      initial role of counting hardware events, and has become (and is
      becoming) a much broader generic event enumeration, reporting, logging,
      monitoring, analysis facility.
      
      Naming its core object 'perf_counter' and naming the subsystem
      'perfcounters' has become more and more of a misnomer. With pending
      code like hw-breakpoints support the 'counter' name is less and
      less appropriate.
      
      All in one, we've decided to rename the subsystem to 'performance
      events' and to propagate this rename through all fields, variables
      and API names. (in an ABI compatible fashion)
      
      The word 'event' is also a bit shorter than 'counter' - which makes
      it slightly more convenient to write/handle as well.
      
      Thanks goes to Stephane Eranian who first observed this misnomer and
      suggested a rename.
      
      User-space tooling and ABI compatibility is not affected - this patch
      should be function-invariant. (Also, defconfigs were not touched to
      keep the size down.)
      
      This patch has been generated via the following script:
      
        FILES=$(find * -type f | grep -vE 'oprofile|[^K]config')
      
        sed -i \
          -e 's/PERF_EVENT_/PERF_RECORD_/g' \
          -e 's/PERF_COUNTER/PERF_EVENT/g' \
          -e 's/perf_counter/perf_event/g' \
          -e 's/nb_counters/nb_events/g' \
          -e 's/swcounter/swevent/g' \
          -e 's/tpcounter_event/tp_event/g' \
          $FILES
      
        for N in $(find . -name perf_counter.[ch]); do
          M=$(echo $N | sed 's/perf_counter/perf_event/g')
          mv $N $M
        done
      
        FILES=$(find . -name perf_event.*)
      
        sed -i \
          -e 's/COUNTER_MASK/REG_MASK/g' \
          -e 's/COUNTER/EVENT/g' \
          -e 's/\<event\>/event_id/g' \
          -e 's/counter/event/g' \
          -e 's/Counter/Event/g' \
          $FILES
      
      ... to keep it as correct as possible. This script can also be
      used by anyone who has pending perfcounters patches - it converts
      a Linux kernel tree over to the new naming. We tried to time this
      change to the point in time where the amount of pending patches
      is the smallest: the end of the merge window.
      
      Namespace clashes were fixed up in a preparatory patch - and some
      stylistic fallout will be fixed up in a subsequent patch.
      
      ( NOTE: 'counters' are still the proper terminology when we deal
        with hardware registers - and these sed scripts are a bit
        over-eager in renaming them. I've undone some of that, but
        in case there's something left where 'counter' would be
        better than 'event' we can undo that on an individual basis
        instead of touching an otherwise nicely automated patch. )
      Suggested-by: NStephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
      Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Acked-by: NPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Reviewed-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
      Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
      Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Cc: Kyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      Cc: <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>
      LKML-Reference: <new-submission>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      cdd6c482
  4. 17 9月, 2009 13 次提交
  5. 23 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  6. 17 7月, 2009 1 次提交
    • M
      Blackfin: define HARDIRQ_BITS again for now · 6843f405
      Mike Frysinger 提交于
      The default values of HARDIRQ_BITS and PREEMPT_BITS in common code leads to
      build failure:
      
      In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:12,
                      from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:8,
                      from arch/blackfin/kernel/asm-offsets.c:32:
      include/linux/hardirq.h:66:2: error: #error PREEMPT_ACTIVE is too low!
      
      So until that gets resolved, just declare our own default value again.
      Signed-off-by: NMike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
      6843f405
  7. 16 7月, 2009 3 次提交
  8. 11 7月, 2009 1 次提交
  9. 23 6月, 2009 11 次提交
  10. 19 6月, 2009 7 次提交