All pr_warning are removed from kernel, let's cleanup pr_warning
check in checkpatch.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191128004752.35268-5-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de
Cc: sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com
Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NKefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
Acked-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NPetr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

This extension was introduced in commit 57f5677e ("printf: add
support for printing symbolic error names").

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191114100416.23928-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de
To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel@pengutronix.de
Signed-off-by: NUwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Acked-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
[pmladek@suse.com: Switched the ordering: eE -> Ee]
Signed-off-by: NPetr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>

DT bindings are moving to using a json-schema based schema format
instead of freeform text. Add a checkpatch.pl check to encourage using
the schema for new bindings. It's not yet a requirement, but is
progressively being required by some maintainers.

Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Add support for %pfw conversion specifier (with "f" and "P" modifiers) to
support printing full path of the node, including its name ("f") and only
the node's name ("P") in the printk family of functions. The two flags
have equivalent functionality to existing %pOF with the same two modifiers
("f" and "P") on OF based systems. The ability to do the same on ACPI
based systems is added by this patch.

On ACPI based systems the resulting strings look like

	\_SB.PCI0.CIO2.port@1.endpoint@0

where the nodes are separated by a dot (".") and the first three are
ACPI device nodes and the latter two ACPI data nodes.
Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPetr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

%pS and %ps are now the preferred conversion specifiers to print function
names. The functionality is equivalent; remove the old, deprecated %pF
and %pf support.

Depends-on: commit 2d44d165 ("scsi: lpfc: Convert existing %pf users to %ps")
Depends-on: commit b295c3e3 ("tools lib traceevent: Convert remaining %p[fF] users to %p[sS]")
Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPetr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

IS_ERR(), IS_ERR_OR_NULL(), IS_ERR_VALUE() and WARN*() already contain
unlikely() optimization internally.  Thus, there is no point in calling
these functions and defines under likely()/unlikely().

This check is based on the coccinelle rule developed by Enrico Weigelt
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1559767582-11081-1-git-send-email-info@metux.net/

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190829165025.15750-1-efremov@linux.comSigned-off-by: NDenis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <anton@tuxera.com>
Cc: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Cc: Boris Pismenny <borisp@mellanox.com>
Cc: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Denis Efremov <efremov@linux.com>
Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@intel.com>
Cc: Inaky Perez-Gonzalez <inaky.perez-gonzalez@intel.com>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Mike Marciniszyn <mike.marciniszyn@intel.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
Cc: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@mellanox.com>
Cc: Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

git output parsing depends on the language being en_US english.

Make the backtick execution of all `git <foo>` commands set the
LANGUAGE of the process to en_US.utf8 before executing the actual
command using `export LANGUAGE=en_US.utf8; git <foo>`.

Because the command is executed in a child process, the parent
LANGUAGE is unchanged.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bb9f29988f3258281956680ff39c3e19e37dc0b8.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Reported-by: NSean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NSean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Tested-by: NSean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Git dropped the period from its "ambiguous SHA1" error message in commit
0c99171ad2 ("get_short_sha1: mark ambiguity error for translation"), circa
2016.  Drop the period from checkpatch's associated query so as to match
both the old and new error messages.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190830163103.15914-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.comSigned-off-by: NSean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

checkpatch allows consecutive open braces, so it should also allow
consecutive close braces.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/bfdb49ae2c3fa7b52fa168769e38b48f959880e2.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Acked-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Add another test for __attribute__((section("foo"))) uses that should be
__section(foo)

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2f374c3c27054b7f978115270d587c624d9962fc.camel@perches.comSuggested-by: NNick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Tested-by: NNick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The arguments of sizeof are not evaluated so arguments are safe to re-use
in that context.  Excluding sizeof subexpressions means macros like
ARRAY_SIZE can pass checkpatch.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190806070833.24423-1-brendan.jackman@bluwireless.co.ukSigned-off-by: NBrendan Jackman <brendan.jackman@bluwireless.co.uk>
Acked-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

It can happen that a commit message refers to an invalid commit id,
because the referenced hash changed following a rebase, or simply by
mistake.  Add a check in checkpatch.pl which checks that an hash
referenced by a Fixes tag, or just cited in the commit message, is a valid
commit id.

    $ scripts/checkpatch.pl <<'EOF'
    Subject: [PATCH] test commit

    Sample test commit to test checkpatch.pl
    Commit 1da177e4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") really exists,
    commit 0bba044c4ce7 ("tree") is valid but not a commit,
    while commit b4cc0b1c0cca ("unknown") is invalid.

    Fixes: f0cacc14cade ("unknown")
    Fixes: 1da177e4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2")
    EOF
    WARNING: Unknown commit id '0bba044c4ce7', maybe rebased or not pulled?
    #8:
    commit 0bba044c4ce7 ("tree") is valid but not a commit,

    WARNING: Unknown commit id 'b4cc0b1c0cca', maybe rebased or not pulled?
    #9:
    while commit b4cc0b1c0cca ("unknown") is invalid.

    WARNING: Unknown commit id 'f0cacc14cade', maybe rebased or not pulled?
    #11:
    Fixes: f0cacc14cade ("unknown")

    total: 0 errors, 3 warnings, 4 lines checked

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190711001640.13398-1-mcroce@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NMatteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Use perl's m@<match>@ match and not /<match>/ comparisons to avoid
an error using c90's // comment style.

Miscellanea:

o Use normal tab indentation and alignment

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5e4a8fa7901148fbcd77ab391e6dd0e6bf95777f.camel@perches.com

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f08eb62458407a145cfedf959d1091af151cd665.1563575364.git.joe@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Add more types of lines that appear to be stack dumps that also include
hex lines that might otherwise be interpreted as commit IDs.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/ff00208289224f0ca4eaf4ff7c9c6e087dad0a63.camel@perches.com

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/f7dc9727795db3802809a24162abe0b67e14123b.1563575364.git.joe@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Commit d91bff3011cf ("proc/sysctl: add shared variables for range
check") adds some shared const variables to be used instead of a local
copy in each source file.  Warn when a chunk duplicates one of these
values in a ctl_table struct:

    $ scripts/checkpatch.pl 0001-test-commit.patch
    WARNING: duplicated sysctl range checking value 'zero', consider using the shared one in include/linux/sysctl.h
    #27: FILE: arch/arm/kernel/isa.c:48:
    +               .extra1         = &zero,

    WARNING: duplicated sysctl range checking value 'int_max', consider using the shared one in include/linux/sysctl.h
    #28: FILE: arch/arm/kernel/isa.c:49:
    +               .extra2         = &int_max,

    total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 14 lines checked

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190531131422.14970-1-mcroce@redhat.comSigned-off-by: NMatteo Croce <mcroce@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Aaron Tomlin <atomlin@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The conversion here is really trivial: just a bunch of title
markups and very few puntual changes is enough to make it to
be parsed by Sphinx and generate a nice html.

The conversion is actually:
  - add blank lines and identation in order to identify paragraphs;
  - fix tables markups;
  - add some lists markups;
  - mark literal blocks;
  - adjust title markups.

At its new index.rst, let's add a :orphan: while this is not linked to
the main index.rst file, in order to avoid build warnings.
Signed-off-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>

In commit 8122de54 ("dt-bindings: Convert vendor prefixes to
json-schema"), vendor-prefixes.txt has been converted to a DT schema.
Update the checkpatch.pl DT check to extract vendor prefixes from the new
vendor-prefixes.yaml file.

Fixes: 8122de54 ("dt-bindings: Convert vendor prefixes to json-schema")
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Commit 4d42c447 ("lib/vsprintf: Print time and date in human
readable format via %pt") introduced a new extension, %pt.

Add it in the list of valid extensions.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190314203719.29130-1-alexandre.belloni@bootlin.comSigned-off-by: NAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The purpose of Co-developed-by: is to give attribution to authors who
aren't already attributed by the From: tag, i.e. who aren't the nominal
patch author.  Because Co-developed-by: is essentially a variation of
From:, it must be accompanied by a Signed-off-by: of the associated
co-author.  To ease the burden of determining whether or not co-authors
have signed off, Co-developed-by and Signed-off-by: must be explicitly
paired, i.e. on consecutive lines for a given co-author.
Suggested-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NSean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>

Warn when any SPDX-License-Identifier: tag is not created on the proper
line number.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/9b74ee87f8c1b8fd310e213fcb4994d58610fcb6.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: "Enrico Weigelt, metux IT consult" <lkml@metux.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Presently C99 style comments are removed unconditionally before actual
patch validity check happens.  This is a problem for some third party
projects which use checkpatch.pl but do not allow C99 style comments.

This patch adds yet another variable, named C99_COMMENT_TOLERANCE.  If
it is included in the --ignore command line or config file options list,
C99 comments in the patch are reported as errors.

Tested by processing a patch with a C99 style comment, it passes the
check just fine unless '--ignore C99_COMMENT_TOLERANCE' is present in
.checkpatch.conf.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190110224957.25008-1-vbendeb@chromium.orgSigned-off-by: NVadim Bendebury <vbendeb@chromium.org>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Many new generic allocation functions like the kvmalloc family have been
added recently to the kernel.

The allocation functions test now includes:

o kvmalloc and variants
o kstrdup_const
o kmemdup_nul
o dma_alloc_coherent
o alloc_skb and variants

Add a separate $allocFunctions variable to help make the allocation
functions test a bit more readable.

Miscellanea:

o Use $allocFunctions in the unnecessary OOM message test and
  add exclude uses with __GFP_NOWARN
o Use $allocFunctions in the unnecessary cast test
o Add the kvmalloc family to the preferred sizeof alloc style
  foo = kvmalloc(sizeof(*foo), ...)

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/a5e60a2b93e10baf84af063f6c8e56402273105d.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Using SPDX commenting style // or /* is specified for various file types
in Documentation/process/license-rules.rst so add an appropriate test for
.[chsS] files because many proposed file additions and patches do not use
the correct style.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/8b02899853247a2c67669561761f354dd3bd110e.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

There has been some confusion since checkpatch started warning about bool
use in structures, and people have been avoiding using it.

Many people feel there is still a legitimate place for bool in structures,
so provide some guidance on bool usage derived from the entire thread that
spawned the checkpatch warning.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFwVZk1OfB9T2v014PTAKFhtVan_Zj2dOjnCy3x6E4UJfA@mail.gmail.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Acked-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Reviewed-by: NBart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Acked-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoey Pabalinas <joeypabalinas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NJonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>

As per Documentation/process/submitting-patches, Co-developed-by is a
valid signature.

This commit removes the warning.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1544808928-20002-3-git-send-email-jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.orgSigned-off-by: NJorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz@linaro.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@gmail.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

These declarations should generally be static const to avoid poor
compilation and runtime performance where compilers tend to initialize
the const declaration for every call instead of using .rodata for the
string.

Miscellanea:

 - Convert spaces to tabs for indentation in 2 adjacent checks

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/10ea5f4b087dc911e41e187a4a2b5e79c7529aa3.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

This commit points people who might otherwise code up something like
WARN_ON(!spin_is_locked(&mylock)) to lockdep_assert_held(&mylock).
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>

This patch creates a deprecated_apis map, which allows such APIs to
be flagged with suggested replacements more compactly and straightforwardly.
It also uses this map to flag the old flavorful RCU APIs as deprecated,
suggesting their vanilla-RCU counterparts as replacements.
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
[ paulmck: Merged with earlier less-deft approach. ]

This warning was there to avoid the use of 0bxxx values as they are not
supported by gcc prior to v4.3

Since cafa0010 ("Raise the minimum required gcc version to 4.6"),
it's not an issue anymore and using such values can increase readability
of code.

Joe said:

: Seems sensible as the other compilers also support binary literals from
: relatively old versions.
: http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2012/n3472.pdf
: https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/c14-features-supported-by-intel-c-compiler

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/392eeae782302ee8812a3c932a602035deed1609.1535351453.git.christophe.leroy@c-s.frSigned-off-by: NChristophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@c-s.fr>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

__ro_after_init is a specific __attribute__ that checkpatch does currently
not understand.

Add it to the known $Attribute types so that code that uses variables
declared with __ro_after_init are not thought to be a modifier type.

This appears as a defect in checkpatch output of code like:

static bool trust_cpu __ro_after_init = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RANDOM_TRUST_CPU);
[...]
       if (trust_cpu && arch_init) {

where checkpatch reports:

ERROR: space prohibited after that '&&' (ctx:WxW)
	if (trust_cpu && arch_init) {

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/0fa8a2cb83ade4c525e18261ecf6cfede3015983.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Reported-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Tested-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Using a static const struct definition as part of a series of
declarations produces a false positive "Missing a blank line after
declarations" for code like:

  WARNING: Missing a blank line after declarations
  #710: FILE: drivers/gpu/drm/tidss/tidss_scale_coefs.c:137:
  +       int inc;
  +       static const struct {

So fix it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5905126e70b0ed1781e49265fd5c49c5090d0223.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Reported-by: NJyri Sarha <jsarha@ti.com>
Cc: "Valkeinen, Tomi" <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Devicetree bindings should be their own patch as documented in
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt section I.1.
This is because bindings are logically independent from a driver
implementation, they have a different maintainer (even though they often
are applied via the same tree), and it makes for a cleaner history in the
DT only tree created with git-filter-branch.

[robh@kernel.org: add doc pointer to warning, simplify logic]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180810170513.26284-1-robh@kernel.org
[robh@kernel.org: v3]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180810225049.20452-1-robh@kernel.org
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180809205032.22205-1-robh@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

On Sun, 2018-08-05 at 08:52 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> "long unsigned int" isn't _technically_ wrong. But we normally
> call that type "unsigned long".

So add a checkpatch test for it.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/7bbd97dc0a1e5896a0251fada7bb68bb33643f77.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Current checkpatch implementation permits notation like

	} else{

in kernel code.  It looks like oversight and inconsistency in checkpatch
rules (e.g.  instruction like 'do' is tested).

Add regex for checking space after 'else' keyword and trigger error if
space is not present.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1533545753-8870-1-git-send-email-michal.zylowski@intel.comSigned-off-by: NMichal Zylowski <michal.zylowski@intel.com>
Acked-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

checkpatch uses the in-kernel script spdxcheck.py to validate the specific
license in a file or script.

This check can currently fail for a couple reasons:

o spdxcheck.py assumes the existence of git tree that may not
  exist for a bare source tree from something like a tarball
o the spdxcheck.py must be run from the top level root directory

So add a git existence test and set the subprocess subdirectory.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2b32864324ae9c92948b002ec4c0c22409ed98f1.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Reported-by: NCharlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@gmail.com>
Tested-by: NCharlemagne Lasse <charlemagnelasse@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Potential patches should have a commit description.  Emit a warning when
there isn't one.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: s/else if/elsif/]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1b099f4d8373aa583a17011992676bf0f3f09eee.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Suggested-by: NPrakruthi Deepak Heragu <pheragu@codeaurora.org>
Reviewed-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The #if 0 or #if 1 is used to toggle features. Warn if #if 0 or #if 1
is present and suggest that they can be removed.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix spacing around periods, per Joe\
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1532625218-24321-1-git-send-email-pheragu@codeaurora.orgSigned-off-by: NAbhijeet Dharmapurikar <adharmap@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: NPrakruthi Deepak Heragu <pheragu@codeaurora.org>
Acked-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

The current krealloc test does not function correctly when the temporary
pointer return name contains the original pointer name.

Fix that by maximally matching the return pointer name and the original
pointer name and doing a separate comparison of the both names.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/e617ecb8c019a9c4c56540a1bec16c8aed43a4e4.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Reported-by: NLars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>
Cc: Manish Narani <manish.narani@xilinx.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Use the existing scripts/spdxcheck.py to validate any
SPDX-License-Identifier found in line 1 or 2 of patches or files.

Miscellanea:

o Properly indent the existing SPDX-License-Identifier block.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/05b832407b24e0a27e419906187cd863bc1617c7.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Acked-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Multiple line macro definitions where the arguments are separated by line
continuations can cause checkpatch to emit invalid syntax regex tests.

This can occur when a single argument is modified in a part of a patch.

For example: (to not add a diff in the commit message)

$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --git db023296
Unterminated \g... pattern in regex; <very long regex omitted>

And, the test does not work correctly when these arguments are all new as
the initial patch line addition "+" is used in the argument name.

Fix this by stripping the line continuations and any "+" from the list of
arguments.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/86cdb43a4db70670c102020093f7fb4eb3003e01.camel@perches.comSigned-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>