- 07 10月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Bacik 提交于
When we COW a block we are holding a lock on the original block, and then we lock the new COW block. Because our lockdep maps are based on root + level, this will make lockdep complain. We need a way to indicate a subclass for locking the COW'ed block, so plumb through our btrfs_lock_nesting from btrfs_cow_block down to the btrfs_init_buffer, and then introduce BTRFS_NESTING_COW to be used for cow'ing blocks. The reason I've added all this extra infrastructure is because there will be need of different nesting classes in follow up patches. Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 27 7月, 2020 11 次提交
-
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Since most metadata reservation calls can return -EINTR when get interrupted by fatal signal, we need to review the all the metadata reservation call sites. In relocation code, the metadata reservation happens in the following sites: - btrfs_block_rsv_refill() in merge_reloc_root() merge_reloc_root() is a pretty critical section, we don't want to be interrupted by signal, so change the flush status to BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT, so it won't get interrupted by signal. Since such change can be ENPSPC-prone, also shrink the amount of metadata to reserve least amount avoid deadly ENOSPC there. - btrfs_block_rsv_refill() in reserve_metadata_space() It calls with BTRFS_RESERVE_FLUSH_LIMIT, which won't get interrupted by signal. - btrfs_block_rsv_refill() in prepare_to_relocate() - btrfs_block_rsv_add() in prepare_to_relocate() - btrfs_block_rsv_refill() in relocate_block_group() - btrfs_delalloc_reserve_metadata() in relocate_file_extent_cluster() - btrfs_start_transaction() in relocate_block_group() - btrfs_start_transaction() in create_reloc_inode() Can be interrupted by fatal signal and we can handle it easily. For these call sites, just catch the -EINTR value in btrfs_balance() and count them as canceled. CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.4+ Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Although btrfs balance can be canceled with "btrfs balance cancel" command, it's still almost muscle memory to press Ctrl-C to cancel a long running btrfs balance. So allow btrfs balance to check signal to determine if it should exit. The cancellation points are in known location and we're only adding one more reason, so this should be safe. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
The vfs inode is only used for a pair of inode_lock/unlock calls all other uses call for btrfs_inode. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
No point in taking an inode only to get btrfs_fs_info from it, instead take btrfs_fs_info directly. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Preparation to make btrfs_dirty_pages take btrfs_inode as parameter. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
This function iterates all extents in the extent cluster, make this intention obvious by using a for loop. No functional chanes. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand and btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota don't really use the guts of the inodes being passed to them. This implies it's not required to call them under extent lock. Move code around in prealloc_file_extent_cluster to do the heavy, data alloc/free operations outside of the lock. This also makes the 'out' label unnecessary, so remove it. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
Extents in the extent cluster are guaranteed to be contiguous as such the hole check inside the loop can never trigger. In fact this check was never functional since it was added in 18513091 ("btrfs: update btrfs_space_info's bytes_may_use timely") which came after the commit introducing clustered/contiguous extents 0257bb82 ("Btrfs: relocate file extents in clusters"). Let's just remove it as it adds noise to the source. Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
It really wants btrfs_inode and not a vfs inode. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
It doesn't use the generic vfs inode for anything use btrfs_inode directly. Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
We currently use btrfs_check_data_free_space() when allocating space for relocating data extents, but that is not necessary because that function combines btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand(), which does the actual space reservation, and btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(). We can use btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand() directly because we know we do not need to reserve qgroup space since we are dealing with a relocation tree, which can never have qgroups (btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() does nothing as is_fstree() returns false for a relocation tree). Conversely we can use btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota() directly instead of btrfs_free_reserved_data_space(), since we had no qgroup reservation when allocating space. This change is preparatory work for another patch in this series that makes relocation reserve the exact amount of space it needs to relocate a data block group. The function btrfs_check_data_free_space() has the incovenient of requiring a start offset argument and we will want to be able to allocate space for multiple ranges, which are not consecutive, at once. Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
- 25 5月, 2020 28 次提交
-
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The inode lookup starting at btrfs_iget takes the full location key, while only the objectid is used to match the inode, because the lookup happens inside the given root thus the inode number is unique. The entire location key is properly set up in btrfs_init_locked_inode. Simplify the helpers and pass only inode number, renaming it to 'ino' instead of 'objectid'. This allows to remove temporary variables key, saving some stack space. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
After the update to btrfs_get_fs_root, read_fs_root has become trivial wrapper that can be open coded. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The main function to lookup a root by its id btrfs_get_fs_root takes the whole key, while only using the objectid. The value of offset is preset to (u64)-1 but not actually used until btrfs_find_root that does the actual search. Switch btrfs_get_fs_root to use only objectid and remove all local variables that existed just for the lookup. The actual key for search is set up in btrfs_get_fs_root, reusing another key variable. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
[BUG] There are several reported runaway balance, that balance is flooding the log with "found X extents" where the X never changes. [CAUSE] Commit d2311e69 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots") introduced BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE bit to indicate that one subvolume has finished its tree blocks swap with its reloc tree. However if balance is canceled or hits ENOSPC halfway, we didn't clear the BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE bit, leaving that bit hanging forever until unmount. Any subvolume root with that bit, would cause backref cache to skip this tree block, as it has finished its tree block swap. This would cause all tree blocks of that root be ignored by balance, leading to runaway balance. [FIX] Fix the problem by also clearing the BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE bit for the original subvolume of orphan reloc root. Add an umount check for the stale bit still set. Fixes: d2311e69 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots") Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
[BUG] When balance is canceled, there is a pretty high chance that unmounting the fs can lead to lead the NULL pointer dereference: BTRFS warning (device dm-3): page private not zero on page 223158272 ... BTRFS warning (device dm-3): page private not zero on page 223162368 BTRFS error (device dm-3): leaked root 18446744073709551608-304 refcount 1 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000168 #PF: supervisor read access in kernel mode #PF: error_code(0x0000) - not-present page PGD 0 P4D 0 Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP NOPTI CPU: 2 PID: 5793 Comm: umount Tainted: G O 5.7.0-rc5-custom+ #53 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015 RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0x5dc/0x24c0 Call Trace: lock_acquire+0xab/0x390 _raw_spin_lock+0x39/0x80 btrfs_release_extent_buffer_pages+0xd7/0x200 [btrfs] release_extent_buffer+0xb2/0x170 [btrfs] free_extent_buffer+0x66/0xb0 [btrfs] btrfs_put_root+0x8e/0x130 [btrfs] btrfs_check_leaked_roots.cold+0x5/0x5d [btrfs] btrfs_free_fs_info+0xe5/0x120 [btrfs] btrfs_kill_super+0x1f/0x30 [btrfs] deactivate_locked_super+0x3b/0x80 deactivate_super+0x3e/0x50 cleanup_mnt+0x109/0x160 __cleanup_mnt+0x12/0x20 task_work_run+0x67/0xa0 exit_to_usermode_loop+0xc5/0xd0 syscall_return_slowpath+0x205/0x360 do_syscall_64+0x6e/0xb0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xb3 RIP: 0033:0x7fd028ef740b [CAUSE] When balance is canceled, all reloc roots are marked as orphan, and orphan reloc roots are going to be cleaned up. However for orphan reloc roots and merged reloc roots, their lifespan are quite different: Merged reloc roots | Orphan reloc roots by cancel -------------------------------------------------------------------- create_reloc_root() | create_reloc_root() |- refs == 1 | |- refs == 1 | btrfs_grab_root(reloc_root); | btrfs_grab_root(reloc_root); |- refs == 2 | |- refs == 2 | root->reloc_root = reloc_root; | root->reloc_root = reloc_root; >>> No difference so far <<< | prepare_to_merge() | prepare_to_merge() |- btrfs_set_root_refs(item, 1);| |- if (!err) (err == -EINTR) | merge_reloc_roots() | merge_reloc_roots() |- merge_reloc_root() | |- Doing nothing to put reloc root |- insert_dirty_subvol() | |- refs == 2 |- __del_reloc_root() | |- btrfs_put_root() | |- refs == 1 | >>> Now orphan reloc roots still have refs 2 <<< | clean_dirty_subvols() | clean_dirty_subvols() |- btrfs_drop_snapshot() | |- btrfS_drop_snapshot() |- reloc_root get freed | |- reloc_root still has refs 2 | related ebs get freed, but | reloc_root still recorded in | allocated_roots btrfs_check_leaked_roots() | btrfs_check_leaked_roots() |- No leaked roots | |- Leaked reloc_roots detected | |- btrfs_put_root() | |- free_extent_buffer(root->node); | |- eb already freed, caused NULL | pointer dereference [FIX] The fix is to clear fs_root->reloc_root and put it at merge_reloc_roots() time, so that we won't leak reloc roots. Fixes: d2311e69 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1+ Tested-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
SHAREABLE flag is set for subvolumes because users can create snapshot for subvolumes, thus sharing tree blocks of them. But data reloc tree is not exposed to user space, as it's only an internal tree for data relocation, thus it doesn't need the full path replacement handling at all. This patch will make data reloc tree a non-shareable tree, and add btrfs_fs_info::data_reloc_root for data reloc tree, so relocation code can grab it from fs_info directly. This would slightly improve tree relocation, as now data reloc tree can go through regular COW routine to get relocated, without bothering the complex tree reloc tree routine. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The name BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS is not very clear about the meaning. In fact, that bit can only be set to those trees: - Subvolume roots - Data reloc root - Reloc roots for above roots All other trees won't get this bit set. So just by the result, it is obvious that, roots with this bit set can have tree blocks shared with other trees. Either shared by snapshots, or by reloc roots (an special snapshot created by relocation). This patch will rename BTRFS_ROOT_REF_COWS to BTRFS_ROOT_SHAREABLE to make it easier to understand, and update all comment mentioning "reference counted" to follow the rename. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
All callers pass the eb::level so we can get read it directly inside the btrfs_bin_search and key_search. This is inspired by the work of Marek in U-boot. CC: Marek Behun <marek.behun@nic.cz> Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com> Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Nikolay Borisov 提交于
The function always works on a local copy of the reloc root list, which cannot be modified outside of it so using list_for_each_entry is fine. Additionally the macro handles empty lists so drop list_empty checks of callers. No semantic changes. Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The error cleanup will be extracted as a new function, btrfs_backref_error_cleanup(), and moved to backref.c and exported for later usage. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This the the 2nd major part of generic backref cache. Move it to backref.c so we can reuse it. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This function is the major part of backref cache build process, move it to backref.c so we can reuse it later. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
The backref code is going to be moved to backref.c, and read_fs_root() is just a simple wrapper, open-code it to prepare to the incoming code move. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This function is mostly single purpose to relocation backref cache, but since we're moving the main part of backref cache to backref.c, we need to export such function. And to avoid confusion, rename the function to btrfs_should_ignore_reloc_root() make the name a little more clear. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Also change the parameter, since all callers can easily grab an fs_info, there is no need for all the pointer chasing. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Since we're releasing all existing nodes/edges, other than cleanup the mess after error, "release" is a more proper naming here. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Also add comment explaining the cleanup progress, to differ it from btrfs_backref_drop_node(). Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
With extra comment for drop_backref_node() as it has some similarity with remove_backref_node(), thus we need extra comment explaining the difference. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Structure tree_entry provides a very simple rb_tree which only uses bytenr as search index. That tree_entry is used in 3 structures: backref_node, mapping_node and tree_block. Since we're going to make backref_node independnt from relocation, it's a good time to extract the tree_entry into rb_simple_node, and export it into misc.h. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
These 3 structures are the main part of btrfs backref cache, move them to backref.h to build the basis for later reuse. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
Those three structures are the main elements of backref cache. Add the "btrfs_" prefix for later export. Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
This patch will also add some comment for the cleanup. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-
由 Qu Wenruo 提交于
After handle_one_tree_backref(), all newly added (not cached) edges and nodes have the following features: - Only backref_edge::list[LOWER] is linked. This means, we can only iterate from botton to top, not the other direction. - Newly added nodes are not added to cache rb_tree yet So to finish the backref cache, we still need to finish the links and add all nodes into backref cache rb_tree. This patch will refactor the existing code into finish_upper_links(), add more comments of each branch, and why we need to do all the work. Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com> Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
-