1. 18 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  2. 17 7月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 12 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  4. 02 9月, 2006 1 次提交
    • P
      [PATCH] dm: work around mempool_alloc, bio_alloc_bioset deadlocks · 0b1d647a
      Pavel Mironchik 提交于
      This patch works around a complex dm-related deadlock/livelock down in the
      mempool allocator.
      
      Alasdair said:
      
        Several dm targets suffer from this.
      
        Mempools are not yet used correctly everywhere in device-mapper: they can
        get shared when devices are stacked, and some targets share them across
        multiple instances.  I made fixing this one of the prerequisites for this
        patch:
      
          md-dm-reduce-stack-usage-with-stacked-block-devices.patch
      
        which in some cases makes people more likely to hit the problem.
      
        There's been some progress on this recently with (unfinished) dm-crypt
        patches at:
      
          http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/agk/patches/2.6/editing/
            (dm-crypt-move-io-to-workqueue.patch plus dependencies)
      
      and:
      
        I've no problems with a temporary workaround like that, but Milan Broz (a
        new Redhat developer in the Czech Republic) has started reviewing all the
        mempool usage in device-mapper so I'm expecting we'll soon have a proper fix
        for this associated problems.  [He's back from holiday at the start of next
        week.]
      
      For now, this sad-but-safe little patch will allow the machine to recover.
      
      [akpm@osdl.org: rewrote changelog]
      Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      0b1d647a
  5. 27 3月, 2006 4 次提交
  6. 22 3月, 2006 1 次提交
  7. 28 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  8. 09 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  9. 08 7月, 2005 1 次提交
  10. 24 6月, 2005 2 次提交
  11. 01 5月, 2005 3 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] use smp_mb/wmb/rmb where possible · d59dd462
      akpm@osdl.org 提交于
      Replace a number of memory barriers with smp_ variants.  This means we won't
      take the unnecessary hit on UP machines.
      Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      d59dd462
    • N
      [PATCH] mempool: simplify alloc · 20a77776
      Nick Piggin 提交于
      Mempool is pretty clever.  Looks too clever for its own good :) It
      shouldn't really know so much about page reclaim internals.
      
      - don't guess about what effective page reclaim might involve.
      
      - don't randomly flush out all dirty data if some unlikely thing
        happens (alloc returns NULL). page reclaim can (sort of :P) handle
        it.
      
      I think the main motivation is trying to avoid pool->lock at all costs.
      However the first allocation is attempted with __GFP_WAIT cleared, so it
      will be 'can_try_harder' if it hits the page allocator.  So if allocation
      still fails, then we can probably afford to hit the pool->lock - and what's
      the alternative?  Try page reclaim and hit zone->lru_lock?
      
      A nice upshot is that we don't need to do any fancy memory barriers or do
      (intentionally) racy access to pool-> fields outside the lock.
      Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      20a77776
    • N
      [PATCH] mempool: NOMEMALLOC and NORETRY · b84a35be
      Nick Piggin 提交于
      Mempools have 2 problems.
      
      The first is that mempool_alloc can possibly get stuck in __alloc_pages
      when they should opt to fail, and take an element from their reserved pool.
      
      The second is that it will happily eat emergency PF_MEMALLOC reserves
      instead of going to their reserved pools.
      
      Fix the first by passing __GFP_NORETRY in the allocation calls in
      mempool_alloc.  Fix the second by introducing a __GFP_MEMPOOL flag which
      directs the page allocator not to allocate from the reserve pool.
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      b84a35be
  12. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4