- 09 12月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The service where DSA assigns a unique bridge number for each forwarding domain is useful even for drivers which do not implement the TX forwarding offload feature. For example, drivers might use the dp->bridge_num for FDB isolation. So rename ds->num_fwd_offloading_bridges to ds->max_num_bridges, and calculate a unique bridge_num for all drivers that set this value. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NAlvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
I have seen too many bugs already due to the fact that we must encode an invalid dp->bridge_num as a negative value, because the natural tendency is to check that invalid value using (!dp->bridge_num). Latest example can be seen in commit 1bec0f05 ("net: dsa: fix bridge_num not getting cleared after ports leaving the bridge"). Convert the existing users to assume that dp->bridge_num == 0 is the encoding for invalid, and valid bridge numbers start from 1. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NAlvin Šipraga <alsi@bang-olufsen.dk> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 25 10月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Now that the rtnl_mutex is going away for dsa_port_{host_,}fdb_{add,del}, no one is serializing access to the address lists that DSA keeps for the purpose of reference counting on shared ports (CPU and cascade ports). It can happen for one dsa_switch_do_fdb_del to do list_del on a dp->fdbs element while another dsa_switch_do_fdb_{add,del} is traversing dp->fdbs. We need to avoid that. Currently dp->mdbs is not at risk, because dsa_switch_do_mdb_{add,del} still runs under the rtnl_mutex. But it would be nice if it would not depend on that being the case. So let's introduce a mutex per port (the address lists are per port too) and share it between dp->mdbs and dp->fdbs. The place where we put the locking is interesting. It could be tempting to put a DSA-level lock which still serializes calls to .port_fdb_{add,del}, but it would still not avoid concurrency with other driver code paths that are currently under rtnl_mutex (.port_fdb_dump, .port_fast_age). So it would add a very false sense of security (and adding a global switch-wide lock in DSA to resynchronize with the rtnl_lock is also counterproductive and hard). So the locking is intentionally done only where the dp->fdbs and dp->mdbs lists are traversed. That means, from a driver perspective, that .port_fdb_add will be called with the dp->addr_lists_lock mutex held on the CPU port, but not held on user ports. This is done so that driver writers are not encouraged to rely on any guarantee offered by dp->addr_lists_lock. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
This reverts commit 965e6b26, reversing changes made to 4d98bb0d.
-
- 24 10月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Now that the rtnl_mutex is going away for dsa_port_{host_,}fdb_{add,del}, no one is serializing access to the address lists that DSA keeps for the purpose of reference counting on shared ports (CPU and cascade ports). It can happen for one dsa_switch_do_fdb_del to do list_del on a dp->fdbs element while another dsa_switch_do_fdb_{add,del} is traversing dp->fdbs. We need to avoid that. Currently dp->mdbs is not at risk, because dsa_switch_do_mdb_{add,del} still runs under the rtnl_mutex. But it would be nice if it would not depend on that being the case. So let's introduce a mutex per port (the address lists are per port too) and share it between dp->mdbs and dp->fdbs. The place where we put the locking is interesting. It could be tempting to put a DSA-level lock which still serializes calls to .port_fdb_{add,del}, but it would still not avoid concurrency with other driver code paths that are currently under rtnl_mutex (.port_fdb_dump, .port_fast_age). So it would add a very false sense of security (and adding a global switch-wide lock in DSA to resynchronize with the rtnl_lock is also counterproductive and hard). So the locking is intentionally done only where the dp->fdbs and dp->mdbs lists are traversed. That means, from a driver perspective, that .port_fdb_add will be called with the dp->addr_lists_lock mutex held on the CPU port, but not held on user ports. This is done so that driver writers are not encouraged to rely on any guarantee offered by dp->addr_lists_lock. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 10月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Find the remaining iterators over dst->ports that only filter for the ports belonging to a certain switch, and replace those with the dsa_switch_for_each_port helper that we have now. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Ever since Vivien's conversion of the ds->ports array into a dst->ports list, and the introduction of dsa_to_port, iterations through the ports of a switch became quadratic whenever dsa_to_port was needed. dsa_to_port can either be called directly, or indirectly through the dsa_is_{user,cpu,dsa,unused}_port helpers. Use the newly introduced dsa_switch_for_each_port() iteration macro that works with the iterator variable being a struct dsa_port *dp directly, and not an int i. It is an expensive variable to go from i to dp, but cheap to go from dp to i. This macro iterates through the entire ds->dst->ports list and filters by the ports belonging just to the switch provided as argument. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 10月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christophe JAILLET 提交于
If we return before the end of the 'for_each_child_of_node()' iterator, the reference taken on 'port' must be released. Add the missing 'of_node_put()' calls. Fixes: 83c0afae ("net: dsa: Add new binding implementation") Signed-off-by: NChristophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/15d5310d1d55ad51c1af80775865306d92432e03.1634587046.git.christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.frSigned-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 14 10月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
To be symmetric with the error unwind path of dsa_switch_setup(), call dsa_switch_unregister_notifier() after ds->ops->teardown. The implication is that ds->ops->teardown cannot emit cross-chip notifiers. For example, currently the dsa_tag_8021q_unregister() call from sja1105_teardown() does not propagate to the entire tree due to this reason. However I cannot find an actual issue caused by this, observed using code inspection. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211012123735.2545742-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.comSigned-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 09 10月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
It was a documented fact that ds->ops->change_tag_protocol() offered rtnetlink mutex protection to the switch driver, since there was an ASSERT_RTNL right before the call in dsa_switch_change_tag_proto() (initiated from sysfs). The blamed commit introduced another call path for ds->ops->change_tag_protocol() which does not hold the rtnl_mutex. This is: dsa_tree_setup -> dsa_tree_setup_switches -> dsa_switch_setup -> dsa_switch_setup_tag_protocol -> ds->ops->change_tag_protocol() -> dsa_port_setup -> dsa_slave_create -> register_netdevice(slave_dev) -> dsa_tree_setup_master -> dsa_master_setup -> dev->dsa_ptr = cpu_dp The reason why the rtnl_mutex is held in the sysfs call path is to ensure that, once the master and all the DSA interfaces are down (which is required so that no packets flow), they remain down during the tagging protocol change. The above calling order illustrates the fact that it should not be risky to change the initial tagging protocol to the one specified in the device tree at the given time: - packets cannot enter the dsa_switch_rcv() packet type handler since netdev_uses_dsa() for the master will not yet return true, since dev->dsa_ptr has not yet been populated - packets cannot enter the dsa_slave_xmit() function because no DSA interface has yet been registered So from the DSA core's perspective, holding the rtnl_mutex is indeed not necessary. Yet, drivers may need to do things which need rtnl_mutex protection. For example: felix_set_tag_protocol -> felix_setup_tag_8021q -> dsa_tag_8021q_register -> dsa_tag_8021q_setup -> dsa_tag_8021q_port_setup -> vlan_vid_add -> ASSERT_RTNL These drivers do not really have a choice to take the rtnl_mutex themselves, since in the sysfs case, the rtnl_mutex is already held. Fixes: deff7107 ("net: dsa: Allow default tag protocol to be overridden from DT") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The dp->bridge_num is zero-based, with -1 being the encoding for an invalid value. But dsa_bridge_num_put used to check for an invalid value by comparing bridge_num with 0, which is of course incorrect. The result is that the bridge_num will never get cleared by dsa_bridge_num_put, and further port joins to other bridges will get a bridge_num larger than the previous one, and once all the available bridges with TX forwarding offload supported by the hardware get exhausted, the TX forwarding offload feature is simply disabled. In the case of sja1105, 7 iterations of the loop below are enough to exhaust the TX forwarding offload bits, and further bridge joins operate without that feature. ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1 while :; do ip link set sw0p2 master br0 && sleep 1 ip link set sw0p2 nomaster && sleep 1 done This issue is enough of an indication that having the dp->bridge_num invalid encoding be a negative number is prone to bugs, so this will be changed to a one-based value, with the dp->bridge_num of zero being the indication of no bridge. However, that is material for net-next. Fixes: f5e165e7 ("net: dsa: track unique bridge numbers across all DSA switch trees") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 27 9月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Leon Romanovsky 提交于
This change prevents from users to access device before devlink is fully configured. Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 9月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Leon Romanovsky 提交于
devlink_register() can't fail and always returns success, but all drivers are obligated to check returned status anyway. This adds a lot of boilerplate code to handle impossible flow. Make devlink_register() void and simplify the drivers that use that API call. Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NSimon Horman <simon.horman@corigine.com> Acked-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> # dsa Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 9月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The Linux device model permits both the ->shutdown and ->remove driver methods to get called during a shutdown procedure. Example: a DSA switch which sits on an SPI bus, and the SPI bus driver calls this on its ->shutdown method: spi_unregister_controller -> device_for_each_child(&ctlr->dev, NULL, __unregister); -> spi_unregister_device(to_spi_device(dev)); -> device_del(&spi->dev); So this is a simple pattern which can theoretically appear on any bus, although the only other buses on which I've been able to find it are I2C: i2c_del_adapter -> device_for_each_child(&adap->dev, NULL, __unregister_client); -> i2c_unregister_device(client); -> device_unregister(&client->dev); The implication of this pattern is that devices on these buses can be unregistered after having been shut down. The drivers for these devices might choose to return early either from ->remove or ->shutdown if the other callback has already run once, and they might choose that the ->shutdown method should only perform a subset of the teardown done by ->remove (to avoid unnecessary delays when rebooting). So in other words, the device driver may choose on ->remove to not do anything (therefore to not unregister an MDIO bus it has registered on ->probe), because this ->remove is actually triggered by the device_shutdown path, and its ->shutdown method has already run and done the minimally required cleanup. This used to be fine until the blamed commit, but now, the following BUG_ON triggers: void mdiobus_free(struct mii_bus *bus) { /* For compatibility with error handling in drivers. */ if (bus->state == MDIOBUS_ALLOCATED) { kfree(bus); return; } BUG_ON(bus->state != MDIOBUS_UNREGISTERED); bus->state = MDIOBUS_RELEASED; put_device(&bus->dev); } In other words, there is an attempt to free an MDIO bus which was not unregistered. The attempt to free it comes from the devres release callbacks of the SPI device, which are executed after the device is unregistered. I'm not saying that the fact that MDIO buses allocated using devres would automatically get unregistered wasn't strange. I'm just saying that the commit didn't care about auditing existing call paths in the kernel, and now, the following code sequences are potentially buggy: (a) devm_mdiobus_alloc followed by plain mdiobus_register, for a device located on a bus that unregisters its children on shutdown. After the blamed patch, either both the alloc and the register should use devres, or none should. (b) devm_mdiobus_alloc followed by plain mdiobus_register, and then no mdiobus_unregister at all in the remove path. After the blamed patch, nobody unregisters the MDIO bus anymore, so this is even more buggy than the previous case which needs a specific bus configuration to be seen, this one is an unconditional bug. In this case, DSA falls into category (a), it tries to be helpful and registers an MDIO bus on behalf of the switch, which might be on such a bus. I've no idea why it does it under devres. It does this on probe: if (!ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) alloc and register mdio bus and this on remove: if (ds->slave_mii_bus && ds->ops->phy_read) unregister mdio bus I _could_ imagine using devres because the condition used on remove is different than the condition used on probe. So strictly speaking, DSA cannot determine whether the ds->slave_mii_bus it sees on remove is the ds->slave_mii_bus that _it_ has allocated on probe. Using devres would have solved that problem. But nonetheless, the existing code already proceeds to unregister the MDIO bus, even though it might be unregistering an MDIO bus it has never registered. So I can only guess that no driver that implements ds->ops->phy_read also allocates and registers ds->slave_mii_bus itself. So in that case, if unregistering is fine, freeing must be fine too. Stop using devres and free the MDIO bus manually. This will make devres stop attempting to free a still registered MDIO bus on ->shutdown. Fixes: ac3a68d5 ("net: phy: don't abuse devres in devm_mdiobus_register()") Reported-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Tested-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Since the blamed commit, dsa_tree_teardown_switches() was split into two smaller functions, dsa_tree_teardown_switches and dsa_tree_teardown_ports. However, the error path of dsa_tree_setup stopped calling dsa_tree_teardown_ports. Fixes: a57d8c21 ("net: dsa: flush switchdev workqueue before tearing down CPU/DSA ports") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 19 9月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Commit 86f8b1c0 ("net: dsa: Do not make user port errors fatal") decided it was fine to ignore errors on certain ports that fail to probe, and go on with the ports that do probe fine. Commit fb6ec87f ("net: dsa: Fix type was not set for devlink port") noticed that devlink_port_type_eth_set(dlp, dp->slave); does not get called, and devlink notices after a timeout of 3600 seconds and prints a WARN_ON. So it went ahead to unregister the devlink port. And because there exists an UNUSED port flavour, we actually re-register the devlink port as UNUSED. Commit 08156ba4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") added devlink port regions, which are set up by the driver and not by DSA. When we trigger the devlink port deregistration and reregistration as unused, devlink now prints another WARN_ON, from here: devlink_port_unregister: WARN_ON(!list_empty(&devlink_port->region_list)); So the port still has regions, which makes sense, because they were set up by the driver, and the driver doesn't know we're unregistering the devlink port. Somebody needs to tear them down, and optionally (actually it would be nice, to be consistent) set them up again for the new devlink port. But DSA's layering stays in our way quite badly here. The options I've considered are: 1. Introduce a function in devlink to just change a port's type and flavour. No dice, devlink keeps a lot of state, it really wants the port to not be registered when you set its parameters, so changing anything can only be done by destroying what we currently have and recreating it. 2. Make DSA cache the parameters passed to dsa_devlink_port_region_create, and the region returned, keep those in a list, then when the devlink port unregister needs to take place, the existing devlink regions are destroyed by DSA, and we replay the creation of new regions using the cached parameters. Problem: mv88e6xxx keeps the region pointers in chip->ports[port].region, and these will remain stale after DSA frees them. There are many things DSA can do, but updating mv88e6xxx's private pointers is not one of them. 3. Just let the driver do it (i.e. introduce a very specific method called ds->ops->port_reinit_as_unused, which unregisters its devlink port devlink regions, then the old devlink port, then registers the new one, then the devlink port regions for it). While it does work, as opposed to the others, it's pretty horrible from an API perspective and we can do better. 4. Introduce a new pair of methods, ->port_setup and ->port_teardown, which in the case of mv88e6xxx must register and unregister the devlink port regions. Call these 2 methods when the port must be reinitialized as unused. Naturally, I went for the 4th approach. Fixes: 08156ba4 ("net: dsa: Add devlink port regions support to DSA") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Lino reports that on his system with bcmgenet as DSA master and KSZ9897 as a switch, rebooting or shutting down never works properly. What does the bcmgenet driver have special to trigger this, that other DSA masters do not? It has an implementation of ->shutdown which simply calls its ->remove implementation. Otherwise said, it unregisters its network interface on shutdown. This message can be seen in a loop, and it hangs the reboot process there: unregister_netdevice: waiting for eth0 to become free. Usage count = 3 So why 3? A usage count of 1 is normal for a registered network interface, and any virtual interface which links itself as an upper of that will increment it via dev_hold. In the case of DSA, this is the call path: dsa_slave_create -> netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_upper_dev_link -> __netdev_adjacent_dev_insert -> dev_hold So a DSA switch with 3 interfaces will result in a usage count elevated by two, and netdev_wait_allrefs will wait until they have gone away. Other stacked interfaces, like VLAN, watch NETDEV_UNREGISTER events and delete themselves, but DSA cannot just vanish and go poof, at most it can unbind itself from the switch devices, but that must happen strictly earlier compared to when the DSA master unregisters its net_device, so reacting on the NETDEV_UNREGISTER event is way too late. It seems that it is a pretty established pattern to have a driver's ->shutdown hook redirect to its ->remove hook, so the same code is executed regardless of whether the driver is unbound from the device, or the system is just shutting down. As Florian puts it, it is quite a big hammer for bcmgenet to unregister its net_device during shutdown, but having a common code path with the driver unbind helps ensure it is well tested. So DSA, for better or for worse, has to live with that and engage in an arms race of implementing the ->shutdown hook too, from all individual drivers, and do something sane when paired with masters that unregister their net_device there. The only sane thing to do, of course, is to unlink from the master. However, complications arise really quickly. The pattern of redirecting ->shutdown to ->remove is not unique to bcmgenet or even to net_device drivers. In fact, SPI controllers do it too (see dspi_shutdown -> dspi_remove), and presumably, I2C controllers and MDIO controllers do it too (this is something I have not researched too deeply, but even if this is not the case today, it is certainly plausible to happen in the future, and must be taken into consideration). Since DSA switches might be SPI devices, I2C devices, MDIO devices, the insane implication is that for the exact same DSA switch device, we might have both ->shutdown and ->remove getting called. So we need to do something with that insane environment. The pattern I've come up with is "if this, then not that", so if either ->shutdown or ->remove gets called, we set the device's drvdata to NULL, and in the other hook, we check whether the drvdata is NULL and just do nothing. This is probably not necessary for platform devices, just for devices on buses, but I would really insist for consistency among drivers, because when code is copy-pasted, it is not always copy-pasted from the best sources. So depending on whether the DSA switch's ->remove or ->shutdown will get called first, we cannot really guarantee even for the same driver if rebooting will result in the same code path on all platforms. But nonetheless, we need to do something minimally reasonable on ->shutdown too to fix the bug. Of course, the ->remove will do more (a full teardown of the tree, with all data structures freed, and this is why the bug was not caught for so long). The new ->shutdown method is kept separate from dsa_unregister_switch not because we couldn't have unregistered the switch, but simply in the interest of doing something quick and to the point. The big question is: does the DSA switch's ->shutdown get called earlier than the DSA master's ->shutdown? If not, there is still a risk that we might still trigger the WARN_ON in unregister_netdevice that says we are attempting to unregister a net_device which has uppers. That's no good. Although the reference to the master net_device won't physically go away even if DSA's ->shutdown comes afterwards, remember we have a dev_hold on it. The answer to that question lies in this comment above device_link_add: * A side effect of the link creation is re-ordering of dpm_list and the * devices_kset list by moving the consumer device and all devices depending * on it to the ends of these lists (that does not happen to devices that have * not been registered when this function is called). so the fact that DSA uses device_link_add towards its master is not exactly for nothing. device_shutdown() walks devices_kset from the back, so this is our guarantee that DSA's shutdown happens before the master's shutdown. Fixes: 2f1e8ea7 ("net: dsa: link interfaces with the DSA master to get rid of lockdep warnings") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20210909095324.12978-1-LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de/Reported-by: NLino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Tested-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 9月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Sometimes when unbinding the mv88e6xxx driver on Turris MOX, these error messages appear: mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete be:79:b4:9e:9e:96 vid 1 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete be:79:b4:9e:9e:96 vid 0 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 100 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 1 from fdb: -2 mv88e6085 d0032004.mdio-mii:12: port 1 failed to delete d8:58:d7:00:ca:6d vid 0 from fdb: -2 (and similarly for other ports) What happens is that DSA has a policy "even if there are bugs, let's at least not leak memory" and dsa_port_teardown() clears the dp->fdbs and dp->mdbs lists, which are supposed to be empty. But deleting that cleanup code, the warnings go away. => the FDB and MDB lists (used for refcounting on shared ports, aka CPU and DSA ports) will eventually be empty, but are not empty by the time we tear down those ports. Aka we are deleting them too soon. The addresses that DSA complains about are host-trapped addresses: the local addresses of the ports, and the MAC address of the bridge device. The problem is that offloading those entries happens from a deferred work item scheduled by the SWITCHDEV_FDB_DEL_TO_DEVICE handler, and this races with the teardown of the CPU and DSA ports where the refcounting is kept. In fact, not only it races, but fundamentally speaking, if we iterate through the port list linearly, we might end up tearing down the shared ports even before we delete a DSA user port which has a bridge upper. So as it turns out, we need to first tear down the user ports (and the unused ones, for no better place of doing that), then the shared ports (the CPU and DSA ports). In between, we need to ensure that all work items scheduled by our switchdev handlers (which only run for user ports, hence the reason why we tear them down first) have finished. Fixes: 161ca59d ("net: dsa: reference count the MDB entries at the cross-chip notifier level") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210914134726.2305133-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.comSigned-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 23 8月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Right now, cross-tree bridging setups work somewhat by mistake. In the case of cross-tree bridging with sja1105, all switch instances need to agree upon a common VLAN ID for forwarding a packet that belongs to a certain bridging domain. With TX forwarding offload, the VLAN ID is the bridge VLAN for VLAN-aware bridging, and the tag_8021q TX forwarding offload VID (a VLAN which has non-zero VBID bits) for VLAN-unaware bridging. The VBID for VLAN-unaware bridging is derived from the dp->bridge_num value calculated by DSA independently for each switch tree. If ports from one tree join one bridge, and ports from another tree join another bridge, DSA will assign them the same bridge_num, even though the bridges are different. If cross-tree bridging is supported, this is an issue. Modify DSA to calculate the bridge_num globally across all switch trees. This has the implication for a driver that the dp->bridge_num value that DSA will assign to its ports might not be contiguous, if there are boards with multiple DSA drivers instantiated. Additionally, all bridge_num values eat up towards each switch's ds->num_fwd_offloading_bridges maximum, which is potentially unfortunate, and can be seen as a limitation introduced by this patch. However, that is the lesser evil for now. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 12 8月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Currently, on my board with multiple sja1105 switches in disjoint trees described in commit f66a6a69 ("net: dsa: permit cross-chip bridging between all trees in the system"), rebooting the board triggers the following benign warnings: [ 12.345566] sja1105 spi2.0: port 0 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1088 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.353804] sja1105 spi2.0: port 0 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2112 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.362019] sja1105 spi2.0: port 1 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1089 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.370246] sja1105 spi2.0: port 1 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2113 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.378466] sja1105 spi2.0: port 2 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 1090 deletion: -ENOENT [ 12.386683] sja1105 spi2.0: port 2 failed to notify tag_8021q VLAN 2114 deletion: -ENOENT Basically switch 1 calls dsa_tag_8021q_unregister, and switch 1's TX and RX VLANs cannot be found on switch 2's CPU port. But why would switch 2 even attempt to delete switch 1's TX and RX tag_8021q VLANs from its CPU port? Well, because we use dsa_broadcast, and it is supposed that it had added those VLANs in the first place (because in dsa_port_tag_8021q_vlan_match, all CPU ports match regardless of their tree index or switch index). The two trees probe asynchronously, and when switch 1 probed, it called dsa_broadcast which did not notify the tree of switch 2, because that didn't probe yet. But during unbind, switch 2's tree _is_ probed, so it _is_ notified of the deletion. Before jumping to introduce a synchronization mechanism between the probing across disjoint switch trees, let's take a step back and see whether we _need_ to do that in the first place. The RX and TX VLANs of switch 1 would be needed on switch 2's CPU port only if switch 1 and 2 were part of a cross-chip bridge. And dsa_tag_8021q_bridge_join takes care precisely of that (but if probing was synchronous, the bridge_join would just end up bumping the VLANs' refcount, because they are already installed by the setup path). Since by the time the ports are bridged, all DSA trees are already set up, and we don't need the tag_8021q VLANs of one switch installed on the other switches during probe time, the answer is that we don't need to fix the synchronization issue. So make the setup and teardown code paths call dsa_port_notify, which notifies only the local tree, and the bridge code paths call dsa_broadcast, which let the other trees know as well. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 8月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Leon Romanovsky 提交于
All kernel devlink implementations call to devlink_alloc() during initialization routine for specific device which is used later as a parent device for devlink_register(). Such late device assignment causes to the situation which requires us to call to device_register() before setting other parameters, but that call opens devlink to the world and makes accessible for the netlink users. Any attempt to move devlink_register() to be the last call generates the following error due to access to the devlink->dev pointer. [ 8.758862] devlink_nl_param_fill+0x2e8/0xe50 [ 8.760305] devlink_param_notify+0x6d/0x180 [ 8.760435] __devlink_params_register+0x2f1/0x670 [ 8.760558] devlink_params_register+0x1e/0x20 The simple change of API to set devlink device in the devlink_alloc() instead of devlink_register() fixes all this above and ensures that prior to call to devlink_register() everything already set. Signed-off-by: NLeon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 8月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Be there an "H" switch topology, where there are 2 switches connected as follows: eth0 eth1 | | CPU port CPU port | DSA link | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 -------- sw1p4 sw1p3 sw1p2 sw1p1 sw1p0 | | | | | | user user user user user user port port port port port port basically one where each switch has its own CPU port for termination, but there is also a DSA link in case packets need to be forwarded in hardware between one switch and another. DSA insists to see this as a daisy chain topology, basically registering all network interfaces as sw0p0@eth0, ... sw1p0@eth0 and disregarding eth1 as a valid DSA master. This is only half the story, since when asked using dsa_port_is_cpu(), DSA will respond that sw1p1 is a CPU port, however one which has no dp->cpu_dp pointing to it. So sw1p1 is enabled, but not used. Furthermore, be there a driver for switches which support only one upstream port. This driver iterates through its ports and checks using dsa_is_upstream_port() whether the current port is an upstream one. For switch 1, two ports pass the "is upstream port" checks: - sw1p4 is an upstream port because it is a routing port towards the dedicated CPU port assigned using dsa_tree_setup_default_cpu() - sw1p1 is also an upstream port because it is a CPU port, albeit one that is disabled. This is because dsa_upstream_port() returns: if (!cpu_dp) return port; which means that if @dp does not have a ->cpu_dp pointer (which is a characteristic of CPU ports themselves as well as unused ports), then @dp is its own upstream port. So the driver for switch 1 rightfully says: I have two upstream ports, but I don't support multiple upstream ports! So let me error out, I don't know which one to choose and what to do with the other one. Generally I am against enforcing any default policy in the kernel in terms of user to CPU port assignment (like round robin or such) but this case is different. To solve the conundrum, one would have to: - Disable sw1p1 in the device tree or mark it as "not a CPU port" in order to comply with DSA's view of this topology as a daisy chain, where the termination traffic from switch 1 must pass through switch 0. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of termination throughput in switch 1. - Disable the DSA link between sw0p4 and sw1p4 and do software forwarding between switch 0 and 1, and basically treat the switches as part of disjoint switch trees. This is counter-productive because it wastes 1Gbps of autonomous forwarding throughput between switch 0 and 1. - Treat sw0p4 and sw1p4 as user ports instead of DSA links. This could work, but it makes cross-chip bridging impossible. In this setup we would need to have 2 separate bridges, br0 spanning the ports of switch 0, and br1 spanning the ports of switch 1, and the "DSA links treated as user ports" sw0p4 (part of br0) and sw1p4 (part of br1) are the gateway ports between one bridge and another. This is hard to manage from a user's perspective, who wants to have a unified view of the switching fabric and the ability to transparently add ports to the same bridge. VLANs would also need to be explicitly managed by the user on these gateway ports. So it seems that the only reasonable thing to do is to make DSA prefer CPU ports that are local to the switch. Meaning that by default, the user and DSA ports of switch 0 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 0 (sw0p1) and the user and DSA ports of switch 1 will get assigned to the CPU port from switch 1. The way this solves the problem is that sw1p4 is no longer an upstream port as far as switch 1 is concerned (it no longer views sw0p1 as its dedicated CPU port). So here we are, the first multi-CPU port that DSA supports is also perhaps the most uneventful one: the individual switches don't support multiple CPUs, however the DSA switch tree as a whole does have multiple CPU ports. No user space assignment of user ports to CPU ports is desirable, necessary, or possible. Ports that do not have a local CPU port (say there was an extra switch hanging off of sw0p0) default to the standard implementation of getting assigned to the first CPU port of the DSA switch tree. Is that good enough? Probably not (if the downstream switch was hanging off of switch 1, we would most certainly prefer its CPU port to be sw1p1), but in order to support that use case too, we would need to traverse the dst->rtable in search of an optimum dedicated CPU port, one that has the smallest number of hops between dp->ds and dp->cpu_dp->ds. At the moment, the DSA routing table structure does not keep the number of hops between dl->dp and dl->link_dp, and while it is probably deducible, there is zero justification to write that code now. Let's hope DSA will never have to support that use case. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
There is nothing specific to having a default CPU port to what dsa_tree_teardown_default_cpu() does. Even with multiple CPU ports, it would do the same thing: iterate through the ports of this switch tree and reset the ->cpu_dp pointer to NULL. So rename it accordingly. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 23 7月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
For a DSA switch, to offload the forwarding process of a bridge device means to send the packets coming from the software bridge as data plane packets. This is contrary to everything that DSA has done so far, because the current taggers only know to send control packets (ones that target a specific destination port), whereas data plane packets are supposed to be forwarded according to the FDB lookup, much like packets ingressing on any regular ingress port. If the FDB lookup process returns multiple destination ports (flooding, multicast), then replication is also handled by the switch hardware - the bridge only sends a single packet and avoids the skb_clone(). DSA keeps for each bridge port a zero-based index (the number of the bridge). Multiple ports performing TX forwarding offload to the same bridge have the same dp->bridge_num value, and ports not offloading the TX data plane of a bridge have dp->bridge_num = -1. The tagger can check if the packet that is being transmitted on has skb->offload_fwd_mark = true or not. If it does, it can be sure that the packet belongs to the data plane of a bridge, further information about which can be obtained based on dp->bridge_dev and dp->bridge_num. It can then compose a DSA tag for injecting a data plane packet into that bridge number. For the switch driver side, we offer two new dsa_switch_ops methods, called .port_bridge_fwd_offload_{add,del}, which are modeled after .port_bridge_{join,leave}. These methods are provided in case the driver needs to configure the hardware to treat packets coming from that bridge software interface as data plane packets. The switchdev <-> bridge interaction happens during the netdev_master_upper_dev_link() call, so to switch drivers, the effect is that the .port_bridge_fwd_offload_add() method is called immediately after .port_bridge_join(). If the bridge number exceeds the number of bridges for which the switch driver can offload the TX data plane (and this includes the case where the driver can offload none), DSA falls back to simply returning tx_fwd_offload = false in the switchdev_bridge_port_offload() call. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
In preparation of supporting data plane forwarding on behalf of a software bridge, some drivers might need to view bridges as virtual switches behind the CPU port in a cross-chip topology. Give them some help and let them know how many physical switches there are in the tree, so that they can count the virtual switches starting from that number on. Note that the first dsa_switch_ops method where this information is reliably available is .setup(). This is because of how DSA works: in a tree with 3 switches, each calling dsa_register_switch(), the first 2 will advance until dsa_tree_setup() -> dsa_tree_setup_routing_table() and exit with error code 0 because the topology is not complete. Since probing is parallel at this point, one switch does not know about the existence of the other. Then the third switch comes, and for it, dsa_tree_setup_routing_table() returns complete = true. This switch goes ahead and calls dsa_tree_setup_switches() for everybody else, calling their .setup() methods too. This acts as the synchronization point. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 6月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The same concerns expressed for host MDB entries are valid for host FDBs just as well: - in the case of multiple bridges spanning the same switch chip, deleting a host FDB entry that belongs to one bridge will result in breakage to the other bridge - not deleting FDB entries across DSA links means that the switch's hardware tables will eventually run out, given enough wear&tear So do the same thing and introduce reference counting for CPU ports and DSA links using the same data structures as we have for MDB entries. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Ever since the cross-chip notifiers were introduced, the design was meant to be simplistic and just get the job done without worrying too much about dangling resources left behind. For example, somebody installs an MDB entry on sw0p0 in this daisy chain topology. It gets installed using ds->ops->port_mdb_add() on sw0p0, sw1p4 and sw2p4. | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ x ] Then the same person deletes that MDB entry. The cross-chip notifier for deletion only matches sw0p0: | sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 sw0p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ cpu ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 sw1p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] | +---------+ | sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3 sw2p4 [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ user ] [ dsa ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] Why? Because the DSA links are 'trunk' ports, if we just go ahead and delete the MDB from sw1p4 and sw2p4 directly, we might delete those multicast entries when they are still needed. Just consider the fact that somebody does: - add a multicast MAC address towards sw0p0 [ via the cross-chip notifiers it gets installed on the DSA links too ] - add the same multicast MAC address towards sw0p1 (another port of that same switch) - delete the same multicast MAC address from sw0p0. At this point, if we deleted the MAC address from the DSA links, it would be flooded, even though there is still an entry on switch 0 which needs it not to. So that is why deletions only match the targeted source port and nothing on DSA links. Of course, dangling resources means that the hardware tables will eventually run out given enough additions/removals, but hey, at least it's simple. But there is a bigger concern which needs to be addressed, and that is our support for SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB. DSA simply translates such an object into a dsa_port_host_mdb_add() which ends up as ds->ops->port_mdb_add() on the upstream port, and a similar thing happens on deletion: dsa_port_host_mdb_del() will trigger ds->ops->port_mdb_del() on the upstream port. When there are 2 VLAN-unaware bridges spanning the same switch (which is a use case DSA proudly supports), each bridge will install its own SWITCHDEV_OBJ_ID_HOST_MDB entries. But upon deletion, DSA goes ahead and emits a DSA_NOTIFIER_MDB_DEL for dp->cpu_dp, which is shared between the user ports enslaved to br0 and the user ports enslaved to br1. Not good. The host-trapped multicast addresses installed by br1 will be deleted when any state changes in br0 (IGMP timers expire, or ports leave, etc). To avoid this, we could of course go the route of the zero-sum game and delete the DSA_NOTIFIER_MDB_DEL call for dp->cpu_dp. But the better design is to just admit that on shared ports like DSA links and CPU ports, we should be reference counting calls, even if this consumes some dynamic memory which DSA has traditionally avoided. On the flip side, the hardware tables of switches are limited in size, so it would be good if the OS managed them properly instead of having them eventually overflow. To address the memory usage concern, we only apply the refcounting of MDB entries on ports that are really shared (CPU ports and DSA links) and not on user ports. In a typical single-switch setup, this means only the CPU port (and the host MDB entries are not that many, really). The name of the newly introduced data structures (dsa_mac_addr) is chosen in such a way that will be reusable for host FDB entries (next patch). With this change, we can finally have the same matching logic for the MDB additions and deletions, as well as for their host-trapped variants. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 6月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The difference between dsa_is_user_port and dsa_port_is_user is that the former needs to look up the list of ports of the DSA switch tree in order to find the struct dsa_port, while the latter directly receives it as an argument. dsa_is_user_port is already in widespread use and has its place, so there isn't any chance of converting all callers to a single form. But being able to do: dsa_port_is_user(dp) instead of dsa_is_user_port(dp->ds, dp->index) is much more efficient too, especially when the "dp" comes from an iterator over the DSA switch tree - this reduces the complexity from quadratic to linear. Move these helpers from dsa2.c to include/net/dsa.h so that others can use them too. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The cross-chip notifiers work by comparing each ds->index against the info->sw_index value from the notifier. The ds->index is retrieved from the device tree dsa,member property. If a single tree cross-chip topology does not declare unique switch IDs, this will result in hard-to-debug issues/voodoo effects such as the cross-chip notifier for one switch port also matching the port with the same number from another switch. Check in dsa_switch_parse_member_of() whether the DSA switch tree contains a DSA switch with the index we're preparing to add, before actually adding it. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 4月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tobias Waldekranz 提交于
Some combinations of tag protocols and Ethernet controllers are incompatible, and it is hard for the driver to keep track of these. Therefore, allow the device tree author (typically the board vendor) to inform the driver of this fact by selecting an alternate protocol that is known to work. Signed-off-by: NTobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Reviewed-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 14 4月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Walle 提交于
of_get_mac_address() returns a "const void*" pointer to a MAC address. Lately, support to fetch the MAC address by an NVMEM provider was added. But this will only work with platform devices. It will not work with PCI devices (e.g. of an integrated root complex) and esp. not with DSA ports. There is an of_* variant of the nvmem binding which works without devices. The returned data of a nvmem_cell_read() has to be freed after use. On the other hand the return of_get_mac_address() points to some static data without a lifetime. The trick for now, was to allocate a device resource managed buffer which is then returned. This will only work if we have an actual device. Change it, so that the caller of of_get_mac_address() has to supply a buffer where the MAC address is written to. Unfortunately, this will touch all drivers which use the of_get_mac_address(). Usually the code looks like: const char *addr; addr = of_get_mac_address(np); if (!IS_ERR(addr)) ether_addr_copy(ndev->dev_addr, addr); This can then be simply rewritten as: of_get_mac_address(np, ndev->dev_addr); Sometimes is_valid_ether_addr() is used to test the MAC address. of_get_mac_address() already makes sure, it just returns a valid MAC address. Thus we can just test its return code. But we have to be careful if there are still other sources for the MAC address before the of_get_mac_address(). In this case we have to keep the is_valid_ether_addr() call. The following coccinelle patch was used to convert common cases to the new style. Afterwards, I've manually gone over the drivers and fixed the return code variable: either used a new one or if one was already available use that. Mansour Moufid, thanks for that coccinelle patch! <spml> @a@ identifier x; expression y, z; @@ - x = of_get_mac_address(y); + x = of_get_mac_address(y, z); <... - ether_addr_copy(z, x); ...> @@ identifier a.x; @@ - if (<+... x ...+>) {} @@ identifier a.x; @@ if (<+... x ...+>) { ... } - else {} @@ identifier a.x; expression e; @@ - if (<+... x ...+>@e) - {} - else + if (!(e)) {...} @@ expression x, y, z; @@ - x = of_get_mac_address(y, z); + of_get_mac_address(y, z); ... when != x </spml> All drivers, except drivers/net/ethernet/aeroflex/greth.c, were compile-time tested. Suggested-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NMichael Walle <michael@walle.cc> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 3月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Maxim Kochetkov 提交于
If PHY is not available on DSA port (described at devicetree but absent or failed to detect) then kernel prints warning after 3700 secs: [ 3707.948771] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 3707.948784] Type was not set for devlink port. [ 3707.948894] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 17 at net/core/devlink.c:8097 0xc083f9d8 We should unregister the devlink port as a user port and re-register it as an unused port before executing "continue" in case of dsa_port_setup error. Fixes: 86f8b1c0 ("net: dsa: Do not make user port errors fatal") Signed-off-by: NMaxim Kochetkov <fido_max@inbox.ru> Reviewed-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 23 3月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 George McCollister 提交于
Use a temporary variable to hold the return value from dsa_tag_driver_get() instead of assigning it to dst->tag_ops. Leaving an error value in dst->tag_ops can result in deferencing an invalid pointer when a deferred switch configuration happens later. Fixes: 357f203b ("net: dsa: keep a copy of the tagging protocol in the DSA switch tree") Signed-off-by: NGeorge McCollister <george.mccollister@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 2月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Since teardown is supposed to undo the effects of the setup method, it should be called in the error path for dsa_switch_setup, not just in dsa_switch_teardown. Fixes: 5e3f847a ("net: dsa: Add teardown callback for drivers") Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210204163351.2929670-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.comSigned-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 30 1月, 2021 3 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Currently DSA exposes the following sysfs: $ cat /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ocelot which is a read-only device attribute, introduced in the kernel as commit 98cdb480 ("net: dsa: Expose tagging protocol to user-space"), and used by libpcap since its commit 993db3800d7d ("Add support for DSA link-layer types"). It would be nice if we could extend this device attribute by making it writable: $ echo ocelot-8021q > /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging This is useful with DSA switches that can make use of more than one tagging protocol. It may be useful in dsa_loop in the future too, to perform offline testing of various taggers, or for changing between dsa and edsa on Marvell switches, if that is desirable. In terms of implementation, drivers can support this feature by implementing .change_tag_protocol, which should always leave the switch in a consistent state: either with the new protocol if things went well, or with the old one if something failed. Teardown of the old protocol, if necessary, must be handled by the driver. Some things remain as before: - The .get_tag_protocol is currently only called at probe time, to load the initial tagging protocol driver. Nonetheless, new drivers should report the tagging protocol in current use now. - The driver should manage by itself the initial setup of tagging protocol, no later than the .setup() method, as well as destroying resources used by the last tagger in use, no earlier than the .teardown() method. For multi-switch DSA trees, error handling is a bit more complicated, since e.g. the 5th out of 7 switches may fail to change the tag protocol. When that happens, a revert to the original tag protocol is attempted, but that may fail too, leaving the tree in an inconsistent state despite each individual switch implementing .change_tag_protocol transactionally. Since the intersection between drivers that implement .change_tag_protocol and drivers that support D in DSA is currently the empty set, the possibility for this error to happen is ignored for now. Testing: $ insmod mscc_felix.ko [ 79.549784] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Adding to iommu group 14 [ 79.565712] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Failed to register DSA switch: -517 $ insmod tag_ocelot.ko $ rmmod mscc_felix.ko $ insmod mscc_felix.ko [ 97.261724] libphy: VSC9959 internal MDIO bus: probed [ 97.267363] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 0 [ 97.274998] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 1 [ 97.282561] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 2 [ 97.289700] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Found PCS at internal MDIO address 3 [ 97.599163] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp0 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:10] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 97.862034] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp1 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:11] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 97.950731] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp0: configuring for inband/qsgmii link mode [ 97.964278] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device swp0 [ 98.146161] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp2 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:12] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 98.238649] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp1: configuring for inband/qsgmii link mode [ 98.251845] 8021q: adding VLAN 0 to HW filter on device swp1 [ 98.433916] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5 swp3 (uninitialized): PHY [0000:00:00.3:13] driver [Microsemi GE VSC8514 SyncE] (irq=POLL) [ 98.485542] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: configuring for fixed/internal link mode [ 98.503584] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Link is Up - 2.5Gbps/Full - flow control rx/tx [ 98.527948] device eno2 entered promiscuous mode [ 98.544755] DSA: tree 0 setup $ ping 10.0.0.1 PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=2.337 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.754 ms ^C - 10.0.0.1 ping statistics - 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max = 0.754/1.545/2.337 ms $ cat /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ocelot $ cat ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh #!/bin/bash ip link set swp0 down ip link set swp1 down ip link set swp2 down ip link set swp3 down ip link set swp5 down ip link set eno2 down echo ocelot-8021q > /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ip link set eno2 up ip link set swp0 up ip link set swp1 up ip link set swp2 up ip link set swp3 up ip link set swp5 up $ ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh: line 9: echo: write error: Protocol not available $ rmmod tag_ocelot.ko rmmod: can't unload module 'tag_ocelot': Resource temporarily unavailable $ insmod tag_ocelot_8021q.ko $ ./test_ocelot_8021q.sh $ cat /sys/class/net/eno2/dsa/tagging ocelot-8021q $ rmmod tag_ocelot.ko $ rmmod tag_ocelot_8021q.ko rmmod: can't unload module 'tag_ocelot_8021q': Resource temporarily unavailable $ ping 10.0.0.1 PING 10.0.0.1 (10.0.0.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.953 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.787 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.771 ms $ rmmod mscc_felix.ko [ 645.544426] mscc_felix 0000:00:00.5: Link is Down [ 645.838608] DSA: tree 0 torn down $ rmmod tag_ocelot_8021q.ko Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Cascading DSA switches can be done multiple ways. There is the brute force approach / tag stacking, where one upstream switch, located between leaf switches and the host Ethernet controller, will just happily transport the DSA header of those leaf switches as payload. For this kind of setups, DSA works without any special kind of treatment compared to a single switch - they just aren't aware of each other. Then there's the approach where the upstream switch understands the tags it transports from its leaves below, as it doesn't push a tag of its own, but it routes based on the source port & switch id information present in that tag (as opposed to DMAC & VID) and it strips the tag when egressing a front-facing port. Currently only Marvell implements the latter, and Marvell DSA trees contain only Marvell switches. So it is safe to say that DSA trees already have a single tag protocol shared by all switches, and in fact this is what makes the switches able to understand each other. This fact is also implied by the fact that currently, the tagging protocol is reported as part of a sysfs installed on the DSA master and not per port, so it must be the same for all the ports connected to that DSA master regardless of the switch that they belong to. It's time to make this official and enforce it (yes, this also means we won't have any "switch understands tag to some extent but is not able to speak it" hardware oddities that we'll support in the future). This is needed due to the imminent introduction of the dsa_switch_ops:: change_tag_protocol driver API. When that is introduced, we'll have to notify switches of the tagging protocol that they're configured to use. Currently the tag_ops structure pointer is held only for CPU ports. But there are switches which don't have CPU ports and nonetheless still need to be configured. These would be Marvell leaf switches whose upstream port is just a DSA link. How do we inform these of their tagging protocol setup/deletion? One answer to the above would be: iterate through the DSA switch tree's ports once, list the CPU ports, get their tag_ops, then iterate again now that we have it, and notify everybody of that tag_ops. But what to do if conflicts appear between one cpu_dp->tag_ops and another? There's no escaping the fact that conflict resolution needs to be done, so we can be upfront about it. Ease our work and just keep the master copy of the tag_ops inside the struct dsa_switch_tree. Reference counting is now moved to be per-tree too, instead of per-CPU port. There are many places in the data path that access master->dsa_ptr->tag_ops and we would introduce unnecessary performance penalty going through yet another indirection, so keep those right where they are. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
The existence of dsa_broadcast has generated some confusion in the past: https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev@vger.kernel.org/msg365042.html So let's document the existing dsa_port_notify and dsa_broadcast functions and explain when each of them should be used. Also, in fact, the in-between function has always been there but was lacking a name, and is the main reason for this patch: dsa_tree_notify. Refactor dsa_broadcast to use it. This patch also moves dsa_broadcast (a top-level function) to dsa2.c, where it really belonged in the first place, but had no companion so it stood with dsa_port_notify. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 16 1月, 2021 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
Switches that care about QoS might have hardware support for reserving buffer pools for individual ports or traffic classes, and configuring their sizes and thresholds. Through devlink-sb (shared buffers), this is all configurable, as well as their occupancy being viewable. Add the plumbing in DSA for these operations. Individual drivers still need to call devlink_sb_register() with the shared buffers they want to expose. A helper was not created in DSA for this purpose (unlike, say, dsa_devlink_params_register), since in my opinion it does not bring any benefit over plainly calling devlink_sb_register() directly. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NAndrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于
As explained in commit 54a0ed0d ("net: dsa: provide an option for drivers to always receive bridge VLANs"), DSA has historically been skipping VLAN switchdev operations when the bridge wasn't in vlan_filtering mode, but the reason why it was doing that has never been clear. So the configure_vlan_while_not_filtering option is there merely to preserve functionality for existing drivers. It isn't some behavior that drivers should opt into. Ideally, when all drivers leave this flag set, we can delete the dsa_port_skip_vlan_configuration() function. New drivers always seem to omit setting this flag, for some reason. So let's reverse the logic: the DSA core sets it by default to true before the .setup() callback, and legacy drivers can turn it off. This way, new drivers get the new behavior by default, unless they explicitly set the flag to false, which is more obvious during review. Remove the assignment from drivers which were setting it to true, and add the assignment to false for the drivers that didn't previously have it. This way, it should be easier to see how many we have left. The following drivers: lan9303, mv88e6060 were skipped from setting this flag to false, because they didn't have any VLAN offload ops in the first place. The Broadcom Starfighter 2 driver calls the common b53_switch_alloc and therefore also inherits the configure_vlan_while_not_filtering=true behavior. Also, print a message through netlink extack every time a VLAN has been skipped. This is mildly annoying on purpose, so that (a) it is at least clear that VLANs are being skipped - the legacy behavior in itself is confusing, and the extack should be much more difficult to miss, unlike kernel logs - and (b) people have one more incentive to convert to the new behavior. No behavior change except for the added prints is intended at this time. $ ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 0 $ ip link set sw0p2 master br0 [ 60.315148] br0: port 1(sw0p2) entered blocking state [ 60.320350] br0: port 1(sw0p2) entered disabled state [ 60.327839] device sw0p2 entered promiscuous mode [ 60.334905] br0: port 1(sw0p2) entered blocking state [ 60.340142] br0: port 1(sw0p2) entered forwarding state Warning: dsa_core: skipping configuration of VLAN. # This was the pvid $ bridge vlan add dev sw0p2 vid 100 Warning: dsa_core: skipping configuration of VLAN. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: NKurt Kanzenbach <kurt@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210115231919.43834-1-vladimir.oltean@nxp.comSigned-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-
- 15 1月, 2021 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tobias Waldekranz 提交于
Monitor the following events and notify the driver when: - A DSA port joins/leaves a LAG. - A LAG, made up of DSA ports, joins/leaves a bridge. - A DSA port in a LAG is enabled/disabled (enabled meaning "distributing" in 802.3ad LACP terms). When a LAG joins a bridge, the DSA subsystem will treat that as each individual port joining the bridge. The driver may look at the port's LAG device pointer to see if it is associated with any LAG, if that is required. This is analogue to how switchdev events are replicated out to all lower devices when reaching e.g. a LAG. Drivers can optionally request that DSA maintain a linear mapping from a LAG ID to the corresponding netdev by setting ds->num_lag_ids to the desired size. In the event that the hardware is not capable of offloading a particular LAG for any reason (the typical case being use of exotic modes like broadcast), DSA will take a hands-off approach, allowing the LAG to be formed as a pure software construct. This is reported back through the extended ACK, but is otherwise transparent to the user. Signed-off-by: NTobias Waldekranz <tobias@waldekranz.com> Reviewed-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Tested-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
-