Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

We can handle the special case of num_stripes == 0 directly inside
btrfs_read_sys_array. The BUG_ON in btrfs_chunk_item_size is there to
catch other unhandled cases where we fail to validate external data.

A crafted or corrupted image crashes at mount time:

BTRFS: device fsid 9006933e-2a9a-44f0-917f-514252aeec2c devid 1 transid 7 /dev/loop0
BTRFS info (device loop0): disk space caching is enabled
BUG: failure at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:337/btrfs_chunk_item_size()!
Kernel panic - not syncing: BUG!
CPU: 0 PID: 313 Comm: mount Not tainted 4.2.5-00657-ge047887-dirty #25
Stack:
 637af890 60062489 602aeb2e 604192ba
 60387961 00000011 637af8a0 6038a835
 637af9c0 6038776b 634ef32b 00000000
Call Trace:
 [<6001c86d>] show_stack+0xfe/0x15b
 [<6038a835>] dump_stack+0x2a/0x2c
 [<6038776b>] panic+0x13e/0x2b3
 [<6020f099>] btrfs_read_sys_array+0x25d/0x2ff
 [<601cfbbe>] open_ctree+0x192d/0x27af
 [<6019c2c1>] btrfs_mount+0x8f5/0xb9a
 [<600bc9a7>] mount_fs+0x11/0xf3
 [<600d5167>] vfs_kern_mount+0x75/0x11a
 [<6019bcb0>] btrfs_mount+0x2e4/0xb9a
 [<600bc9a7>] mount_fs+0x11/0xf3
 [<600d5167>] vfs_kern_mount+0x75/0x11a
 [<600d710b>] do_mount+0xa35/0xbc9
 [<600d7557>] SyS_mount+0x95/0xc8
 [<6001e884>] handle_syscall+0x6b/0x8e
Reported-by: NJiri Slaby <jslaby@suse.com>
Reported-by: NVegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org	# 3.19+
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Since we will add support for -d dup for non-mixed filesystem,
kernel need to support converting to this raid-type.

This patch remove limitation of above case.

Tested by following script:
(combination of dup conversion with fsck):

export TEST_DEV='/dev/vdc'
export TEST_DIR='/var/ltf/tester/mnt'

do_dup_test()
{
    local m_from="$1"
    local d_from="$2"
    local m_to="$3"
    local d_to="$4"

    echo "Convert from -m $m_from -d $d_from to -m $m_to -d $d_to"

    umount "$TEST_DIR" &>/dev/null
    ./mkfs.btrfs -f -m "$m_from" -d "$d_from" "$TEST_DEV" >/dev/null || return 1
    mount "$TEST_DEV" "$TEST_DIR" || return 1

    cp -a /sbin/* "$TEST_DIR"

    [[ "$m_from" != "$m_to" ]] && {
        ./btrfs balance start -f -mconvert="$m_to" "$TEST_DIR" || return 1
    }

    [[ "$d_from" != "$d_to" ]] && {
	local opt=()
	[[ "$d_to" == single ]] && opt+=("-f")
        ./btrfs balance start "${opt[@]}" -dconvert="$d_to" "$TEST_DIR" || return 1
    }

    umount "$TEST_DIR" || return 1
    ./btrfsck "$TEST_DEV" || return 1
    echo

    return 0
}

test_all()
{
    for m_from in single dup; do
    for d_from in single dup; do
    for m_to in single dup; do
    for d_to in single dup; do
    do_dup_test "$m_from" "$d_from" "$m_to" "$d_to" || return 1
    done
    done
    done
    done
}

test_all
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

If we fail to allocate a new data chunk, we were jumping to the error path
without release the transaction handle we got before. Fix this by always
releasing it before doing the jump.

Fixes: 2c9fe835 ("btrfs: Fix lost-data-profile caused by balance bg")
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>

There's a regression in 4.4-rc since commit bc309467
(btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum) in that
existing (non-ranged) balance with -dusage=x no longer works; all chunks
are skipped.

After staring at the code for a while and wondering why a non-ranged
balance would even need min and max thresholds (..which then were not
set correctly, leading to the bug) I realized that the only problem
was the fact that the filter functions were named wrong, thanks to
patching copypasta. Simply renaming both functions lets the existing
btrfs-progs call balance with -dusage=x and now the non-ranged filter
function is invoked, properly using only a single chunk limit.
Signed-off-by: NHolger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@googlemail.com>
Fixes: bc309467 ("btrfs: extend balance filter usage to take minimum and maximum")
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The test btrfs/011 triggers a rcu warning
Reviewed-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>

===============================
[ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
4.4.0-rc1-default+ #286 Tainted: G        W
-------------------------------
fs/btrfs/volumes.c:1977 suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage!

other info that might help us debug this:

rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
4 locks held by btrfs/28786:

0:  (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock_finishing_cancel_unmount){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc785>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x45/0xa00 [btrfs]
1:  (uuid_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc84f>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x10f/0xa00 [btrfs]
2:  (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc868>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x128/0xa00 [btrfs]
3:  (&fs_info->chunk_mutex){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa00bc87d>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x13d/0xa00 [btrfs]

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 28786 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W       4.4.0-rc1-default+ #286
Hardware name: Intel Corporation SandyBridge Platform/To be filled by O.E.M., BIOS ASNBCPT1.86C.0031.B00.1006301607 06/30/2010
0000000000000001 ffff8800a07dfb48 ffffffff8141d47b 0000000000000001
0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffff8801464a4f00 ffff8800a07dfb78
ffffffff810cd883 ffff880146eb9400 ffff8800a3698600 ffff8800a33fe220
Call Trace:
[<ffffffff8141d47b>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x74
[<ffffffff810cd883>] lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0x103/0x140
[<ffffffffa0071261>] btrfs_rm_dev_replace_remove_srcdev+0x111/0x130 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff810d354d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
[<ffffffff81449536>] ? __percpu_counter_sum+0x66/0x80
[<ffffffffa00bcc15>] btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x4d5/0xa00 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00bc96e>] ? btrfs_dev_replace_finishing+0x22e/0xa00 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00a8795>] ? btrfs_scrub_dev+0x415/0x6d0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa003ea69>] ? btrfs_start_transaction+0x9/0x20 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa00bda79>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x339/0x590 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81196aa5>] ? __might_fault+0x95/0xa0
[<ffffffffa0078638>] btrfs_ioctl_dev_replace+0x118/0x160 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff811409c6>] ? stack_trace_call+0x46/0x70
[<ffffffffa007c914>] ? btrfs_ioctl+0x24/0x1770 [btrfs]
[<ffffffffa007ce43>] btrfs_ioctl+0x553/0x1770 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff811409c6>] ? stack_trace_call+0x46/0x70
[<ffffffff811d6eb1>] ? do_vfs_ioctl+0x21/0x5a0
[<ffffffff811d6f1c>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x8c/0x5a0
[<ffffffff811e3336>] ? __fget_light+0x86/0xb0
[<ffffffff811e3369>] ? __fdget+0x9/0x20
[<ffffffff811d7451>] ? SyS_ioctl+0x21/0x80
[<ffffffff811d7483>] SyS_ioctl+0x53/0x80
[<ffffffff81b1efd7>] entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x12/0x6f

This is because of unprotected use of rcu_dereference in
btrfs_scratch_superblocks. We can't add rcu locks around the whole
function because we read the superblock.

The fix will use the rcu string buffer directly without the rcu locking.
Thi is safe as the device will not go away in the meantime. We're
holding the device list mutexes.

Restructuring the code to narrow down the rcu section turned out to be
impossible, we need to call filp_open (through update_dev_time) on the
buffer and this could call kmalloc/__might_sleep. We could call kstrdup
with GFP_ATOMIC but it's not absolutely necessary.

Fixes: 12b1c263 (Btrfs: enhance btrfs_scratch_superblock to scratch all superblocks)
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We were using only 1 transaction unit when attempting to delete an unused
block group but in reality we need 3 + N units, where N corresponds to the
number of stripes. We were accounting only for the addition of the orphan
item (for the block group's free space cache inode) but we were not
accounting that we need to delete one block group item from the extent
tree, one free space item from the tree of tree roots and N device extent
items from the device tree.

While one unit is not enough, it worked most of the time because for each
single unit we are too pessimistic and assume an entire tree path, with
the highest possible heigth (8), needs to be COWed with eventual node
splits at every possible level in the tree, so there was usually enough
reserved space for removing all the items and adding the orphan item.

However after adding the orphan item, writepages() can by called by the VM
subsystem against the btree inode when we are under memory pressure, which
causes writeback to start for the nodes we COWed before, this forces the
operation to remove the free space item to COW again some (or all of) the
same nodes (in the tree of tree roots). Even without writepages() being
called, we could fail with ENOSPC because these items are located in
multiple trees and one of them might have a higher heigth and require
node/leaf splits at many levels, exhausting all the reserved space before
removing all the items and adding the orphan.

In the kernel 4.0 release, commit 3d84be79 ("Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in
btrfs_orphan_add() when delete unused block group"), we attempted to fix
a BUG_ON due to ENOSPC when trying to add the orphan item by making the
cleaner kthread reserve one transaction unit before attempting to remove
the block group, but this was not enough. We had a couple user reports
still hitting the same BUG_ON after 4.0, like Stefan Priebe's report on
a 4.2-rc6 kernel for example:

    http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg46070.html

So fix this by reserving all the necessary units of metadata.
Reported-by: NStefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Fixes: 3d84be79 ("Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_orphan_add() when delete unused block group")
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

It's possible to reach a state where the cleaner kthread isn't able to
start a transaction to delete an unused block group due to lack of enough
free metadata space and due to lack of unallocated device space to allocate
a new metadata block group as well. If this happens try to use space from
the global block group reserve just like we do for unlink operations, so
that we don't reach a permanent state where starting a transaction for
filesystem operations (file creation, renames, etc) keeps failing with
-ENOSPC. Such an unfortunate state was observed on a machine where over
a dozen unused data block groups existed and the cleaner kthread was
failing to delete them due to ENOSPC error when attempting to start a
transaction, and even running balance with a -dusage=0 filter failed with
ENOSPC as well. Also unmounting and mounting again the filesystem didn't
help. Allowing the cleaner kthread to use the global block reserve to
delete the unused data block groups fixed the problem.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Reproduce:
 (In integration-4.3 branch)

 TEST_DEV=(/dev/vdg /dev/vdh)
 TEST_DIR=/mnt/tmp

 umount "$TEST_DEV" >/dev/null
 mkfs.btrfs -f -d raid1 "${TEST_DEV[@]}"

 mount -o nospace_cache "$TEST_DEV" "$TEST_DIR"
 btrfs balance start -dusage=0 $TEST_DIR
 btrfs filesystem usage $TEST_DIR

 dd if=/dev/zero of="$TEST_DIR"/file count=100
 btrfs filesystem usage $TEST_DIR

Result:
 We can see "no data chunk" in first "btrfs filesystem usage":
 # btrfs filesystem usage $TEST_DIR
 Overall:
    ...
 Metadata,single: Size:8.00MiB, Used:0.00B
    /dev/vdg        8.00MiB
 Metadata,RAID1: Size:122.88MiB, Used:112.00KiB
    /dev/vdg      122.88MiB
    /dev/vdh      122.88MiB
 System,single: Size:4.00MiB, Used:0.00B
    /dev/vdg        4.00MiB
 System,RAID1: Size:8.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB
    /dev/vdg        8.00MiB
    /dev/vdh        8.00MiB
 Unallocated:
    /dev/vdg        1.06GiB
    /dev/vdh        1.07GiB

 And "data chunks changed from raid1 to single" in second
 "btrfs filesystem usage":
 # btrfs filesystem usage $TEST_DIR
 Overall:
    ...
 Data,single: Size:256.00MiB, Used:0.00B
    /dev/vdh      256.00MiB
 Metadata,single: Size:8.00MiB, Used:0.00B
    /dev/vdg        8.00MiB
 Metadata,RAID1: Size:122.88MiB, Used:112.00KiB
    /dev/vdg      122.88MiB
    /dev/vdh      122.88MiB
 System,single: Size:4.00MiB, Used:0.00B
    /dev/vdg        4.00MiB
 System,RAID1: Size:8.00MiB, Used:16.00KiB
    /dev/vdg        8.00MiB
    /dev/vdh        8.00MiB
 Unallocated:
    /dev/vdg        1.06GiB
    /dev/vdh      841.92MiB

Reason:
 btrfs balance delete last data chunk in case of no data in
 the filesystem, then we can see "no data chunk" by "fi usage"
 command.

 And when we do write operation to fs, the only available data
 profile is 0x0, result is all new chunks are allocated single type.

Fix:
 Allocate a data chunk explicitly to ensure we don't lose the
 raid profile for data.

Test:
 Test by above script, and confirmed the logic by debug output.
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd

__GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold
spinlocks or are in interrupts.  They are expected to be high priority and
have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred
to as the "atomic reserve".  __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first
lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve".

Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options
were available.  Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where
an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic
reserves.

This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic,
cannot sleep and have no alternative.  High priority users continue to use
__GFP_HIGH.  __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and
are willing to enter direct reclaim.  __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify
callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim.  __GFP_WAIT is
redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake
kswapd for background reclaim.

This patch then converts a number of sites

o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory
  pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag.

o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear
  __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall
  into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves
  are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress.

o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the
  helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because
  checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false
  positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent
  is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to
  flag manipulations.

o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL
  and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.

The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT
and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons.
In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH.

The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of
GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL.  They may
now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM.  It's almost certainly harmless
if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd.
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Similar to the 'limit' filter, we can enhance the 'usage' filter to
accept a range. The change is backward compatible, the range is applied
only in connection with the BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_USAGE_RANGE flag.

We don't have a usecase yet, the current syntax has been sufficient. The
enhancement should provide parity with other range-like filters.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Balance block groups which have the given number of stripes, defined by
a range min..max. This is useful to selectively rebalance only chunks
that do not span enough devices, applies to RAID0/10/5/6.
Signed-off-by: NGabríel Arthúr Pétursson <gabriel@system.is>
[ renamed bargs members, added to the UAPI, wrote the changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The 'limit' filter is underdesigned, it should have been a range for
[min,max], with some relaxed semantics when one of the bounds is
missing. Besides that, using a full u64 for a single value is a waste of
bytes.

Let's fix both by extending the use of the u64 bytes for the [min,max]
range. This can be done in a backward compatible way, the range will be
interpreted only if the appropriate flag is set
(BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_LIMIT_RANGE).
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

I want to set some per transaction flags, so instead of adding yet another int
lets just convert the current two int indicators to flags and add a flags field
for future use.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Improve readability by generalizing the profile validity checks.
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexandru Moise <00moses.alexander00@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs_raid_array[] is used to define all raid attributes, use it
to get tolerated_failures in btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(),
instead of complex condition in function.

It can make code simple and auto-support other possible raid-type in
future.
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This array is used to record attributes of each raid type,
make it public, and many functions will benifit with this array.

For example, num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures(), we can
avoid complex conditions in this function, and get raid attribute
simply by accessing above array.

It can also make code logic simple, reduce duplication code, and
increase maintainability.
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

There are atomic operations that imply the barrier for waitqueue_active
mixed in an if-condition.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Convert the simple cases, not all functions provide a way to reach the
fs_info. Also skipped debugging messages (print-tree, integrity
checker and pr_debug) and messages that are printed from possibly
unfinished mount.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
[reworded subject and changelog]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Originally the message was not in a helper but ended up there. We should
print error messages from callers instead.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
[reworded subject and changelog]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This patch updates and renames btrfs_scratch_superblocks, (which is used
by the replace device thread), with those fixes from the scratch
superblock code section of btrfs_rm_device(). The fixes are:
  Scratch all copies of superblock
  Notify kobject that superblock has been changed
  Update time on the device

So that btrfs_rm_device() can use the function
btrfs_scratch_superblocks() instead of its own scratch code. And further
replace deivce code which similarly releases device back to the system,
will have the fixes from the btrfs device delete.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
[renamed to btrfs_scratch_superblock]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Use btrfs specific error code BTRFS_ERROR_DEV_MISSING_NOT_FOUND instead
of -ENOENT.  Next this removes the logging when user specifies "missing"
and we don't find it in the kernel device list. Logging are for system
events not for user input errors.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing
and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together.
And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely
named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other
is to log the error, so don't closely name them.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

This will return EIO when __bread() fails to read SB,
instead of EINVAL.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

 num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in btrfs_balance

Code for updating fs_info->num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures in
btrfs_balance() lacks raid56 support.

Reason:
 Above code was wroten in 2012-08-01, together with
 btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()'s first version.

 Then, btrfs_calc_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures() got updated
 later to support raid56, but code in btrfs_balance() was not
 updated together.

Fix:
 Merge above similar code to a common function:
 btrfs_get_num_tolerated_disk_barrier_failures()
 and make it support both case.

 It can fix this bug with a bonus of cleanup, and make these code
 never in above no-sync state from now on.
Suggested-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

bio->bi_css and bio->bi_ioc don't exist when block cgroups are not on.
This adds an ifdef around them.  It's not perfect, but our
use of bi_ioc is being removed in the 4.3 merge window.

The bi_css usage really should go into bio_clone, but I want to make
sure that doesn't introduce problems for other bio_clone use cases.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

alloc_btrfs_bio relies on GFP_NOFS allocation when committing the
transaction but this allocation context is rather weak wrt. reclaim
capabilities. The page allocator currently tries hard to not fail these
allocations if they are small (<=PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER) but it can
still fail if the _current_ process is the OOM killer victim. Moreover
there is an attempt to move away from the default no-fail behavior and
allow these allocation to fail more eagerly. This would lead to:

[   37.928625] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:4045

which is clearly undesirable and the nofail behavior should be explicit
if the allocation failure cannot be tolerated.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Btrfs has been doing bio splitting from btrfs_map_bio(), by checking
device limits as well as calling ->merge_bvec_fn() etc. That is not
necessary any more, because generic_make_request() is now able to
handle arbitrarily sized bios. So clean up unnecessary code paths.

Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NKent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
[dpark: add more description in commit message]
Signed-off-by: NDongsu Park <dpark@posteo.net>
Signed-off-by: NMing Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

This attaches accounting information to bios as we submit them so the
new blkio controllers can throttle on btrfs filesystems.

Not much is required, we're just associating bios with blkcgs during clone,
calling wbc_init_bio()/wbc_account_io() during writepages submission,
and attaching the bios to the current context during direct IO.

Finally if we are splitting bios during btrfs_map_bio, this attaches
accounting information to the split.

The end result is able to throttle nicely on single disk filesystems.  A
little more work is required for multi-device filesystems.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Remove chunk_objectid argument from btrfs_relocate_chunk() because
it is not necessary, it can also cleanup some code in caller for
prepare its value.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

xfstests btrfs/070 sometimes failed.
In my test machine, its fail rate is about 30%.
In another vm(vmware), its fail rate is about 50%.

Reason:
  btrfs/070 do replace and defrag with fsstress simultaneously,
  after above operation, checksum error is found by scrub.

  Actually, it have no relationship with defrag operation, only
  replace with fsstress can trigger this bug.

  New data writen to target device have possibility rewrited by
  old data from source device by replace code in debug, to avoid
  above problem, we can set target block group to readonly in
  replace period, so new data requested by other operation will
  not write to same place with replace code.

  Before patch(4.1-rc3):
    30% failed in 100 xfstests.
  After patch:
    0% failed in 300 xfstests.

It also happened in btrfs/071 as it's another scrub with IO load tests.
Reported-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Since we now clean up block groups automatically as they become
empty, iterating over block groups is no longer sufficient to discard
unused space.

This patch iterates over the unused chunk space and discards any regions
that are unallocated, regardless of whether they were ever used.  This is
a change for btrfs but is consistent with other file systems.

We do this in a transactionless manner since the discard process can take
a substantial amount of time and a transaction would need to be started
before the acquisition of the device list lock.  That would mean a
transaction would be held open across /all/ of the discards collectively.
In order to prevent other threads from allocating or freeing chunks, we
hold the chunks lock across the search and discard calls.  We release it
between searches to allow the file system to perform more-or-less
normally.  Since the running transaction can commit and disappear while
we're using the transaction pointer, we take a reference to it and
release it after the search.  This is safe since it would happen normally
at the end of the transaction commit after any locks are released anyway.
We also take the commit_root_sem to protect against a transaction starting
and committing while we're running.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Currently we have two different ways to signal an I/O error on a BIO:

 (1) by clearing the BIO_UPTODATE flag
 (2) by returning a Linux errno value to the bi_end_io callback

The first one has the drawback of only communicating a single possible
error (-EIO), and the second one has the drawback of not beeing persistent
when bios are queued up, and are not passed along from child to parent
bio in the ever more popular chaining scenario.  Having both mechanisms
available has the additional drawback of utterly confusing driver authors
and introducing bugs where various I/O submitters only deal with one of
them, and the others have to add boilerplate code to deal with both kinds
of error returns.

So add a new bi_error field to store an errno value directly in struct
bio and remove the existing mechanisms to clean all this up.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NHannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>

We have a race between deleting an unused block group and balancing the
same block group that leads to an assertion failure/BUG(), producing the
following trace:

[181631.208236] BTRFS: assertion failed: 0, file: fs/btrfs/volumes.c, line: 2622
[181631.220591] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[181631.222959] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:4062!
[181631.223932] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[181631.224566] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse acpi_cpufreq parpor$
[181631.224566] CPU: 8 PID: 17451 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W       4.1.0-rc5-btrfs-next-10+ #1
[181631.224566] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[181631.224566] task: ffff880127e09590 ti: ffff8800b5824000 task.ti: ffff8800b5824000
[181631.224566] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa03f19f6>]  [<ffffffffa03f19f6>] assfail.constprop.50+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs]
[181631.224566] RSP: 0018:ffff8800b5827ae8  EFLAGS: 00010246
[181631.224566] RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffff8800109fc218 RCX: ffffffff81095dce
[181631.224566] RDX: 0000000000005124 RSI: ffffffff81464819 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[181631.224566] RBP: ffff8800b5827ae8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[181631.224566] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800109fc200
[181631.224566] R13: ffff880020095000 R14: ffff8800b1a13f38 R15: ffff880020095000
[181631.224566] FS:  00007f70ca0b0c80(0000) GS:ffff88013ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[181631.224566] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[181631.224566] CR2: 00007f2872ab6e68 CR3: 00000000a717c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[181631.224566] Stack:
[181631.224566]  ffff8800b5827ba8 ffffffffa03f3916 ffff8800b5827b38 ffffffffa03d080e
[181631.224566]  ffffffffa03d1423 ffff880020095000 ffff88001233c000 0000000000000001
[181631.224566]  ffff880020095000 ffff8800b1a13f38 0000000a69c00000 0000000000000000
[181631.224566] Call Trace:
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa03f3916>] btrfs_remove_chunk+0xa4/0x6bb [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa03d080e>] ? join_transaction.isra.8+0xb9/0x3ba [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa03d1423>] ? wait_current_trans.isra.13+0x22/0xfc [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa03f3fbc>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.29+0x8f/0xa7 [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa03f54df>] btrfs_balance+0xaa4/0xc52 [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa03fd388>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x23f/0x2b0 [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff810872f9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa04019a3>] btrfs_ioctl+0xfe2/0x2220 [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff812603ed>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff81084669>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff81138def>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x834/0xcd2
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff81138def>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x834/0xcd2
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff8103e48c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x211/0x424
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff811755e6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x3c6/0x479
(...)

The sequence of steps leading to this are:

           CPU 0                                         CPU 1

  btrfs_balance()
    btrfs_relocate_chunk()

      btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X)
        btrfs_lookup_block_group(bg X)

                                               cleaner_kthread
                                                  locks fs_info->cleaner_mutex

                                                  btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
                                                    finds bg X, which became
                                                    unused in the previous
                                                    transaction

                                                    checks bg X ->ro == 0,
                                                    so it proceeds
        sets bg X ->ro to 1
        (btrfs_set_block_group_ro(bg X))

        blocks on fs_info->cleaner_mutex
                                                    btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)
                                                  unlocks fs_info->cleaner_mutex

        acquires fs_info->cleaner_mutex
        relocate_block_group()
          --> does nothing, no extents found in
              the extent tree from bg X
        unlocks fs_info->cleaner_mutex

      btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X) returns

    btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)
       extent map not found
          --> ASSERT(0)

Fix this by using a new mutex to make sure these 2 operations, block
group relocation and removal, are serialized.

This issue is reproducible by running fstests generic/038 (which stresses
chunk allocation and automatic removal of unused block groups) together
with the following balance loop:

    while true; do btrfs balance start -dusage=0 <mountpoint> ; done
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>