Add support for SnJ devices with Jf and a workaround for some cases
where the devices erroneously show as QnJ devices.
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.ae6ed654e557.Ic11ed4df410328359b6a2c997456692901d99468@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We were hardcoding the SnJ and So IDs already at the trans_cfg
selection, instead of doing it in a more generic way.  Use the generic
trans_cfg selection for these devices and move the hardcoded IDs to
the new table.
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.7e11dcb7b04e.I6f65126175d54b73834c2896013d00ce114ff601@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The "supp" variable doesn't need to be unsigned long, only
"tmp" is used with for_each_set_bit(). "supp" should just
be a u16, since that's how it's sent to the firmware.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.762e50704a39.I014bc7898f90c734f8e9be2a3efaf9bf8b7db6db@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

In struct iwl_tx_cmd, there's no risk (as Arnd implied) that we
might access this as an array, as it's really not an array and
cannot be - there's only a single 802.11 header per frame. The
only reason for this member is for being able to access it a
bit more nicely.

On the other hand, this structure is used as a sub-struct in a
few places, and then some compilers (e.g. clang with certain
options) complain as you shouldn't have structs with variable-
length fields embedded in other structs.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.46cd538c90bf.I92179567d96938598806b560be59d787c2a8cc16@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Start supporting API version 60 for AX devices.
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.7b908f5dd970.Id2aec0d7d33921aba77ba9853196f81d5950c31c@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

If the firmware has support, then advertise it to the stack and
send the key down. Since we re-check the protection in the host
anyway, we don't really need to do anything on RX except that we
should drop frames that the firmware _knows_ are replay errors,
since beacon filtering might otherwise result in replays being
possible.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210205110447.f5a3d53301b3.I23e84c9bb0b039d9106a07e9d6847776757f9029@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

On devices starting from 9000 series, always allow maximum A-MSDU
sizes regardless of the amsdu_size module parameter, which really
hasn't meant that for a long time but just controls the receive
buffer size.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.ebf6efb380a9.I237be6ec70bee6ec52a2f379ee1f15b1196488d0@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

When we check the length, we only check that the advertised
data length fits into the data we have, but currently not
that it actually matches correctly.

This should be harmless, but if the first two bytes are zero,
then the iwl_rx_packet_payload_len() ends up negative, and
that might later cause issues if unsigned variables are used,
as this is not something that's normally expected.

Change the validation here to precisely validate the lengths
match, to avoid such issues.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.5184dfc2a445.I0631d2e4f6ffb93cf06618edb035c45bd6d1d7b9@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

There's no need to double this code, just put it into the common
code that's called in all the cases.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.1f75d426ebe4.I58f6612f7e168c655bdef206a53e5bc117c84cf5@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Handling host commands in a sync way is not directly related to PCIe
transport, and can serve as common logic for any transport, so move
it to trans layer.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.fde99af4e0f7.I4cab95919eb35cc5bfb26d32dcf5e15419d0e0ef@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

In roaming flows and during reassociation, its possible that data frames
such as EAPOLs for 4 way handshake/ 802.1x authentication are initially set
to higher MCS rate. Though these are pruned down to a lower legacy rate
before sending to the FW, driver also emits a kernel warning - intended for
non-data frames. Add checks to avoid such warnings for data frames, while
also enhancing the debug data printed.
Signed-off-by: NKrishnanand Prabhu <krishnanand.prabhu@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.d9ded010c4ce.Ie1d5a33d7175c0bcb35c10b5729748646671da31@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Add debugfs file to print the PHY integration version.
File name is: phy_integration_ver
Signed-off-by: NDror Moshe <drorx.moshe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.f5127d919656.Ib714f444390b39cbbf7eb143c5440cc890385981@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Parse phy integration string from FW TLV.
Signed-off-by: NDror Moshe <drorx.moshe@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.0c790e930484.I23ef2cb9c871e6adc4aab6be378f3811cb531155@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

While disconnecting from the AP due to bad channel switch
params (e.g. too long Tx block), do not send the firmware
'CSA abort' before disconnecting. That causes canceling the
immediate quiet and can cause transmitting data before the
disconnection happens.
Signed-off-by: NShaul Triebitz <shaul.triebitz@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.b9af359a675f.I996fc7eb3d94e9539f8b117017c428448c42c7ad@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

D3_CONFIG_CMD and D0I3_END_CMD should be the last\first
command upon suspend\resume correspondingly, otherwise,
FW will raise an assert (0x342).

There are firmware notifications that cause the driver to
send a command back to the firmware. If such a notification
is sent to the driver while the the driver prepares the
firmware for D3, operation, what is likely to happen is that
the handling of the notification will try to get the mutex
and will wait unil the driver finished configuring the
firmware for D3. Then the handling notification will get
the mutex and handle the notification which will lead to
the aforementioned ASSERT 342.

To avoid this, we need to prevent any command to be sent to
the firmware between the D3_CONFIG_CMD and the D0I3_END_CMD.
Check this in the utility layer that sends the host commands
and in the transport layer as well.
Flag the D3_CONFIG_CMD and the D0I3_END_CMD commands as
commands that must be sent even if the firmware has already
been configured for D3 operation.
Signed-off-by: NHaim Dreyfuss <haim.dreyfuss@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117164916.1935a993b471.I3192c93c030576ca16773c01b009c4d93610d6ea@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

When we want to stop TX'ing because we are suspending, we
have two options: either we check system_pm_mode or we
check the mvm's status that has a bit for the suspend
flow.
The latter is better because test_bit is atomic. Also
add a call to synchronize_net after we set the bit to
make sure that all the new Tx see the bit before we
actually complete the suspend flow.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.243c88781302.I5c0379c5a7e5d49410569e7fcd2fff7a419c6dea@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Those were needed for a slave bus that is not longer supported.
Remove code that is mainly useless stubs.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.8f8a735f39dd.If5716eaae0df5e6295a2af927bf3ab0ee074f0a0@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We skip index 0 that holds CSS section which isn't relevant for paged
memory.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.ad2df68fccbc.I381f931c6e7606c21935ec6667619b209224e408@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The code is not directly related to PCIe transport, and it will help
moving sync/async commands logic out of PCIe in the next patches.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.271f59887fd1.I8ff41236f4e11a25df83d76c982a2a30ba2b9903@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Instead of pretending to have NAPI and then relying entirely on
interrupts anyway, properly implement NAPI and schedule the poll
when we get an interrupt, re-enabling the interrupt only after
the poll completed.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.a5951ac4fc06.I9c84a147288fcfb1b019572c6758f2d92949f5d7@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

In the new api all the flush in the FW is done before we
get the response and in the response we only get the updated
read pointer and all queued packets don't get anymore rx_tx
per packet to free the queued packet, so driver needs to free
all queued packets on flushed queue at once after flush response.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4bd0eca8c0ef.I1601aad2eb2cc83f6f73b8ca52be57bb9fd626ab@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

If there are frequent CCA delays due to the extension channel
as detected by the firmware, and we're on 2.4 GHz, then handle
this by disconnecting (with a reconnect hint).

When we disconnect, we'll also update our capabilities to use
only 20 MHz on the next connection (if it's on 2.4 GHz) as to
avoid the use of the extension channel that has too much noise.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4de9c363b0b5.I709b7e6f73a7537c53f22d7418927691259de8a8@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

When restarting firmware with an ongoing scheduled scan, we
don't (and shouldn't) mark it as aborted as mac80211 will be
restarting it, and so no event should go out to userspace.
The appropriate comment regarding this wasn't moved to this
place, so add it.

However, we _do_ need to clean up our internal state, since
mac80211 will restart the scan, and we'll otherwise get to
the WARN_ON() a few lines below for no reason whatsoever.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4ddc9b017268.Ie869b628ae56a5d776eba0e7b7f05f42fc566f2e@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

For testing features where the firmware may send some
notifications it can often be a lot easier to do that
from a test script. Remove most injection limitations
from debugfs to be able to do this.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.9aff3c6b4607.I03b0ae7df094734451445ffcb7f9f0274969f1c0@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Some notifications aren't handled by the general RX handler
code, due to multi-queue. Add size checks for them explicitly.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.1370c776cb31.Ic536bd1aee5368969fbf65db85b9b9b5dc9c6034@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We shouldn't trust the firmware with the sizes (or contents)
of notifications, accessing too much data could cause page
faults if the data doesn't fit into the allocated space. This
applies more on older NICs where multiple notifications can
be in a single RX buffer.

Add a general framework for checking a minimum size of any
notification in the RX handlers and use it for most. Some RX
handlers were already checking and I've moved the checks,
some more complex checks I left and made them _NO_SIZE for
the RX handlers.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.3e155d5e5f90.I2121fa4ac7cd7eb98970d84b793796646afa3eed@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'rev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'func' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'args' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'rev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'func' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-17-lee.jones@linaro.org

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/dbg.c:1932: warning: Function parameter or member 'reg_data' not described in 'iwl_dump_ini_mem'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/dbg.c:1932: warning: Excess function parameter 'reg' description in 'iwl_dump_ini_mem'

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-15-lee.jones@linaro.org

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-phy-db.c:97: warning: Function parameter or member 'trans' not described in 'iwl_phy_db'

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-14-lee.jones@linaro.org

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-parse.c:340: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct iwl_eeprom_enhanced_txpwr '

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-9-lee.jones@linaro.org

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'trans' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'eeprom' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'eeprom_size' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-8-lee.jones@linaro.org

Also add documentation for 'mvm'.

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:400: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'const u16 expected_tpt_legacy[IWL_RATE_COUNT] = '
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'tbl' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'scale_index' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'attempts' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'successes' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'window' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2677: warning: duplicate section name 'NOTE'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'sta' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'lq_sta' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'band' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:3761: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'rs_program_fix_rate'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:3761: warning: Function parameter or member 'lq_sta' not described in 'rs_program_fix_rate'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:4213: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'iwl_mvm_tx_protection'

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-3-lee.jones@linaro.org

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a
warning by replacing a /* fall through */ comment with the new
pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.

Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as
implicit fall-through markings.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/edd98d194bfc98b4be93a9bdc303630b719c0e66.1605896060.git.gustavoars@kernel.org

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly using the fallthrough pseudo-keyword as a
replacement for a number of "fall through" markings.

Notice that Clang doesn't recognize "fall through" comments as
implicit fall-through.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117155904.GA14551@embeddedor

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly using the fallthrough pseudo-keyword as a
replacement for a number of "fall through" markings.

Notice that Clang doesn't recognize "fall through" comments as
implicit fall-through.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117135053.GA13248@embeddedor

When waiting for a notification and then processing it,
we also need to check the size of the data before we use
it. Most places do that already, but fix the remaining
ones to do it as well.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.b29573bcba39.I4b7e72824d06dc0719a40021d933e29edfc14713@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

When the firmware is loaded, its internal timer (GP2) is
reset and all the time_sync in the BSS table is now
unusable. Ask cfg80211 to purge the BSS table.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.1b703b6f4c05.I0b5c51aa87e86c964e2eae6d959a96e232840ef5@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

FW now puts in the struct version, the TLV version so we also check
it to make sure it matches.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.bc1dfb56ffbd.I99d8085cccc8687805781ccc43e189dbcef0e63b@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The range response notification has several versions. Check the
notification size according to the expected notification version.
Notifications with incorrect size will be ignored.
Signed-off-by: NAvraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.ee57c3214d05.I810d7de33fb08001ef1a2e24714d5b68932e088e@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The RX handlers for probe response data and channel switch weren't
hooked up properly, fix that.

Fixes: 86e177d8 ("iwlwifi: mvm: add NOA and CSA to a probe response")
Fixes: d3a108a4 ("iwlwifi: mvm: Support CSA countdown offloading")
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.2d07dcee0d35.I07a61b5d734478db57d9434ff303e4c90bf6c32b@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>