1. 01 8月, 2011 1 次提交
  2. 23 7月, 2011 1 次提交
  3. 27 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  4. 25 5月, 2011 1 次提交
  5. 26 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  6. 23 3月, 2011 2 次提交
  7. 12 1月, 2011 4 次提交
  8. 29 10月, 2010 2 次提交
  9. 11 8月, 2010 7 次提交
  10. 08 3月, 2010 2 次提交
  11. 03 3月, 2010 4 次提交
  12. 17 12月, 2009 2 次提交
  13. 14 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  14. 22 9月, 2009 3 次提交
  15. 17 9月, 2009 4 次提交
  16. 15 6月, 2009 3 次提交
  17. 31 3月, 2009 1 次提交
    • D
      regulator: twl4030 regulators · fa16a5c1
      David Brownell 提交于
      Support most of the LDO regulators in the twl4030 family chips.
      In the case of LDOs supporting MMC/SD, the voltage controls are
      used; but in most other cases, the regulator framework is only
      used to enable/disable a supplies, conserving power when a given
      voltage rail is not needed.
      
      The drivers/mfd/twl4030-core.c code already sets up the various
      regulators according to board-specific configuration, and knows
      that some chips don't provide the full set of voltage rails.
      
      The omitted regulators are intended to be under hardware control,
      such as during the hardware-mediated system powerup, powerdown,
      and suspend states.  Unless/until software hooks are known to
      be safe, they won't be exported here.
      
      These regulators implement the new get_status() operation, but
      can't realistically implement get_mode(); the status output is
      effectively the result of a vote, with the relevant hardware
      inputs not exposed.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net>
      Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLiam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
      fa16a5c1