1. 14 7月, 2012 4 次提交
  2. 01 6月, 2012 5 次提交
  3. 30 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  4. 16 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 06 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 29 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 21 3月, 2012 6 次提交
  8. 20 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  9. 04 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  10. 11 1月, 2012 4 次提交
    • F
      reiserfs: don't lock root inode searching · 9b467e6e
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      Nothing requires that we lock the filesystem until the root inode is
      provided.
      
      Also iget5_locked() triggers a warning because we are holding the
      filesystem lock while allocating the inode, which result in a lockdep
      suspicion that we have a lock inversion against the reclaim path:
      
      [ 1986.896979] =================================
      [ 1986.896990] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
      [ 1986.896997] 3.1.1-main #8
      [ 1986.897001] ---------------------------------
      [ 1986.897007] inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
      [ 1986.897016] kswapd0/16 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
      [ 1986.897023]  (&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock){+.+.?.}, at: [<c01f8bd4>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
      [ 1986.897044] {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at:
      [ 1986.897050]   [<c014a5b9>] mark_held_locks+0xae/0xd0
      [ 1986.897060]   [<c014aab3>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0x7d/0x91
      [ 1986.897068]   [<c0190ee0>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x1a/0x93
      [ 1986.897078]   [<c01e7728>] reiserfs_alloc_inode+0x13/0x3d
      [ 1986.897088]   [<c01a5b06>] alloc_inode+0x14/0x5f
      [ 1986.897097]   [<c01a5cb9>] iget5_locked+0x62/0x13a
      [ 1986.897106]   [<c01e99e0>] reiserfs_fill_super+0x410/0x8b9
      [ 1986.897114]   [<c01953da>] mount_bdev+0x10b/0x159
      [ 1986.897123]   [<c01e764d>] get_super_block+0x10/0x12
      [ 1986.897131]   [<c0195b38>] mount_fs+0x59/0x12d
      [ 1986.897138]   [<c01a80d1>] vfs_kern_mount+0x45/0x7a
      [ 1986.897147]   [<c01a83e3>] do_kern_mount+0x2f/0xb0
      [ 1986.897155]   [<c01a987a>] do_mount+0x5c2/0x612
      [ 1986.897163]   [<c01a9a72>] sys_mount+0x61/0x8f
      [ 1986.897170]   [<c044060c>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x32
      [ 1986.897181] irq event stamp: 7509691
      [ 1986.897186] hardirqs last  enabled at (7509691): [<c0190f34>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x6e/0x93
      [ 1986.897197] hardirqs last disabled at (7509690): [<c0190eea>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x24/0x93
      [ 1986.897209] softirqs last  enabled at (7508896): [<c01294bd>] __do_softirq+0xee/0xfd
      [ 1986.897222] softirqs last disabled at (7508859): [<c01030ed>] do_softirq+0x50/0x9d
      [ 1986.897234]
      [ 1986.897235] other info that might help us debug this:
      [ 1986.897242]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
      [ 1986.897244]
      [ 1986.897250]        CPU0
      [ 1986.897254]        ----
      [ 1986.897257]   lock(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock);
      [ 1986.897265] <Interrupt>
      [ 1986.897269]     lock(&REISERFS_SB(s)->lock);
      [ 1986.897276]
      [ 1986.897277]  *** DEADLOCK ***
      [ 1986.897278]
      [ 1986.897286] no locks held by kswapd0/16.
      [ 1986.897291]
      [ 1986.897292] stack backtrace:
      [ 1986.897299] Pid: 16, comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 3.1.1-main #8
      [ 1986.897306] Call Trace:
      [ 1986.897314]  [<c0439e76>] ? printk+0xf/0x11
      [ 1986.897324]  [<c01482d1>] print_usage_bug+0x20e/0x21a
      [ 1986.897332]  [<c01479b8>] ? print_irq_inversion_bug+0x172/0x172
      [ 1986.897341]  [<c014855c>] mark_lock+0x27f/0x483
      [ 1986.897349]  [<c0148d88>] __lock_acquire+0x628/0x1472
      [ 1986.897358]  [<c0149fae>] lock_acquire+0x47/0x5e
      [ 1986.897366]  [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
      [ 1986.897384]  [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
      [ 1986.897397]  [<c043b5ef>] mutex_lock_nested+0x35/0x26f
      [ 1986.897409]  [<c01f8bd4>] ? reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
      [ 1986.897421]  [<c01f8bd4>] reiserfs_write_lock+0x20/0x2a
      [ 1986.897433]  [<c01e2edd>] map_block_for_writepage+0xc9/0x590
      [ 1986.897448]  [<c01b1706>] ? create_empty_buffers+0x33/0x8f
      [ 1986.897461]  [<c0121124>] ? get_parent_ip+0xb/0x31
      [ 1986.897472]  [<c043ef7f>] ? sub_preempt_count+0x81/0x8e
      [ 1986.897485]  [<c043cae0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3d
      [ 1986.897496]  [<c0121124>] ? get_parent_ip+0xb/0x31
      [ 1986.897508]  [<c01e355d>] reiserfs_writepage+0x1b9/0x3e7
      [ 1986.897521]  [<c0173b40>] ? clear_page_dirty_for_io+0xcb/0xde
      [ 1986.897533]  [<c014a6e3>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x108/0x138
      [ 1986.897546]  [<c014a71e>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
      [ 1986.897559]  [<c0177b38>] shrink_page_list+0x34f/0x5e2
      [ 1986.897572]  [<c01780a7>] shrink_inactive_list+0x172/0x22c
      [ 1986.897585]  [<c0178464>] shrink_zone+0x303/0x3b1
      [ 1986.897597]  [<c043cae0>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x27/0x3d
      [ 1986.897611]  [<c01788c9>] kswapd+0x3b7/0x5f2
      
      The deadlock shouldn't happen since we are doing that allocation in the
      mount path, the filesystem is not available for any reclaim.  Still the
      warning is annoying.
      
      To solve this, acquire the lock later only where we need it, right before
      calling reiserfs_read_locked_inode() that wants to lock to walk the tree.
      Reported-by: NKnut Petersen <Knut_Petersen@t-online.de>
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9b467e6e
    • F
      reiserfs: don't lock journal_init() · 37c69b98
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      journal_init() doesn't need the lock since no operation on the filesystem
      is involved there.  journal_read() and get_list_bitmap() have yet to be
      reviewed carefully though before removing the lock there.  Just keep the
      it around these two calls for safety.
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      37c69b98
    • F
      reiserfs: delay reiserfs lock until journal initialization · f32485be
      Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
      In the mount path, transactions that are made before journal
      initialization don't involve the filesystem.  We can delay the reiserfs
      lock until we play with the journal.
      Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
      Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Cc: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f32485be
    • D
      reiserfs: delete comments referring to the BKL · b18c1c6e
      Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dave@gnu.org>
      Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b18c1c6e
  11. 09 1月, 2012 2 次提交
    • J
      reiserfs: Force inode evictions before umount to avoid crash · a9e36da6
      Jeff Mahoney 提交于
      This patch fixes a crash in reiserfs_delete_xattrs during umount.
      
      When shrink_dcache_for_umount clears the dcache from
      generic_shutdown_super, delayed evictions are forced to disk. If an
      evicted inode has extended attributes associated with it, it will
      need to walk the xattr tree to locate and remove them.
      
      But since shrink_dcache_for_umount will BUG if it encounters active
      dentries, the xattr tree must be released before it's called or it will
      crash during every umount.
      
      This patch forces the evictions to occur before generic_shutdown_super
      by calling shrink_dcache_sb first. The additional evictions caused
      by the removal of each associated xattr file and dir will be automatically
      handled as they're added to the LRU list.
      
      CC: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
      CC: stable@kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      a9e36da6
    • J
      reiserfs: Fix quota mount option parsing · a06d789b
      Jan Kara 提交于
      When jqfmt mount option is not specified on remount, we mistakenly clear
      s_jquota_fmt value stored in superblock. Fix the problem.
      
      CC: stable@kernel.org
      CC: reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
      a06d789b
  12. 07 1月, 2012 2 次提交
  13. 04 1月, 2012 7 次提交
  14. 02 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  15. 15 9月, 2011 1 次提交
  16. 01 8月, 2011 1 次提交