1. 08 5月, 2007 10 次提交
  2. 26 4月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 28 3月, 2007 1 次提交
    • J
      [PATCH] uml: use correct register file size everywhere · b92c4f92
      Jeff Dike 提交于
      This patch uses MAX_REG_NR consistently to refer to the register file size.
       FRAME_SIZE isn't sufficient because on x86_64, it is smaller than the
      ptrace register file size.  MAX_REG_NR was introduced as a consistent way
      to get the number of registers, but wasn't used everywhere it should be.
      
      When this causes a problem, it makes PTRACE_SETREGS fail on x86_64 because
      of a corrupted segment register value in the known-good register file.  The
      patch also adds a register dump at that point in case there are any future
      problems here.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
      Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b92c4f92
  4. 08 3月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 07 3月, 2007 2 次提交
  6. 02 3月, 2007 2 次提交
  7. 17 2月, 2007 1 次提交
    • J
      [PATCH] uml: fix 2.6.20 hang · 838e56a1
      Jeff Dike 提交于
      A previous cleanup misused need_poll, which had a fairly broken interface.
      It implemented a growable array, changing the used elements count itself,
      but leaving it up to the caller to fill in the actual elements, including
      the entire array if the array had to be reallocated.  This worked because
      the previous users were switching between two such structures, and the
      elements were copied from the inactive array to the active array after
      making sure the active array had enough room.
      
      maybe_sigio_broken was made to use need_poll, but it was operating on a
      single array, so when the buffer was reallocated, the previous contents
      were lost.
      
      This patch makes need_poll implement more sane semantics.  It merely
      assures that the array is of the proper size and that the contents are
      preserved.  It is up to the caller to adjust the used elements count and to
      ensure that the proper elements are resent.
      
      This manifested itself as a hang in 2.6.20 as the uninitialized buffer
      convinced UML that one of its own file descriptors didn't support SIGIO and
      needed to be watched by poll in a separate thread.  The result was an
      interrupt flood as control traffic over this descriptor sparked interrupts,
      which resulted in more control traffic, ad nauseum.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
      Cc: <stable@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      838e56a1
  8. 12 2月, 2007 12 次提交
  9. 08 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 26 11月, 2006 1 次提交
    • P
      [PATCH] uml: make execvp safe for our usage · 5d48545e
      Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso 提交于
      Reimplement execvp for our purposes - after we call fork() it is fundamentally
      unsafe to use the kernel allocator - current is not valid there.  So we simply
      pass to our modified execvp() a preallocated buffer.  This fixes a real bug
      and works very well in testing (I've seen indirectly warning messages from the
      forked thread - they went on the pipe connected to its stdout and where read
      as a number by UML, when calling read_output().  I verified the obtained
      number corresponded to "BUG:").
      
      The added use of __cant_sleep() is not a new bug since __cant_sleep() is
      already used in the same function - passing an atomicity parameter would be
      better but it would require huge change, stating that this function must not
      be called in atomic context and can sleep is a better idea (will make sure of
      this gradually).
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      Acked-by: NJeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      5d48545e
  11. 04 11月, 2006 2 次提交
    • J
      [PATCH] uml: include tidying · 1f6f6164
      Jeff Dike 提交于
      In order to get the __NR_* constants, we need sys/syscall.h.
      linux/unistd.h works as well since it includes syscall.h, however syscall.h
      is more parsimonious.  We were inconsistent in this, and this patch adds
      syscall.h includes where necessary and removes linux/unistd.h includes
      where they are not needed.
      
      asm/unistd.h also includes the __NR_* constants, but these are not the
      glibc-sanctioned ones, so this also removes one such inclusion.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
      Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      1f6f6164
    • J
      [PATCH] uml: fix I/O hang · 53b17332
      Jeff Dike 提交于
      Fix a UML hang in which everything would just stop until some I/O happened
      - a ping, someone whacking the keyboard - at which point everything would
      start up again as though nothing had happened.
      
      The cause was gcc reordering some code which absolutely needed to be
      executed in the order in the source.  When unblock_signals switches signals
      from off to on, it needs to see if any interrupts had happened in the
      critical section.  The interrupt handlers check signals_enabled - if it is
      zero, then the handler adds a bit to the "pending" bitmask and returns.
      unblock_signals checks this mask to see if any signals need to be
      delivered.
      
      The crucial part is this:
      	signals_enabled = 1;
      	save_pending = pending;
      	if(save_pending == 0)
      		return;
      	pending = 0;
      
      In order to avoid an interrupt arriving between reading pending and setting
      it to zero, in which case, the record of the interrupt would be erased,
      signals are enabled.
      
      What happened was that gcc reordered this so that 'save_pending = pending'
      came before 'signals_enabled = 1', creating a one-instruction window within
      which an interrupt could arrive, set its bit in pending, and have it be
      immediately erased.
      
      When the I/O workload is purely disk-based, the loss of a block device
      interrupt stops the entire I/O system because the next block request will
      wait for the current one to finish.  Thus the system hangs until something
      else causes some I/O to arrive, such as a network packet or console input.
      
      The fix to this particular problem is a memory barrier between enabling
      signals and reading the pending signal mask.  An xchg would also probably
      work.
      
      Looking over this code for similar problems led me to do a few more
      things:
      
      - make signals_enabled and pending volatile so that they don't get cached
        in registers
      
      - add an mb() to the return paths of block_signals and unblock_signals so
        that the modification of signals_enabled doesn't get shuffled into the
        caller in the event that these are inlined in the future.
      Signed-off-by: NJeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
      Cc: Paolo 'Blaisorblade' Giarrusso <blaisorblade@yahoo.it>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      53b17332
  12. 31 10月, 2006 1 次提交
  13. 21 10月, 2006 4 次提交
  14. 12 10月, 2006 1 次提交