Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 11 5月, 2020 4 次提交
  3. 28 4月, 2020 1 次提交
    • A
      Bluetooth: Adding driver and quirk defs for multi-role LE · 22091585
      由 Alain Michaud 提交于 
      This change adds the relevant driver and quirk to allow drivers to
report the le_states as being trustworthy.

This has historically been disabled as controllers did not reliably
support this. In particular, this will be used to relax this condition
for controllers that have been well tested and reliable.

	/* Most controller will fail if we try to create new connections
	 * while we have an existing one in slave role.
	 */
	if (hdev->conn_hash.le_num_slave > 0)
		return NULL;
Signed-off-by: NAlain Michaud <alainm@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NMarcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
      22091585
  5. 22 4月, 2020 5 次提交
  7. 21 4月, 2020 2 次提交
  9. 19 4月, 2020 1 次提交
  11. 16 4月, 2020 1 次提交
    • V
      net: mscc: ocelot: fix untagged packet drops when enslaving to vlan aware bridge · 87b0f983
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      To rehash a previous explanation given in commit 1c44ce56 ("net:
mscc: ocelot: fix vlan_filtering when enslaving to bridge before link is
up"), the switch driver operates the in a mode where a single VLAN can
be transmitted as untagged on a particular egress port. That is the
"native VLAN on trunk port" use case.

The configuration for this native VLAN is driven in 2 ways:
 - Set the egress port rewriter to strip the VLAN tag for the native
   VID (as it is egress-untagged, after all).
 - Configure the ingress port to drop untagged and priority-tagged
   traffic, if there is no native VLAN. The intention of this setting is
   that a trunk port with no native VLAN should not accept untagged
   traffic.

Since both of the above configurations for the native VLAN should only
be done if VLAN awareness is requested, they are actually done from the
ocelot_port_vlan_filtering function, after the basic procedure of
toggling the VLAN awareness flag of the port.

But there's a problem with that simplistic approach: we are trying to
juggle with 2 independent variables from a single function:
 - Native VLAN of the port - its value is held in port->vid.
 - VLAN awareness state of the port - currently there are some issues
   here, more on that later*.
The actual problem can be seen when enslaving the switch ports to a VLAN
filtering bridge:
 0. The driver configures a pvid of zero for each port, when in
    standalone mode. While the bridge configures a default_pvid of 1 for
    each port that gets added as a slave to it.
 1. The bridge calls ocelot_port_vlan_filtering with vlan_aware=true.
    The VLAN-filtering-dependent portion of the native VLAN
    configuration is done, considering that the native VLAN is 0.
 2. The bridge calls ocelot_vlan_add with vid=1, pvid=true,
    untagged=true. The native VLAN changes to 1 (change which gets
    propagated to hardware).
 3. ??? - nobody calls ocelot_port_vlan_filtering again, to reapply the
    VLAN-filtering-dependent portion of the native VLAN configuration,
    for the new native VLAN of 1. One can notice that after toggling "ip
    link set dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 0 && ip link set dev br0
    type bridge vlan_filtering 1", the new native VLAN finally makes it
    through and untagged traffic finally starts flowing again. But
    obviously that shouldn't be needed.

So it is clear that 2 independent variables need to both re-trigger the
native VLAN configuration. So we introduce the second variable as
ocelot_port->vlan_aware.

*Actually both the DSA Felix driver and the Ocelot driver already had
each its own variable:
 - Ocelot: ocelot_port_private->vlan_aware
 - Felix: dsa_port->vlan_filtering
but the common Ocelot library needs to work with a single, common,
variable, so there is some refactoring done to move the vlan_aware
property from the private structure into the common ocelot_port
structure.

Fixes: 97bb69e1 ("net: mscc: ocelot: break apart ocelot_vlan_port_apply")
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NHoratiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      87b0f983
  13. 15 4月, 2020 3 次提交
  15. 14 4月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 12 4月, 2020 1 次提交
  19. 11 4月, 2020 13 次提交
  21. 10 4月, 2020 1 次提交
    • E
      proc: Use a dedicated lock in struct pid · 63f818f4
      由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于 
      syzbot wrote:
> ========================================================
> WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
> 5.6.0-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> --------------------------------------------------------
> swapper/1/0 just changed the state of lock:
> ffffffff898090d8 (tasklist_lock){.+.?}-{2:2}, at: send_sigurg+0x9f/0x320 fs/fcntl.c:840
> but this lock took another, SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
>  (&pid->wait_pidfd){+.+.}-{2:2}
>
>
> and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
>
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
>  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
>
>        CPU0                    CPU1
>        ----                    ----
>   lock(&pid->wait_pidfd);
>                                local_irq_disable();
>                                lock(tasklist_lock);
>                                lock(&pid->wait_pidfd);
>   <Interrupt>
>     lock(tasklist_lock);
>
>  *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> 4 locks held by swapper/1/0:

The problem is that because wait_pidfd.lock is taken under the tasklist
lock.  It must always be taken with irqs disabled as tasklist_lock can be
taken from interrupt context and if wait_pidfd.lock was already taken this
would create a lock order inversion.

Oleg suggested just disabling irqs where I have added extra calls to
wait_pidfd.lock.  That should be safe and I think the code will eventually
do that.  It was rightly pointed out by Christian that sharing the
wait_pidfd.lock was a premature optimization.

It is also true that my pre-merge window testing was insufficient.  So
remove the premature optimization and give struct pid a dedicated lock of
it's own for struct pid things.  I have verified that lockdep sees all 3
paths where we take the new pid->lock and lockdep does not complain.

It is my current day dream that one day pid->lock can be used to guard the
task lists as well and then the tasklist_lock won't need to be held to
deliver signals.  That will require taking pid->lock with irqs disabled.
Acked-by: NChristian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/00000000000011d66805a25cd73f@google.com/
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+343f75cdeea091340956@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+832aabf700bc3ec920b9@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+f675f964019f884dbd0f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+a9fb1457d720a55d6dc5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 7bc3e6e5 ("proc: Use a list of inodes to flush from proc")
Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      63f818f4
  23. 09 4月, 2020 2 次提交
  25. 08 4月, 2020 5 次提交