1. 16 2月, 2007 7 次提交
  2. 14 2月, 2007 8 次提交
  3. 13 2月, 2007 4 次提交
  4. 12 2月, 2007 7 次提交
  5. 07 2月, 2007 8 次提交
  6. 05 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  7. 04 2月, 2007 2 次提交
  8. 03 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  9. 02 2月, 2007 2 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] sanitize sections for sparc32 smp · b4cff846
      Al Viro 提交于
      a) sun4d_boot_one_cpu() should be __cpuinit (called only from
         __cpuinit __cpu_up(), for one thing, leads to calls of __cpuinit
         functions for another).
      b) got externs in arch/sparc/kernel/smp.c to match reality.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b4cff846
    • A
      [PATCH] __crc_... is intended to be absolute · 2a3d4f1f
      Al Viro 提交于
      i386 boot/compressed/relocs checks for absolute symbols and warns about
      unexpected ones.  If you build with modversions, you get ~2500 warnings
      about __crc_<symbol>.  These suckers are really absolute symbols - we
      do _not_ want to modify them on relocation.
      
      They are generated by genksyms - EXPORT_... generates a weak alias, then
      genksyms produces an ld script with __crc_<symbol> = <checksum> and it's
      fed to ld to produce the final object file.  Their only use is to match
      kernel and module at modprobe time; they _must_ be absolute.
      
      boot/compressed/relocs has a whitelist of known absolute symbols, but
      it doesn't know about __crc_... stuff.  As the result, we get shitloads
      of false positives on any ld(1) version.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      2a3d4f1f