Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 18 4月, 2014 14 次提交
    • O
      uprobes/x86: Emulate relative conditional "short" jmp's · 8f95505b
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Teach branch_emulate_op() to emulate the conditional "short" jmp's which
check regs->flags.

Note: this doesn't support jcxz/jcexz, loope/loopz, and loopne/loopnz.
They all are rel8 and thus they can't trigger the problem, but perhaps
we will add the support in future just for completeness.
Reported-by: NJonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
      8f95505b
    • O
      uprobes/x86: Emulate relative call's · 8e89c0be
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      See the previous "Emulate unconditional relative jmp's" which explains
why we can not execute "jmp" out-of-line, the same applies to "call".

Emulating of rip-relative call is trivial, we only need to additionally
push the ret-address. If this fails, we execute this instruction out of
line and this should trigger the trap, the probed application should die
or the same insn will be restarted if a signal handler expands the stack.
We do not even need ->post_xol() for this case.

But there is a corner (and almost theoretical) case: another thread can
expand the stack right before we execute this insn out of line. In this
case it hit the same problem we are trying to solve. So we simply turn
the probed insn into "call 1f; 1:" and add ->post_xol() which restores
->sp and restarts.

Many thanks to Jonathan who finally found the standalone reproducer,
otherwise I would never resolve the "random SIGSEGV's under systemtap"
bug-report. Now that the problem is clear we can write the simplified
test-case:

	void probe_func(void), callee(void);

	int failed = 1;

	asm (
		".text\n"
		".align 4096\n"
		".globl probe_func\n"
		"probe_func:\n"
		"call callee\n"
		"ret"
	);

	/*
	 * This assumes that:
	 *
	 *	- &probe_func = 0x401000 + a_bit, aligned = 0x402000
	 *
	 *	- xol_vma->vm_start = TASK_SIZE_MAX - PAGE_SIZE = 0x7fffffffe000
	 *	  as xol_add_vma() asks; the 1st slot = 0x7fffffffe080
	 *
	 * so we can target the non-canonical address from xol_vma using
	 * the simple math below, 100 * 4096 is just the random offset
	 */
	asm (".org . + 0x800000000000 - 0x7fffffffe080 - 5 - 1  + 100 * 4096\n");

	void callee(void)
	{
		failed = 0;
	}

	int main(void)
	{
		probe_func();
		return failed;
	}

It SIGSEGV's if you probe "probe_func" (although this is not very reliable,
randomize_va_space/etc can change the placement of xol area).

Note: as Denys Vlasenko pointed out, amd and intel treat "callw" (0x66 0xe8)
differently. This patch relies on lib/insn.c and thus implements the intel's
behaviour: 0x66 is simply ignored. Fortunately nothing sane should ever use
this insn, so we postpone the fix until we decide what should we do; emulate
or not, support or not, etc.
Reported-by: NJonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
      8e89c0be
    • O
      uprobes/x86: Emulate nop's using ops->emulate() · d2410063
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Finally we can kill the ugly (and very limited) code in __skip_sstep().
Just change branch_setup_xol_ops() to treat "nop" as jmp to the next insn.

Thanks to lib/insn.c, it is clever enough. OPCODE1() == 0x90 includes
"(rep;)+ nop;" at least, and (afaics) much more.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
      d2410063
    • O
      uprobes/x86: Emulate unconditional relative jmp's · 7ba6db2d
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Currently we always execute all insns out-of-line, including relative
jmp's and call's. This assumes that even if regs->ip points to nowhere
after the single-step, default_post_xol_op(UPROBE_FIX_IP) logic will
update it correctly.

However, this doesn't work if this regs->ip == xol_vaddr + insn_offset
is not canonical. In this case CPU generates #GP and general_protection()
kills the task which tries to execute this insn out-of-line.

Now that we have uprobe_xol_ops we can teach uprobes to emulate these
insns and solve the problem. This patch adds branch_xol_ops which has
a single branch_emulate_op() hook, so far it can only handle rel8/32
relative jmp's.

TODO: move ->fixup into the union along with rip_rela_target_address.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reported-by: NJonathan Lebon <jlebon@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
      7ba6db2d
    • O
      uprobes/x86: Introduce sizeof_long(), cleanup adjust_ret_addr() and... · 8faaed1b
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      uprobes/x86: Introduce sizeof_long(), cleanup adjust_ret_addr() and arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr()

1. Add the trivial sizeof_long() helper and change other callers of
   is_ia32_task() to use it.

   TODO: is_ia32_task() is not what we actually want, TS_COMPAT does
   not necessarily mean 32bit. Fortunately syscall-like insns can't be
   probed so it actually works, but it would be better to rename and
   use is_ia32_frame().

2. As Jim pointed out "ncopied" in arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr()
   and adjust_ret_addr() should be named "nleft". And in fact only the
   last copy_to_user() in arch_uretprobe_hijack_return_addr() actually
   needs to inspect the non-zero error code.

TODO: adjust_ret_addr() should die. We can always calculate the value
we need to write into *regs->sp, just UPROBE_FIX_CALL should record
insn->length.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
      8faaed1b
    • O
      uprobes/x86: Teach arch_uprobe_post_xol() to restart if possible · 75f9ef0b
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      SIGILL after the failed arch_uprobe_post_xol() should only be used as
a last resort, we should try to restart the probed insn if possible.

Currently only adjust_ret_addr() can fail, and this can only happen if
another thread unmapped our stack after we executed "call" out-of-line.
Most probably the application if buggy, but even in this case it can
have a handler for SIGSEGV/etc. And in theory it can be even correct
and do something non-trivial with its memory.

Of course we can't restart unconditionally, so arch_uprobe_post_xol()
does this only if ->post_xol() returns -ERESTART even if currently this
is the only possible error.

default_post_xol_op(UPROBE_FIX_CALL) can always restart, but as Jim
pointed out it should not forget to pop off the return address pushed
by this insn executed out-of-line.

Note: this is not "perfect", we do not want the extra handler_chain()
after restart, but I think this is the best solution we can realistically
do without too much uglifications.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
      75f9ef0b
    • O
      uprobes/x86: Send SIGILL if arch_uprobe_post_xol() fails · 014940ba
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Currently the error from arch_uprobe_post_xol() is silently ignored.
This doesn't look good and this can lead to the hard-to-debug problems.

1. Change handle_singlestep() to loudly complain and send SIGILL.

   Note: this only affects x86, ppc/arm can't fail.

2. Change arch_uprobe_post_xol() to call arch_uprobe_abort_xol() and
   avoid TF games if it is going to return an error.

   This can help to to analyze the problem, if nothing else we should
   not report ->ip = xol_slot in the core-file.

   Note: this means that handle_riprel_post_xol() can be called twice,
   but this is fine because it is idempotent.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
      014940ba
    • O
      uprobes/x86: Conditionalize the usage of handle_riprel_insn() · e55848a4
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      arch_uprobe_analyze_insn() calls handle_riprel_insn() at the start,
but only "0xff" and "default" cases need the UPROBE_FIX_RIP_ logic.
Move the callsite into "default" case and change the "0xff" case to
fall-through.

We are going to add the various hooks to handle the rip-relative
jmp/call instructions (and more), we need this change to enforce the
fact that the new code can not conflict with is_riprel_insn() logic
which, after this change, can only be used by default_xol_ops.

Note: arch_uprobe_abort_xol() still calls handle_riprel_post_xol()
directly. This is fine unless another _xol_ops we may add later will
need to reuse "UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX|UPROBE_FIX_RIP_CX" bits in ->fixup.
In this case we can add uprobe_xol_ops->abort() hook, which (perhaps)
we will need anyway in the long term.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
      e55848a4
    • O
      uprobes/x86: Introduce uprobe_xol_ops and arch_uprobe->ops · 8ad8e9d3
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Introduce arch_uprobe->ops pointing to the "struct uprobe_xol_ops",
move the current UPROBE_FIX_{RIP*,IP,CALL} code into the default
set of methods and change arch_uprobe_pre/post_xol() accordingly.

This way we can add the new uprobe_xol_ops's to handle the insns
which need the special processing (rip-relative jmp/call at least).
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
      8ad8e9d3
    • O
      uprobes/x86: move the UPROBE_FIX_{RIP,IP,CALL} code at the end of pre/post hooks · 34e7317d
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      No functional changes. Preparation to simplify the review of the next
change. Just reorder the code in arch_uprobe_pre/post_xol() functions
so that UPROBE_FIX_{RIP_*,IP,CALL} logic goes to the end.

Also change arch_uprobe_pre_xol() to use utask instead of autask, to
make the code more symmetrical with arch_uprobe_post_xol().
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      34e7317d
    • O
      uprobes/x86: Gather "riprel" functions together · d20737c0
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Cosmetic. Move pre_xol_rip_insn() and handle_riprel_post_xol() up to
the closely related handle_riprel_insn(). This way it is simpler to
read and understand this code, and this lessens the number of ifdef's.

While at it, update the comment in handle_riprel_post_xol() as Jim
suggested.

TODO: rename them somehow to make the naming consistent.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
      d20737c0
    • O
      uprobes/x86: Kill the "ia32_compat" check in handle_riprel_insn(), remove "mm" arg · 59078d4b
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      Kill the "mm->context.ia32_compat" check in handle_riprel_insn(), if
it is true insn_rip_relative() must return false. validate_insn_bits()
passed "ia32_compat" as !x86_64 to insn_init(), and insn_rip_relative()
checks insn->x86_64.

Also, remove the no longer needed "struct mm_struct *mm" argument and
the unnecessary "return" at the end.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      59078d4b
    • O
      uprobes/x86: Fold prepare_fixups() into arch_uprobe_analyze_insn() · ddb69f27
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      No functional changes, preparation.

Shift the code from prepare_fixups() to arch_uprobe_analyze_insn()
with the following modifications:

	- Do not call insn_get_opcode() again, it was already called
	  by validate_insn_bits().

	- Move "case 0xea" up. This way "case 0xff" can fall through
	  to default case.

	- change "case 0xff" to use the nested "switch (MODRM_REG)",
	  this way the code looks a bit simpler.

	- Make the comments look consistent.

While at it, kill the initialization of rip_rela_target_address and
->fixups, we can rely on kzalloc(). We will add the new members into
arch_uprobe, it would be better to assume that everything is zero by
default.

TODO: cleanup/fix the mess in validate_insn_bits() paths:

	- validate_insn_64bits() and validate_insn_32bits() should be
	  unified.

	- "ifdef" is not used consistently; if good_insns_64 depends
	  on CONFIG_X86_64, then probably good_insns_32 should depend
	  on CONFIG_X86_32/EMULATION

	- the usage of mm->context.ia32_compat looks wrong if the task
	  is TIF_X32.
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      ddb69f27
    • O
      uprobes: Kill UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP and can_skip_sstep() · 8a6b1732
      由 Oleg Nesterov 提交于 
      UPROBE_COPY_INSN, UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP, and uprobe->flags must die. This
patch kills UPROBE_SKIP_SSTEP. I never understood why it was added;
not only it doesn't help, it harms.

It can only help to avoid arch_uprobe_skip_sstep() if it was already
called before and failed. But this is ugly, if we want to know whether
we can emulate this instruction or not we should do this analysis in
arch_uprobe_analyze_insn(), not when we hit this probe for the first
time.

And in fact this logic is simply wrong. arch_uprobe_skip_sstep() can
fail or not depending on the task/register state, if this insn can be
emulated but, say, put_user() fails we need to xol it this time, but
this doesn't mean we shouldn't try to emulate it when this or another
thread hits this bp next time.

And this is the actual reason for this change. We need to emulate the
"call" insn, but push(return-address) can obviously fail.

Per-arch notes:

	x86: __skip_sstep() can only emulate "rep;nop". With this
	     change it will be called every time and most probably
	     for no reason.

	     This will be fixed by the next changes. We need to
	     change this suboptimal code anyway.

	arm: Should not be affected. It has its own "bool simulate"
	     flag checked in arch_uprobe_skip_sstep().

	ppc: Looks like, it can emulate almost everything. Does it
	     actually need to record the fact that emulate_step()
	     failed? Hopefully not. But if yes, it can add the ppc-
	     specific flag into arch_uprobe.

TODO: rename arch_uprobe_skip_sstep() to arch_uprobe_emulate_insn(),
Signed-off-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid A. Long <dave.long@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: NJim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      8a6b1732
  3. 17 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  5. 16 4月, 2014 11 次提交
  7. 14 4月, 2014 14 次提交