- 07 8月, 2015 9 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
With "operating-points-v2" its possible to tell which devices share OPPs. We already have infrastructure to decode that information. This patch adds following APIs: - of_get_cpus_sharing_opps: Returns cpumask of CPUs sharing OPPs (only valid with v2 bindings). - of_cpumask_init_opp_table: Initializes OPPs for all CPUs present in cpumask. - of_cpumask_free_opp_table: Frees OPPs for all CPUs present in cpumask. - set_cpus_sharing_opps: Sets which CPUs share OPPs (only valid with old OPP bindings, as this information isn't present in DT). Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
With "operating-points-v2" bindings, it's possible to specify the OPP to which the device must be switched, before suspending. This patch adds support for getting that information. Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
An opp can be shared by multiple devices, for example its very common for CPUs to share the OPPs, i.e. when they share clock/voltage rails. This patch adds support of shared OPPs to the OPP library. Instead of a single device, dev_opp will now contain a list of devices that use it. It also senses if the device (we are trying to initialize OPPs for) shares OPPs with a device added earlier and in that case we update the list of devices managed by OPPs instead of duplicating OPPs again. The same infrastructure will be used for the old OPP bindings, with later patches. Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
With "operating-points-v2" bindings, clock-latency is defined per OPP. Users of this value expect a single value which defines the latency to switch to any clock rate. Find maximum clock-latency-ns from the OPP table to service requests from such users. Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This adds support in OPP library to parse and create list of OPPs from operating-points-v2 bindings. It takes care of most of the properties of new bindings (except shared-opp, which will be handled separately). For backward compatibility, we keep supporting earlier bindings. We try to search for the new bindings first, in case they aren't present we look for the old deprecated ones. There are few things marked as TODO: - Support for multiple OPP tables - Support for multiple regulators They should be fixed separately. Reviewed-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Later commits would add support for new OPP bindings and this would be required then. So, lets do it in a separate patch to make it easily reviewable. Another change worth noticing is INIT_LIST_HEAD(&opp->node). We weren't doing it earlier as we never tried to delete a list node before it is added to list. But this wouldn't be the case anymore. We might try to delete a node (just to reuse the same code paths), without it being getting added to the list. Reviewed-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
There is no need to complicate _opp_add_dynamic() with allocation of dev_opp as well. Allocate it from _add_device_opp() instead. Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This will be used from multiple places later. Lets create a separate routine for that. Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
In order to prepare for the later commits, this relocates few routines towards the top as they will be used earlier in the code. Reviewed-by: NStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 12 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Quentin Lambert 提交于
This patch reduces the kernel size by removing error messages that duplicate the normal OOM message. A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr) @@ identifier f,print,l; expression e; constant char[] c; @@ e = \(kzalloc\|kmalloc\|devm_kzalloc\|devm_kmalloc\)(...); if (e == NULL) { <+... - print(...,c,...); ... when any ( goto l; | return ...; ) ...+> } Signed-off-by: NQuentin Lambert <lambert.quentin@gmail.com> Acked-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 24 1月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Krzysztof Kozlowski 提交于
Add lockdep asserts for holding the RCU lock when calling dev_pm_opp_get_freq() and dev_pm_opp_get_voltage() to aid in detecting RCU misuses. These are called often after dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil/exact() which already asserts for RCU lock. However one could make an error by releasing lock too early - just after dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(). Signed-off-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
kernel doc has gotten bit-rotted over time. Re-sync with Locking and Return information. document all functions properly and ensure that ./scripts/kernel-doc -v ./drivers/base/power/opp.c >/dev/null returns no errors Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
All exported functions use dev_pm_* prefix and all static functions are now standardized with _ prefix. This is better than having to deal with multiple function naming styles within the same file. Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
Allows user drivers such as devfreq to be modules. Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 18 12月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Torokhov 提交于
A lot of callers are missing the fact that dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count needs to be called under RCU lock. Given that RCU locks can safely be nested, instead of providing *_locked() API, let's take RCU lock inside dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count() and leave callers as is. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Dmitry Torokhov 提交于
Not having OPP defined for a device is not a crime, we should not splat warning in this case. Also, it seems that we are ready to accept invalid dev (find_device_opp will return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL) then) so let's not crash in dev_name() in such case. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Dmitry Torokhov 提交于
Certain OPP APIs need to be called under RCU lock; let's add a few rcu_lockdep_assert() calls to warn about potential misuse. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 12月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This makes it less error prone and moves common resource deallocation at a single place. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Get the 'device_opp' allocation code into a separate routine to keep only the necessary part in dev_pm_opp_add_dynamic(). Also do s/sizeof(struct device_opp)/sizeof(*dev_opp) and remove the print message on kzalloc() failure as checkpatch warns for that. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Reuse find_device_opp() in opp_set_availability() instead of duplicating code. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Its a local routine and need not be accessible outside of opp.c. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Somehow one of the instance of freeing resources failed to use kfree_rcu() and used kfree() instead. This might cause problems as the node might be referenced by readers under rcu locks and we must wait for the rcu grace period as well. While we are at it, also update comment over 'struct device_opp' to mention why we are waiting for both rcu and srcu grace periods. Fixes: 129eec55 (PM / OPP Introduce APIs to remove OPPs) Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 10 12月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
By mistake we called find_device_opp() twice in of_free_opp_table(), fix it. Generated diff doesn't show the problem well and so here is the code snippet: void of_free_opp_table(struct device *dev) { struct device_opp *dev_opp = find_device_opp(dev); struct dev_pm_opp *opp, *tmp; /* Check for existing list for 'dev' */ dev_opp = find_device_opp(dev); ... } Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
We find/allocate dev_opp after using its value to fill new_opp->dev_opp right now. Move this to a later point where dev_opp is valid. Fixes: a7470db6 (PM / OPP don't match for existing OPPs when list is empty) Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 11月, 2014 5 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
This existed before we introduced call_srcu() in opp layer to synchronize with srcu_notifier_call_chain() while removing OPPs. And is a potential bug which wasn't noticed earlier. Let fix it as well by using the right API to free OPP. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
OPPs are created statically (from DT) or dynamically. Currently we don't free OPPs that are created statically, when the module unloads. And so if the module is inserted back again, we get warning for duplicate OPPs as the same were already present. Also, there might be a need to remove dynamic OPPs in future and so API for that is also added. This patch adds helper APIs to remove/free existing static and dynamic OPPs. Because the OPPs are used both under RCU and SRCU, we have to wait for grace period of both. And so are using kfree_rcu() from within call_srcu(). Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Static OPPs are the ones created from Device Tree entries and dynamic are the ones created at runtime by calling dev_pm_opp_add(). There is a need to distinguish them as we need to free static OPPs from cpufreq drivers when they are removed. So, add another field 'dynamic' in 'struct dev_pm_opp' to keep this information. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
OPP list is guaranteed to be empty when 'dev_opp' is created. And so we don't need to run the comparison loop with existing OPPs. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Both 'struct dev_pm_opp' and 'struct device_opp' have member with name 'head' but with different types. This leads to confusion while reading the code. Name them 'rcu_head' and 'srcu_head'. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 27 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chander Kashyap 提交于
We don't have any protection against addition of duplicate OPPs currently and in case some code tries to add them, it will end up corrupting OPP tables. We need to handle some duplication cases separately as returning error might not be the right thing always. The new list of return values for dev_pm_opp_add() are: 0: On success OR Duplicate OPPs (both freq and volt are same) and opp->available -EEXIST: Freq are same and volt are different OR Duplicate OPPs (both freq and volt are same) and !opp->available -ENOMEM: Memory allocation failure Acked-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NChander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NInderpal Singh <inderpal.s@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chander Kashyap 提交于
In of_init_opp_table function, if a failure to add an OPP is detected, the count of OPPs, yet to be added is not updated. Fix this by decrementing this count on failure as well. Signed-off-by: NChander Kashyap <k.chander@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NInderpal Singh <inderpal.s@samsung.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: 3.7+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.7+ Acked-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
CPUFreq specific helper functions for OPP (Operating Performance Points) now use generic OPP functions that allow CPUFreq to be be moved back into CPUFreq framework. This allows for independent modifications or future enhancements as needed isolated to just CPUFreq framework alone. Here, we just move relevant code and documentation to make this part of CPUFreq infrastructure. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
CPUFREQ custom functions for OPP (Operating Performance Points) currently exist inside the OPP library. These custom functions currently depend on internal data structures to pick up OPP information to create the cpufreq table. For example, the cpufreq table is created precisely in the same order of how OPP entries are stored inside the list implementation. This kind of tight interdependency is purely artificial since the same functionality can be achieved using the generic OPP functions meant to do the same. This interdependency also limits the independent modification of cpufreq and OPP library. So use the generic dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil function that achieves the table organization as we currently use. As a result of this, we dont need to use the internal device_opp structure anymore, and we hence we can switch over to rcu lock instead of the mutex holding the internal list lock. This breaking of dependency on internal data structure imposes no change to usage of these. NOTE: This change is a precursor to moving this cpufreq specific logic out of the generic library into cpufreq. Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com> Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 15 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paul Gortmaker 提交于
None of these files are actually using any __init type directives and hence don't need to include <linux/init.h>. Most are just a left over from __devinit and __cpuinit removal, or simply due to code getting copied from one driver to the next. Cc: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 26 10月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
Since Operating Performance Points (OPP) functions are specific to device specific power management, be specific and rename opp.h to pm_opp.h Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
Since Operating Performance Points (OPP) data structures are specific to device specific power management, be specific and rename opp_* data structures in OPP library with dev_pm_opp_* equivalent. Affected structures are: struct opp enum opp_event Minor checkpatch warning resulting of this change was fixed as well. Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
Since Operating Performance Points (OPP) functions are specific to device specific power management, be specific and rename opp_* accessors in OPP library with dev_pm_opp_* equivalent. Affected functions are: opp_get_voltage opp_get_freq opp_get_opp_count opp_find_freq_exact opp_find_freq_floor opp_find_freq_ceil opp_add opp_enable opp_disable opp_get_notifier opp_init_cpufreq_table opp_free_cpufreq_table Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Export opp_add() so that modules can use it. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The "index" field of struct cpufreq_frequency_table was never an index and isn't used at all by the cpufreq core. It only is useful for cpufreq drivers for their internal purposes. Many people nowadays blindly set it in ascending order with the assumption that the core will use it, which is a mistake. Rename it to "driver_data" as that's what its purpose is. All of its users are updated accordingly. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Acked-by: NSimon Horman <horms+renesas@verge.net.au> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 05 4月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nishanth Menon 提交于
commit dde8437d (PM / OPP: RCU reclaim) introduced rcu_head for struct opp. This aids freeing using kfree_rcu. However, we missed adding documentation for the same. This generates kernel doc warning: Warning(drivers/base/power/opp.c:70): No description found for parameter 'head' Add documentation as appropriate. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NNishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-