1. 08 8月, 2020 14 次提交
  2. 07 8月, 2020 4 次提交
  3. 06 8月, 2020 9 次提交
  4. 05 8月, 2020 2 次提交
  5. 04 8月, 2020 1 次提交
    • L
      userfaultfd: simplify fault handling · f9bf3522
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Instead of waiting in a loop for the userfaultfd condition to become
      true, just wait once and return VM_FAULT_RETRY.
      
      We've already dropped the mmap lock, we know we can't really
      successfully handle the fault at this point and the caller will have to
      retry anyway.  So there's no point in making the wait any more
      complicated than it needs to be - just schedule away.
      
      And once you don't have that complexity with explicit looping, you can
      also just lose all the 'userfaultfd_signal_pending()' complexity,
      because once we've set the correct process sleeping state, and don't
      loop, the act of scheduling itself will be checking if there are any
      pending signals before going to sleep.
      
      We can also drop the VM_FAULT_MAJOR games, since we'll be treating all
      retried faults as major soon anyway (series to regularize and share more
      of fault handling across architectures in a separate series by Peter Xu,
      and in the meantime we won't worry about the possible minor - I'll be
      here all week, try the veal - accounting difference).
      
      Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
      Cc: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f9bf3522
  6. 03 8月, 2020 10 次提交