Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 19 8月, 2021 1 次提交
  3. 02 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  5. 24 3月, 2021 1 次提交
  7. 19 3月, 2021 1 次提交
  9. 04 3月, 2021 1 次提交
  11. 12 2月, 2021 1 次提交
  13. 03 2月, 2021 3 次提交
  15. 26 10月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 20 3月, 2020 1 次提交
    • S
      tracing: Save off entry when peeking at next entry · ff895103
      由 Steven Rostedt (VMware) 提交于 
      In order to have the iterator read the buffer even when it's still updating,
it requires that the ring buffer iterator saves each event in a separate
location outside the ring buffer such that its use is immutable.

There's one use case that saves off the event returned from the ring buffer
interator and calls it again to look at the next event, before going back to
use the first event. As the ring buffer iterator will only have a single
copy, this use case will no longer be supported.

Instead, have the one use case create its own buffer to store the first
event when looking at the next event. This way, when looking at the first
event again, it wont be corrupted by the second read.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200317213415.722539921@goodmis.orgSigned-off-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      ff895103
  19. 11 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  21. 02 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  23. 30 1月, 2020 6 次提交
  25. 14 1月, 2020 3 次提交
  27. 27 11月, 2019 1 次提交
    • P
      ftrace: Rework event_create_dir() · 04ae87a5
      由 Peter Zijlstra 提交于 
      Rework event_create_dir() to use an array of static data instead of
function pointers where possible.

The problem is that it would call the function pointer on module load
before parse_args(), possibly even before jump_labels were initialized.
Luckily the generated functions don't use jump_labels but it still seems
fragile. It also gets in the way of changing when we make the module map
executable.

The generated function are basically calling trace_define_field() with a
bunch of static arguments. So instead of a function, capture these
arguments in a static array, avoiding the function call.

Now there are a number of cases where the fields are dynamic (syscall
arguments, kprobes and uprobes), in which case a static array does not
work, for these we preserve the function call. Luckily all these cases
are not related to modules and so we can retain the function call for
them.

Also fix up all broken tracepoint definitions that now generate a
compile error.
Tested-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Tested-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191111132458.342979914@infradead.orgSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
      04ae87a5
  29. 23 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  31. 15 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  33. 31 8月, 2019 1 次提交
  35. 17 7月, 2019 2 次提交
  37. 19 12月, 2018 1 次提交
  39. 11 12月, 2018 1 次提交
  41. 09 12月, 2018 1 次提交
    • M
      tracing: Lock event_mutex before synth_event_mutex · fc800a10
      由 Masami Hiramatsu 提交于 
      synthetic event is using synth_event_mutex for protecting
synth_event_list, and event_trigger_write() path acquires
locks as below order.

event_trigger_write(event_mutex)
  ->trigger_process_regex(trigger_cmd_mutex)
    ->event_hist_trigger_func(synth_event_mutex)

On the other hand, synthetic event creation and deletion paths
call trace_add_event_call() and trace_remove_event_call()
which acquires event_mutex. In that case, if we keep the
synth_event_mutex locked while registering/unregistering synthetic
events, its dependency will be inversed.

To avoid this issue, current synthetic event is using a 2 phase
process to create/delete events. For example, it searches existing
events under synth_event_mutex to check for event-name conflicts, and
unlocks synth_event_mutex, then registers a new event under event_mutex
locked. Finally, it locks synth_event_mutex and tries to add the
new event to the list. But it can introduce complexity and a chance
for name conflicts.

To solve this simpler, this introduces trace_add_event_call_nolock()
and trace_remove_event_call_nolock() which don't acquire
event_mutex inside. synthetic event can lock event_mutex before
synth_event_mutex to solve the lock dependency issue simpler.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/154140844377.17322.13781091165954002713.stgit@devboxReviewed-by: NTom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: NTom Zanussi <tom.zanussi@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      fc800a10
  43. 11 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  45. 29 5月, 2018 1 次提交
    • S
      tracing: Do not reference event data in post call triggers · c94e45bc
      由 Steven Rostedt (VMware) 提交于 
      Trace event triggers can be called before or after the event has been
committed. If it has been called after the commit, there's a possibility
that the event no longer exists. Currently, the two post callers is the
trigger to disable tracing (traceoff) and the one that will record a stack
dump (stacktrace). Neither of them reference the trace event entry record,
as that would lead to a race condition that could pass in corrupted data.

To prevent any other users of the post data triggers from using the trace
event record, pass in NULL to the post call trigger functions for the event
record, as they should never need to use them in the first place.

This does not fix any bug, but prevents bugs from happening by new post call
trigger users.
Reviewed-by: NMasami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: NNamhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
      c94e45bc
  47. 25 5月, 2018 1 次提交
    • Y
      bpf: introduce bpf subcommand BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY · 41bdc4b4
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      Currently, suppose a userspace application has loaded a bpf program
and attached it to a tracepoint/kprobe/uprobe, and a bpf
introspection tool, e.g., bpftool, wants to show which bpf program
is attached to which tracepoint/kprobe/uprobe. Such attachment
information will be really useful to understand the overall bpf
deployment in the system.

There is a name field (16 bytes) for each program, which could
be used to encode the attachment point. There are some drawbacks
for this approaches. First, bpftool user (e.g., an admin) may not
really understand the association between the name and the
attachment point. Second, if one program is attached to multiple
places, encoding a proper name which can imply all these
attachments becomes difficult.

This patch introduces a new bpf subcommand BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY.
Given a pid and fd, if the <pid, fd> is associated with a
tracepoint/kprobe/uprobe perf event, BPF_TASK_FD_QUERY will return
   . prog_id
   . tracepoint name, or
   . k[ret]probe funcname + offset or kernel addr, or
   . u[ret]probe filename + offset
to the userspace.
The user can use "bpftool prog" to find more information about
bpf program itself with prog_id.
Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      41bdc4b4
  49. 29 3月, 2018 1 次提交
    • A
      bpf: introduce BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT · c4f6699d
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      Introduce BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT bpf program type to access
kernel internal arguments of the tracepoints in their raw form.

>From bpf program point of view the access to the arguments look like:
struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args {
       __u64 args[0];
};

int bpf_prog(struct bpf_raw_tracepoint_args *ctx)
{
  // program can read args[N] where N depends on tracepoint
  // and statically verified at program load+attach time
}

kprobe+bpf infrastructure allows programs access function arguments.
This feature allows programs access raw tracepoint arguments.

Similar to proposed 'dynamic ftrace events' there are no abi guarantees
to what the tracepoints arguments are and what their meaning is.
The program needs to type cast args properly and use bpf_probe_read()
helper to access struct fields when argument is a pointer.

For every tracepoint __bpf_trace_##call function is prepared.
In assembler it looks like:
(gdb) disassemble __bpf_trace_xdp_exception
Dump of assembler code for function __bpf_trace_xdp_exception:
   0xffffffff81132080 <+0>:     mov    %ecx,%ecx
   0xffffffff81132082 <+2>:     jmpq   0xffffffff811231f0 <bpf_trace_run3>

where

TRACE_EVENT(xdp_exception,
        TP_PROTO(const struct net_device *dev,
                 const struct bpf_prog *xdp, u32 act),

The above assembler snippet is casting 32-bit 'act' field into 'u64'
to pass into bpf_trace_run3(), while 'dev' and 'xdp' args are passed as-is.
All of ~500 of __bpf_trace_*() functions are only 5-10 byte long
and in total this approach adds 7k bytes to .text.

This approach gives the lowest possible overhead
while calling trace_xdp_exception() from kernel C code and
transitioning into bpf land.
Since tracepoint+bpf are used at speeds of 1M+ events per second
this is valuable optimization.

The new BPF_RAW_TRACEPOINT_OPEN sys_bpf command is introduced
that returns anon_inode FD of 'bpf-raw-tracepoint' object.

The user space looks like:
// load bpf prog with BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT type
prog_fd = bpf_prog_load(...);
// receive anon_inode fd for given bpf_raw_tracepoint with prog attached
raw_tp_fd = bpf_raw_tracepoint_open("xdp_exception", prog_fd);

Ctrl-C of tracing daemon or cmdline tool that uses this feature
will automatically detach bpf program, unload it and
unregister tracepoint probe.

On the kernel side the __bpf_raw_tp_map section of pointers to
tracepoint definition and to __bpf_trace_*() probe function is used
to find a tracepoint with "xdp_exception" name and
corresponding __bpf_trace_xdp_exception() probe function
which are passed to tracepoint_probe_register() to connect probe
with tracepoint.

Addition of bpf_raw_tracepoint doesn't interfere with ftrace and perf
tracepoint mechanisms. perf_event_open() can be used in parallel
on the same tracepoint.
Multiple bpf_raw_tracepoint_open("xdp_exception", prog_fd) are permitted.
Each with its own bpf program. The kernel will execute
all tracepoint probes and all attached bpf programs.

In the future bpf_raw_tracepoints can be extended with
query/introspection logic.

__bpf_raw_tp_map section logic was contributed by Steven Rostedt
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      c4f6699d
  51. 11 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  53. 06 2月, 2018 2 次提交
  55. 14 12月, 2017 1 次提交
    • Y
      bpf/tracing: fix kernel/events/core.c compilation error · f4e2298e
      由 Yonghong Song 提交于 
      Commit f371b304 ("bpf/tracing: allow user space to
query prog array on the same tp") introduced a perf
ioctl command to query prog array attached to the
same perf tracepoint. The commit introduced a
compilation error under certain config conditions, e.g.,
  (1). CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL is not defined, or
  (2). CONFIG_TRACING is defined but neither CONFIG_UPROBE_EVENTS
       nor CONFIG_KPROBE_EVENTS is defined.

Error message:
  kernel/events/core.o: In function `perf_ioctl':
  core.c:(.text+0x98c4): undefined reference to `bpf_event_query_prog_array'

This patch fixed this error by guarding the real definition under
CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS and provided static inline dummy function
if CONFIG_BPF_EVENTS was not defined.
It renamed the function from bpf_event_query_prog_array to
perf_event_query_prog_array and moved the definition from linux/bpf.h
to linux/trace_events.h so the definition is in proximity to
other prog_array related functions.

Fixes: f371b304 ("bpf/tracing: allow user space to query prog array on the same tp")
Reported-by: NStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      f4e2298e
  57. 13 12月, 2017 1 次提交